Post: #1

Roosh recently wrote in an article about a city - "Too many Asian and Indian girls" and then goes on about him discriminating against girls from minority backgrounds and that he only likes white girls.

The thing is, he himself is from a minority background.

I see this all over the place. All of my minority friends are either totally against dating girls of their own race/minority races or settle for that and claim that they wish they could be with a white girl.

I've heard black guys say they think black girls are ugly and would never date them. You see it all over the media (Tiger Woods with yet another new blonde girl for example).

I could go on and on. It seems a lot of the men on this forum are from ethnic backgrounds and are really keen on traveling to "white" European countries so they can hopefully get a white girl.

Now I'm happy with my dating life but it's just a really weird thing that I've noticed and I want to know what's going on.

I'm white and I like white girls. Most white guys like white girls. If I said that I would never date a white girl or that they're ugly, then I would be saying that I think I'm ugly and not worthy of dating. If I only wanted to date girls from another ethnicity, then, to me, that would mean that I want to weed out my genes because I find them disgusting.

Then the other question - if all of you guys who think this way had your way and procreated with white women, then your children would no longer be white. So for the next generation of racist/discriminating men, there would be less white women.

So I guess my question is, why do you hate yourselves?

Post: #2

Post: #3

Gone in less than 10 minutes.

Post: #4

Hahahahaha!!!
He Gone!

Post: #5

(04-04-2013 06:57 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Gone in less than 10 minutes.

thank you !!!

Post: #6

Is it even possible to have a sensible discussion about this topic? OP raised an interesting point worth some exploration at least.

Post: #7

WTF troll comes with this topic on his first post. Isn't this a game/travel/lifestyle forum??

WHO CARES about this topic.

Post: #8

(04-04-2013 09:19 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  WTF troll comes with this topic on his first post. Isn't this a game/travel/lifestyle forum??

WHO CARES about this topic.

Most likely another Heartiste fan trying to migrate over here.

Post: #9

(04-04-2013 06:57 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Gone in less than 10 minutes.

Gone in 600 Seconds.

Post: #10

LOL

Post: #11

I'm going to assume this wasn't a genuine troll and this was meant seriously.

(04-04-2013 09:08 PM)OkStudies Wrote:  Is it even possible to have a sensible discussion about this topic? OP raised an interesting point worth some exploration at least.

In other words, we're all somehow obliged to have a preference for women with the same skin tones and facial features as us? Not having a sexual preference for women with those physical traits must mean you hate yourself???? Are you fucking kidding me?

This reasoning is so contorted for so many reasons I don't even know where to start.

This statement somehow assumes that liking certain characteristics about yourself automatically means you must be sexually attracted to those characteristics and seek them in a mate.

I have big feet and a broad shoulders.
I like having big feet and broad shoulders.
Am I attracted to women with big feet and broad shoulders?
No.

Quote:Then the other question - if all of you guys who think this way had your way and procreated with white women, then your children would no longer be white. So for the next generation of racist/discriminating men, there would be less white women.

O seriously, what the fuck. Do you have any idea how many billions of people would have to do this in order for there to be "less white women"? I really get tired of hearing these stupid statements. This is anoher "if everyone did A, B would happen. B is bad, therefore no one should do A."

If everyone who wanted to be a multi-billionaire celebrity did so, we'd have hyperinflation and probably no one to clean our streets and do our manual labour.

If everyone on this planet owned a car, we'd have massive traffick jams each day and more pollution. I guess no one should own a car.

If everyone stopped having children the world would depopulate. I guess that means we should criticize anyone who doesn't want kids.

Post: #12

Everyone knows he's making that up. "Good riddance to bad rubbish" I say. Where are the white girls?

In an unrelated story I really like Latinas and Asians, and this is coming from a black guy.

Post: #13

The points he brings up are invalid to the forum. 90% of the forum would smash any 7. Black, white, Indian, Asian, Latina, Native. Maybe most have their prefence, but to almost all forum players pussy is pussy.

Carry on.

Post: #14

The funny thing is that white americans/white canadians, etc arent that white themselves on average (they have a lot of mix down below their family tree), and yet they are probably the most closet racist people on the planet. For me whites are only europeans.

Post: #15

(04-06-2013 01:57 PM)SouthernWizard Wrote:  The funny thing is that white americans/white canadians, etc arent that white themselves on average (they have a lot of mix down below their family tree), and yet they are probably the most closet racist people on the planet. For me whites are only europeans.

Please post a population structure analysis that displays more than the occasional trace amount of Native American or African admixture among white Americans.

I suspect you are talking out of your ass.

American whites often look "whiter" than a lot of European groups on populations structure studies, because American whites have greater proportions of Briton and Germanic heritages, and thus a greater degree of genetic markers that are more distinctly white--as opposed to say Finns who have northeast Asian admixture, or Southeast European groups who have Middle Eastern admixture.

Post: #16

So I guess white guys who like Asian chicks can't stand the fact that they themselves are white?

I would've maybe liked to seen this guy make one more post for the sake of my laughter

Post: #17

No....you can love yourself but still prefer white girls. We can't forget media hype.

From a very early age most of us have been brain washed that white women are the most desirable. Don't under estimate the power of the media. It's called television "programming" for a reason.

Post: #18

(04-06-2013 03:10 PM)rakishness Wrote:  No....you can love yourself but still prefer white girls. We can't forget media hype.

From a very early age most of us have been brain washed that white women are the most desirable. Don't under estimate the power of the media. It's called television "programming" for a reason.

He was being sarcastic.

What's this blue pill stuff about media brainwashing men with Eurocentric notions of beauty?

There's hot girls of all backgrounds and men's tastes vary, but on average, white girls and East/Southeast Asian girls have the most physically feminine features. Large eyes and light hair for white girls, paedomorphic facial features for Asian girls. Women have larger eyes and lighter hair than men; women have more paedomorphic facial features than men. One can also consider large eyes a paedomorphic feature. Men are attracted to youth.

Unsurprisingly, they're quite popular with men of all backgrounds.

Post: #19

Why do some of you want to discuss this nonsense?

Again who the fuck cares!!!!

Post: #20

(04-06-2013 03:10 PM)rakishness Wrote:  No....you can love yourself but still prefer white girls. We can't forget media hype.

From a very early age most of us have been brain washed that white women are the most desirable. Don't under estimate the power of the media. It's called television "programming" for a reason.

I watched rap videos as a kid...so I like BIG BOOTy ethnic girls
Not beckys..so much.

Post: #21

(04-06-2013 02:36 PM)Kabal Wrote:  

(04-06-2013 01:57 PM)SouthernWizard Wrote:  The funny thing is that white americans/white canadians, etc arent that white themselves on average (they have a lot of mix down below their family tree), and yet they are probably the most closet racist people on the planet. For me whites are only europeans.

Please post a population structure analysis that displays more than the occasional trace amount of Native American or African admixture among white Americans.

I suspect you are talking out of your ass.

American whites often look "whiter" than a lot of European groups on populations structure studies, because American whites have greater proportions of Briton and Germanic heritages, and thus a greater degree of genetic markers that are more distinctly white--as opposed to say Finns who have northeast Asian admixture, or Southeast European groups who have Middle Eastern admixture.

Most white americans (bar the midwest) and white canadians are on average darker haired than non mediterranean/balkan europeans. I've been to north america many times and it amazed me how much dark features white americans have on average, just look at those clubs on dc, sausagefests, those white people dont look northern european at all.

And by the way british people are not particularly blonde at all, Even central european groups like polish/czech are actually much naturally blonder than brits.

Post: #22

(04-06-2013 05:38 PM)SouthernWizard Wrote:  Most white americans (bar the midwest) and white canadians are on average darker haired than non mediterranean/balkan europeans. I've been to north america many times and it amazed me how much dark features white americans have on average, just look at those clubs on dc, sausagefests, those white people dont look northern european at all.

And by the way british people are not particularly blonde at all, Even central european groups like polish/czech are actually much naturally blonder than brits.

Even assuming your observations are correct, your problems are at least two-fold:
1. Your intuition is poor.
2. You lack an understanding of population genetics, which could otherwise mitigate your poor intuition.

As a simple example to illustrate the inanity of what you just said, Russians consistently show a high degree of East/Central Asian admixture on the order of roughly 15%, yet they have blondism rates much higher than that of "whiter" countries such as France and Spain. You even almost skirted upon this with your comment about Poles and Czechs. Conversely, Sardinians are often pinpointed as the "whitest" group by population studies, and they have "dark" features and low blondism rates.

"Darker" features in whites are not necessarily linked with admixture with groups such as Africans or Amerindians. No genetic study has picked up signals of consistent and/or widespread African or Native American admixture in American whites. In fact, studies have repeatedly suggested the opposite: admixture is low (<<5%), if not indistinguishable from noise.

Stop promulgating your ignorance as fact.

Post: #23

in all honesty, the OP makes too many generalizations. that's the problem.

there is a very very small grain of truth in what he implies. but he makes too many broad strokes.! he is way off base!!!

are there people in our society today that date/fuck outside of their own race and are doing it for the wrong reasons? Of course there are people like that.

at what point in history did we not have people like this? those types of people will always exist. why try to cross-examine it. it is what it is.

we can look at celebrities, rich guys, middle class guys and even take this arguement down to the level of the porno industry.

i read an article online that in the porn industry there is a complaint among white men performers because white women who star in interracial themed pornos with thug looking black men, get paid more money than their white male counterparts. its a simple demand and supply issue. thug black guys from the hood have a sex fantasy and they buy what they want to see, thus those women star in that to make the fantasy become reality. Does that mean they hate themselves? maybe and maybe not.

this issue of self-hatred is multi-faced and too deep for the OP to diagnose. and he is wrong in so many ways for attempting to try to do it here.

so does self hatred exist in people today, do men sleep with a certain type of pretty woman for the wrong reasons? maybe.

however, do all people who fuck/date outside of their race do it for the same reasons. hell no!!!

I'm an american black guy and i feel all women are beautiful. there are all types of beauty out there. right now, for me its a tie between Latino & Brazillian Women and Slavic/Russian - East Europe Women. And i learn more towards the russian/slavic side.

but i have encountered some truly beautiful nubian model black women from africa too. they're very rare, but they exist. i would love to have one. but i'm gonna go to where i can have my needs met.

At the end of the day i want a woman with alot of sex appeal and some integrity and has no drama.

And as an american black man in my culture its very hard to find that mixture of beauty, integrity and class too. A feminine sexy woman who knows how to play her feminine role who not just some attractive but damaged pussy that has been fucked alot of dicks. know what i mean?

And i will go to the place in the world where i can find what i'm looking for. Where there is an abundant supply of what i want t find, which is a complete mixture of female attributes. Now are there men out there that just want a pretty white european woman? sure there are.

and if that's what they want. then so be it. who gives a shit.

please view this 30 min video and learn to not make generalizations about interracial dating:

Post: #24

(04-07-2013 01:51 AM)Kabal Wrote:  

(04-06-2013 05:38 PM)SouthernWizard Wrote:  Most white americans (bar the midwest) and white canadians are on average darker haired than non mediterranean/balkan europeans. I've been to north america many times and it amazed me how much dark features white americans have on average, just look at those clubs on dc, sausagefests, those white people dont look northern european at all.

And by the way british people are not particularly blonde at all, Even central european groups like polish/czech are actually much naturally blonder than brits.

Even assuming your observations are correct, your problems are at least two-fold:
1. Your intuition is poor.
2. You lack an understanding of population genetics, which could otherwise mitigate your poor intuition.

As a simple example to illustrate the inanity of what you just said, Russians consistently show a high degree of East/Central Asian admixture on the order of roughly 15%, yet they have blondism rates much higher than that of "whiter" countries such as France and Spain. You even almost skirted upon this with your comment about Poles and Czechs. Conversely, Sardinians are often pinpointed as the "whitest" group by population studies, and they have "dark" features and low blondism rates.

"Darker" features in whites are not necessarily linked with admixture with groups such as Africans or Amerindians. No genetic study has picked up signals of consistent and/or widespread African or Native American admixture in American whites. In fact, studies have repeatedly suggested the opposite: admixture is low (<<5%), if not indistinguishable from noise.

Stop promulgating your ignorance as fact.

Well then I was talking about people who superficially looks as whiter, with fair features, white americans/canadians are darker that quite a lot european subgroups/ethnicities.

Guys in that forum arent focused into dating the most 100% caucasian dna populations, they care about superficial looks, that why aframs and also a lot of white americans are so fond on blonde women from northern and eastern europe...

Post: #25

Leaving the "Do Ethnic Men Hate Themselves" question out of it, it can't be denied that on that "are you racist in the girls you will date" thread started by Roosh, an exorbitant amount of men of color talk about white girls, far more than the reverse. The causes of this, who knows