Post: #26

Have the images of the Victoria's Secret models been digitally altered by whoever originally created this comparison? I've looked at Victoria's Secret catalogs every now and then, and I don't remember ever seeing any models who were as emaciated-looking as that. In fact, there have been some who were surprisingly well-padded--the early Laetitia Casta and the early Miranda Kerr being cases in point. (Don't worry, I don't learn the names of Victoria's Secret models as a matter of course, but I checked out the names of those two several years ago because I thought they were especially attractive. And Laetitia Casta is well-known on other grounds, having gone on to have a minor acting career, including in the recent American movie Arbitrage with Richard Gere.)

Note that, in the Victoria's Secret box, there's already unquestionably some fakery involved, since some of the figures are the same person. Whoever created the box was trying to create the impression that "there are at least seven Victoria's Secret models who are excessively thin"; but he or she was unable to find seven such models, and so had to fake the point by using images of what appear to be no more than three or four different women. If he or she was willing to do that, it makes it all the more likely that he or she would have been willing to falsify the models' proportions as well.

I don't care for any of the Victoria's Secret models as they're pictured here. They're all too thin, their beauty is way too generic for me, and some or all of them seem to have fake breasts. About half the Dove models, on the other hand, look good to me.

The one hesitation I'd have in the above judgment is that, since obviously most people (especially women) get quite a bit fatter as they age, the Victoria's Secret models might be better long-term investments. If they're really as thin as the picture makes them out to be (which I don't think they are), then ten or twenty or thirty years down the road they might be just right. The less heavy Dove models, on the other hand, will probably get fairly gross within a few years, unless they're very, very disciplined about diet and exercise. Actually, they've probably turned gross already, since I think the picture is several years old.

Post: #27

I posted this on another forum (non game / women related) and asked the guys what they preferred. Most came out, as predicted, and said "I'd be worried about breaking / snapping the Vic Secrets models" or "their too thin and I bet they are bitches" and called anyone who claimed the models were better were shallow or pathetic. So apparently it's not OK to be attracted to tall, slim, beautiful girls, it must mean you are shallow.

Post: #28

IainMuirs: I'm okay with tall, slim, beautiful girls--just not that slim. I've had sex with really thin girls before, and I didn't like the way they felt: in fact, I was a little grossed out by it. In addition, I don't like the idea that some really thin girl might pull the "frail woman" routine on me, and claim to be unable to help out with any kind of substantial physical work. I like the idea of a woman who's built substantially enough to pick up a heavy suitcase or a heavy box, and who could do a decent job of pitching in with various ordinary physical tasks. Furthermore, suppose you got one of these very thin women pregnant, whether accidentally or on purpose: would you feel comfortable with the idea of creating a son, or indirectly creating a grandson, who's dismissed by a lot of women because he's skinny and frail, who might not have a prayer of being able to deal with a sport like football or rugby or wrestling, and who might even have bones that break easily? I wouldn't feel comfortable with that.

I'm not saying I like genuinely fat women, either: they disgust me as well. Of the eleven Dove models, there are five I wouldn't bang; but the other six I'd have no problem banging. (And then I might say to them, "Hey, could you help me carry this dresser across the room?".)

Post: #29

them bitches be on this shit

Post: #30

(09-26-2012 05:00 PM)gds555 Wrote:  IainMuirs: I'm okay with tall, slim, beautiful girls--just not that slim. I've had sex with really thin girls before, and I didn't like the way they felt: in fact, I was a little grossed out by it. In addition, I don't like the idea that some really thin girl might pull the "frail woman" routine on me, and claim to be unable to help out with any kind of substantial physical work. I like the idea of a woman who's built substantially enough to pick up a heavy suitcase or a heavy box, and who could do a decent job of pitching in with various ordinary physical tasks. Furthermore, suppose you got one of these very thin women pregnant, whether accidentally or on purpose: would you feel comfortable with the idea of creating a son, or indirectly creating a grandson, who's dismissed by a lot of women because he's skinny and frail, who might not have a prayer of being able to deal with a sport like football or rugby or wrestling, and who might even have bones that break easily? I wouldn't feel comfortable with that.

I'm not saying I like genuinely fat women, either: they disgust me as well. Of the eleven Dove models, there are five I wouldn't bang; but the other six I'd have no problem banging. (And then I might say to them, "Hey, could you help me carry this dresser across the room?".)

I don't date girls so they can help me do physical work or carry suit cases so that's not of concern to me.

Post: #31

(09-26-2012 04:10 PM)IainMuirs Wrote:  I posted this on another forum (non game / women related) and asked the guys what they preferred. Most came out, as predicted, and said "I'd be worried about breaking / snapping the Vic Secrets models" or "their too thin and I bet they are bitches" and called anyone who claimed the models were better were shallow or pathetic. So apparently it's not OK to be attracted to tall, slim, beautiful girls, it must mean you are shallow.

With one hand, they type that shit. With the other, they jerk off imagining the VS models.

Thankfully guys are still honest when there aren't any girls around for them to appease.

Post: #32

(09-26-2012 01:29 PM)gds555 Wrote:  Have the images of the Victoria's Secret models been digitally altered by whoever originally created this comparison?

I got a feeling of something not being on the up-and-up with the VS pics as well. Could be they are exaggerated as part of the National Fattie Defense Day coming up.

If you pump a baby or two into a bitch, she's probably going to gain 10-15 pounds PERMANENTLY, however, while her sense of entitlement will prove astoundingly robust even while her ass and belly swell up with delicious Downtown Pizza and Beer, like a sorority girl's Facewhore friend count.

So if you are one of us breeder, develops-a-strong-pair-bond suckers, you probably want someone too thin unless they have an eating disorder ( doesn't love food=doesn't love dick) or are ill.

Oh and to quote one of my patients from prison, "Dat bitch needs fuckin'"

Always a good thing to remember.

Post: #33

(09-26-2012 07:22 PM)IainMuirs Wrote:  I don't date girls so they can help me do physical work or carry suit cases so that's not of concern to me.

I don't date girls so they can help me do physical work either, but I enjoy the feeling that they could do it if the need arose. It's like having features and capabilities that you might never use in a product, but that you like knowing are there. And as for suitcases, I don't particularly like travelling with a woman who can't or won't make a decent effort at carrying luggage when necessary. I've had the "frail woman" routine pulled on me a few times too many, and I'm tired of it.