Post: #26

Doesn't this look classy?

Post: #27

I was talking to a lesbian friend of mine about the explosion of female tattoos over the last year, and she said that the more feminine lesbians get tattoos to signify that they are bi (as opposed to going all out butch).

So, there's a functional reason.

Now our culture equates being a lesbian with being rebellious or cool, and we've got a huge trend with a masses of lemming chicks jumping on the band wagon.

A generation of girls ruined.

Post: #28

Walking down the street with an alpha mentor of mine, and a girl with tats covering her body walks by.

I point it out and express my dissatisfaction.

He responds "It's OK- it's like reading the newspaper!"

Post: #29

(05-30-2012 08:56 PM)Nonpareil Wrote:  A tiny, two inch by two inch butterfly on her lower-hip/upper-pussy area is one thing; sleeves, giant tramp stamps and shit all over her back (girl I banged in less than an hour and a half last summer told me that her work, which was all colored, had so far set her back about 3k...just why!?). I know the girls (for the same reason that they do anything that only men used to do) will think we'll think of them as 'strong, confident and empowered!' with their full body ink, but you know what I think of when I see a girl with extensive ink?

- Someone with poor impulse control (Girls with poor-impulse control are almost always sluts...Not wife material!).
- Someone with zero future time orientation; that shit looks plenty different when she's 23 than it will at 43 (Girls with no future-time orientation will have no problem fleecing you in a divorce with little regard for the long-term future of your children and negative-regard for your own long-term future...Not wife material!).
- Someone who craves attention to the point that she'll spend hundreds of dollars to permanently mangle her skin (Attention whores are either sluts or teases, and if there's one thing I like less than a slut, it's a tease [at least sluts are fun]...Not wife material!).
- Someone who thinks she's 'unique and special' when she is in fact doing something that at least 23% of her peer group has done (Special Snowflake Syndrome, though in the west it's a pandemic...Not wife material!).
- Someone who with each thing she gets done becomes an increased risk for Hepatitis C, tetanus and even HIV (Not only are these diseases bad, but once you have them, if they can even be cured, it's such a bitch...Not wife material!).
- Someone who, with each work she has larger than my hand (about 8 inches by 6 inches), has taken between 10 and 20 additional cocks (Sluts have difficulty bonding with one man, we all know this...Not wife material!).

As I said, a small tattoo that's only visible when she's in her underwear or naked is one thing. I don't have Facebook and even if I did, I couldn't check it. How 'Liked!' did this get by chicks on some of your guys feeds? Part of the reason I lost Facebook a few years ago is encapsulated by this type of asinine wholesale-liking of anything that glorifies womanhood or is posted by women.

I find it interesting that all the references to wife material are accepted and "liked" by so many here when, on the other hand, if someone came in here talking about their interest in seeking out wife material, they'd get clowned. I'm not trying to roast you specifically here; I just find it interesting and thought-provoking.

I see this a lot on pua/game/manoshre forums, etc. Where we want women to act like wife material, yet we typically don't acknowledge our inherent desire to have it - and even ridicule men who admit theirs.

If we're really all in it for the lay, who cares if they have tats, right? I find it sexy on some girls - even cute on some. Would I want a wife all tatted up? Probably not, but I'm not against admitting that marriage might someday be in the cards either.

Anyone have thoughts on this?

Beyond All Seas

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe.
To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes
frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Kipling

Post: #30

(06-17-2012 05:27 PM)houston Wrote:  Doesn't this look classy?
.....

Those pics reminded me of a wedding I attended earlier this year. The bride was OK looking, wearing a beautiful strapless wedding dress, and the most god awful cheap unicorn with rainbows & roses tattoo on her left shoulder-blade. It made an otherwise lovely scene look like the guy was marrying a prostitute.

Post: #31

I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.

Post: #32

At least these girls have decent looking tats. Whenever I go to the beach I see tons of women with flat out retarded tattoos.

Personally I don't mind a girl who's inked up, as long as it looks aesthetically pleasing.

Earlier this year I was banging a girl who was all tatted up (full back work, anklets, tats up her arms and on her wrists) and I thought it was awesome.

On the flip side I hate piercings, those are like an automatic kill switch for my boner.

Post: #33

(08-04-2012 08:55 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  I find it interesting that all the references to wife material are accepted and "liked" by so many here when, on the other hand, if someone came in here talking about their interest in seeking out wife material, they'd get clowned. I'm not trying to roast you specifically here; I just find it interesting and thought-provoking.

I see this a lot on pua/game/manoshre forums, etc. Where we want women to act like wife material, yet we typically don't acknowledge our inherent desire to have it - and even ridicule men who admit theirs.

If we're really all in it for the lay, who cares if they have tats, right? I find it sexy on some girls - even cute on some. Would I want a wife all tatted up? Probably not, but I'm not against admitting that marriage might someday be in the cards either.

Anyone have thoughts on this?

Women are the gatekeepers of sex
Men are the gatekeepers of commitment

I personally haven't seen anyone ridiculed for admitting that they have a desire for a good wife. Oneitis is looked down upon. That's because oneitis limits options, which will lead to a world of hurt when dealing with women.

I think that's why most of us are here. Today's society has put the screws to "good and worthy" men. So we come here to learn and discuss how we can better navigate the minefield that is the modern SMP.

Since we are bonders by nature and the gatekeepers of commitment, I don't see any contradiction to trying to qualify women as wife material, even if marriage isn't the end goal.

I look at some of the wedding photos posted in this thread, and some of the girls are damn cute. However, heavily inked women is a huge turnoff for me, despite having several tattoos myself (Hypocrisy? I don't care, fuck you!). If one of them threw it at me, I'd certainly take it, but it would end as soon as I got my nut. I would never try to open one of them though.

Post: #34

(08-05-2012 12:12 AM)WesternCancer Wrote:  I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.

You should come to north Brooklyn. Nothing short of a tattoo epidemic here.

Post: #35

(08-06-2012 02:00 AM)soup Wrote:  

(08-05-2012 12:12 AM)WesternCancer Wrote:  I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.

You should come to north Brooklyn. Nothing short of a tattoo epidemic here.

Hipster Brooklyn is ground zero for insane liberalism.

Liberalism denies all traditional social bonds, i.e. kinship, shared language and cultured based down over generations, shared values religious or otherwise, ethnic preference, etc. Individualism reigns supreme, and having any "tribe" based on real values is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.

The problem is humans are not individuals. They have evolved to function within a hierarchical tribe of about 100 to 200 people. Leaders of the tribe, like the high IQ elite of America, were the ones who set the rules. But the vast majority of people have always NEEDED to conform to their tribes norms. Their identity comes from conformity.

Since broad efforts have been made to quash this normal human behavior, via criminal law and/or propaganda, there is an emptiness left in many people.

If they cannot modify their character and ideals, what is left? Triviality and Banality, the essence of post modernism. They modify their bodies, because to do so causes no offense. It is the last method of identity acquisition the politically correct regime allows that is somewhat unique.

On a side note - what else can observed in Brooklyn? Absolutely fanatical, tyrannical liberalism. Walk into a bar and start spouting game principles or say you are sick of queers. You'll get the most vicious stares of hate.

I've made girls cry in Williamsburg over the most mundane, mildly anti-PC concepts. It's truly sad. The tattoos suck for these babes, but when the whole shitstorm comes and they realize their worldview is a daft fantasy, they are going to end up in the loony bin.

Post: #36

(08-06-2012 07:04 AM)Don_Johnson Wrote:  

(08-06-2012 02:00 AM)soup Wrote:  

(08-05-2012 12:12 AM)WesternCancer Wrote:  I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.

You should come to north Brooklyn. Nothing short of a tattoo epidemic here.

Hipster Brooklyn is ground zero for insane liberalism.

Liberalism denies all traditional social bonds, i.e. kinship, shared language and cultured based down over generations, shared values religious or otherwise, ethnic preference, etc. Individualism reigns supreme, and having any "tribe" based on real values is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.

The problem is humans are not individuals. They have evolved to function within a hierarchical tribe of about 100 to 200 people. Leaders of the tribe, like the high IQ elite of America, were the ones who set the rules. But the vast majority of people have always NEEDED to conform to their tribes norms. Their identity comes from conformity.

Since broad efforts have been made to quash this normal human behavior, via criminal law and/or propaganda, there is an emptiness left in many people.

If they cannot modify their character and ideals, what is left? Triviality and Banality, the essence of post modernism. They modify their bodies, because to do so causes no offense. It is the last method of identity acquisition the politically correct regime allows that is somewhat unique.

On a side note - what else can observed in Brooklyn? Absolutely fanatical, tyrannical liberalism. Walk into a bar and start spouting game principles or say you are sick of queers. You'll get the most vicious stares of hate.

I've made girls cry in Williamsburg over the most mundane, mildly anti-PC concepts. It's truly sad. The tattoos suck for these babes, but when the whole shitstorm comes and they realize their worldview is a daft fantasy, they are going to end up in the loony bin.

I agree with a lot of what you say here. Our culture tries to sell "individualism" to a lot of people that would, deep down inside, probably feel more comfortable being the followers. But, most girls are just too stupid to realize that getting a tattoo is a permanent commitment to a fad. Even though they know they are going to get old, they are drunk on power, and their erroneous, in the moment judgment makes them think they are going to be young and attractive for ever.

But, I'd argue that a core tenet of liberalism is that all men are sentient beings, not dogs, and, given the opportunities, we can potentially improve ourselves. And this is why we all need access to education, and basic necessities.. so we can have some options.

Not all beta males are inveterate followers like women. Some of them just don't know that there is a "red pill." I think it might be too early since the Game has come on-line to make a call on whether or not all men's alpha/beta status is set in stone.

The real contradiction is for women. I believe it is close to impossible for most women to square the feminist agenda with finding happiness in their own lives. This is why so many of them are on anti-depressants.

You hate ALL queers? I know a bunch of them that are cool. And, they have better game than most guys.

Williamsburg is definitely left leaning, and it is also a pyro-technic insanitarium of pussy.

Post: #37

Post: #38

A new trend I've been noticing is girls with dia de los muertos tattoos who have no idea where it comes from. I see a lot of white trash type girls with them online who say they only want white guys lol.

Post: #39

Huge chest tattoos are gaining popularity in my circle. I hate it personally.

They're limiting their marketability in the dating market. They can no longer be social chameleons by changing their clothes and hairstyle. When you look at them you just think ...skank.

Post: #40

Quote:"It's a confidence thing, it shows you are not afraid of pain, and that you can make choices for life."

No, it's an attention whoring crutch. If you were confident, you wouldn't "need" to do it.

While the numbers are few, the women I have the most respect for are stunning and confident, without the need to chase fads.*

*Save the long lecture about tats being a tradition with sailors, soldiers, society's fringe groups, etc. When ignorant twenty-something chicks and housewives are getting tattoos, it is a fad.



You know how ridiculous it looks to see a bumper sticker on a Rolls-Royce? Well...

Post: #41

I never thought bitches en masse would start getting tatts covering their arms, it just adds masculine qualities to their looks but here it is. I remember when I started seeing the tramp stamps on girls everywhere and thought it was a pretty stupid thing to do but at least it was a subtle way of letting ya know what's what. So what do we got now, fat chicks, ugly chicks, bitchy chicks, tatted chicks and some who are able to fit into all 3 of those lovely categories. It's as if they're willingly making themselves unpalatable to most men on purpose. Has there ever been a more obvious sign that any man worth his salt needs to be out of the West as soon as he can if he wants to be around genuinely feminine women?

Post: #42

I never got why fat chicks would get tattoos, but looking at it...:

Fat chick = ugly and desperate

Fat chick with tattoos = uglier, but easier

Now it makes sense...

Post: #43

Might as well ask in this thread, how many guys here have tats?
Personally, I have none, I was never creative enough to think of what to get.

Post: #44

What do our rvfers in Thailand think about the yants that so many girls 'round these parts have? I used to think it was a thing for lower class sluts, but I've been seeing it more and more on rich girls, and girls in university.

Personally I'm more forgiving towards them then I am for a normal tattoo, but I'd still prefer nothing.

Post: #45

(01-14-2014 01:44 AM)commiejoe Wrote:  Might as well ask in this thread, how many guys here have tats?
Personally, I have none, I was never creative enough to think of what to get.

I have a bunch, I like them but am not dumb enough to get neck, face or hand tattoos (aka "Job Breakers").

Women have to be incredibly careful about tattoos, done wrong they break up their curves, which is what makes women hot to look at in the first place. Broad chest pieces make their shoulders look broad, and sleeves make their arms and hands look big.

The tramp stamp is good for making skinny girls look like they have hips, but it makes fat girls seem even more fat.

Conversely, a well placed secret tattoo like a SMALL star behind the ear, top of the hair line or ankle will make me look twice at a girl I may not have.

Tattoos can be modest and feminine or masculine and obnoxious. Women these days are choosing masculine and obnoxious to match their personalities.

Post: #46

I don't have any, and while I occasionally consider getting one (a phoenix of some sort), the immutability aspect always deters me. Who knows if I'll still like it in 10 years? If it will look good when I get old, no matter in how fine a shape I am? It's better to err on the side of caution. I view tattoos on women with disgust for precisely the same reason - it's a sign of recklessness, and restraint is even more critical for a woman than it would be for a man.

Post: #47

(08-04-2012 08:55 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  

(05-30-2012 08:56 PM)Nonpareil Wrote:  A tiny, two inch by two inch butterfly on her lower-hip/upper-pussy area is one thing; sleeves, giant tramp stamps and shit all over her back (girl I banged in less than an hour and a half last summer told me that her work, which was all colored, had so far set her back about 3k...just why!?). I know the girls (for the same reason that they do anything that only men used to do) will think we'll think of them as 'strong, confident and empowered!' with their full body ink, but you know what I think of when I see a girl with extensive ink?

- Someone with poor impulse control (Girls with poor-impulse control are almost always sluts...Not wife material!).
- Someone with zero future time orientation; that shit looks plenty different when she's 23 than it will at 43 (Girls with no future-time orientation will have no problem fleecing you in a divorce with little regard for the long-term future of your children and negative-regard for your own long-term future...Not wife material!).
- Someone who craves attention to the point that she'll spend hundreds of dollars to permanently mangle her skin (Attention whores are either sluts or teases, and if there's one thing I like less than a slut, it's a tease [at least sluts are fun]...Not wife material!).
- Someone who thinks she's 'unique and special' when she is in fact doing something that at least 23% of her peer group has done (Special Snowflake Syndrome, though in the west it's a pandemic...Not wife material!).
- Someone who with each thing she gets done becomes an increased risk for Hepatitis C, tetanus and even HIV (Not only are these diseases bad, but once you have them, if they can even be cured, it's such a bitch...Not wife material!).
- Someone who, with each work she has larger than my hand (about 8 inches by 6 inches), has taken between 10 and 20 additional cocks (Sluts have difficulty bonding with one man, we all know this...Not wife material!).

As I said, a small tattoo that's only visible when she's in her underwear or naked is one thing. I don't have Facebook and even if I did, I couldn't check it. How 'Liked!' did this get by chicks on some of your guys feeds? Part of the reason I lost Facebook a few years ago is encapsulated by this type of asinine wholesale-liking of anything that glorifies womanhood or is posted by women.

I find it interesting that all the references to wife material are accepted and "liked" by so many here when, on the other hand, if someone came in here talking about their interest in seeking out wife material, they'd get clowned. I'm not trying to roast you specifically here; I just find it interesting and thought-provoking.

I see this a lot on pua/game/manoshre forums, etc. Where we want women to act like wife material, yet we typically don't acknowledge our inherent desire to have it - and even ridicule men who admit theirs.

If we're really all in it for the lay, who cares if they have tats, right? I find it sexy on some girls - even cute on some. Would I want a wife all tatted up? Probably not, but I'm not against admitting that marriage might someday be in the cards either.

Anyone have thoughts on this?

I was thinking exactly the same. Why worry about wife material? Most guys in the manosphere were hurt by a former girlfriend/wife and are still looking for a serious girlfriend/wife. What they don't see is that a man get's betaised sooner or later in a every serious relationship, even if you're "alpha". I think serious relationships only make sense when you're +50.

I like to use tats as in indicator for promiscuousness, though this indicator is not as strong anymore in countries where tats become sooo mainstream.

Some of the worst tats I saw on women:
- A turtle
- A fishhook
- A red pepper ("because I'm spicy in bed")

Post: #48

I hate big tattoos(sleeve etc.) but i'm fine with smaller ones. My last ex-gf took a small tattoo on her arm, which was fine. Current regular has 2 small tattoos as well. If i started to ignore girls with tattoos, i would get MUCH less ass and that's not ok.

Post: #49

The only people who should be getting tattoos are members of the Yakuza only because they do it right

Post: #50

Tattoos on both men and women are major red flags for me.

I wouldn't hire someone with visible tattoos.