Post: #76

(04-04-2014 10:37 PM)Earth Wrote:  Has anyone successfully used social media (besides myspace or facebook) to get laid consistently? I don't know of a single guy who has done that...

Dude I've gotten laid by trolling the forum page of my university, so anything is possible.

Impossible is nothing.

Post: #77

You can certainly get laid with good IG/Twitter game. I've had numerous models compliment my photos on IG. Some of them may be in other countries but they all come thru NYC at some point.

Post: #78

Apologies bumping an old thread. I tried a few searches. The two more recent IG game threads were closed for hawking?

They seem to push the latest development in IG game being a follower count at ridiculous levels. Usually in the tens of thousands. This of course costs money and seems to have run afoul. So let’s put that aside.

I’ve had some success with IG game. All 7s and below. No luck punching past my own weight class. Even in the developing world!

I talked with quite a few players who claim to be killing it. They all seem to be following the same optimization model.

1. 50 pics max
2. DHV bordering on fake baller
3. 25% photos of you (un/dressed to kill)
4. 75% photos of things girls want from guys (nice apartment, restaurants, destination vacations)

Things they rarely (if ever) show:
-Photos with other girls (even family)
-Realistic photos (unedited or non-stylized)
-Photos with no one in them.

There isn’t a consensus on public verse private accounts. Private accounts do force girls to request a follow in order to see your pics. This bumps your count up. However the busiest and hottest girls might not have time or interest for this.

I’m still not sure that even an optimized IG allows regular access to the 7+ realm. Most really attractive girls don’t even seem to open their DM anymore. They most likely have private personal accounts. The only way to get added is to actually be part of their social circle.

I still think there is a sweet spot for gaming 7s and 8s. Girls who are hot, but with no modeling careers. These are your hot young student types, career women, etc.

It also opens up the possibility for gaming niches. It’s quite easy to find girls into athletics like #fitness. Needless to say, unless you’re also buff you’ll rarely get more than a few replies.

However, just being able to slice that cross section of society is way better than relying on dating apps which are 90% fat girls. I’ve found scrolling through #yourlocation yields only slightly less hot girls than swiping that same location on Tinder.

Also, instead of seeing fatties you’re looking at fun pics that give you a more well rounded idea of who’s around you, what people are doing for fun, events, the local competition, etc.

Best of all you can immediately message hot girls on IG. Unlike dating apps or cold approach. You’re already staring at each other’s IG. Depending on your level of optimization you will also make a very consistent first impression when she scrolls your feed. No such thing as a fucked up set, off day, etc.

Your number one problem with IG:
*You are your own worst enemy*

A game profile is not your diary. So no emo posts. Neither is it a travel journal. No hot girl will scroll a bunch of scenic landscapes. The photo only counts if you’re in it, or it somehow defines your life on a personal level.

Properties and land are OK if you are announcing how you just bought it. Same for cars. Food is OK if you just cooked it, though this is weak. Better to show yourself out at a fancy date restaurant with friends.

Selfies are generally weak unless it seems fun or expensive. You in a suit is still weak. Better: you at the tailor (show him with the tape taking measure).

Some guys get away with showing sexual stuff like handcuffs, spanking a girls ass, girls on their yacht, etc. This largely depends on your frame, target audience, and country.

Your IG feed should succinctly convey two things:
1. I’m an attractive, high value man.
2. I have money and expensive things.

Without both of these your shot at getting a reply is near zero. Seems like a lot of work, right? Maybe.

50 pics may not sound like a lot. How many killer photos do you have of yourself? Just a few? How many of those show you doing boss stuff? And still how many of those look professionally shot?

Like it or not, this what you’re up against gentleman. Social media has spoiled girls rotten. They now expect you to be a walking, talking cologne ad. Faking this kind of thing can be done. We are only talking 50 pics. But this is the image you should be shooting for IRL anyway.

Post: #79

Great post....with Insta you really got to define your niche... pick 2 or 3 (travel, fitness, etc) otherwise who cares what your eating or drinking.

If your good looking yes lots of pic's of you...if your not then get some professional photo's done. Post 1 a week but use Stories more to see who is interested enough to follow you.

At 48 I have banged more girls 1/2 my age due to Instagram but it's for the long haul..it builds a level of social proof that's why I have girls even come straight over to my place on the first meeting but that does not always result in the bang.

Make sure your comments and engagement match your number of followers to look realistic

Post: #80

(10-08-2018 08:00 AM)Ten Feet Tall Right Now Wrote:  Apologies bumping an old thread. I tried a few searches. The two more recent IG game threads were closed for hawking?

They seem to push the latest development in IG game being a follower count at ridiculous levels. Usually in the tens of thousands. This of course costs money and seems to have run afoul. So let’s put that aside.

I’ve had some success with IG game. All 7s and below. No luck punching past my own weight class. Even in the developing world!

I talked with quite a few players who claim to be killing it. They all seem to be following the same optimization model.

1. 50 pics max
2. DHV bordering on fake baller
3. 25% photos of you (un/dressed to kill)
4. 75% photos of things girls want from guys (nice apartment, restaurants, destination vacations)

Things they rarely (if ever) show:
-Photos with other girls (even family)
-Realistic photos (unedited or non-stylized)
-Photos with no one in them.

There isn’t a consensus on public verse private accounts. Private accounts do force girls to request a follow in order to see your pics. This bumps your count up. However the busiest and hottest girls might not have time or interest for this.

I’m still not sure that even an optimized IG allows regular access to the 7+ realm. Most really attractive girls don’t even seem to open their DM anymore. They most likely have private personal accounts. The only way to get added is to actually be part of their social circle.

I still think there is a sweet spot for gaming 7s and 8s. Girls who are hot, but with no modeling careers. These are your hot young student types, career women, etc.

It also opens up the possibility for gaming niches. It’s quite easy to find girls into athletics like #fitness. Needless to say, unless you’re also buff you’ll rarely get more than a few replies.

However, just being able to slice that cross section of society is way better than relying on dating apps which are 90% fat girls. I’ve found scrolling through #yourlocation yields only slightly less hot girls than swiping that same location on Tinder.

Also, instead of seeing fatties you’re looking at fun pics that give you a more well rounded idea of who’s around you, what people are doing for fun, events, the local competition, etc.

Best of all you can immediately message hot girls on IG. Unlike dating apps or cold approach. You’re already staring at each other’s IG. Depending on your level of optimization you will also make a very consistent first impression when she scrolls your feed. No such thing as a fucked up set, off day, etc.

Your number one problem with IG:
*You are your own worst enemy*

A game profile is not your diary. So no emo posts. Neither is it a travel journal. No hot girl will scroll a bunch of scenic landscapes. The photo only counts if you’re in it, or it somehow defines your life on a personal level.

Properties and land are OK if you are announcing how you just bought it. Same for cars. Food is OK if you just cooked it, though this is weak. Better to show yourself out at a fancy date restaurant with friends.

Selfies are generally weak unless it seems fun or expensive. You in a suit is still weak. Better: you at the tailor (show him with the tape taking measure).

Some guys get away with showing sexual stuff like handcuffs, spanking a girls ass, girls on their yacht, etc. This largely depends on your frame, target audience, and country.

Your IG feed should succinctly convey two things:
1. I’m an attractive, high value man.
2. I have money and expensive things.

Without both of these your shot at getting a reply is near zero. Seems like a lot of work, right? Maybe.

50 pics may not sound like a lot. How many killer photos do you have of yourself? Just a few? How many of those show you doing boss stuff? And still how many of those look professionally shot?

Like it or not, this what you’re up against gentleman. Social media has spoiled girls rotten. They now expect you to be a walking, talking cologne ad. Faking this kind of thing can be done. We are only talking 50 pics. But this is the image you should be shooting for IRL anyway.

Great post!

What's the reason for 50 pics max?

Post: #81

People are too lazy and stupid to hit the tab that just shows tagged photos of you. Instead the give your profile feed a few flicks and make a value judgement.

She will assess your worth to her based solely on this and your follow count. Sad but true. Your entire SMV is reduced to your 50 best photos and how many people think you’re cool.

The good news: You don’t have to be a male model or a Saudi prince. You do have to offer enough value (combination of looks and money) for her to associate with you.

As discussed in the closed threads a hack for increasing your value was artificially boosting your follow count to celeb levels. Thus engaging value of an actual famous person. This has worn off with everyone using bots and services.

Post: #82

(10-08-2018 08:00 AM)Ten Feet Tall Right Now Wrote:  Apologies bumping an old thread. I tried a few searches. The two more recent IG game threads were closed for hawking?

You didn't see the "A Balanced Guide to Instagram Game" thread? Was on the first page when you posted this:
/thread-66379-page-8.html

Great post, though. I agree that the boosting follower count effect has worn off (or was never important in the first place). In the US, girls don't really care about that too much.

Post: #83

Quote @10 feet tall right now
"1. 50 pics max
2. DHV bordering on fake baller
3. 25% photos of you (un/dressed to kill)
4. 75% photos of things girls want from guys (nice apartment, restaurants, destination vacations)

Things they rarely (if ever) show:
-Photos with other girls (even family)
-Realistic photos (unedited or non-stylized)
-Photos with no one in them. " quotes not working on my phone right now...

Great break down overall! I'm curious though. You mention that ideally only 25% of photos will be of you, and you also say that ideally you won't post photos with no one in them. Isn't that contradictory?

Based on the math, shouldn't 75% of photos be NOT of you? Which then makes me wonder, what are these 75% of photos supposed to be if they can't have yourself in them? A picture of a cool vacation or apartment with your friends in it but not you?