UrbanNerd
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,039
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 10
|
RE: Where are the easy broads in the US?
I think that map and the original question are comparing apples and oranges. While the northeast (according to the map) may have more single women, the QUESTION was where the easy broads are? I think if DC had easy broads, there would not be as many anti-DC threads on this I site. I always thought/knew DC had more available women than men but them chicks STILL give you a hard time (gotta give the DC chicks for having heart, lol).
The ANSWER(s) to the question be:
- Midwest USA (especially upper midwest Dakotas, Minnesota, etc)
- States with no real big cities (Delaware, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, S.Carolina)
- Rural/Semi-Rural areas of big states (central/northern Pennsylvania, some areas of Texas)
- The "non-descript" states (Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, etc)
|
|
| 03-24-2012 09:20 AM |
|
|
Hotwheels
International Playboy
     
Posts: 5,315
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 80
|
RE: Where are the easy broads in the US?
(03-24-2012 09:20 AM)UrbanNerd Wrote: I think that map and the original question are comparing apples and oranges. While the northeast (according to the map) may have more single women, the QUESTION was where the easy broads are? I think if DC had easy broads, there would not be as many anti-DC threads on this I site. I always thought/knew DC had more available women than men but them chicks STILL give you a hard time (gotta give the DC chicks for having heart, lol).
The ANSWER(s) to the question be:
- Midwest USA (especially upper midwest Dakotas, Minnesota, etc)
- States with no real big cities (Delaware, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, S.Carolina)
- Rural/Semi-Rural areas of big states (central/northern Pennsylvania, some areas of Texas)
- The "non-descript" states (Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, etc)
The first map shows where broads seem to have higher sex drives which would lead one to think the likelyhood of finding those DTF would be easier. It doesn't show anything about the number of single women compared to men.
If one goes to the blogpost on okcupid the DTF map has a slider where one can see how it changes for different ages, which is kind of interesting.
Like you say areas like DC and Miami that have a high number of single broads have been shown here to not necessarily be all that easy, but the map in the first post doesn't show a hotbed of DTF broads in those areas either.
Mech has consistently said Tampa is full of sluts and the map does in fact show that area to have a high concentration of broads that want sex daily.
__________________________________________________
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
|
|
| 03-24-2012 12:13 PM |
|
|
Samseau
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 14,309
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 287
|
RE: Where are the easy broads in the US?
Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.
(This post was last modified: 03-24-2012 02:40 PM by Samseau.)
|
|
| 03-24-2012 02:39 PM |
|
|
anewtypedude
Banned
Posts: 101
Joined: Aug 2011
|
RE: Where are the easy broads in the US?
(03-24-2012 11:02 AM)BadgerHut Wrote: I've seen that map a bunch of times, and it's not just the numbers - the problem is that female-heavy areas tend to super-hypergamy and scarcity mentality on the part of women, requiring a dude to have ultra tight asshole game. Vox riffed on this based on a question from me:
http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2012/0...ntity.html
The basic phenomenon in my view is that when there are few dudes, women become even more paranoid about landing a man, so they are skittish about dating a man with even a hint of beta...when you don't get that many shots at a guy, you have to make the most of them, which means not risking your time and trouble dating Poindexter. Beta males also become self-emasculated trying to play to the feminized environment that results, only heavy alphas can get away with bucking their pink-rallies-and-brunch trends. The mainstream scenes in DC and NYC are total cuntfests because of all this.
Plus having lots of chicks around makes for a massive preselection swarm, since there are just more women around a given guy.
This is false. There is a study on this: women in countries with a higher female to male ratio are less reserved. In those countries, the women are forced play the male game (bang). In sausage fest countries, the males are forced to play the female game (LTR).
|
|
| 03-24-2012 06:04 PM |
|
|
anewtypedude
Banned
Posts: 101
Joined: Aug 2011
|
RE: Where are the easy broads in the US?
Best countries to get laid
Here's the paper. It's pretty technical though. Some good country to get laid indexed by sociosexuality (how much they love to bang):
Latvia, Finland, Austria, New Zealand, Slovania, Lithuania, Germany
Chastity belt wearing countries  : Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Taiwan, Ukraine, Lebanon, South Korea
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2012 03:52 AM by anewtypedude.)
|
|
| 03-25-2012 03:47 AM |
|
|
BadgerHut
Wingman
  
Posts: 804
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 14
|
RE: Where are the easy broads in the US?
(03-24-2012 06:04 PM)anewtypedude Wrote: (03-24-2012 11:02 AM)BadgerHut Wrote: I've seen that map a bunch of times, and it's not just the numbers - the problem is that female-heavy areas tend to super-hypergamy and scarcity mentality on the part of women, requiring a dude to have ultra tight asshole game. Vox riffed on this based on a question from me:
http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2012/0...ntity.html
The basic phenomenon in my view is that when there are few dudes, women become even more paranoid about landing a man, so they are skittish about dating a man with even a hint of beta...when you don't get that many shots at a guy, you have to make the most of them, which means not risking your time and trouble dating Poindexter. Beta males also become self-emasculated trying to play to the feminized environment that results, only heavy alphas can get away with bucking their pink-rallies-and-brunch trends. The mainstream scenes in DC and NYC are total cuntfests because of all this.
Plus having lots of chicks around makes for a massive preselection swarm, since there are just more women around a given guy.
This is false. There is a study on this: women in countries with a higher female to male ratio are less reserved. In those countries, the women are forced play the male game (bang). In sausage fest countries, the males are forced to play the female game (LTR).
Your point doesn't invalidate my point. My point is that a high F:M ratio appears to produce hypergamous behavior, which means women put out more, but they put out for a smaller group of men. So an average guy is in bad straits in such an environment, even thought the conventional wisdom is that he's living in a bounty.
|
|
| 03-25-2012 06:40 PM |
|
|