Post: #26

(04-12-2012 08:51 AM)P Dog Wrote:  

(04-12-2012 05:58 AM)Eliogabalus Wrote:  

(04-12-2012 02:11 AM)P Dog Wrote:  I don't know about British South Africans but the Afrikaaner girls are notably more attractive than Aussie women.

thats because of the dutch genes vs british genes, big difference.

Yeah, that's what I was getting at. Afrikaaners are a lot taller than Brits too. They have a tall, solid build. If you want your son to be a quarterback in football have babies with an Afrikaaner. haha, I just realized Roosh said the same about Danish girls.

They are also much blonde haired than the british south africans. british/irish genes produce mostly brown haired people with normal statures, meanwhile dutch, scandinavian and geman(specially the northern ones) produce blonde giants.

Thanks to the british genes is that the vast majority of developed new world nation average is quite low. In the us the lesser the british influenced a state is the better it gets in terms of women quality.

Post: #27

"the women tend to be a little hairy"

Yum. Nothing is tastier than a nice thick bush.

Post: #28

Sydney-a smorgasboard of beautiful women from all over the world and a banging nightlife

Post: #29

It depends on the personal taste, for me it's basically all the places where tall natural blondes are abundant. Finland,Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Northern Germany, Estonia, Latvia, North-west russia. Out of those only Estonia, Latvia and North-west russia wouldn't fit as fully developed nations.