Post: #51

85% of women would be happier staying at home with kids an doing part time job.

Post: #52

Post: #53

Fertile Women of childbearing age should not be allowed to have a career until they have produced at least two children (preferably three) preferably from the same man and in a marriage, and brought them up. Only once beyond their child rearing years and the kids are independent should the woman start her career. They may have a part time job, but only during the kids school hours.

That is the only way to reverse the decline in western civilisation.

Post: #54

(11-26-2015 04:21 PM)The Father Wrote:  

(12-23-2012 03:22 PM)Gaston Wrote:  In EE/FSU women do jobs, not careers. And only if they are lucky, or connected.

That wasn't my experience when I lived there. They had C level careers in the company I worked at - a large company. BUT, there was no political correctness, and you could compliment them, tease them, etc. It was a normal human sexual dynamic, not the repressed one we have here. Heck, I kissed my secretary good morning EVERY day - and if I didn't, she would worry she wasn't attractive that day.

That there is grounds for another I Have a Dream Speech! I would love to grab some ass, get a kiss and brush against some fine titties every morning. We could put a man on Mars with that kind of motivation.

Post: #55

As some of you may not believe, some women did in fact work. Most of this I learned from my father.

-A women's education was important so she could be refined rather than be like a man. They weren't likely to study English or major in a non-stem job to be work horse. Keep in mind Education was once seen as a way of building refined character in people, both men and women. Now it is a political propaganda institution.

-Women did in fact work when they were young. But once they were married, they were expected to do her wifely and motherly duties. If they still worked, it was generally as a part time job(less than 40 hours a week). As a mother, it wasn't expected that she dedicate her time away from work.

Post: #56

Careers are fine, just don't put women in charge of anyone. I for one won't work for a female boss. They have no leadership skills, they think being bossy is what being a boss is about. Being bossed around just makes workers try to do as little as possible.

My boss right now is cool, there's a mutual respect because I do a good job, he leaves me alone other than giving me the tasks for the day, and he works damn hard himself, hardest worker in the place.

Female bosses just bitch, moan, nag, etc.

Post: #57

(11-26-2015 04:27 PM)The Father Wrote:  But some countries, like Japan, expect their populations to HALVE. That crushes their economy because more people are living longer, so they have many more pensioners and far fewer people paying into that. BUT ABSURDLY, rather than encouraging women to be sweet and domestic and have 2 kids each (i.e., to produce future workers), they encourage women to work as a means of solving Japan's 30 year slow down! Ay ay ay...

Yes but these birth rates and population shocks have always happened during different times in history in many countries and civilizations. The difference is that Japan isn't mortgaging its future by importing arab muslim immigrants or immigrants of an entirely different culture to "repopulate" their urban centers.

People shouldn't really criticize the way Japan is handling their problems. It's not ideal and their situation will get worse in the short run but in the long run their culture and identity will still persevere in the long run.

I can't say the same about parts of mainland Europe.

Post: #58

Women gave always worked, until western scientific advances meant they could stay home.

Look at Africa and Asia, other than rich man's wives, they all worked.

What changed was the industrial revolution. We produced the same amount of stuff with half the labour. We then decided to send half the labour force home, they were women.

This half invested in social capital, raising kids, nurturing households, getting to know neighbours.

It is a hell of a lit less back breaking too.

Western men gifted women the ability to stay home, as I said women in other cultures weren't gifted this.

Shiny ads with wow factor convinced them hand bags and shoes were more valuable than the above mentioned investments, and with government underwriting their lifestyle, they no longer need to manage a spousal relationship by maintaining a decent personality.

Retail shopping, bullshit jibs, kids wrecked by a divorce industry and high male suicide rates are the result.

Post: #59

Women should have the equal opportunity for work without the artificial enforcement of women's quotas (certain positions that require a top level of male performance, i.e. combat positions, special or elite forces excepted)

Despite the above, society should emphasize and glorify the housewife who has at least 2-3 children with her husband. Jobs and employment to be encouraged are those that are incidental and additional to the housewife role (small side business with crafty, food, or child centered project or home-daycare), or should be a nurturing role (nurse, daycare, elementary school teacher, working with the elderly).

Unwed young women, widows, and older women with grown adult children fit nicely into supportive secretarial-type roles.

Women who desire to "play in the man's world" should only gain admittance based upon the ability to compete in a man's world without the threat of government force as a backing. These are the small number of women who want to grit their way into the career world with wide eyes open to the fact they will most likely not have children and are not marriageable material unless to men who absolutely desire no family.

It is not the way of an aspiring alpha or self respecting beta male to pay for sex, but, recognizing that prostitution will always happen; I would also advocate for the elimination and control of the vice crime of prostitution. It is an outlet for the extreme beta/omega rage. Strict health testing and regulation would also then be possible. Of course whores would be acknowledged as whores and treated accordingly.

Most women should fit well into the mothering/nurturing role, women at different phases fit well into the supportive/secretary role, a small percentage of women can try to compete in the man's world without daddy government and full knowledge of a likely empty and challenging life, and finally whores would again be acknowledged to be whores that should be avoided, but fill the important role of being a societal outlet to the essentially sexless extreme beta/gamma.

Post: #60

Exhibit 1) - "I'm gone"
Before:


After:


Exhibit 2) - "no clue"


Exhibit 3) - "silly me"
https://twitter.com/KerryMP/status/670156870426996736
(conversation of the gods)

Post: #61

If they want to, but sometimes it doesn't make sense. I'm dating a junior doctor atm and she's made it clear that she's doesn't want to work as a doctor for much longer.

I'd say that's a bit immoral, she's wasted a uni spot for a doctor and the time and money of the state that's paid for most of her education. Only for Britain to be one doctor poorer.

I don't have a clear cut answer to that kind of situation, comes down to morality

Post: #62

Having women in any demanding profession is a joke

http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/...tors/?_r=0

Quote:Today… increasing numbers of doctors — mostly women — decide to work part time or leave the profession

with nearly 4 in 10 female doctors between the ages of 35 and 44 reporting in 2010 that they worked part time. This may seem like a personal decision, but it has serious consequences for patients and the public.
Medical education is supported by federal and state tax money both at the university level — student tuition doesn’t come close to covering the schools’ costs — and at the teaching hospitals where residents are trained. So if doctors aren’t making full use of their training, taxpayers are losing their investment. With a growing shortage of doctors in America, we can no longer afford to continue training doctors who don’t spend their careers in the full-time practice of medicine.
Since women’s productivity in medicine does not match that of men (female doctors employed full time work 4.5 fewer hours each week, and female pediatricians are five times more likely to take extended leaves), women, she argues, should think twice about entering the field in the first place:

It's irrelevant to them that their decisions hurt society. they will spend 24 years being educated, insisting how ambitious and smart they are. just to quit as soon as they have to work long hours.

I know a young woman who became a dentist, and right after she graduated took a part time teaching gig at the dental school. never tried to build a practice, provide dental care or anything. just wants to be a part time instructor and now shows off pictures of her baby bump.

Women are dangerous children and will destroy whatever you give them responsibility over. They contribute far, far less than what is portrayed in media and academia.

Post: #63

Exhibit 4) - "kill her please, Thor!"




Exhibit 5) - "career = bad wife"