Post: #26

I think she's really pretty.

Post: #27

I find it disgusting to watch the beta men sitting behind her nodding in agreement. Spineless pussies if you ask me.

Post: #28

I lasted 52 seconds.

Post: #29

I hate Gillard. I hope she dies from a cock going through the eyeball and having acid poured into the wound

Post: #30

I'd bang, just to shut her up. It's so funny how most feminists will turn into little pussy cats after you feed them with some alpha seed. It's all brainwashing and front I tell you.

Post: #31

(01-23-2013 03:10 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  We should compile a list of women not cut out for power. There was the woman who took over Hewlett-Packard and ran it into the ground, Tina Brown who took over Newsweek, after which it stopped its print edition...

How about all of them?

The only woman I've heard of who was a good leader was Queen Boudica. Her tribe was absorbed into the Roman Empire, though.

Post: #32

(02-09-2013 05:28 PM)Walderschmidt Wrote:  

(01-23-2013 03:10 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  We should compile a list of women not cut out for power. There was the woman who took over Hewlett-Packard and ran it into the ground, Tina Brown who took over Newsweek, after which it stopped its print edition...

How about all of them?

The only woman I've heard of who was a good leader was Queen Boudica. Her tribe was absorbed into the Roman Empire, though.

Margaret Thatcher was a fucking badass

Post: #33

Didn't want to open a new thread so I'm posting this in here as to one more, albeit humorous, example of why women are not fit for any position of power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...nxS7_aMU#!

Btw, Roosh, your forum platform is feminist! Seriously, I tried doing a search for this thread using the following keywords as I couldn't remember the exact title of the thread:

"why women shouldn't be in power" --- no match.
"women shouldn't be in power" ----- no match.

But when I entered the following keywords in the search box of the forum:
"women in power" it brought a few matches, mind you not this thread.
LOL
Are you being sabotaged from within?

Post: #34

Conservatives love Thatcher despite the fact that Britain today is a deindustrialized, finance-dependent, fiscally insolvent, culturally depraved, immigrant overrun, post-Christian atheistic, gay marriage approving shadow of itself. Without a doubt the woman set a precedent for *clowns* like Blair and Cameron. And for what? A country in a double or triple dip recession.

The Brits needed a strongman like Enoch Powell.

Post: #35

You aussies really can't tie your bitches down can you?

Post: #36

(02-23-2013 01:05 AM)Vacancier Permanent Wrote:  Didn't want to open a new thread so I'm posting this in here as to one more, albeit humorous, example of why women are not fit for any position of power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...nxS7_aMU#!

Post: #37

(02-23-2013 01:05 AM)Vacancier Permanent Wrote:  Didn't want to open a new thread so I'm posting this in here as to one more, albeit humorous, example of why women are not fit for any position of power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...nxS7_aMU#!

Btw, Roosh, your forum platform is feminist! Seriously, I tried doing a search for this thread using the following keywords as I couldn't remember the exact title of the thread:

"why women shouldn't be in power" --- no match.
"women shouldn't be in power" ----- no match.

But when I entered the following keywords in the search box of the forum:
"women in power" it brought a few matches, mind you not this thread.
LOL
Are you being sabotaged from within?

It's pains me that someone like that has the same amount of voting power as I do.

Post: #38

http://allthingsd.com/20130222/yahoo-ceo...?mod=tweet

According to numerous sources, Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer has instituted a HR plan today to require Yahoo employees who work remotely to relocate to company facilities. The move will apparently impact several hundred employees, who must either comply without exception or presumably quit. It impacts workers such as customer service reps, who perhaps work from home or an office in another city where Yahoo does not have one. Many such staffers who wrote me today are angry, because they felt they were initially hired with the assumption that they could work more flexibly. Not so, as it turns out. A Yahoo spokesperson said the company does not comment on internal matters.

WIA

Post: #39

(02-23-2013 03:24 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  http://allthingsd.com/20130222/yahoo-ceo...?mod=tweet

According to numerous sources, Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer has instituted a HR plan today to require Yahoo employees who work remotely to relocate to company facilities. The move will apparently impact several hundred employees, who must either comply without exception or presumably quit. It impacts workers such as customer service reps, who perhaps work from home or an office in another city where Yahoo does not have one. Many such staffers who wrote me today are angry, because they felt they were initially hired with the assumption that they could work more flexibly. Not so, as it turns out. A Yahoo spokesperson said the company does not comment on internal matters.

WIA

Post: #40

I present another example.

Money moment happens at around 1:05

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2196026685001...=obnetwork

Congresswoman estimates a job loss number due to the sequester that's 30-40 million higher than the total amount of jobs in this country

Post: #41

This speech prompted a change in the definition of misogyny.

Quote:Prime Minister Julia Gillard's fiery speech about sexism and misogyny has even forced the word watchers to take note.

The Macquarie Dictionary has announced it is broadening the definition of the word "misogyny".

As it stands, the reference book says misogyny is a hatred of women, the kind that's pathological.

But editor Sue Butler says it's time that changed to reflect what Ms Gillard really meant last week when she accused Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of sexism and misogyny during a speech to parliament.

ot that he needs a session on the psychiatrist's couch, but that he merely has an "entrenched prejudice against women".

That will be the official second definition in the next updated edition of the dictionary.

"We decided that we had the basic definition, hatred of women, but that's not how misogyny has been used for about the last 20, 30 years, particularly in feminist language," Ms Butler told ABC radio on Wednesday.

"Sexist does seem to be moving towards this description of surface features and misogynist applies to the underlying attitude."

http://www.smh.com.au/national/misogyny-...z2MKovQW45

In other words, rather than correct her improper use of the word, they change the meaning of the word to suit her.

Post: #42

It's pretty sickening to watch this uppity twat have a tantrum and lecture the country about misogyny on the tax payer's dime. More sickening that she likely considers this the most important issue. More sickening still that these "men" likely agree with her.

Post: #43

(01-24-2013 12:04 AM)Huck Finn Wrote:  I live in Oz atm and have lived here since she was elected. The general consensus here is she is the worst leader Australia and possibly the world has ever seen. Her opponent actually received more votes than here but she won office due to garbage system.

Faceplant...

A very poor excuse for a human:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Julia-Gill...6265642512

"Lifes about, shooting your load"

Post: #44

As of yesterday, the conservative leader in Australia was a media-vilified and unapologetic right-winger: anti-tax, anti-immigration, monarchist, devout Roman Catholic, anti-abortion, enviro-sceptic, a bit of a male chauvinist and lad's lad. Today, he's the Prime Minister-elect with a thumping parliamentary majority. Principle over pander.

Post: #45

He's a damn ugly cunt. At least he can't possibly fuck up as badly as the last 4 year fiasco

EDIT: Just came across this lol

Post: #46

(01-24-2013 12:04 AM)Huck Finn Wrote:  I live in Oz atm and have lived here since she was elected. The general consensus here is she is the worst leader Australia and possibly the world has ever seen. Her opponent actually received more votes than here but she won office due to garbage system.

Faceplant...

Wow, she basically blames the patriarchy for forcing her to wear heels.

Post: #47

Leftist Australians that I know are going apeshit on Facebook right now, saying that Rupert Murdoch washed Australians' brains and that "people with low IQ shouldn't be allowed to vote" (I'm sure the irony of clamoring for something that might usually be proposed by the right is obvious).

Post: #48

(02-09-2013 05:28 PM)Walderschmidt Wrote:  

(01-23-2013 03:10 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  We should compile a list of women not cut out for power. There was the woman who took over Hewlett-Packard and ran it into the ground, Tina Brown who took over Newsweek, after which it stopped its print edition...

How about all of them?

The only woman I've heard of who was a good leader was Queen Boudica. Her tribe was absorbed into the Roman Empire, though.

Queen Elizabeth I?

Once every few hundred years, a competent woman who is fit to lead actually comes along. We just have to not make the mistake of electing someone(man or woman) who isn't fit to lead.

Post: #49

(01-24-2013 01:54 AM)TheRookie Wrote:  Except for the staying with Bill thing during the Lewinsky scandal...that was beta.


This is the last place I thought I'd see praise for an Alinksyite gradualist, Fabian, bloodthirsty, lesbian, domineering, gun-grabbing, social engineering, suitpant-wearing female.

That was a pretty good tirade except the gun grabbing sounds a little fringy. I live in California, pinko ground zero (And by far the state whose residents obtain the most patents) and I get a weekly circular from a gun shop stuffed in my mailbox whether I like it or not advertising enough firepower to kill everyone in Benghazi.

"The gun grabbers are after us!! The gun grabbers are after us!!"

"But you can buy as many guns as you want, just not full auto. You want to buy rocket launchers and AA too? "

"But they're THINKING about grabbing my guns!!!! They're even TALKING about it and putting it up for a vote in the legislatures!!!!!"

"Well, the freedom to think, speak freely, and to have a democratic process is what the guns supposedly are here to protect, right?"

Post: #50

(09-08-2013 11:11 AM)Hencredible Casanova Wrote:  As of yesterday, the conservative leader in Australia was a media-vilified and unapologetic right-winger: anti-tax, anti-immigration, monarchist, devout Roman Catholic, anti-abortion, enviro-sceptic, a bit of a male chauvinist and lad's lad.

I doubt any major party in Australia will put forth a female leader for a few decades now, particularly as our ex-PM lost the female voting block by playing the misogyny card.

Here's a true feminist point of view from her:

Quote:''If I was the first indigenous prime minister, and (Tony) Abbott had gone out and stood next to a sign that said, 'Ditch the black bastard', I reckon that would be the end of a political career,'' Ms Gillard said.

''And it's not less because it's gender. But it's been treated as less.''

She's actually comparing her experience and existence whilst suffering some mild verbal slander as a privileged, affluent white woman who ran the country, and who will be subsidised by taxpayer money through a prime ministerial pension for the rest of her life, to that of the reality of life as an aboriginal person. Once again, proving Feminists are spoilt children of privilege who have never suffered true hardship, and are incapable of showing any trace of compassion for those who do.

If you can afford to use an Apple product to blog about social injustice, I have zero sympathy for your point of view. Check your privilege, bitches.