Post: #6001

Been on tinder for about 3 weeks. Complete waste of time.

The attitude of some really average and below average women is astounding.

Got one coffee date out of around 20 conversations where it's mostly up to you as the guy to drive/force the conversation. The women make no effort and ask zero questions. At any point they can stop replying completely or delete you.

I'm going to stick to day game. Way easier and far more fun.

Post: #6002

(04-25-2017 07:20 PM)Mig Picante Wrote:  Been on tinder for about 3 weeks. Complete waste of time.

The attitude of some really average and below average women is astounding.

Got one coffee date out of around 20 conversations where it's mostly up to you as the guy to drive/force the conversation. The women make no effort and ask zero questions. At any point they can stop replying completely or delete you.

I'm going to stick to day game. Way easier and far more fun.

My experience exactly alike.

Post: #6003

(04-25-2017 07:33 PM)ksbms Wrote:  My experience exactly alike.

Good to know it's not just me then!
I had a short 3 month STR with a young woman I met off bumble in January and a few dates where I would meet for coffee/drink and then go for a walk and make out somewhere with several others. BUT in that time I have turned 35, which i think is now acting against me. I think it puts me in an older bracket that younger women in my target range won't consider. (Most people guess that I'm in my late 20's that I meet in person, so having to enter it in an app is counterproductive.)

Contrast the experience on tinder where I am trying to convince some bored bitch that I am worth responding to, messaging her for several days in a row, often waiting days at a time for a reply. Compare that with day game or being at a bar, where I can walk into a venue, can smile at a woman, with great posture, strong eye contact, good personal style and grooming, talking, joking and laughing with people, flirting and touching.

Tinder is just a crap joke.

It's been a good experience overall. It's re-focused me!
It's reminded me that I need to be out meeting women somewhere else. I have to actively be social. I need to display high value at all times. I need to be overt and gaming women elsewhere and I need to work on myself more.

Pandering to the lowest common denominator on tinder is not the way to go about it!

Post: #6004

(04-25-2017 09:14 PM)Mig Picante Wrote:  

(04-25-2017 07:33 PM)ksbms Wrote:  My experience exactly alike.

Good to know it's not just me then!
I had a short 3 month STR with a young woman I met off bumble in January and a few dates where I would meet for coffee/drink and then go for a walk and make out somewhere with several others. BUT in that time I have turned 35, which i think is now acting against me. I think it puts me in an older bracket that younger women in my target range won't consider. (Most people guess that I'm in my late 20's that I meet in person, so having to enter it in an app is counterproductive.)

Contrast the experience on tinder where I am trying to convince some bored bitch that I am worth responding to, messaging her for several days in a row, often waiting days at a time for a reply. Compare that with day game or being at a bar, where I can walk into a venue, can smile at a woman, with great posture, strong eye contact, good personal style and grooming, talking, joking and laughing with people, flirting and touching.

Tinder is just a crap joke.

It's been a good experience overall. It's re-focused me!
It's reminded me that I need to be out meeting women somewhere else. I have to actively be social. I need to display high value at all times. I need to be overt and gaming women elsewhere and I need to work on myself more.

Pandering to the lowest common denominator on tinder is not the way to go about it!

As a man you will generally fall into one of two categories on tinder. The first is one where you get a ton of matches daily and have a lot of prospects (rare). The other is where you barely get a few matches a day and experience what you talked about (common, and includes me).

The solution is to keep tinder, but to change your perception about it and how you use it. Instead of using tinder to get dates, just get a conversation going with the girls at your leisure, and trying to keep that conversation going over a week or two (or three). Then just invite them over directly or ask them to invite you over (which is better so you don't have crazy randoms at your place).

There was another great post where this strategy was laid out, I just don't remember the name. Apparently you are generally likely to get laid with this strategy as much as you would by endless conversations and stupid dates, but it is a huge time saver.

Post: #6005

(04-25-2017 09:41 PM)StackGsMan Wrote:  

(04-25-2017 09:14 PM)Mig Picante Wrote:  

(04-25-2017 07:33 PM)ksbms Wrote:  My experience exactly alike.

Good to know it's not just me then!
I had a short 3 month STR with a young woman I met off bumble in January and a few dates where I would meet for coffee/drink and then go for a walk and make out somewhere with several others. BUT in that time I have turned 35, which i think is now acting against me. I think it puts me in an older bracket that younger women in my target range won't consider. (Most people guess that I'm in my late 20's that I meet in person, so having to enter it in an app is counterproductive.)

Contrast the experience on tinder where I am trying to convince some bored bitch that I am worth responding to, messaging her for several days in a row, often waiting days at a time for a reply. Compare that with day game or being at a bar, where I can walk into a venue, can smile at a woman, with great posture, strong eye contact, good personal style and grooming, talking, joking and laughing with people, flirting and touching.

Tinder is just a crap joke.

It's been a good experience overall. It's re-focused me!
It's reminded me that I need to be out meeting women somewhere else. I have to actively be social. I need to display high value at all times. I need to be overt and gaming women elsewhere and I need to work on myself more.

Pandering to the lowest common denominator on tinder is not the way to go about it!

As a man you will generally fall into one of two categories on tinder. The first is one where you get a ton of matches daily and have a lot of prospects (rare). The other is where you barely get a few matches a day and experience what you talked about (common, and includes me).

The solution is to keep tinder, but to change your perception about it and how you use it. Instead of using tinder to get dates, just get a conversation going with the girls at your leisure, and trying to keep that conversation going over a week or two (or three). Then just invite them over directly or ask them to invite you over (which is better so you don't have crazy randoms at your place).

There was another great post where this strategy was laid out, I just don't remember the name. Apparently you are generally likely to get laid with this strategy as much as you would by endless conversations and stupid dates, but it is a huge time saver.

Can anyone elaborate on this? Because I think I am done with the whole dating thing with tinder for a couple of months, it's too much energy for someone who has to commute from the suburbs.

Post: #6006

Just the general rule, women worth it are rarely online, women approached by you and receptive = connection that sets the tone.

Again, it becomes volume and problem of access. Getting lucky with social circle (so increase those chances) or niche is the only hope ... in America.

Time to travel, boys.

Post: #6007

It's called the Zero-Date Bang Method. Search on the forum for it.

Post: #6008

Can't help but notice the trend of many girls advertising in profiles that they're 'sarcastic' (seen this on other services too). Quite the turn off, but perhaps this could be exploited into a neg opener/transitional conversation to get her qualifying. Also pretty sure its been pointed out numerous times in the Online Girl Hamster Thread.

Post: #6009

It is off putting. Someone here explained it as the most accessible (IE low) form of comedy to women.

A woman saying she is fluent in sarcasm is not special or even a positive to me at all. I haven't come up with a good way to neg or use it very much. It's just another sign that a women is shallow and has low self awareness, so basically a basic bitch. It's not even useful for profiling purposes.

If you find some way to use it let me know, because it's on almost every womans profile everywhere on the internet.

Post: #6010

Sarcasm is easy, then you never have to be sincere and risk having your ego trampled.

'Being fluent in sarcasm' isn't a positive for me either.

Post: #6011

Any good openers? I have been out of the tinder game a while and my old opener isnt working as good anymore.

Post: #6012

My tinder game sucks, openers and maintaining conversation is probably the hardest parts.
Any success I've had is where the girl at least meets me halfway and is chatty.
This is on UK tinder too

Post: #6013

(04-29-2017 09:59 AM)TheDuncan Wrote:  Any good openers? I have been out of the tinder game a while and my old opener isnt working as good anymore.

Any reason why you can't change it in a way to make it relevant again.

Post: #6014

I got to the philipines a few days ago and have a bunch of girls from pipelining beforehand, but the app won't work here. I've reinstalled a bunch of times. Very frustrating.
It's bizarre.

Post: #6015

I have not had much success with Tinder over the past year.

Many experienced forummembers are saying the same thing.

This thread has slowed down bigly.

Is Tinder cashed?

Post: #6016

Nah I'm still getting 1-2 dates a week with almost 0 effort on my part, but the trick is as always... LOCATION. I've done a lot of GPS spoofing with tinder, and it works great in some places, and sucks just in the neighboring city.

If you are lucky to be in a place where tinder works well, you have tight logistics (live in the city center 20 meters from a subway station you can meet the girl at) and invite them directly to your place (my "homemade sangria" always get's a positive answer), it's a great way to get pussy delivered at your door with no effort.

If you live in the suburbs though... yeah, I can imagine tinder not being worth the effort. I've said it before on this thread... TINDER IS NOT TO GET DATES. You are supposed to find the DTF ones and invite them over after 4 or 5 messages maximum.

As for openers, I've been getting lazy and just sending the giff of the koala winking and saying SUP GIRL. Cheesy, but get's a high response rate. 18-21 girls can't resist a cute koala.

Post: #6017

Yeah, Tinder has gone to shits. It always was going to. As water is wet.

Post: #6018

I don't know if many guys were using an older version of tinder to see when girls were last online, but that "hack" seems to have been shut down about 1-2 months ago. So there is really no more point in using the old version of the app, except for MAYBE the possibility to use the old version to allow you to phone verify your account by adding an extra digit to the phone # if you are unable to receive the verification text message when you delete and re-install tinder (for whatever reason). I made an old post about this in this thread, but basically if your # is 555-555-5555 you could enter 555-555-55551 and verify your account bypassing tinder's spam filter or whatever. This might still be possible by downloading tinder 4.3.4 apk instead of the current version. Otherwise there is no point to using an old version.

*Next, as for spoofing location, bluestacks on windows still works for changing your location, but most/all of the "fake gps" apps don't seem to work any more (and haven't for a long tme) for android or iphone. download bluestacks on pc. go to app store and download tinder. go into the location provider app, set location, and THEN open and login to tinder app or it will not work correctly. I still use bluestacks for pre "traveling" purposes even with paid tinder.


If anyone has any other "helper" app suggestions please post them up!


So there has been a lot of down talking in this thread ("tinder has gone to shit"), and while I do agree with a lot of what is being said, I think it's just as important to realize that lots of guys are getting laid off of tinder, and if you set yourself apart from the masses it's still going to work just fine... (as in there are still hot girls who are using it to fuck guys).

For me it has continued to be pretty good, especially for banging younger girls in the 18-22 range and foreigners. It seems like a good avenue for these girls to "explore" the idea of older men (could replace "old" with any other niche also, for one example, bsdm) without any judgement.

It can be aggravating if you're not getting a lot of responses to your messages... but just fire out your messages (spend 5-15min a day) and move along.

*I have 2 strategies I try to use with pretty good success. for girls with low investment (1 word replies, or nothing substantial) I don't reply for 2-3 days or a week or more, and I try to set something up over the course of 2-3 weeks.

Even if the girl responds quickly to my message, I still use the delayed reply strategy unless I really think it's possible to get her over quickly and she seems dtf (same or next day) and even then (for me) the conversion to fucking these low commitment girls...even if I do hang out with the girl and think all is going well ...is low (when I am pushing for it).

IF the girl replies with something substantial, I try to reply more quickly, engage/challenge her, and then set up a meet up (either "adventure" or drinks or right to my/her place) within 1-4 days or so.

With the 18-20 crowd unless I can tell the girl really likes drinking/smoking weed, I pitch an "adventure" type "date" for some day about 1-4 days in the future.

*ALSO, I no longer really worry if a girl doesn't reply to my messages. 2-3 days, or a week later, I will send a 2nd opener, or a teasing comment or something like that. A couple of times now I've sent 3-4 messages over the course of a month with no response, finally she replies, we met up, and I banged her. Of course this is probably the exception but knowing how many messages these girls get (I've seen their tinders) it's not really coming across as too "try hard" any more. You just have to assume your message might not have even been read the first few time, she read it and couldn't come up with anything to say (you know you have done that yourself) so she put it off and then your message got burred or more likely she was interested in some other guy at the time.

*As I said when I made a post about my "strategy" quite awhile back in this thread, I still think it is MOST important to look at more than one picture, read the profile. As a bonus the fake profiles become really obvious, work/school & profile text is unrelated to the location you are in (typically hot girl, usually 4 pictures, often look like they could be from a photoshoot).

Look at all the pics and decide if she is really bang-able instead of just trying to swipe quickly through girls and unmatch the fatties later. I don't get a lot of matches, maybe 1-5 per day, but if I mass swipe right, or often even if I am just going by the 1st picture... I still get the same # of matches per day, but the quality is terrible. I think setting your distance to 20 miles or less, preferably, and going through enough profiles to swipe right 10-50(?) or so times per day seems to be the sweet spot.

So let's say with this strategy you invest 15minutes per day on average, and I've been able to average 1 new notch per 1-2 weeks. This number hasn't really fallen off, for me, although I have definitely taken time off from tinder at times due to being too busy or whatever.... and I am happy with these results. It works even better for me when I travel to a new city and get the resulting "boost". It beats night game and other dating sites (for me, in my location), and about the same or better than day game, as far as time invested per bang.


*I'm not sure how it plays out in the largest cities, but in even mid sized cities, even with tinder plus you are probably going to run out of profiles "There's no one new around you." So I set my age range 18-55 a lot of the time and that way I have more to swipe "no" to... I think this might improve my "tinder score" but who really knows.

*Said this before, but, especially if you are older it's important to use your super like/s. I use them on 18-19 year old's. If some girl is 18 she most likely has her age range set 19-23 or something like that. In that case if your age is 30, she will never get shown your profile at all, unless you super like her, in which case it shows up pretty close to the top of her "stack" of profiles. I have confirmed this. Same thing I suppose applies if you are younger and looking for older women.

*Regarding changing your age. Don't be afraid to do it and see what results you get. But be aware that facebook only let's you change your age once (or once/twice per 90 days/6 months or something like that) You may want to start a new "fake"/private facebook for using tinder anyways. If you are signing up for tinder plus, set your age/date of birth below 28, and you will pay significantly less. Then you can change it (one time) in facebook to above 28 if desired.

I felt bad about putting a significantly younger age in the past, but I met up with a girl recently who thought I was going to be 24 (I'm obviously a lot older in photos, and alluded to it in the profile, so I don't know what she was thinking). The topic didn't come up for awhile, and when she tried to call me out on it, I just had her try to guess my age and then said something along the lines of "oops.. I didn't realize it said that...my friends just set the tinder thing up for me as a joke" and we were banging 15-20 minutes later anyways.

Post: #6019

Dirty_old, your strategy above sounds legit. I am personally trying out something similar, the Zero Date Bang strategy. The best results I got from tinder with my old strategy of treating it like a girl that I met in real time only got me several dates with what I consider defective chicks and 2 straight to sex girls.

I won't go out of my way to meet up with a tinder girl now unless I've spoken to her and she has been responsive for at least a week or two.

Post: #6020

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  I don't know if many guys were using an older version of tinder to see when girls were last online, but that "hack" seems to have been shut down about 1-2 months ago. So there is really no more point in using the old version of the app, except for MAYBE the possibility to use the old version to allow you to phone verify your account by adding an extra digit to the phone # if you are unable to receive the verification text message when you delete and re-install tinder (for whatever reason). I made an old post about this in this thread, but basically if your # is 555-555-5555 you could enter 555-555-55551 and verify your account bypassing tinder's spam filter or whatever. This might still be possible by downloading tinder 4.3.4 apk instead of the current version. Otherwise there is no point to using an old version.

*Next, as for spoofing location, bluestacks on windows still works for changing your location, but most/all of the "fake gps" apps don't seem to work any more (and haven't for a long tme) for android or iphone. download bluestacks on pc. go to app store and download tinder. go into the location provider app, set location, and THEN open and login to tinder app or it will not work correctly. I still use bluestacks for pre "traveling" purposes even with paid tinder.


If anyone has any other "helper" app suggestions please post them up!


So there has been a lot of down talking in this thread ("tinder has gone to shit"), and while I do agree with a lot of what is being said, I think it's just as important to realize that lots of guys are getting laid off of tinder, and if you set yourself apart from the masses it's still going to work just fine... (as in there are still hot girls who are using it to fuck guys).

For me it has continued to be pretty good, especially for banging younger girls in the 18-22 range and foreigners. It seems like a good avenue for these girls to "explore" the idea of older men (could replace "old" with any other niche also, for one example, bsdm) without any judgement.

It can be aggravating if you're not getting a lot of responses to your messages... but just fire out your messages (spend 5-15min a day) and move along.

*I have 2 strategies I try to use with pretty good success. for girls with low investment (1 word replies, or nothing substantial) I don't reply for 2-3 days or a week or more, and I try to set something up over the course of 2-3 weeks.

Even if the girl responds quickly to my message, I still use the delayed reply strategy unless I really think it's possible to get her over quickly and she seems dtf (same or next day) and even then (for me) the conversion to fucking these low commitment girls...even if I do hang out with the girl and think all is going well ...is low (when I am pushing for it).

IF the girl replies with something substantial, I try to reply more quickly, engage/challenge her, and then set up a meet up (either "adventure" or drinks or right to my/her place) within 1-4 days or so.

With the 18-20 crowd unless I can tell the girl really likes drinking/smoking weed, I pitch an "adventure" type "date" for some day about 1-4 days in the future.

*ALSO, I no longer really worry if a girl doesn't reply to my messages. 2-3 days, or a week later, I will send a 2nd opener, or a teasing comment or something like that. A couple of times now I've sent 3-4 messages over the course of a month with no response, finally she replies, we met up, and I banged her. Of course this is probably the exception but knowing how many messages these girls get (I've seen their tinders) it's not really coming across as too "try hard" any more. You just have to assume your message might not have even been read the first few time, she read it and couldn't come up with anything to say (you know you have done that yourself) so she put it off and then your message got burred or more likely she was interested in some other guy at the time.

*As I said when I made a post about my "strategy" quite awhile back in this thread, I still think it is MOST important to look at more than one picture, read the profile. As a bonus the fake profiles become really obvious, work/school & profile text is unrelated to the location you are in (typically hot girl, usually 4 pictures, often look like they could be from a photoshoot).

Look at all the pics and decide if she is really bang-able instead of just trying to swipe quickly through girls and unmatch the fatties later. I don't get a lot of matches, maybe 1-5 per day, but if I mass swipe right, or often even if I am just going by the 1st picture... I still get the same # of matches per day, but the quality is terrible. I think setting your distance to 20 miles or less, preferably, and going through enough profiles to swipe right 10-50(?) or so times per day seems to be the sweet spot.

So let's say with this strategy you invest 15minutes per day on average, and I've been able to average 1 new notch per 1-2 weeks. This number hasn't really fallen off, for me, although I have definitely taken time off from tinder at times due to being too busy or whatever.... and I am happy with these results. It works even better for me when I travel to a new city and get the resulting "boost". It beats night game and other dating sites (for me, in my location), and about the same or better than day game, as far as time invested per bang.


*I'm not sure how it plays out in the largest cities, but in even mid sized cities, even with tinder plus you are probably going to run out of profiles "There's no one new around you." So I set my age range 18-55 a lot of the time and that way I have more to swipe "no" to... I think this might improve my "tinder score" but who really knows.

*Said this before, but, especially if you are older it's important to use your super like/s. I use them on 18-19 year old's. If some girl is 18 she most likely has her age range set 19-23 or something like that. In that case if your age is 30, she will never get shown your profile at all, unless you super like her, in which case it shows up pretty close to the top of her "stack" of profiles. I have confirmed this. Same thing I suppose applies if you are younger and looking for older women.

*Regarding changing your age. Don't be afraid to do it and see what results you get. But be aware that facebook only let's you change your age once (or once/twice per 90 days/6 months or something like that) You may want to start a new "fake"/private facebook for using tinder anyways. If you are signing up for tinder plus, set your age/date of birth below 28, and you will pay significantly less. Then you can change it (one time) in facebook to above 28 if desired.

I felt bad about putting a significantly younger age in the past, but I met up with a girl recently who thought I was going to be 24 (I'm obviously a lot older in photos, and alluded to it in the profile, so I don't know what she was thinking). The topic didn't come up for awhile, and when she tried to call me out on it, I just had her try to guess my age and then said something along the lines of "oops.. I didn't realize it said that...my friends just set the tinder thing up for me as a joke" and we were banging 15-20 minutes later anyways.

Thanks for sharing. How many bangs from Tinder this year? Just curious.

Post: #6021

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  So there has been a lot of down talking in this thread ("tinder has gone to shit"), and while I do agree with a lot of what is being said, I think it's just as important to realize that lots of guys are getting laid off of tinder, and if you set yourself apart from the masses it's still going to work just fine... (as in there are still hot girls who are using it to fuck guys).

+1

Excellent positive and realistic take on what works on Tinder. Welcome takedown of the relentless "Tinder is Dead" nattering.

Post: #6022

...
First useful, positive post in this thread for some time. Thank you. Couple thoughts/questions.

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  I don't know if many guys were using an older version of tinder to see when girls were last online, but that "hack" seems to have been shut down about 1-2 months ago.

Confirmed. I was using flamite and then tind3r on Chrome and the "last logon" feature stopped working on both. Apparently there was a change to the Tinder API that disabled this feature. There was dev chatter on tind3r to that effect.

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  I still use bluestacks for pre "traveling" purposes even with paid tinder.

Why? Why not change location via tinder plus?

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  So there has been a lot of down talking in this thread ("tinder has gone to shit"), and while I do agree with a lot of what is being said, I think it's just as important to realize that lots of guys are getting laid off of tinder, and if you set yourself apart from the masses it's still going to work just fine... (as in there are still hot girls who are using it to fuck guys).

Concur. Appreciate the constructive positive approach.

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  For me it has continued to be pretty good, especially for banging younger girls in the 18-22 range and foreigners. It seems like a good avenue for these girls to "explore" the idea of older men (could replace "old" with any other niche also, for one example, bsdm) without any judgement.

How old are you?

I am mid fifties and consistently matching 18-38, but have not (yet) had success getting anyone under 27 out.

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  *I have 2 strategies I try to use with pretty good success. for girls with low investment (1 word replies, or nothing substantial) I don't reply for 2-3 days or a week or more, and I try to set something up over the course of 2-3 weeks.

Even if the girl responds quickly to my message, I still use the delayed reply strategy unless I really think it's possible to get her over quickly and she seems dtf (same or next day) and even then (for me) the conversion to fucking these low commitment girls...even if I do hang out with the girl and think all is going well ...is low (when I am pushing for it).

IF the girl replies with something substantial, I try to reply more quickly, engage/challenge her, and then set up a meet up (either "adventure" or drinks or right to my/her place) within 1-4 days or so.

How are you defining "substantial"?

With what do you re-open open your second or third attempt?

I think your observation is spot on, btw. In going back through all my convos, the ones that resulted in dates/bangs ALL started with the girl substantially and quickly engaging in the conversation, asking questions, being playful, etc.

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  With the 18-20 crowd unless I can tell the girl really likes drinking/smoking weed, I pitch an "adventure" type "date" for some day about 1-4 days in the future.

What are your "Go-To" adventure dates?

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  *ALSO, I no longer really worry if a girl doesn't reply to my messages. 2-3 days, or a week later, I will send a 2nd opener, or a teasing comment or something like that. A couple of times now I've sent 3-4 messages over the course of a month with no response, finally she replies, we met up, and I banged her. Of course this is probably the exception but knowing how many messages these girls get (I've seen their tinders) it's not really coming across as too "try hard" any more. You just have to assume your message might not have even been read the first few time, she read it and couldn't come up with anything to say (you know you have done that yourself) so she put it off and then your message got burred or more likely she was interested in some other guy at the time.

Have you noticed any correlation between the amount of time that elapses between initial match/contact and restart and outcome?

I have seen it argued elsewhere that women go on Tinder (et al) and engage when they are at the horniest point in their cycle and that re-starting 28 days after the initial interaction can be a useful strategy. I think I have seen this happen a couple times, but do not have enough data to tell for sure.

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  *As I said when I made a post about my "strategy" quite awhile back in this thread, I still think it is MOST important to look at more than one picture, read the profile. As a bonus the fake profiles become really obvious, work/school & profile text is unrelated to the location you are in (typically hot girl, usually 4 pictures, often look like they could be from a photoshoot).

Look at all the pics and decide if she is really bang-able instead of just trying to swipe quickly through girls and unmatch the fatties later. I don't get a lot of matches, maybe 1-5 per day, but if I mass swipe right, or often even if I am just going by the 1st picture... I still get the same # of matches per day, but the quality is terrible. I think setting your distance to 20 miles or less, preferably, and going through enough profiles to swipe right 10-50(?) or so times per day seems to be the sweet spot.

My teenage son (who has 1000+ matches) says any girl with A) only head shots, or B) no bio is an automatic left swipe. Thoughts?

(05-06-2017 08:42 PM)dirty_old Wrote:  *Regarding changing your age. Don't be afraid to do it and see what results you get. But be aware that facebook only let's you change your age once (or once/twice per 90 days/6 months or something like that) You may want to start a new "fake"/private facebook for using tinder anyways. If you are signing up for tinder plus, set your age/date of birth below 28, and you will pay significantly less. Then you can change it (one time) in facebook to above 28 if desired.

I felt bad about putting a significantly younger age in the past, but I met up with a girl recently who thought I was going to be 24 (I'm obviously a lot older in photos, and alluded to it in the profile, so I don't know what she was thinking). The topic didn't come up for awhile, and when she tried to call me out on it, I just had her try to guess my age and then said something along the lines of "oops.. I didn't realize it said that...my friends just set the tinder thing up for me as a joke" and we were banging 15-20 minutes later anyways.

How much of an age gap do you routinely run?

I am 100% straight on this, except the same wrt weight/whaleness from women, and have read elsewhere that age deceipt blows up dates. Apparently not for you...

Post: #6023

Lol, anyone trying to vindicate this app in 'the current year' is downright making apologetics. Sure there might be some convoluted manner in which it can be salvaged (location dependent), but give it 6 months before even those methods dry up. It's over. It's been over for a while. But it was officially over when armies of simps started paying random chicks $5 for... apparently nothing in return.

Post: #6024

Tinder isn't dead, but it certainly isn't what it used to be. I know, people have been saying this years, but now I think its really true.

If you don't pay for Boosts, Tinder is useless.

Even when you run boost now, it isn't as effective as it once was.

Post: #6025

(05-07-2017 11:48 AM)ziggystardust Wrote:  Sure there might be some convoluted manner in which it can be salvaged (location dependent), but give it 6 months before even those methods dry up.