Post: #1

In my opinion this is the only possible position for women after modern science (not to speak of their modern freedoms) has revealed them for the natural prostitutes and soulless beasts they are.

In my opinion women should be raised separately, not taught anything but the most rudimentary language, and then be groomed to be breeding stock. The best females will be bred by the best males: these best specimens will be chosen by a special eugenic council of men like myself, of good taste. Additionally I will choose from among men the most impressive specimens as "studs" to breed the female population at large and thereby improve the race.

It is true that under this scheme most men would not be fathers, but most men do not desire this anyway; they would, in exchange, get plenty of free sex, which is better than they can say for themselves now.

The noxious influence of women not only in politics and public life, but also in the culture, in the arts and letters, will be eliminated and the biological quality of the race will be improved under the direction and foresight and good taste of men like myself.

What do you think? I have put up four choices.

Post: #2

I don't know, the last time we had a major eugenics guy we ended up with Hitler.

Post: #3

Nah. The only fair solution is to suppress the baser natures of both men AND women. Strictly enforced monogamy accomplishes this. A man's desire for variety would not be met, and a woman's hypergamous instincts, past the initial selection of a spouse, would have no chance of wrecking the relationship. Strictly enforced monogamy is, in fact, a form of "sexual socialism." But surely it's better than the alternative where most men face sexual poverty with regards to women in their prime years and a few top men dominate those women.

Post: #4

(04-10-2013 12:38 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  In my opinion this is the only possible position for women after modern science (not to speak of their modern freedoms) has revealed them for the natural prostitutes and soulless beasts they are.
What do you think? I have put up four choices.

I think you're not too bright, pissed off, and someone stole your toys when you were a kid.

I'd also be interested in the list of massive and broad accomplishments that have qualified you to declare this sweeping
change in society heroically leading us toward becoming an enlightened paradise like Saudi Arabia or Iran.

Post: #5

(04-10-2013 12:44 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:38 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  In my opinion this is the only possible position for women after modern science (not to speak of their modern freedoms) has revealed them for the natural prostitutes and soulless beasts they are.
What do you think? I have put up four choices.

I think you're not too bright, pissed off, and someone stole your toys when you were a kid.

I'd also be interested in the list of massive and broad accomplishments that have qualified you to declare this sweeping
change in society heroically leading us toward becoming an enlightened paradise like Saudi Arabia or Iran.

I want to remind you that this is a forum for men who are supportive of each other, not for name-calling. This is a forum for practical advice.

It sounds like you might not care too much about the biological quality of the human race, is all I will say.

Post: #6

(04-10-2013 12:43 AM)himynameischris Wrote:  Nah. The only fair solution is to suppress the baser natures of both men AND women. Strictly enforced monogamy accomplishes this. A man's desire for variety would not be met, and a woman's hypergamous instincts, past the initial selection of a spouse, would have no chance of wrecking the relationship. Strictly enforced monogamy is, in fact, a form of "sexual socialism." But surely it's better than the alternative where most men face sexual poverty with regards to women in their prime years and a few top men dominate those women.

Monogamy, in being a form of sexual socialism as you say, is the cause of the biological degeneration of mankind which has led to the modern man, a bug man worthy of extermination. Most men and women should probably not breed. The system I propose seeks to improve the quality of the next generation based on long-standing breeding practices; we have also been successful with dogs, horses, and so on. You would care that the next generation of farm animals be improved, but not care that human beings should receive the same attention?

Post: #7

I would be interested as to your definition of the "best" of either sex.

Also, while much of what women produce is either derivative or just plain drivel, some women have produced important and significant contributions to the arts and the like.

Post: #8

(04-10-2013 12:49 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  I want to remind you that this is a forum for men who are supportive of each other, not for name-calling. This is a forum for practical advice.

It sounds like you might not care too much about the biological quality of the human race, is all I will say.

Thanks for explaining what the forum's for.

I'm afraid I can't offer much practical advice for starting a fascist state ruled by simps that are frustated over their inability to control women.

It hasn't seemed to work out too well in history.

Hey, I've got an idea-- make YOURSELF a quality human who offers value to others and then women will be interested in you.

Post: #9

Can we make them wear cowbells?

Post: #10

(04-10-2013 12:54 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:49 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  I want to remind you that this is a forum for men who are supportive of each other, not for name-calling. This is a forum for practical advice.

It sounds like you might not care too much about the biological quality of the human race, is all I will say.

Thanks for explaining what the forum's for.

I'm afraid I can't offer much practical advice for starting a fascist state ruled by simps that are frustated over their inability to control women.

It hasn't seemed to work out too well in history.

It's worked out very well. Sparta was such a state and lasted for 800 years, much longer than any modern state you can name. There are also tribes in Africa and other places that have similar practices and have lasted for a very long time. The specimens of these tribes, like the Nuba, are impressive people, reflecting the wisdom of the eugenic policy.

The shaming you're trying to engage in is similar to what feminists do, by the way. I have no doubt that you are, spiritually, a feminist (or feminized/soft). But, of course, you will boast you are an internet tough guy who has "worked with the best gamers" and can control womyn with your cawk, right?

My understanding was that personal attaqs are not allowed on this forum. I don't know who you are, but based on your reference to Saudi Arabia and Iran, neither of which has a eugenic or breeding program, and your ignorance of history, it is you who is unintelligent.

Post: #11

(04-10-2013 12:59 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:54 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:49 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  I want to remind you that this is a forum for men who are supportive of each other, not for name-calling. This is a forum for practical advice.

It sounds like you might not care too much about the biological quality of the human race, is all I will say.

Thanks for explaining what the forum's for.

I'm afraid I can't offer much practical advice for starting a fascist state ruled by simps that are frustated over their inability to control women.

It hasn't seemed to work out too well in history.

It's worked out very well. Sparta was such a state and lasted for 800 years, .... it is you who is unintelligent.

Yes, you're right, without Sparta we wouldn't have that movie "The 300". I retract it all, expand your basement and take some prisoners.

Post: #12

(04-10-2013 12:53 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  I would be interested as to your definition of the "best" of either sex.

Also, while much of what women produce is either derivative or just plain drivel, some women have produced important and significant contributions to the arts and the like.

Definitions may differ from society to society, tribe to tribe, city-state to city-state, but any people or nation that has wanted to become great has engaged in something like this, consciously or not.

Post: #13

(04-10-2013 01:01 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:53 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  I would be interested as to your definition of the "best" of either sex.

Also, while much of what women produce is either derivative or just plain drivel, some women have produced important and significant contributions to the arts and the like.

Definitions may differ from society to society, tribe to tribe, city-state to city-state, but any people or nation that has wanted to become great has engaged in something like this, consciously or not.

Yes and we look to great ones like you for leadership as to how to consciously follow it and achieve superiority. Please let us know how we can achieve this wonderful future.

Post: #14

(04-10-2013 01:01 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:59 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:54 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:49 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  I want to remind you that this is a forum for men who are supportive of each other, not for name-calling. This is a forum for practical advice.

It sounds like you might not care too much about the biological quality of the human race, is all I will say.

Thanks for explaining what the forum's for.

I'm afraid I can't offer much practical advice for starting a fascist state ruled by simps that are frustated over their inability to control women.

It hasn't seemed to work out too well in history.

It's worked out very well. Sparta was such a state and lasted for 800 years, .... it is you who is unintelligent.

Yes, you're right, without Sparta we wouldn't have that movie "The 300". I retract it all, expand your basement and take some prisoners.

You are reduced to boasting about your own ignorance.

And you repeat the typical shaming tactics of feminists, etc.; any guy who doesn't embrace FCKH8 and tranny rights is a loser living in his basement, right?

Please tell me again what Saudi Arabia and Iran have to do with eugenic policies?

Post: #15

(04-10-2013 12:55 AM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  Can we make them wear cowbells?

Put a collar and cowbells on them; put shiny necklaces on the nubile ones. Throw them in the hay in the barn, listen to their Banshee-like screams of pleasure and agony as they are bred.

Post: #16

I guess that was worth wasting my 1000th post on. Oh well.

Post: #17

(04-10-2013 01:04 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  

(04-10-2013 12:55 AM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  Can we make them wear cowbells?

Put a collar and cowbells on them; put shiny necklaces on the nubile ones. Throw them in the hay in the barn, listen to their Banshee-like screams of pleasure and agony as they are bred.

Chilling.

Post: #18

To the people who are voting that women and men make good EUGENIC choices on their own, I would ask you, do you have any historical examples to back this up? The age of supposed sexual freedom in choosing one's mate has led to a steady decrease in human capital by almost any measure; economic, intellectual, and I would argue also aesthetic, if you look at the walking abortions that make up most of the world, and indeed the Western world, today.

Post: #19

You talk about eugenics, well, what have YOU done? Are you a surgeon, a general, did you invent a vaccine that prevents Internet Stupidity?

By the way, Spartan women had much more civil rights than their ancient world contemporaries, you've got a long re-evaluation of your half-baked "ideas" ahead of you.

"By contrast, Spartan women enjoyed a status, power, and respect that was unknown in the rest of the classical world."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_rights

Post: #20

I am in Brazil right now. If I was dictator here I would choose men like Ricardo Arona,



among others, to breed many nubile young women and improve the Brazilian people, who have been degenerating recently. Regardless of disagreements between who is better or worse at the higher levels, I think all can agree he is superior by much to the average Brazilian.

In the US I might choose Brad Pitt or Dolph Lundgren,



...to impregnate hundreds of thousands of nubile attractive girls ready for breeding. All quibbling aside, who can doubt that this would improve the race?

Some who post against me on this thread, I suspect, know full well they are lacking in objective high quality and would lose out under this system.

Post: #21

regardless if it would improve a race or not, it's a dumb idea.

Post: #22

(04-10-2013 12:38 AM)Bronze Age Pervert Wrote:  In my opinion this is the only possible position for women after modern science (not to speak of their modern freedoms) has revealed them for the natural prostitutes and soulless beasts they are.

In my opinion women should be raised separately, not taught anything but the most rudimentary language, and then be groomed to be breeding stock. The best females will be bred by the best males: these best specimens will be chosen by a special eugenic council of men like myself, of good taste. Additionally I will choose from among men the most impressive specimens as "studs" to breed the female population at large and thereby improve the race.

It is true that under this scheme most men would not be fathers, but most men do not desire this anyway; they would, in exchange, get plenty of free sex, which is better than they can say for themselves now.

The noxious influence of women not only in politics and public life, but also in the culture, in the arts and letters, will be eliminated and the biological quality of the race will be improved under the direction and foresight and good taste of men like myself.

What do you think? I have put up four choices.

Stop worrying about the world and start worrying about your world !

You sound angry and bitter brah ! And i do understand

Try to stay away from threads on the ills of Feminism, fatties , white knights, liberals and stuff like that. Those will just reduce the quality fo your life.

Work on improving yourself & being the best you can be in every aspect and you will realize that women are cool, fun and a nice accessory to every mans life.

Post: #23

This idea is not only offensive from a human rights point of view (I could see some curtailing of women's rights, such as eliminating no-fault divorce, alimony, abortion etc., but of course not slavery), but it also serves a ludicrous purpose: enriching the few "selected" with infinite pussy while ruining everyone else. Other than the enslavement of women, we are already moving towards such a system, so you are basically planning to replace it with a very similar one. The only difference is that right now there is freedom to compete (through game, for example) for those few precious roles, whereas in the future someone would just decide who gets in based on some subjective criteria.

Quote:Monogamy, in being a form of sexual socialism as you say, is the cause of the biological degeneration of mankind which has led to the modern man, a bug man worthy of extermination.

This has nothing to do with monogamy. Men will always have lesser biological value / be more expendable. It's a basic fact of nature.

Aside from the obvious problems with your idea, the main issue is that you are treating "improving the race" as something valuable per se. Who gives a fuck about the genetic quality of mankind as whole? Who would even measure genetic quality?

In short, you correctly describe how women don't make good mating choices when left to their own devices, and propose to replace it with an even worse system. Congratulations. The current and future states of the sexual market don't seem that terrible after reading this.

Post: #24

I don't think the human race is degenerating. It has it's ups and downs, but philosophers, thinkers and inventors have been present in every age, and stupid peasants tilling the fields/texting on phones have always been with us as well. Nothing has changed overall.

It's also difficult to predict what kind of people are 'well-evolved', because that's relative to your environment. If there was a world-wide meat shortage, those big buff guys that the OP wants to breed and who require high-protein diets would be wiped out in the ensuing protein-deficiency epidemic, and all the thin Indian vegetarians will inherit the earth, spending their lives hunting down the last few remaining blonde white women who escaped the OP's breeding barns in the ensuing collapse of the super-race.

Eugenics is in essence stifling variety, and variety is necessary for evolutionary adaptation to changing environments. With eugenics you might end up breeding a homogenous super-race that can be wiped out in an instant with the right stressor.

Post: #25

Seriously, how old are you? 13?