Post: #1

I have trouble believing that DC is as bad as people are saying it is.

Anyone in DC complaining should come over to the West Coast and see how life is.

http://www.lesjones.com/www/images/posts...es2ql8.jpg

According to that map, the east coast, and particularly DC, have a surplus of women compared to anywhere across the Mississippi.

Post: #2

Supposedly the surplus of women in DC consists of Fat ghetto women.

Btw, anyone know what happened to The Ratio Factor blog? Did it get moved somewhere? There was some eye-opening info there.

Post: #3

DC's problem isn't the ratio. There are women everywhere; they're just mostly over-aggressive, lame, and/or fat. The problem with DC is that the amount of effort it takes isn't worth the quality of woman you get.

Post: #4

Most guys would rather live in a city that had 100 surplus single 6s than in a city with 1,000 surplus 3s.

Post: #5

Yes, DC is a surplus of fat or subpar women with inflated egos and graduate degrees.

Post: #6

(08-02-2012 05:10 PM)Rurik Wrote:  I have trouble believing that DC is as bad as people are saying it is.

Anyone in DC complaining should come over to the West Coast and see how life is.

http://www.lesjones.com/www/images/posts...es2ql8.jpg

According to that map, the east coast, and particularly DC, have a surplus of women compared to anywhere across the Mississippi.

They said single, not sexually frustrated. If there's more single men in a place like LA, wouldn't that be due to less motivation to go into an LTR? (Like a generally sluttier population, perhaps)

Post: #7

That image is 5 years old. Demographics can rapidly change.

Post: #8

One of the best looking girls I have been with (posted her pic on a separate thread but had to take it down as others said I was bragging) was from Washington DC.

If I had a list of one of the worst places to game women in terms of quality and barriers to overcome, DC would not be on the bottom of my list but then again I haven't lived there for a long time. In my experience, the worst area is the deep south (Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, SC, and Arkansas), sure some of the big cities may have their talents but it is full of whales. Heard a lot of people bash DC but in my experience there are worse areas out there. Tons of my buddies who have been to Southern California have faltered in terms of gaming women while they did fine elsewhere in the world. The women are definitely better looking in So Cal from what I hear but it is really hard to get with them since most of them are more shallow than your average girl elsewhere. Again, my friends are experienced in this and they have done well elsewhere while falling to bits and pieces in So Cal. I am going there soon and staying with a friend so I might be able to comment then.

Top quality women are difficult to game everywhere but I think DC is more about fitting into a niche. Have done cold approaches in my visits there and they ended up in some success.

Still, NYC and Miami rank top on my list. Tons of talent, tons of quality, and decent game can get you laid. I have seen ALL kinds of men do good in NYC.

Post: #9

here's an interesting article on female ratios in New York, and how they are favorable towards men:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...s-U-S.html

Post: #10

If anyone has lived in both the west coast and DC it's likely they'd be in Sac town and DC... Hard to find true players who work for the good old Govnt.

Curious if anyone spent 3+ months in both areas. I've only visited for shorter time frames?

So far i'd say it ranks like this in east versus west coast.

DC worse than SF
LA worse than SF
LA worse than DC

NYC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SF/LA/DC (combined)

If you can pull regularly in LA I'd say you're the man and have solid game. Competition is tough and logistics are bad.

Note this is night game based so a lot of observations veer on logistics

Post: #11

the only kind of guys my pals out in LA say consistently pull the pretty girls are the frat kids from USC

if you know any other kind of guys, then be happy to talk to my friends because other than the frat kids from SC, I have not known any other guys to consistently do well there, most guys find a niche and stick with it

Post: #12

It's like a math formula, (girl quality)*(single girls) vs. (man quality)*(single men). Whoever has the bigger number is at the disadvantage.

NYC fixes what would be another silicon valley with finance by being a fashion, dance, theatre, art, lifestyle & tourist center, all female dominated professions. And NYC is a destination for women.

Silicon valley has... nice weather. SF has some tourism, art & lifestyle to balance out the tech, but not nearly as much as NYC.

Post: #13

Money/Income has a lot to do with it. Women have climbed up income brackets along with Gays/Lesbians. Men due to laws of the State have been getting raped in income scales and I think NYC has so many more women simply because many men have been squeezed out of the City and moved away. Art and culture have to do with the draw for females but if this were the case the most female obsessed industry ..Hollywood.. would mean that LA should have the same ratios or close to as NYC. In the priciest places you will be finding close too or more females and it has more to do of how Men have falling down the earnings ladder more than anything else.

Men moved out west to the Sun belt and California to find work. Defense and Tech jobs are still largely male dominated and these are bountiful out west. Since women are less willing to re-locate or move (usually) many stuck around, especially in the mid-west cities. If they did leave it was most likely eastwards to chase Gubmint money in DC, Schooling in Boston, or a TV lifestyle in NYC.