Post: #26

thats a great theory: the more cocks inside the girl, the wider the thigh gap! i like it!

Post: #27

I feel like..knowledge of game and knowledge of how anatomy work..are not correlated at all on the rooshv forum

Post: #28

As a design student it's nice to see a greater appreciation of whitespace.

Post: #29

Too much male hamster in here. The critiques of the "thigh gap" are off he mark but the look the girls ate chasing are chopstick legs that look nasty and boyish. The examples y'all posting are normal, but of course women can never be happy being healthy and toned. They either have to be whales or stick figures. And moan about some mythical complex put in them to conform to some image that is all in their head. If bitches just stayed healthy and in shape nobody would be crying.

I can't jive with either side on this as the chopstick leg look is unattractive to me but critiques are off the mark as they sit eating donuts.

It's either gluttony or starvation with women. Why can't they just eat some rice and and a steak like we do and shut it. Eat normal and be active, it's not that hard.

Post: #30

I almost started a thread on this video and subject the other day, but it was making me too pissed. I talk to my bitches about the thigh gap all the time.

Why do so many enablers trip over themselves to stop girls from thinking and doing things that preserve and enhance their beauty? There's a reason girls have identified the thigh gap as desirable. It's a sign that their female form is optimized.

Where's the story about the "obsession" over Starbucks Milkshakes and cupcakes?

Post: #31

The girls who are obsessed about thigh gaps, or any other physical feature that makes them attractive, are the smart ones. They are the ones who come the closest to actually understanding what men want, and the incredible disadvantages a (straight)girl faces when she does not do everything possible to maximise her attractiveness. Especially when younger and looking for a man.

The rest who think it doesn't, or shouldn't, matter...I don't know what to say about them. They quite possibly have a psychiatric condition that is listed in DSM IV in boldfaced red, or wherever. Such is the difference between what is going on in her head and objective reality.

Post: #32

We had this discussion before and once again the Male hamster is running wild.

This thigh gap does nothing for my boner:



There is a key difference between a bone and skin set of legs from deliberate starving and a normal gap in-between a females thighs.

That is the shit the girls are chasing whom are we to be fooled women are choosing anything remotely healthy or normal. The pictures y'all posted were just of normal hot chics, that is nothing that is a perverted trend like the "thigh gap" like I said women have a hard time just being normal, its always has to be OD with any trend they go after.

I stand by my claims.. shit is gross and to each their own.

Post: #33

I thought the gap was supposed to be more like this:


and less like this:


Am I wrong or did anorexia nervosa suddenly become fashionable again?

Post: #34

youre welcome
http://www.reddit.com/r/datgap

Post: #35

thigh gaps are amazing. my swedish ex in particular was the proper height (about two inches shorter than me) and had a perfectly toned ass from constantly being in the gym, it was amazing for warm-up bang:
I can't tell you on how many occasions she would be standing there - doing dishes, cooking, putting on make up, whatever - back turned, and i'd just walk up behind, insert boner in the thigh gap and begin thrusting with both hands on the boobs while sucking on her ear lobes and biting her neck. After maybe 60 seconds of this all she would do is move her hand down and provide and arch for me to go up and in. good times

Edit - she was a stereotypical swede in that she was almost always naked while at home, I approve of this lifestyle.

Post: #36

(04-02-2013 02:16 PM)augen sehen Wrote:  I thought the gap was supposed to be more like this:


and less like this:


Am I wrong or did anorexia nervous suddenly become fashionable again?

Your viewing it from a rational Males mind, of course the first example you posted is proper and nice. But females aren't not going for that look, instead they are going for the twig stick look that I posted. As I said there is no shame in women trying to be fit but women can never just do things kosher and it always has to be over the top to the extremes.

Obese whale-ish women aren't trying to get this look so lets toss out the 40-60% of Americans that are fat and then realize that some maybe softer girls or healthier girls are trying to chase this look. And since women are copy cats there is one default "thigh gap" they are trying to go for and its not the lustful and proper one many have posted in this thread. Its the skinny bone shit and its nasty as hell.

I remember growing up when the mid-drift was all the rage. Girls got their bellybuttons pierced and were obsessed with showing off their stomachs. Of course at like 13 years old 90% of girls where fit but many because of their drunken hamsters OD'd and wasted them selves away to sticks for what reason I don't really now. My school had to end banning girls showing their stomachs because it got so bad.

Post: #37

(04-01-2013 03:59 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  A girl can have some gap and still a nice round ass, see below:

This fat ass is far lower in quality for me than the fit, vigorous surfer girl ass above. 2/10, pointy elbows, would harass on beach.

The very thin B&W photo below the chubster photo is too thin, straw man, obvious lack of athleticism.
If that skinny girl ran or surfed her thighs would be more rounded with more development in the middle.

Post: #38

NPR just posted an article decrying thigh gap. The comments are nauseating and remind you just how blue pill this society is:

https://www.facebook.com/NPR/posts/10152005311506756

Feel free to bomb the article with a manosphere perspective.

Oh the horror:

Post: #39

Thigh Gap obsession is probably the only positive thing that came from tumblr. Shit ton of girls I've met are obsessed with getting one.

Post: #40

I'm totally against this, my preference goes out for curvy girls (the ones posted by athlone).

Skinny broads are too bony, you can feel their bones during doggy.

Post: #41

(10-06-2013 07:05 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  I'm totally against this, my preference goes out for curvy girls (the ones posted by athlone).

Skinny broads are too bony, you can feel their bones during doggy.

I used to be feel exactly like you, I made the flip in preference toward petite women this year. Don't like thick women at all anymore. That woman with the jeans above is perfect to me. Some girls of this size even have a small, firm bubble butt.

Post: #42

(10-06-2013 07:05 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  I'm totally against this, my preference goes out for curvy girls (the ones posted by athlone).

Skinny broads are too bony, you can feel their bones during doggy.

I don't understand this preference. "Curvy" may look nice to the eye, but it's constructed of excess fat, same as a potbelly.

It's just luck that it landed in the right places, but in my opinion, "curvy" girls are fat.

If you're cool with "curvy," then you're admitting that you expect girls (who are going to have a chance to meet your meat) to be fat, but just not too fat, which while visually specific, is pretty subjective in terms of the acceptable amount of fat and where it is geographically allowed to fall.

I know marriage isn't the goal for most guys around here and it isn't for me, but I would imagine that if I live in a world where men could manage their own households and didn't face divorce rape around every corner, I'd definitely wanna have a family and so would many guys here.

As far as I see it, in this imaginary world, where marriage IS NOT a death sentence to your sexual satisfaction and the size of your balls, a curvy girl now is a fatty soon enough. The fat ain't gonna stay were you want it to after she's had a kid.

Personally, I like girls who are healthy. So, not unhealthily skinny, but no tendency towards unnecessary fat, even when it might look nice for the moment.

For one night stands, I understand the attraction of a curvy girl, but for that I base my standards in waist size. I've got a 31in waist. She'd better have one at least 2in smaller.

Post: #43

(10-06-2013 09:04 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(10-06-2013 07:05 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  I'm totally against this, my preference goes out for curvy girls (the ones posted by athlone).

Skinny broads are too bony, you can feel their bones during doggy.

I don't understand this preference. "Curvy" may look nice to the eye, but it's constructed of excess fat, same as a potbelly.

It's just luck that it landed in the right places, but in my opinion, "curvy" girls are fat.

If you're cool with "curvy," then you're admitting that you expect girls (who are going to have a chance to meet your meat) to be fat, but just not too fat, which while visually specific, is pretty subjective in terms of the acceptable amount of fat and where it is geographically allowed to fall.

I know marriage isn't the goal for most guys around here and it isn't for me, but I would imagine that if I live in a world where men could manage their own households and didn't face divorce rape around every corner, I'd definitely wanna have a family and so would many guys here.

As far as I see it, in this imaginary world, where marriage IS NOT a death sentence to your sexual satisfaction and the size of your balls, a curvy girl now is a fatty soon enough. The fat ain't gonna stay were you want it to after she's had a kid.

Personally, I like girls who are healthy. So, not unhealthily skinny, but no tendency towards unnecessary fat, even when it might look nice for the moment.

For one night stands, I understand the attraction of a curvy girl, but for that I base my standards in waist size. I've got a 31in waist. She'd better have one at least 2in smaller.

Furthermore, "curviness" in the proper sense (not the euphemistic sense), is having additional curvature in the tits and ass, not the waist and thighs.

So therefore, having curves and having a thigh gap is not mutually exclusive.

Post: #44

(10-06-2013 09:09 PM)Kabal Wrote:  Furthermore, "curviness" in the proper sense (not the euphemistic sense), is having additional curvature in the tits and ass, not the waist and thighs.

So therefore, having curves and having a thigh gap is not mutually exclusive.

This is my understanding. But then I meet guys who like what they call a "thick" girl. Or I meet guys who talk about how they like girls with curves, but the girls they point out as attractive don't have small waists. They just have stalky, fat legs and a good bunch of stomach fat that spreads out just enough to keep it from becoming super obvious that she's a fatty.

Post: #45

Fuckin' perfect:

Post: #46

(04-01-2013 02:21 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  I'm Pro Thigh Gap

Yes.

I approve of this obsession also.

Post: #47

Post: #48

Someone on my Facebook Liked a story about this and the comments were nothing but guys talking shit and fatties saying they love their "thick" thighs haha. I think American guys are just so used to dealing with trash that skinny turns them off or something. Its kind of rare to see real skinny now days so most guys cant comprehend it.

Post: #49

(10-06-2013 10:57 PM)F1Driver Wrote:  

(04-01-2013 02:21 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  I'm Pro Thigh Gap

Yes.

I approve of this obsession also.

this kind of wonderful, wonderful perfection really has as much to do with wide hips combined with slim thighs.

Post: #50

(10-07-2013 03:18 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(10-06-2013 10:57 PM)F1Driver Wrote:  

(04-01-2013 02:21 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  I'm Pro Thigh Gap

Yes.

I approve of this obsession also.

this kind of wonderful, wonderful perfection really has as much to do with wide hips combined with slim thighs.

Slim yet curvy. Nice firm perky C cups would complete the package nicely.