Post: #1

A feminist takes down feminism's implicit acquiescence (and even encouragement) of the idea that males are "disposable" humans who should take a back seat to women every time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-...e=youtu.be

Post: #2

All that she said is true, but I don't think that girlwriteswhat can be called a feminist. Maybe a first-wave feminist who has reasonable demands (just equal rights and that's it), but when you say "feminist" today, it means mostly third-wave feminism, which deals with patriarchy, imagined slights such as wage gap or rape culture, and ridiculous sexual issues such as promoting sluts and fattitude. I think girlwriteswhat would be the first to be insulted if you called her a feminist.

Post: #3

GWW is fucking awesome. Not a feminist, a humanist. Thanks for posting about her.

Post: #4

Yeah, girlwriteswhat is cool with me. As Roosh mentioned, she'll probably be used as a 'safe' (read: female) voice for the manosphere once the mainstream media is forced into airing our views.

Post: #5

Girlwriteswhat gets applause.gif from me

(almost wrote clap.gif but that communicates the wrong message)

Post: #6

In strictly biological terms males are indeed more disposable than women.

Post: #7

^True. Biologically we are disposable as shit. Do you want 10,000 men and 1,000 women or 10,000 women and 1,000 men to repopulate a society?

Post: #8

(04-22-2013 01:43 AM)Tim9000 Wrote:  A feminist takes down feminism's implicit acquiescence (and even encouragement) of the idea that males are "disposable" humans who should take a back seat to women every time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-...e=youtu.be

Just posting the video for you

Post: #9

Now i feel bad about trolling her to grow her hair out.

Post: #10

(04-22-2013 09:52 AM)Scarlet_Terror Wrote:  ^True. Biologically we are disposable as shit. Do you want 10,000 men and 1,000 women or 10,000 women and 1,000 men to repopulate a society?

I see your point -- biologically speaking -- and it's one Roissy has made. BUT...you need a large male populace for protection against enemies and the elements. When someone comes to attack or the power goes out, suddenly men stop being so disposable. Ever notice that?

There are no feminists in hurricanes, earthquakes or snowstorms. Or when the terrorists come to Boston.

Post: #11

(04-22-2013 09:52 AM)Scarlet_Terror Wrote:  ^True. Biologically we are disposable as shit. Do you want 10,000 men and 1,000 women or 10,000 women and 1,000 men to repopulate a society?

Sounds great until the tribe with 10,000 men comes knocking on the tribe's door that has 1,000 men.

Post: #12

Post: #13

GirlWritesWhat is a self-proclaimed anti-feminist. She even writes for A Voice For Men.

Post: #14

(04-22-2013 01:53 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  ... I think girlwriteswhat would be the first to be insulted if you called her a feminist.

Whoops, I should have done a little bit of research rather than using her "look and feel" to classify her. Great example of how you can't judge a book by its cover.

Post: #15

(04-22-2013 11:10 PM)Tim9000 Wrote:  

(04-22-2013 01:53 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  ... I think girlwriteswhat would be the first to be insulted if you called her a feminist.

Whoops, I should have done a little bit of research rather than using her "look and feel" to classify her. Great example of how you can't judge a book by its cover.

I think she cultivates her look for camouflage - She has mentioned having to "pass" for feminist-friendly at public events, etc, as part of her MRA work. She's a real trooper!

Post: #16

She's very articulate and is an asset as far as showing that manosphere is not just that men are pushing. People, not just me, sense that there is a massive imbalance.

I'd offer her a bang for her efforts despite her look.

Post: #17

(04-22-2013 09:52 AM)Scarlet_Terror Wrote:  ^True. Biologically we are disposable as shit. Do you want 10,000 men and 1,000 women or 10,000 women and 1,000 men to repopulate a society?

Unless you're OK with the tons of birth defects resulting from the crippling genetic bottleneck a 10:1 sex ratio would cause, you'd want neither... In the end men aren't really more disposable, despite women being the child-bearers.