Post: #1

Top 10: Pickup Cities

http://www.askmen.com/top_10/dating_150/..._list.html

Post: #2

Surprised they'd put Boston ahead of Miami.

Post: #3

(03-15-2010 05:25 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  Surprised they'd put Boston ahead of Miami.

Yeah, Boston was a surprise. I gotta check it out one day

Post: #4

Word, I'm moving to Denver in August. Never thought it would be a good city to pick up.

Post: #5

(03-18-2010 07:18 PM)Brandon E Wrote:  Word, I'm moving to Denver in August. Never thought it would be a good city to pick up.

Have you been before?

I have heard mixed results. But mostly from one of my friends that only likes NYC, LA and Miami Beach.

So it could be skewed.

Post: #6

Man, I have been there quite a few times and I would have to say that the quality of girls just wasn't that great. I'm from Vegas though so I guess its kinda hard to be on par.

Post: #7

(03-18-2010 08:02 PM)Brandon E Wrote:  Man, I have been there quite a few times and I would have to say that the quality of girls just wasn't that great. I'm from Vegas though so I guess its kinda hard to be on par.

Yeah, Denver is going to have a tough time competing with Vegas on many levels.

I went to Vegas I think 35 times in the last decade.

I might have passed through Denver once.

That says it all right there.

Post: #8

For sure. I was amazed at the low quality of girls in Denver. I almost thought the small little mountain town I live in has better quality girls per capita. That being said though, I didn't go to many good clubs there. Mostly just hole in the wall bars.

Post: #9

I think places with mountains and lots of outdoor activities(e.g. Denver, Seattle, Portland, etc..) are going to attract a more granola, organic type of woman. They aren't the ones that put on makeup, short dresses and high heels.

Post: #10

You'd be suprised about the girls here, but that's also considering the fact a good portion of them are south american. Most of the local Colorado girls here are pretty ugly. But at the same time if they are doing outdoorsy things they probably aren't fat.

Post: #11

I wouldn't pay much attention to this list. They've compiled it using the number of singles and perceived strength of each city's nightlife scene. This is crap - everyone knows the best city to pick up broads in the US is Las Vegas. Everyone goes there to party and get wild and get laid. I've hooked up with many girls there who had brought their own condoms with them on the trip. What does that tell you?

Post: #12

i thought sucked personally

weak beer and expensive cover charges

Post: #13

(03-18-2010 09:33 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  I think places with mountains and lots of outdoor activities(e.g. Denver, Seattle, Portland, etc..) are going to attract a more granola, organic type of woman. They aren't the ones that put on makeup, short dresses and high heels.

I'm from Washington State and to be fair Seattle does have a lot of well-dressed, really pretty women -just check out South Center Mall or the Bellevue Collection. - as well as granola eating hippie chicks that moon tan. That said the Number 1 problem with Seattle are the Uber-Liberal-Feminist b!tch shields the women have there. I remember one time going to the Bumbershoot festival at Seattle Center and there were a bunch of girls running around wearing see-through bras and no shirts..but if you dared look at the boobies they'd get so pissed..classic.

Post: #14

"Uber-Liberal-Feminist b!tch shields", that pretty much sums up half the women in my town.