Post: #501

(07-16-2017 07:35 AM)duedue Wrote:  One more thing: does suggesting to meet the same day convey thirst? I know through reading and personal experience that it's not good to ask when she is available to meet so it leaves the ball in my court.

Ask her to meet up that same day. she is horny when she emailed you so chances are she wont be horny the next day.

Post: #502

(07-16-2017 11:44 AM)Iso Wrote:  

(07-16-2017 07:35 AM)duedue Wrote:  One more thing: does suggesting to meet the same day convey thirst? I know through reading and personal experience that it's not good to ask when she is available to meet so it leaves the ball in my court.

Ask her to meet up that same day. she is horny when she emailed you so chances are she wont be horny the next day.

Agreed. This aint a dating scenario: its a NSA bang. Be decisive and tell them to come over at x o'clock but sooner is usually better than later for this type of deal

Post: #503

I read this thread and made a post and got at least 15 responses in a very very short amount of time.

Now, should I assume the sender is a bot if they write their email addresses in the response? I'm also noticing some messages that arrive with sender names.

Post: #504

Yes, that is a safe assumption

You will get more bots than actual messages, but when you do get what feels like a legit message ask for a pic. They are usually short and to the point.

Then take that email and do a reverse search. Phone numbers are especially good for plugging into FB, many times it will ping to a living and breathing person. Pro tip: Be prepared to see married women with hubby in tow smiling back at you.

If she meets your requirements from there, follow all the aforementioned advice

Happy Hunting

Post: #505

There's way more spam for the US ads than their used to be, but I noticed that you won't receive spam for ads that you delete/repost or renew.

For example, if I make a new post, I might get 20 to 50 spam messages within a few hours. But if I renew that same ad in a couple days, I won't receive any spam at all.

Post: #506

Craigslist took down their personals section.

Quote:US Congress just passed HR 1865, "FOSTA", seeking to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully.

Any tool or service can be misused. We can't take such risk without jeopardizing all our other services, so we are regretfully taking craigslist personals offline. Hopefully we can bring them back some day.

To the millions of spouses, partners, and couples who met through craigslist, we wish you every happiness!

Smells like freedom!

Post: #507

(07-15-2013 05:10 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

(07-15-2013 08:20 AM)assman Wrote:  ^^^ Fat bitches have really bought into fat acceptance. How delusional does a woman have to be to acknowledge that she is 5'6" and 200lbs, and then claim that she is not fat?

I've had some decent experiences on CL when I was in NYC. But in the South, the vast majority of responses are from fat women. Not worth banging unless you really need a slump buster.

Well, these women are all supposedly 5'5" 200 lbs.



Using the same body describer table I linked to earlier in the thread, the first two fall into the chubby to fat range. The first one is a mess but if you take some of the weight from the second girls belly and move it to her ass, I wouldn't consider her fat. The third I don't consider fat at all. A few months in the gym and turning some fat into muscle without even losing weight and she is looking right. #4 looks like she may be hiding a belly but I probably wouldn't call her fat either. Again, relocate the weight from her midsection to her ass and/or tits and we're good to go. Not to mention these women are an inch shorter.

This chick is listed at 5'10" 200.



I'm not saying these are ideal body types but I don't think every woman 200 pounds or above is automatically fat.

These 5'5 women are NOT 200lbs. No way. A 5'5 woman weighing 200lbs has a BMI of 33. That's land whale scale. These women are -- to me -- definitely fat, but not morbidly obese. Their BMI is probably 28 or so, which, for 5'5, implies a weight of about 165 to 170lbs. (And for people raised outside the US, we are talking about 165cm tall and 75kg, approximately.)

The taller black lady is perhaps BMI 25, and as such her weight would be 175lbs, plus or minus. (Aka 178/80.) She may even be below BMI 25, perhaps as low as 22 or 23, which would imply 160lbs (72kg), plus or minus.

Post: #508

Moot point Craigslist no longer hosts personals...

Post: #509

(05-06-2018 01:57 AM)ThrustMaster Wrote:  Moot point Craigslist no longer hosts personals...

The point is about weight estimation, not about Craiglist. Hence, it is not moot at all. However, the only reason I visited the thread in the first place was a fresh post about Craiglist no longer hosting personals.

Post: #510

So now that there aren't personals on Craigslist, where are all the trashy women/whore posts at now?

Post: #511

(05-09-2018 08:35 PM)Heart Break Kid Wrote:  So now that there aren't personals on Craigslist, where are all the trashy women/whore posts at now?

One possible place: doublelist.com

The entire place is very basic and its only major cities that are listed. Can't say I'll even try it but it is an option out there.