WesternCancer
International Playboy
     
Posts: 4,687
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 47
|
Do the girls you bang follow a pattern in physical features?
I know everyone has their type, but I'm talking about something else.
I've begun to notice a pattern in my bangs. To me the girls in which I have the most attraction to and bang for the longest period of time are girls that look similar to girls I was attracted to as a young teenager/through high school.
When I was a kid I had the hugest boner for Aly Michalka. I've been banging a girl that looks a lot like her, same lips, same nose, same everything except she has brown hair and her face is a bit thinner. I just realized this a day or two ago.
I used to be all over the porn star Stoya. To me she is a 10, something about the dark hair, blue eyes and pale skin does it for me. The girl I was in a LTR for about 2 years with looked a lot like her. Same complexion, haircut, lips and body. Facially she wasn't as similar. However, more recently I banged a girl that has that same complexion but a face more similar to stoya's.
There was this girl in highschool I knew was in to me, but I didn't really have an interest in girls, or talked my self out of it. I can't remember which. Last year I was banging a girl that looked very similar to this girl from highschool.
My babysitter when I was <10 was a super hot russian girl with an equally hot accent. Now a days I am all about the EE/russian girls. I am banging one. I also banged a girl on a SNL that looked a lot like my old babysitter.
I can trace most of my bangs with girls that I really wanted to fuck and enjoyed the sex with a lot to girls I was attracted to when I was first going through puberty. However, I never once during sex with these girls realized this fact and said "fuck yeah I'm banging a chick that looks like ___" I realized it long after.
Is your physical preference in girls -- your type -- determined by the girls you were exposed to and found attractive during puberty/young life, or is it that attraction preference is determined mostly by nature rather than nurture. If the first statement is true are we trying to fulfill the fantasies of our adolescence by banging specific girls?
When I say physical/attraction preference I'm talking about certain specifics that make an already hot girl preferred. ie. if you had two girls whos attractiveness was rated the same, but you chose one over the other.
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2012 11:35 PM by WesternCancer.)
|
|
| 05-11-2012 11:35 PM |
|
|
Veloce
International Playboy
     
Posts: 5,900
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 183
|
RE: Do the girls you bang follow a pattern in physical features?
I feel you big time Western. For me it might be a little extreme in that I seriously can't get a boner unless some very specific and nitpicky qualities are met, which probably disqualifies me from being a true playa, but whatever.
The American ideal, blonde hair, blue eyes, tall barbie types do nothing for me, if anything it's a turnoff. I'm like the opposite of Indian trolls. I grew up in a city where 90% of the population was like that.
Stoya: FUCK YES. Definite 10 in my book. Totally my type. I remember when I first saw her I couldn't believe a girl so hot would ever do porn.
EE/Russian girls for sure, but also Eurasian. I love SE asians but nothing is sexier when they get some Euro blood in there too.
Girls I've banged are rarely over 5'6". Always dark hair, usually dark eyes too. Skin color is all over from pale as fuck to Filipina brown girls. Crooked or otherwise imperfect teeth seems to be a reoccurring theme. Despite my moniker, can't do the chubby chaser shit, I just can't get hard, even if the face is good. Gotta have that thin little waist. Tits and ass are all over the place, I've done flat chested to stacked, asian girls with no ass to a colombian girl with the big ol' bubble butt.
|
|
| 05-12-2012 12:36 PM |
|
|
Basil Ransom
International Playboy
     
Posts: 4,877
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 112
|
RE: Do the girls you bang follow a pattern in physical features?
(05-13-2012 10:58 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote: (05-13-2012 10:25 PM)basilransom Wrote: In my experience, American blondes are more judgmental, narrow-minded, insular, more likely to only fuck within their circle, than girls with other colors. More easily weirded out if you say something off-color.
Definitely. I agree with this 100 percent. It even plays out online. It's always the blondes that are the most insistent on dating within their own race (and even penalize, "match-wise," you for not adhering to their insular views). I have a huge sampling in my head, and blondes are overwhelming the ones who do this:
I don't know if it's a genetic thing or it's being blonde in the US. When I talk to a certain type of girl, to which blondes far more often belong, it's like I have too much personality, I'm too weird, and too much of a foreigner, even though I'm white and American-born. Like they have this narrow band of men they socialize with, and everyone else is just "eww, rando." Usually but not always they skew towards the sorority type. And some of the blondes I have fucked made it clear that they had a strong weirdo streak themselves, so they were atypical.
My impression doesn't owe at all to online dating, because I only get a yes/no rejection there, and I don't get the nuanced emotional reaction that you do in person, that judgmental contortion of the face these bitches love to show when you show the slightest deviation from normalcy. They will have no qualms loudly pronouncing you 'weird' and of course white knights and betas will instinctively side with her. They also seem the most likely to get incensed if you show any signs of having a pair.
Based on a small but strong sample size, the worst of the worst are decent-looking blonde engineers, the ones who don't style themselves as nerdy but only try to hang out with cool people. They get so committed to excluding the lame people so abundant in engineering that they get these monstrous bitch shields.
|
|
| 05-13-2012 11:48 PM |
|
|
Cr33pin
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 7,307
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 180
|
RE: Do the girls you bang follow a pattern in physical features?
i like tall girls, short girls, skinny girls, thick girls, hell sometimes chubby girls or if im feeling wild for the night fat girls, blondes, redhead, brunetts, bald girls, girls with big boobs, girls with no boobs, like big butts but i will smash a chick suffering from nasatal.
blue eyes, green eyes, LOVE brown eyes, pink eye, honey badger dont care!!
but even with all that said an done... i like colombia style thick bodies an brown eyes. So pretty much latin women would be my "prefference" but that doesnt mean i dont like chicks with all types of other features
Bruising cervix since 96
#TeamBeard
"I just want to live out my days drinking virgin margaritas and banging virgin señoritas" - Uncle Cr33pin
|
|
| 05-14-2012 12:11 AM |
|
|
Cincinnatus
True Player
    
Posts: 2,898
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 21
|
RE: Do the girls you bang follow a pattern in physical features?
Comparing some of my first bangs...
1.) About 5'0", 110 lbs., long and straight dirty blonde hair, brown eyes.
2.) About 5'6", 120 lbs., shoulder length straight blonde hair, blue eyes.
3.) About 5'3, 100 lbs., curly dirty blonde hair, green eyes.
4.) Hispanic, about 5'6" 125-130 lbs., shoulder length black hair, brown eyes.
...to my most recent bang: Curly brown hair, blue eyes, five feet tall, 95 lbs.
I just look for "fuckable" honestly. Mostly petite but certainly not always.
(02-16-2014 01:05 PM)jariel Wrote: Since chicks have decided they have the right to throw their pussies around like Joe Montana, I have the right to be Jerry Rice.
(This post was last modified: 05-28-2012 12:13 AM by Cincinnatus.)
|
|
| 05-28-2012 12:08 AM |
|
|
Catch 22
Chubby Chaser
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 0
|
RE: Do the girls you bang follow a pattern in physical features?
(05-13-2012 11:48 PM)basilransom Wrote: (05-13-2012 10:58 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote: (05-13-2012 10:25 PM)basilransom Wrote: In my experience, American blondes are more judgmental, narrow-minded, insular, more likely to only fuck within their circle, than girls with other colors. More easily weirded out if you say something off-color.
Definitely. I agree with this 100 percent. It even plays out online. It's always the blondes that are the most insistent on dating within their own race (and even penalize, "match-wise," you for not adhering to their insular views). I have a huge sampling in my head, and blondes are overwhelming the ones who do this:
I don't know if it's a genetic thing or it's being blonde in the US. When I talk to a certain type of girl, to which blondes far more often belong, it's like I have too much personality, I'm too weird, and too much of a foreigner, even though I'm white and American-born. Like they have this narrow band of men they socialize with, and everyone else is just "eww, rando." Usually but not always they skew towards the sorority type. And some of the blondes I have fucked made it clear that they had a strong weirdo streak themselves, so they were atypical.
My impression doesn't owe at all to online dating, because I only get a yes/no rejection there, and I don't get the nuanced emotional reaction that you do in person, that judgmental contortion of the face these bitches love to show when you show the slightest deviation from normalcy. They will have no qualms loudly pronouncing you 'weird' and of course white knights and betas will instinctively side with her. They also seem the most likely to get incensed if you show any signs of having a pair.
Based on a small but strong sample size, the worst of the worst are decent-looking blonde engineers, the ones who don't style themselves as nerdy but only try to hang out with cool people. They get so committed to excluding the lame people so abundant in engineering that they get these monstrous bitch shields.
I think most blondes have dyed their hair and self-select. Seems like blondes, at least on average, put more effort into makeup, nice clothes, etc. It seems a little odd that that would correlate with close-mindedness and sensitive to "rando," but not so much when you consider that they seem to have blander personalities and are more mainstream.
|
|
| 05-28-2012 07:05 PM |
|
|