Post: #151

(01-07-2013 10:33 PM)houston Wrote:  Damn. I went there a few years ago, wasnt making shit and still had to pay around $120. I dont remember if they made me bring a check stub.

There's no check stub to bring in if you tell them you don't have a job

This only works with getting a STD test. You still have to pay $30 (at least in LA and Vegas) to get a morning after pill, even if you say you're unemployed. Girls can get them for free if they say they have no money, but guys can't unless your girls comes along.

Post: #152

I thought there was no downside to raw dogging.
now I got that super gonorrhea that is resistant to antibiotics

Post: #153

Regarding the Antibiotic Resistant Clap...

Quote:Out of 133 of those patients who returned to the facilities during the study for a follow-up visit that tested whether or not they had been cured of the infection, an alleged 6.7 percent still had the disease, even after successful administration of the antibiotic treatments.

The CDC is now recommending a dual treatment that combines an injection of one drug taken in tandem with a week-long course of oral antibiotics, in light of the increased prevalence of stronger and more resilient forms of gonorrhea.

Seems like they'll figure it out.

Post: #154

In honor of this thread I returned a pack of condoms yesterday.

Post: #155

The threat of HIV against straight western men is overblown.

Other stuff, not so much. I always wrap that shit up unless I know she's been tested recently (blood test too, not just a smear).

Herp for life ain't worth it. Molluscum is also vile.

Post: #156

(01-10-2013 11:16 AM)slubu Wrote:  In honor of this thread I returned a pack of condoms yesterday.

...Were they used?

Post: #157

Yeah, I'd rather not get something...

Post: #158

(01-09-2013 08:20 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  I thought there was no downside to raw dogging.
now I got that super gonorrhea that is resistant to antibiotics

Try the herb "Golden Seal"!

or the others mentioned in this article.

http://www.ehow.com/about_6168005_herbal...rhea_.html

Post: #159

I just fucked this girl raw, and while I didn't blow my big load in her, there was a couple of moments where something little spurted out. What do you guys think as far pregnancy odds go? Is it just the main load that needs extra caution?

Post: #160

Unless you're super potent, or extremely unlucky, you shouldn't have to worry much. Try make sure she's on the pill before you neglect your condoms though imo

Post: #161

(01-11-2013 04:14 AM)soup Wrote:  I just fucked this girl raw, and while I didn't blow my big load in her, there was a couple of moments where something little spurted out. What do you guys think as far pregnancy odds go? Is it just the main load that needs extra caution?

If you've washed and urinated, it appears that on round one you are sterile:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12762415

There was a recent study which shows that you have 37% chance of donating sperm, but I've only access to the abstract and from the abstract it appears to be a very oddly designed study. They took 40 samples from 27 men, but some of the men gave 5 samples. Sounds like they were desperate to prove something. I also don't know if they checked for confounding factors (like whether the guy had sex just before the study)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21155689

Lastly, after you've come, you can carry sperm in your penis for up to 5 hours afterwards, so assumably they would be hanging around your penile head for easy donation. So you can't go back in for round 2 without wrapping up.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889505

Post: #162

(01-11-2013 04:46 AM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 04:14 AM)soup Wrote:  I just fucked this girl raw, and while I didn't blow my big load in her, there was a couple of moments where something little spurted out. What do you guys think as far pregnancy odds go? Is it just the main load that needs extra caution?

If you've washed and urinated, it appears that on round one you are sterile:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12762415

There was a recent study which shows that you have 37% chance of donating sperm, but I've only access to the abstract and from the abstract it appears to be a very oddly designed study. They took 40 samples from 27 men, but some of the men gave 5 samples. Sounds like they were desperate to prove something. I also don't know if they checked for confounding factors (like whether the guy had sex just before the study)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21155689

Lastly, after you've come, you can carry sperm in your penis for up to 5 hours afterwards, so assumably they would be hanging around your penile head for easy donation. So you can't go back in for round 2 without wrapping up.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889505

Yes, but your first point is at odds with the third.

Also, what if the girl sucks you off for a while before you go in for round two raw? Is she sucking out the sperm that would have been hanging out at your dickhead for deposit?

Post: #163

(01-11-2013 04:52 AM)soup Wrote:  Yes, but your first point is at odds with the third.

Also, what if the girl sucks you off for a while before you go in for round two raw? Is she sucking out the sperm that would have been hanging out at your dickhead for deposit?

What the third point states is that after you've ejaculated, you are going to have sperm leaking out of you for up to 5 hours, especially if you don't wash up and you don't urinate.

I'm not aware of any scientific studies regarding sucking, but I'd imagine that the typical girl does not have enough suction power to completely clear your urethral shaft of sperm. I'd say if you come, then she licks you clean, and then go in raw, then you are still donating some sperm through leakage of your urethral shaft. The thing is designed, after all, to let stuff out.

This appears to be why in point 2 the researchers still found sperm, but I don't have access to the full research paper, so I can't say.

Post: #164

(01-10-2013 12:23 PM)Architekt Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 11:16 AM)slubu Wrote:  In honor of this thread I returned a pack of condoms yesterday.

...Were they used?

Ha, well then that would defeat the purpose of this thread.

(01-11-2013 04:14 AM)soup Wrote:  I just fucked this girl raw, and while I didn't blow my big load in her, there was a couple of moments where something little spurted out. What do you guys think as far pregnancy odds go? Is it just the main load that needs extra caution?

Doesn't matter had sex? But honestly no, I do it all the time and no preggers yet.

(01-11-2013 04:46 AM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 04:14 AM)soup Wrote:  I just fucked this girl raw, and while I didn't blow my big load in her, there was a couple of moments where something little spurted out. What do you guys think as far pregnancy odds go? Is it just the main load that needs extra caution?

If you've washed and urinated, it appears that on round one you are sterile:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12762415

Best news I heard all day.

Post: #165

(01-11-2013 05:50 AM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 04:52 AM)soup Wrote:  Yes, but your first point is at odds with the third.

Also, what if the girl sucks you off for a while before you go in for round two raw? Is she sucking out the sperm that would have been hanging out at your dickhead for deposit?

What the third point states is that after you've ejaculated, you are going to have sperm leaking out of you for up to 5 hours, especially if you don't wash up and you don't urinate.

I'm not aware of any scientific studies regarding sucking, but I'd imagine that the typical girl does not have enough suction power to completely clear your urethral shaft of sperm. I'd say if you come, then she licks you clean, and then go in raw, then you are still donating some sperm through leakage of your urethral shaft. The thing is designed, after all, to let stuff out.

This appears to be why in point 2 the researchers still found sperm, but I don't have access to the full research paper, so I can't say.

I realize that there are probably a lot of scientific studies that don't get funded because they are un-PC, but should they at least do a test to see a woman-propelled blowjob would slurp leftover sperms? I think this would make a lot of us raw-doggers feel better about our ways.

Post: #166

How do STDs break down by age? Are college-age women more likely to have something? With young women, on one hand I think they have had less time to ride the cock carousel than some 40 year old cougar so maybe they are less likely to have something like herpes or hep. But at the same time, if they're in college and partying they may be slutting around a lot.

Post: #167

a cougar may have been in a monogamous relationship for decades and thus have less experience than some slutty college girl

Post: #168

I don't raw dog because I'm afraid of herpes, not AIDS..

Post: #169

So, based on my own scientific experiment with 40 bangs last year (and other various blow jobs, rollover bangs from past years, and many more kissing sessions, etc.), a lot of them raw-dogged and of varying walks of life, and blood tests that came back this week with no STDs, I'm beginning to err on the side of seeing raw-dog as something that is not as dangerous as society would want men to think.

Post: #170

(01-20-2013 12:28 PM)soup Wrote:  So, based on my own scientific experiment with 40 bangs last year (and other various blow jobs, rollover bangs from past years, and many more kissing sessions, etc.), a lot of them raw-dogged and of varying walks of life, and blood tests that came back this week with no STDs, I'm beginning to err on the side of seeing raw-dog as something that is not as dangerous as society would want men to think.

Post: #171

(01-20-2013 12:28 PM)soup Wrote:  So, based on my own scientific experiment with 40 bangs last year (and other various blow jobs, rollover bangs from past years, and many more kissing sessions, etc.), a lot of them raw-dogged and of varying walks of life, and blood tests that came back this week with no STDs, I'm beginning to err on the side of seeing raw-dog as something that is not as dangerous as society would want men to think.

except for the risk of babies

Post: #172

(01-20-2013 02:11 PM)jammer Wrote:  

(01-20-2013 12:28 PM)soup Wrote:  So, based on my own scientific experiment with 40 bangs last year (and other various blow jobs, rollover bangs from past years, and many more kissing sessions, etc.), a lot of them raw-dogged and of varying walks of life, and blood tests that came back this week with no STDs, I'm beginning to err on the side of seeing raw-dog as something that is not as dangerous as society would want men to think.

except for the risk of babies

Not really in NYC. These are almost all career girls, not backwoods religious fanatics.

Post: #173

(01-20-2013 02:23 PM)soup Wrote:  

(01-20-2013 02:11 PM)jammer Wrote:  

(01-20-2013 12:28 PM)soup Wrote:  So, based on my own scientific experiment with 40 bangs last year (and other various blow jobs, rollover bangs from past years, and many more kissing sessions, etc.), a lot of them raw-dogged and of varying walks of life, and blood tests that came back this week with no STDs, I'm beginning to err on the side of seeing raw-dog as something that is not as dangerous as society would want men to think.

except for the risk of babies

Not really in NYC. These are almost all career girls, not backwoods religious fanatics.

Even is she's a career girl I don't see how you could feel sure that she would get an abortion. Sure, they don't want to lose their career and it's not in their best interest to have a kid, but since when can you count on women to be logical?

Post: #174

Yeah, I have heard the argument that STD risks are overblown but people know many guys who have gotten girls knocked up....

Post: #175

I think there is a genetic component that must be considered regarding herpes.

I think some people are genetically predisposed to becoming infected with herpes and will probably get it at some point no matter how careful they are. Other people are not predisposed and won't become infected even if they are exposed to the virus over and over.

I have not seen any studies that make me draw this conclusion. I've just heard anecdotal reports of some people having raw sex with countless people and never getting herpes. Others get herpes after having sex just a few times with very few partners.

I sometimes wonder if genetics is more of a factor in being infected with incurable STDs rather than consistency of condom use.