Post: #251

(05-14-2016 03:20 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-13-2016 05:03 AM)XXL Wrote:  Discourse.org. It's an opensource forum system with cool layout and notification system [which I think it's great feature for a forum]

Opensource has been targeted for subversion and largely-pozzed by SJW's over the last year. If you read Discourse's Terms and Conditions and About Us pages and what they think makes for acceptable conversation - illustrated with no less than a picture of Wil Wheaton - you can see they aren't to be remotely-trusted.

Their T&C is meaningless as it's self-hosted so they're unable to do anything about it.

You can host whatever you want on your own Discourse forum.

Post: #252

Age or atleast age ranges should become mandatory.

/thread-55642.html

An otherwise promising poster, 16 year-old 'Cortes' not only used but was also recommending DNP for fat loss in the Clenbuterol thread. That shit is literal poison that can kill you.

Guys with little experience in fitness might think it's legit advice and tried it out not knowing it's some guy who's barely legal to drive who's recommending it.

Post: #253

Many really good things are being posted here and I also added my suggentions in this thread. One thing which makes me a little bit sad is that it seems that Roosh doesn't even care if we recommend useful changes or not.

This whole place could be made more attractive and attract more users but it stays the same year by year unfortunately.

No hate but really, why is that? Why does Roosh not implement some nice features?

Hmmm :/

Post: #254

(05-14-2016 04:55 PM)Valentine Wrote:  

(05-14-2016 03:20 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-13-2016 05:03 AM)XXL Wrote:  Discourse.org. It's an opensource forum system with cool layout and notification system [which I think it's great feature for a forum]

Opensource has been targeted for subversion and largely-pozzed by SJW's over the last year. If you read Discourse's Terms and Conditions and About Us pages and what they think makes for acceptable conversation - illustrated with no less than a picture of Wil Wheaton - you can see they aren't to be remotely-trusted.

Their T&C is meaningless as it's self-hosted so they're unable to do anything about it.

You can host whatever you want on your own Discourse forum.

Do you trust Progressives - who lack honour or integrity and have made no secret of their desire to control badthink on technology platforms - to not leave backdoor access in for themselves for monitoring, identification and subversion purposes?

Post: #255

(05-14-2016 07:13 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-14-2016 04:55 PM)Valentine Wrote:  

(05-14-2016 03:20 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-13-2016 05:03 AM)XXL Wrote:  Discourse.org. It's an opensource forum system with cool layout and notification system [which I think it's great feature for a forum]

Opensource has been targeted for subversion and largely-pozzed by SJW's over the last year. If you read Discourse's Terms and Conditions and About Us pages and what they think makes for acceptable conversation - illustrated with no less than a picture of Wil Wheaton - you can see they aren't to be remotely-trusted.

Their T&C is meaningless as it's self-hosted so they're unable to do anything about it.

You can host whatever you want on your own Discourse forum.

Do you trust Progressives - who lack honour or integrity and have made no secret of their desire to control badthink on technology platforms - to not leave backdoor access in for themselves for monitoring, identification and subversion purposes?

I don't trust them of course but it's open source - the code is easy to review to see if there are any backdoors.

Such malicious code is never present in mature open source applications due to the security risks and potential for abuse. Such a feature would immediately cause outrage against the developers and new pull requests would be made.

To be extra paranoid someone could be specifically hired to inspect the code but the actual likelihood of a backdoor is extremely low.

Post: #256

I'm still waiting for that mobile like button. I'm sure it's just a small script / code. I've seen it on different forums that use exactly the same mobile forum template.

Post: #257

Give exemptions to the "only 1 hour to edit" rule to people who make threads that require lots of updating, such as threads that cover terrorist attacks.

Post: #258

A subforum for live streaming (or links to). Members can live stream:
1. bangs
2. orgies
3. streetfights with SJWs, white knights (think Little Dark level), betas, purple haired feminists..
4. real-time commentaries
5. whatever cool thing comes to mind..

Post: #259

There are a ton of good suggestions in here. Especially the private forum, which has been echoed many times.

Why have none of these been implemented?

Post: #260

There is a private forum.

I still would like to see a "dark" color scheme option for the message board. I'm sure MyBB can do this, selectable color schemes for UI per user preference that is.

Post: #261

(11-18-2016 07:45 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  There is a private forum.

I still would like to see a "dark" color scheme option for the message board. I'm sure MyBB can do this, selectable color schemes for UI per user preference that is.

Seconded. A dark color theme or "night reading" mode would be helpful in reducing eye strain at night. Hopefully we can get one installed soon.

Post: #262

(11-18-2016 07:45 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  .

No need to spread rumors. If we needed one, I'm sure Roosh would let us know and give us rules 1 and 2.

Maybe someday.

Post: #263

That users be responsible for doing at least a minimum of fact-checking their own links/information.

It's easy for this forum to become an echo chamber. One of the simplest ways to avoid this is to hold users to a standard of vetting the content they share.

Now, there should be some leeway here, one simple offense shouldn't end up in a significant warning or a short-term ban, but users who consistently post demonstrably false content (such as obviously photoshopped images, quotes that are complete fabrications, or articles on websites that are actual fake-news sites) should have some kind of consequence for being too lazy to do a simple search to keep the quality of the content on the forum at a basic minimum standard.

Post: #264

^
Great tip Aneroid.

Maybe a unique (Temporary) title under their username for people who are repeat offenders. Example: Your title is "True Player". If you started posting a bunch of BS, maybe your title would change to "Bullshiter" for 45 days, or something. I don't know the specifics, but you get the idea.

Post: #265

If someone posts crappy material, isn't that what the report function is for? Instead of posting nonsense, they will get the hint if one of the mods drops them a PM.

Post: #266

Less censorship, less PC - type monitoring.

Post: #267

Stormfront has an open sub forum where guests and non members can post questions and arguments.

Post: #268

EMBEDDING TWEETS.

Post: #269

(11-18-2016 07:55 PM)Gustavus Adolphus Wrote:  

(11-18-2016 07:45 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  .

No need to spread rumors. If we needed one, I'm sure Roosh would let us know and give us rules 1 and 2.

Maybe someday.

Not sure what you are referencing here as you didn't quote me properly.

There is a private forum. It's not a rumor.

/forum-48.html

Post: #270

You know that you can just "Request Desktop Version" on your Phone/Tablet and like posts/see likes right?

(05-23-2016 03:16 PM)YoungArt Wrote:  I'm still waiting for that mobile like button. I'm sure it's just a small script / code. I've seen it on different forums that use exactly the same mobile forum template.

Post: #271

Stalin,

I think he may have been intentionally spreading disinformation to keep out trolls and/or infiltrators.

Post: #272

(11-20-2016 12:12 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

(11-18-2016 07:55 PM)Gustavus Adolphus Wrote:  

(11-18-2016 07:45 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  .

No need to spread rumors. If we needed one, I'm sure Roosh would let us know and give us rules 1 and 2.

Maybe someday.

Not sure what you are referencing here as you didn't quote me properly.

There is a private forum. It's not a rumor.

/forum-48.html

Can't see it, brother. I think you need like 3000 posts before you can get in? Probably got to follow some rules, like Fight Club or something.

Post: #273

But the first rule of Fight Club is you don't talk about Fight Club.

Post: #274

Oh dear Lord...

Post: #275

Advertise. Not here, but elsewhere. Get the Rooshv brand names word around.