Post: #1

Ok. This should settle it. I think the forum can now join in unison and say NOBAMA 2012! This guy has to be the most beta president in American history. I don't remember who posted that one video of him getting checked by his wife in some interview with Barbara Walters. Wow. What's up with this dude?

Post: #2

Meh, I think he just knows who his supporters are. It makes sense with all the openings the Republicans have given him on birth control and other social-issue stuff. This is what a president who wins the female vote by 20 points looks like.

Post: #3

i never been so ashamed to be american.

Post: #4

Yeah, man, but look at the GOP...It's a different form of feminism.

Republicans say, "Man up! Get married. Start a family."

That empowers women at the expense of men.

There's no pro-male political party.

Post: #5

(04-04-2012 11:09 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  There's no pro-male political party.

Sure there is. The Libertarian party.

Eliminate government enforced transfer payments from men to women (via taxes, funding for feminist causes, alimony, no-review child support, etc.), and women will actually have to rely on men directly instead of indirectly via the government. And that will require women earning a man's commitment, rather than getting a government entitlement because she sports an axe wound.

Post: #6

I actually want one of those t-shirts. Given how much of a "misogynist" and "sexist" I'm accused of being by people I have to deal with periodically--for saying a crumb of what I write around here--it would come off as trolling. Probably get me laid too.

Post: #7

(04-04-2012 11:15 PM)assman Wrote:  

(04-04-2012 11:09 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  There's no pro-male political party.

Sure there is. The Libertarian party.

Eliminate government enforced transfer payments from men to women (via taxes, funding for feminist causes, alimony, no-review child support, etc.), and women will actually have to rely on men directly instead of indirectly via the government. And that will require women earning a man's commitment, rather than getting a government entitlement because she sports an axe wound.

Great point.

Post: #8

(04-04-2012 11:15 PM)assman Wrote:  

(04-04-2012 11:09 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  There's no pro-male political party.

Sure there is. The Libertarian party.

Eliminate government enforced transfer payments from men to women (via taxes, funding for feminist causes, alimony, no-review child support, etc.), and women will actually have to rely on men directly instead of indirectly via the government. And that will require women earning a man's commitment, rather than getting a government entitlement because she sports an axe wound.

+1 on this. It's a shame that this party will probably never gain any real traction in the U.S.

Post: #9

Post: #10

delete

Post: #11

(04-04-2012 11:15 PM)assman Wrote:  

(04-04-2012 11:09 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  There's no pro-male political party.

Sure there is. The Libertarian party.

Eliminate government enforced transfer payments from men to women (via taxes, funding for feminist causes, alimony, no-review child support, etc.), and women will actually have to rely on men directly instead of indirectly via the government. And that will require women earning a man's commitment, rather than getting a government entitlement because she sports an axe wound.

Yes, but do you really think we can go backwards? The cat is out of the bag. Mike's right. I believe that the future of politics is the players vs. the haters. That's where all this shit is going.

In an extreme, polar way of thinking, politics is inherently feminine. It is a way of empowering the weak. Otherwise we have war, which is masculine.

I think we need balance. Right now, things are moving out of balance. We are playing roulette with our world, betting on big ideas, but ignoring the reality of what is happening.

Post: #12

(04-04-2012 11:16 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I actually want one of those t-shirts. Given how much of a "misogynist" and "sexist" I'm accused of being by people I have to deal with periodically--for saying a crumb of what I write around here--it would come off as trolling. Probably get me laid too.

I get the same thing. I piss a lot of "regular" people off. But you know what ...when I roll out to a club
or bar with a few women I do the Balkan King style that Greek Kamaki preaches.
I take care of EVERYTHING and I say and do what I please. I never hear women complaining after that.

Post: #13

It's election season. Obama has been criticized by women for having predominantly men around his inner circle. That being said, he is typically beta the way the vast majority of men are.

Post: #14

(04-04-2012 11:16 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I actually want one of those t-shirts. Given how much of a "misogynist" and "sexist" I'm accused of being by people I have to deal with periodically--for saying a crumb of what I write around here--it would come off as trolling. Probably get me laid too.

Exactly what I was thinking homie

Post: #15

Is this shit REAL? He's an even bigger pussy than I thought. Not that it matters who is President... sometime within the next ten years the economy here is going into another recession/depression, bigger than the last. There's no way this country can sustain the baby boomers and the growing portion of the population dependent on welfare.

Post: #16

That pic of the "check out" is fake. There was more going on there, pretty sure it's on snopes. Obama panders to his voters like every good politician does. Nothing to see here, if he were to go against the mold he wouldn't have a shot at the 2012 election. Not that I'm defending him or anything, but let's be intelligent about this.