Post: #1

The internet is full of blogs discussing how creepy men stare at or cat call women and how "threatened" and "violated" women feel. Even most non-feminist men defend this viewpoint.

It seems to me most men that stare at a lady do it because she's usually dressed in a way that attracts the attention of the male.

Why isn't the woman held responsible for men staring at her or making cat calls?

Isn't she the one that initiates the provocation?

Shouldn't men feel more violated than women because of the unwanted erections and sexual stimulation women are provoking?

Most feminists are now busy trying to make cat calls illegal as well as criminalize "creepy stares". We men are just letting them get away with it. While I don't support criminalizing women for dressing sexy, I think men shouldn't be penalized for stares or cat calls. In a real free society women should be able to dress anyway they want or even go naked in public. Men should be able to stare at them in any way they want as well as make cat calls.

Post: #2

Women want men horny enough to be manipulated but not touching or getting any satisfaction so they remain in state of horniness and can still be manipulated.This is the essence of feminism.Look but not touch.

Post: #3

In 10-15 years they'll wish it were still happening.

"The Male Gaze, and Why I Miss it"

http://t.co/8ifkLCqn

Post: #4

I forget the name of the comedian, but he said that when a woman dresses sexy she thinks it's like a laser guided missile. Actually, it's more like a carpet bombing, you are going to hit a lot of unintended targets.

Post: #5

I love it when women are defiant, claiming they don't get dressed for men, but for themselves. Actually, it's neither. They dress for other women first, then men. They love sizing themselves up against other chicks, and criticizing what other chicks are wearing. They also like being noticed by men, but they don't want it to be so obvious. Unless they think the guy is hot, then they don't care how he expresses it.

Post: #6

(04-11-2012 08:21 AM)Gmac Wrote:  In 10-15 years they'll wish it were still happening.

"The Male Gaze, and Why I Miss it"

http://t.co/8ifkLCqn

That was a great read! Thank you Gmac!

Post: #7

I was thinking about it today. The problem is that women don't want to fuck every half-decent looking member of the opposite sex, unlike men do.

But imagine if a girl saw Brad Pitt walking down the street (and for argument's sake, he's single without kids). Would no chick say hello? Would there not be a single chick who tries to meet him? Of course not, plenty would. And this is the same thing as a man hollering at women passing by. A man in his prime is as ready to fuck a random 8 walking down the street about as much your average girl is ready to fuck Brad Pitt. Women want to forbid men from beckoning to that woman, yet they'd see nothing wrong with a girl trying to talk to Brad Pitt. Once you acknowledge the differences between the sexes, it's clear that 'equality' is hardly the goal. Their aim is to suppress our freedom, to make choosing an exclusively female prerogative. In short, next time a chick criticizes the male gazers and macks on the streets, say to her "You wouldn't stare at Brad Pitt? You wouldn't try and talk to him? You would? So don't tell me I can't look at and talk to a random cute girl."

Another thing... these women complaining would shriek at any man who came on to a woman saying, "Hey, wanna fuck?" Yet if an attractive woman came on to a man like that, and she meant it, he wouldn't have such a problem. In telling men NOT to make bold, crude come-ons, you're telling us to treat women *differently.* I thought you didn't want to go down that path...