Post: #1

Roosh predicted this would happen, the leftists and feminists have indeed begun getting websites removed etc.

Scroll to the bottom of the article under the heading 'Vile Trolls could be taking cover on your street',

Basically, Mary Beard is a typical leftist 'champagne socialist', part of the chattering classes, London metropolitan elite etc etc. She's also a feminist. Some guys on a blog or forum called her out for saying all men were rapists by saying "It doesn’t say much for her . . . that with 3.4billion rapists on Earth, she hasn’t had a cock near her for decades". I don't know what else they were dissing her for, and there isn't much info in the articles about the blog.

Here are a few more articles about it, all in Mainstream Media outlets.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/jan...NTCMP=SRCH

http://www.newstatesman.com/media/2013/0...t-hate-mob

No surprises the papers who have full articles about it are both left-wing publications, but nevertheless. Feminism and Leftism are always in the papers over here, but never before have there been reports on the attacking of anti-feminism etc. It all points to a soon to be full-blown culture war.

Post: #2

Yes, and feminists also had CNN remove an article about a study that said the way women voted was hormonally-driven. Whatever you think of Rush Limbaugh, his site is now the one place you can find evidence of what happened.

This reminds me of the "Ministry of Whitewash" in George Orwell's "1984." Their job was to remove news and elements of history it didn't want the public to know about.

How do we prevent this? By NEVER buckling under. The examples you cited (from what I can tell) and the CNN story were voluntarily removed. As people have said, once feminists smell blood, they go in for the kill. The correct response is NEVER to apologize. If you do that makes their inner dogs rabid and makes you look weak. The proper response is: THIS is my opinion. If you don't like it, write your own. I stand by my words.

For further information, research how Frank Zappa behaved when special interest groups like the PMRC called him on his dirty lyrics. He gave no quarter. Ever. 25 years have gone by. Who, now, is considered the innovative genius? Who is now considered the true, visionary artist?

Not the feminists and right wing "Washington wives" who tried to ban his music.

Post: #3

(02-01-2013 06:24 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  For further information, research how Frank Zappa behaved when special interest groups like the PMRC called him on his dirty lyrics. He gave no quarter.

NRA does the same. Not only they don't back down, they have no qualms about going personally after their opponents

Just like leftists would.

Post: #4

I can not stand how passive most conservatives are. Its like they give up their lunch money to the bully everyday instead of hitting in the face. I am gald I am Libraterian.

Post: #5

(02-01-2013 06:38 PM)thatGuy Wrote:  

(02-01-2013 06:24 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  For further information, research how Frank Zappa behaved when special interest groups like the PMRC called him on his dirty lyrics. He gave no quarter.

NRA does the same. Not only they don't back down, they have no qualms about going personally after their opponents

Just like leftists would.

This plan backfired; they shouldn't have went after the President's kids.

Post: #6

(02-01-2013 06:24 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  How do we prevent this? By NEVER buckling under. The examples you cited (from what I can tell) and the CNN story were voluntarily removed. As people have said, once feminists smell blood, they go in for the kill. The correct response is NEVER to apologize. If you do that makes their inner dogs rabid and makes you look weak. The proper response is: THIS is my opinion. If you don't like it, write your own. I stand by my words.

This should be lesson #1 in the "How to survive in a dangerous feminist gynocracy" course. Lesson #2 would be: mock them, laugh at them, ridicule them.

Roosh has done this recently with the "ugliest feminists" post, but he attacked their looks, and he did it online. We must attack their intellect, and it must be done in meatspace, not in cyberspace. Anyone can be a tough guy in cyberspace, courage is required to crush the spirit of retarded feminuts in real life. And it must be done in front of their friends.

If them feminuts think they're smart enough to discuss at an intellectual level, give 'em enough rope for them to hang themselves. Let them talk for a while, let them feel special and unique snowflakes. When they're done, attack each of their points, demolish them with cold manly logic, humiliate them completely, but never lose your cool. This is not personal, this is intellectual fencing, and if a gal is stupid enough to challenge random strangers for a duel, eventually she will get hurt. Poor gal! It's all patriarchy's fault!!

Women are herd animals, their "opinions" and "views" are nothing more than regurgitated memetic trash. Gents, your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to be the leader of the herd. Most of them feminuts are neurotic because there's no one leading the herd, and they feel unprotected and exposed (the rest of them feminuts are just mentally defective).

People respect boldness, but such boldness must come from a position of strength. Thus, work out, learn languages, learn History, improve yourself in every way, dress well, be the best man you can be, attain high status, and then mock your inferiors into submission and, eventually, into surrender. Women will always, always want to earn the validation of alpha men. Be alpha, and they will surrender.

Post: #7

Strong independent woman who want equality yet will lobby on an authority of sorts to take down something they don't agree with.

Post: #8

Well that does make quite a bit of sense: as your opinions get loftier and more abstract, critics love to spew increasingly acidic venom. The great thing about this country is that there is a free speech clause and you aren't breaking any laws by voicing your opinion, contrary to what media bigwigs might say. Also, since war is the penultimate answer to everything and seeing as the media does not deal in such business, that is another layer of protection towards an individual's free speech.

Post: #9

(02-01-2013 06:24 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Yes, and feminists also had CNN remove an article about a study that said the way women voted was hormonally-driven. Whatever you think of Rush Limbaugh, his site is now the one place you can find evidence of what happened.

This reminds me of the "Ministry of Whitewash" in George Orwell's "1984." Their job was to remove news and elements of history it didn't want the public to know about.

How do we prevent this? By NEVER buckling under. The examples you cited (from what I can tell) and the CNN story were voluntarily removed. As people have said, once feminists smell blood, they go in for the kill. The correct response is NEVER to apologize. If you do that makes their inner dogs rabid and makes you look weak. The proper response is: THIS is my opinion. If you don't like it, write your own. I stand by my words.

For further information, research how Frank Zappa behaved when special interest groups like the PMRC called him on his dirty lyrics. He gave no quarter. Ever. 25 years have gone by. Who, now, is considered the innovative genius? Who is now considered the true, visionary artist?

Not the feminists and right wing "Washington wives" who tried to ban his music.

It's akin to negotiating with terrorists. ANY compromise is interpreted as weakness.

Post: #10

Mentioning Zappa was a very valid point, but a more recent example (say, early 2000's?) would be Eminem, before he went total mainstream and stopped doing what he was good at, offending people. He never apologized for his lyrics or backed down, case in point:

Post: #11

This is my go-to argument for whenever anybody tells me I can't have an opinion. Good call on whoever mentioned Zappa.

Post: #12

That is a great video. I almost ditched it cause the quality is questionable but that was a very well spent 20min. Thanks for posting it Kitsune.

Post: #13

(02-02-2013 04:43 AM)Aer Wrote:  Mentioning Zappa was a very valid point, but a more recent example (say, early 2000's?) would be Eminem, before he went total mainstream and stopped doing what he was good at, offending people. He never apologized for his lyrics or backed down, case in point:

eminem was pretty raw, no social group was safe

Post: #14

I think most people get scared when they're backed up against the wall and people are accusing them/talking shit. Multiply that fear by 100 if they might get in legal trouble. I'm glad Roosh isn't one of those people and will do everything he possibly can to keep the forum going....I hope so. Frank Zappa has some restraint for not slapping that dumbass around, especially when he was getting in his face like that.

Eminem has always been cheesy. I'm surprised Brotha Lynch Hung never got in trouble or called out by those stupid music groups. He has a huge underground following but would of been shut down so fast if he started getting into the mainstream.

Post: #15

(02-01-2013 10:12 PM)Fisto Wrote:  

(02-01-2013 06:24 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Yes, and feminists also had CNN remove an article about a study that said the way women voted was hormonally-driven. Whatever you think of Rush Limbaugh, his site is now the one place you can find evidence of what happened.

This reminds me of the "Ministry of Whitewash" in George Orwell's "1984." Their job was to remove news and elements of history it didn't want the public to know about.

How do we prevent this? By NEVER buckling under. The examples you cited (from what I can tell) and the CNN story were voluntarily removed. As people have said, once feminists smell blood, they go in for the kill. The correct response is NEVER to apologize. If you do that makes their inner dogs rabid and makes you look weak. The proper response is: THIS is my opinion. If you don't like it, write your own. I stand by my words.

For further information, research how Frank Zappa behaved when special interest groups like the PMRC called him on his dirty lyrics. He gave no quarter. Ever. 25 years have gone by. Who, now, is considered the innovative genius? Who is now considered the true, visionary artist?

Not the feminists and right wing "Washington wives" who tried to ban his music.

It's akin to negotiating with terrorists. ANY compromise is interpreted as weakness.