Post: #126

-Nose diving your career (highly doubt he's going to be teaching community college again)

-Publicly humiliating yourself with a hilarious first world problems mental breakdown over the Internet for all to see.

-Admitting you tried to murder/suicide your ex wife. You're on meds because your brain is literally deficient, and you have degenerative homoerotic incest fantasies about a male porn star

To


Fuck some impressionable airhead community college sluts? Not worth it and there's easier ways to pull college snatch than acting like a flailing mangina over the Internet. Sure he probably fucked some quality snatch because of his vener of authority over his students but he literally wove one of the most despicable identities possible to blend into a sea of verified nutcases and it turns out he's crazier than a crack house rat himself too. He seems to have a number of disturbing self-loathing homosexual tendencies, has no career or status in the feminist world, and he is weak both mentally and physically as well.

I'd reconsider exalting him as a hero or a calculated troll.

Post: #127

Quote:'Earlier today, while researching male feminist Professor Hugo Schwyzer, I ran across a video in which a young woman read one of Schwyer’s columns and she had such a purty mouth that when I’d finished writing about Schwyzer I wondered, “Who is that girl?”'

VIDEO: Sex-Positive Feminist Tearfully Explains: ‘You’re All the Man I Want’

This chick is a train wreck.

Post: #128

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...fraud.html

But on some level you were telling an audience what they wanted to hear knowing that women were reading it and not men?

Hugo: Exactly. I always wrote for women but wrote in a really backhanded way where it appeared I was writing for men so that it would not appear too presumptuous and instead it would make me look better. And that required presenting myself as the ideal husband, father, and reformed bad boy.

My point is that I was writing for women because I wanted validation from women. The way to get validation from women was to present an idealized picture of what is possible for men.

Even though you weren’t reaching that standard yourself, did you know any men who were? Or was this entirely a fantasy creation?

Hugo: I think there were guys who tried harder than I did. But no.

You don’t know any who succeeded?

Hugo: No. I think there may have been a few who’ve come close, but none who succeeded. We can call this fraudulence or hypocrisy. I wasn’t really interested in other men. I taught a course in men and masculinity, and I cited male authors, but the whole way of designing the course was to get women excited about the possibility for male change, that they would then transfer some of that hope onto me. That is what I was doing.

Post: #129

H to the Schwizzay is BACK ON THE SCENE with a new post. Taken down, but republished at Toy Soldiers with commentary. Schwyzer had a breakthrough in therapy. Realized that a sexual experience he had in the 80's with a sailor, which he had previously fictionalized as "hot," was rape.

"Mike scared me, he beat me, he throat-fucked me and told me he’d kill me if I beat him. He hurt me badly. Some of my rage and fear at men has been with me ever since, and it has shown in my politics and my refusal to acknowledge that boys and men can be comparably harmed."

This is the Inception of Hugo posts. Everything about it is perfect. Ostensibly self-aware and guilt-ridden but actually self-pitying. Perfectly embodying EVERY rationale anyone could have for victim blaming. It's decades later. It's an event he once depicted as consensual and hot. He is an unhinged nut and/ or master manipulator who is never to be believed...

The Schwyzenator has set the perfect trap for his erstwhile allies/ current haters. Blaming a rape victim is the ultimate taboo. But what if the rape victim is the devil himself?

This Hugo at his best. The quasi-erotic detailing of the crime is a particularly fine touch.

And of course, if it's true, it's horrible. And I'm sorry it happened to him. SEE? YOU HAVE TO SAY THAT NO MATTER WHAT! Brilliant.

Post: #130

^^He'll be an MRA by the end of the year. Once his cachet as a feminist ally has been completely depleted, and he no longer has a source of cultural validation for telling lies, he'll have no alternative but to embrace the desolate truth.

Just wait till Schwyzer signs up to join RVF.

Post: #131

(10-07-2013 04:05 PM)Wadsworth Wrote:  ^^He'll be an MRA by the end of the year.

In some circles he'll fit right in. LOL

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Rudyard Kipling

Post: #132

relevant: http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/07/americ...z2h4SsYT00

Post: #133

Is Hugo Schwyzer the Judge Holden of twitter trolls?

Post: #134

(10-07-2013 03:28 PM)delicioustacos Wrote:  H to the Schwizzay is BACK ON THE SCENE with a new post. Taken down, but republished at Toy Soldiers with commentary. Schwyzer had a breakthrough in therapy. Realized that a sexual experience he had in the 80's with a sailor, which he had previously fictionalized as "hot," was rape.

"Mike scared me, he beat me, he throat-fucked me and told me he’d kill me if I beat him. He hurt me badly. Some of my rage and fear at men has been with me ever since, and it has shown in my politics and my refusal to acknowledge that boys and men can be comparably harmed."

This is the Inception of Hugo posts. Everything about it is perfect. Ostensibly self-aware and guilt-ridden but actually self-pitying. Perfectly embodying EVERY rationale anyone could have for victim blaming. It's decades later. It's an event he once depicted as consensual and hot. He is an unhinged nut and/ or master manipulator who is never to be believed...

The Schwyzenator has set the perfect trap for his erstwhile allies/ current haters. Blaming a rape victim is the ultimate taboo. But what if the rape victim is the devil himself?

This Hugo at his best. The quasi-erotic detailing of the crime is a particularly fine touch.

And of course, if it's true, it's horrible. And I'm sorry it happened to him. SEE? YOU HAVE TO SAY THAT NO MATTER WHAT! Brilliant.

Andrea Dworkin also tried to do this. Made a patently obvious false rape claim to try and stay relevant. In Dworkins case even other feminists mocked her and called her out on the false claim, which was so obviously a projection of her own sexual fantasies it was embarrassing.

In Schwzer's case it looks much the same. Projecting a scene that is probably a sexual fantasy of his in order to get sympathy on the internet. It's pathetic.

Post: #135

Injuring someone while driving intoxicated is no joke; it is a felony most places I think. Not to mention the civil damages he'll owe. Of course, these were prescription drugs, which might allow him to wiggle out.

I hope he gets nailed. He is a disgusting human being.

Post: #136

Post: #137

I'm looking forward to Hugo's RVF data sheet on 'How to build a career as a male feminist and bang naive feminists.'

Post: #138

The universal exception to all feminist rules is for conservatives. If Hugo comes back as an MRA or conservative, he will get no quarter from his old friends.

Post: #139

(10-19-2013 03:15 PM)Consul Wrote:  The universal exception to all feminist rules is for conservatives. If Hugo comes back as an MRA or conservative, he will get no quarter from his old friends.

Our society is populated by people who willingly delude themselves if it helps them feel good. Hugo is one of those people. He leads with his feelings, so if it makes him feel good, it's as good as capital T truth. He's subhuman scum because he knowingly disregarded the pain felt by others in favor of feeling good about himself.

The pain Hugo's in will either 1) lead him to kill himself, or 2) lead him to embrace reality. There will no longer be any emotional validation for him if he chooses to continue deluding himself. Feminists will hate him, whatever he says.

This is the reason Hugo will likely become an MRA. He's not a fool, he's perfectly capable of seeing reality, he merely hasn't been forced to feel it until now.

Post: #140

He will simply become a featured writer for A Voice for Men.

Post: #141

This keeps getting better and better. I think he was just a wolf in sheep's clothing the whole time. Dude was banging hot coeds then gets busted and has a supposed meltdown. Said meltdown leads to a scene out of a gay sailor porno during therapy and now he's hinting at joining the conservative fold.

Post: #142

(10-19-2013 02:34 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

Joke's on him, he has no friends.

Post: #143

LA Magazine had a whole write up in this month's issue.
http://www.lamag.com/features/2014/03/26...lem/page/1

Community college male feminist professor game recognized.

He was married 4 times, and plenty of affairs. I really do believe we attract/source similar people. If you're damaged you attract damaged.

In case any of you were planning on it, this is an effective technique below.

Quote:Schwyzer required his students, most of them minority women in their late teens and early twenties, to keep journals. He urged them to share their feelings, their family experiences, and their struggles with sexual identity. One student I spoke to thought this was a little unusual, but she said, “Hugo felt like a very safe person.”

In reality he used the journals to suss out potential sex partners, he told me. If a student addressed him as “professor,” he learned, she wasn’t interested. If she wrote “you,” she probably was. Within months Schwyzer began sleeping with his students—sometimes, he says, conducting several affairs at once. During one student lobbying trip to Washington, D.C., in April 1997, he says he had sex with four coeds, three of them at the same time. This was a period when he was also drinking heavily, abusing cocaine and prescription drugs, and swept up in a stormy relationship with a woman in her twenties.

Post: #144

^ Fucking epic.





I also feel proud having been one the guys calling him a sociopath for years, as MikeCF has, and seeing through his bullshit almost immediately. For real reasons:

There is NO WAY you can be a happy male feminist unless you somehow get pussy out of the deal. Otherwise, who wants to be a male feminist and castrate his own sex all the time and not get any pussy for it? Hugo struck me as too confident and happy of a person. You could see he was superficially happy, but he was faking some of it. Not hard to infer he was faking all the stuff he wrote about feminism, you could tell he didn't give a shit and was just paying lip service.

The kinky thought of Hugo somehow using his position to score some ass while pretending to be a feminist would be rejected from a blue pill perspective, but from a red pill perspective there was at least an equal chance he was bullshitting as much as he was telling the truth.

It seems impossible to understand a man who could genuinely care about feminism enough to teach it as a professor - and still be a happy, lively, social, and cheerful guy. Hugo's personality was why he was such a successful professor. Students loved him. He was a master charlatan, salesman, and orator all rolled into one. His lectures weren't original or educational, he was just an entertaining guy to watch and talked lots about sexual themes and other exciting topics. He knew how to talk. How could such a well-put together man actually take feminism seriously? A contradiction.

Hugo is living proof that a man can make a career out of game. Getting people to believe your bullshit is worth it's weight in gold, and a skilled manipulator will never be wanting for money or sex.

In the end, what trips up the sociopath, as did Hugo, is the only thing that can stop a sociopath - himself. A master sociopath has people figured out so well and has secured his position in society so tightly, he becomes virtually untouchable.

Somewhere in the deep subconscious you know your wrongs and loathe yourself for having committed them, but you consciously tell yourself "Who cares? No one knows, I'm not getting in trouble, and there is no God."

Too bad Hugo couldn't keep his guilt in check, otherwise he could have been banging young co-eds for many more decades.

Post: #145

(08-09-2013 03:54 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Sent him an invite

https://twitter.com/Sam_seau/status/365935516975247360

Samseau, I don't know if you're serious, but I just tweeted this:

Quote:Hey @hugoschwyzer, wanna do an interview with me for @ReturnOfKings and break your game for banging students and pornstars down ?

https://twitter.com/runsonmagic/status/4...7435901952

Schwyzer is the most sociopathic dark triad player in the game. He makes RSD's Julien look like the Dali Lama. Hugo Schwyzer is the Charles Manson of game. He's a serial killer of the psyche, but like Gerardo Rivera, I'll still totally take the interview.

Post: #146

I got the feeling this article isn't for redemption or reconciliation...but for more attention. Feeding the narcissist.

SWPLs wont let him back in anywhere near the kind of position he had before.

What goes on in one womans mind, much less four in the same trip, when they rationalize banging the very patriarchal type she they are supposedly fighting against. Its like an army of women who shoot at men across the battlefield by day, spread their legs and let the opposition into their pants by night. What dumbfuck is still funding this charade?

I love the bubbly mental patient who is clearly falling hook line sinker for the narcissist. They shared a session of 'cigarette burning' their arms? What the fuck is this.

Post: #147

(03-31-2014 11:21 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Too bad Hugo couldn't keep his guilt in check, otherwise he could have been banging young co-eds for many more decades.

Seems odd that a sociopath would have guilt.

Wald