Post: #1

IMO if there was such a thing, it would be a woman who fulfills her motherly role and in a cooperative relationship aims to take some of the load off the man. It's true that the invention of many household appliances has reduced homemaking to maybe 3 hours of a day maximum.
Now I don't know about you, but nowadays, a woman who leeches off a downtrodden man who has a reduced salary due to the high numbers of women in the workforce isn't helping at all. These wives finish washing the dishes and then sit around on Farmville while their men work like slaves. They'd like to believe that they are doing their part to combat feminism, but are they really anything more than lazy opportunists calling themselves feminine or traditional? Paul Elam once wrote an article shitting on these women.
if some well meaning feminist switched her life plan around to have healthy children first in accordance with biology and then make a little bit of money and pursue her interests as the children get older and don't need to be on her teet anymore, I'd say that's fine.

I also don't have issues with women who help out women in the Middle east, although I guess that's technically humanitarianism. There was an article posted here about Iran limiting women's education, and it really didn't sit right with me that this was happening in a country where people carry acid around to splash on women's faces like it's water. Some posters approved saying it would tone down hypergamy. Dumbing down a place that is in the dark ages seems like a recipe for stagnation. The feminism they have over there stresses that the woman must still be humble and not forget her role in the family and community , so it's not the same as the Western Samantha Jones feminism. I also believe that any men guilty of splashing a woman with acid, cutting off her nose, etc. should straight up just be gathered and slaughtered. These retards have no place in civilization.

Post: #2

The only "good" feminist I can think of is Camille Paglia, and she's an old lesbian...HA HA!

Post: #3

Quote:Dumbing down a place that is in the dark ages seems like a recipe for stagnation.

Disagree. Women being highly educated has no net positive value for a society. They are risk-averse and don't create/innovate. In the 1500's how many women joined a crew and set sail to the New World? 0.

Quote:There was an article posted here about Iran limiting women's education, and it really didn't sit right with me that this was happening in a country where people carry acid around to splash on women's faces like it's water.

It's a different culture. The acid is a way to ruin a woman's smv, not kill her, imo. She'll be deformed and no man will want her. Guys don't splash acid on random chicks, only ones who reject them. Women are hypergamous, her man must be older, taller, richer, smarter, etc than she is. With equal education and career opportunities, Iranian men will lose their leverage in the sexual market and probably need to learn game as we see in the US.

Imo feminism is based on the flawed idea men and women are equal save their genitals. So yeah, no such thing as a good feminist.

Post: #4

Like porn stars there are two types of feminists- common hardcore feminists and rare softcore feminists.

Post: #5

(11-05-2012 07:23 AM)Alpha Hunter Zero Wrote:  Like porn stars there are two types of feminists- common hardcore feminists and rare softcore feminists.

A lot of young "softcore feminist" girls don't actually label themselves as feminist at all these days, which is something older feminists complain about a lot. No coincidence that these girls are definitely more hot then their "'I'd hit that, with a shovel" counterparts on a slut walk.

Post: #6

(11-04-2012 11:53 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  It's a different culture. The acid is a way to ruin a woman's smv, not kill her, imo. She'll be deformed and no man will want her. Guys don't splash acid on random chicks, only ones who reject them.

You say that like it brightens up the reality or something. The men are sexually retarded and deprived through societal and religious forces which causes them to lash out unreasonably like starved and beaten pit bulls at women who so much as glance in the wrong direction by mistake. If a psycho Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction type of bitch cutting off a man's dick happened as frequently in the West as the murders, acid splashing, stoning, etc happen there, you'd be pissed off no?

Post: #7

I know one or two girls that are really hot, femmy feminists. They would probably make devoted moms and haven't racked up a lot of man-notches despite being about 20-22. I'm unsure what they want in women's rights but don't care.

Post: #8

I don't know about "good". Depends on how you define the word. There are "sex-positive" feminists. These are essentiallly feminists who do not identify as lesbian. Typically have very high sex drives and are usually bi. You see lots of them in SWPL "alternative" culture.

If by "good" you mean someone who would be a good mother in an old fashioned sense then, no, there are probably close to zero good feminists. Feminism is a masculine and unsuttle movement. The exact opposite of femminnity.

Post: #9

Feminists or not, women will never be on our team.

Post: #10

Sure there is.

She's right here, on her knees.

Post: #11

Quote: If a psycho Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction type of bitch cutting off a man's dick happened as frequently in the West as the murders, acid splashing, stoning, etc happen there, you'd be pissed off no?

Key phrase is bolded. Of course I'd care b/c I live there lol. Their culture operates differently doesn't make it better nor worse than ours.

I live where guys get raped in divorces so I will avoid that by never marrying. These women live in place where they get a face-full of acid for rejecting a guy. They know it can happen but they still reject guys? Pretty foolhardy.

Post: #12

Judge Judy

Post: #13

(11-04-2012 09:26 PM)ghostdog Wrote:  There was an article posted here about Iran limiting women's education, and it really didn't sit right with me that this was happening in a country where people carry acid around to splash on women's faces like it's water.

Based on what are you saying that people in Iran carry acid around to splash on women's faces like its water?

One highly publicized case a few years ago?

Post: #14

If women had created their own feminine interest groups I would agree. Instead they associate themselves with a need to infect male interest groups in order to have clout. Which of course fucks them all over in the end.

Women logic: We won't be respected until we work male jobs right along side men!
Male logic: Women want to take over my job for some fucking weird reason, since I would rather not be working here for the rest of my life.

Adjusted women logic: We want to do the best for our husbands. Will you help us form an advocacy group for issues that might help them out?
Male logic: Wow. I really respect their cause and motivation. I may not be a husband, but I can fully vouch for this organization.

Post: #15

@ p dog- a "soft feminist" woman is certainly a peculiar one. Granted, many dont consider themselves feminists but a trained eye can tell they've been slightly exposed to the virus and display such tendencies. However, if they spend prolonged time exposed to hardcore nazi cunts and environments they can very well go that way. If they spend more time being feminine and doing what they are already doing without any malevolent influence they'll be just fine. The problem is they can very easily be swayed towards the light side as well as the dark side in their younger years. Extra caution must be applied with these softcore types to ensure long term happiness.

Post: #16

The word feminist can mean lots of different things, so to me there are certainly good feminists. If you transported me back in time to 1910 or put me in present day Saudi Arabia, I'd probably be considered a feminist, because I believe in full legal equality for women.

Maybe it's best to distinguish between women's rights and feminism. I believe that are a lot of innate biological differences between men and women (that statement is so tautologically true as to be inane) and that effects how I relate to women in my personal interactions. I do, however, believe that the law should be applied to everyone equally. My problem with contemporary feminists is that they're not really after equality; they're after the institutionalization of female preferences.

I would put women into three categories: traditional, feminist, and radically feminist. Traditional women stick to traditional gender roles and radical feminists run from them. Non-radical feminists are women who are somewhere in between and they don't bother me at all. Any women who wants to go against traditional gender roles is fine by me, so long as she is sincere about wanting to play by the same rules as men and is willing to deal with the consequences of her actions. I actually prefer my women somewhere in that middle category, although leaning towards the traditional side.