Forum homeGamesearch

Tinder App

馃搫 Rendered from the archive database (the original static capture of this page wasn't kept). Content is complete; styling is simplified.
Pages: 1 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 268
michelin 路 2015-03-30 10:48:00 路 #3776
I'm new to online game. Swiped about 60-70 girls to get 1 match (a 6.5 who hasn't responded yet to my message).

It seems to be hard to collect matches, so I plan to uninstall and hit the street again to get some real numbers.
Mister X 路 2015-03-30 10:57:00 路 #3777
(03-30-2015 09:49 AM)zatara Wrote:  Saving their swipes for people they actually like is a good thing though, in my opinion. It means you're less likely to waste your time chatting with someone who just casually swiped right for you with no real interest.

At 50 swipes a day you should probably be getting 5+ new matches a day back anyway. 5 new girls a day is enough of a time sink, I think. An attractive girl is probably still getting 25+ matches a day, if she gets 50 right swipes.

I think the forecasts of Tinders doom are somewhat premature. It's still been hopping in every city I've used it in in the last few months. I've yet to talk to a good looking girl who's complained about the like limit - possibly because they're already pretty selective.

Yeah, that's why I swipe selectively. I only want to match with girls I'm truly into. And for a time, that was happening. And then it wasn't. The height of my Tinder run was late summer/early fall. I had gotten about 200 matches in two months. And then I hit the wall. I would struggle to get one match a day, despite swiping through hundreds of profiles. I would delete my profile every few days and start over, but it was the same shit. Get one or two matches that first day of making a new profile, and nothing after that. Then tinder plus came and it's even worse now. It seems most men here agree that it's worse.

I don't think it's premature to say they're finished. I think most would say that they are. There are other apps that do pretty much what Tinder does but for free.

The only reason it's still somewhat kicking is because no new app has come out to take away the market share. Hinge, Bumble, and Happn all have a variety of things wrong with them. Whether it's lack of user base, buggy performance, or stupid gimmicks like Bumble's thing where women have to initiate the conversation or the match expires after 24 hours.

If/when a new app comes and does exactly what Tinder does - swipe left for no, right for yes - but it's free, and there's no performance issues - Tinder will be officially done.

I expect something new by the summer as we live in a pretty fast and competitive world, but who knows. I think it's safe to say though that summer on Tinder this year won't be quite as enjoyable as it was last year and the years before that. They're certainly not on an upswing.
jamaicabound 路 2015-03-30 13:48:00 路 #3778
(03-30-2015 10:48 AM)michelin Wrote:  I'm new to online game. Swiped about 60-70 girls to get 1 match (a 6.5 who hasn't responded yet to my message).

It seems to be hard to collect matches, so I plan to uninstall and hit the street again to get some real numbers.

I used to be picky about who I swiped, however its a numbers game so honestly the best way to approach it is just swipe everyone as a yes, sure you'll swipe some fatties and some chicks your not attracted to but still the number who like you back or respond is going to be small enough its easy to filter from mutual likes or whatever.

With POF you can swipe yes all day long and go through thousands of girls in a few minutes, on other apps like Tinder or Blendr your limited to so many per day so you can blow through your daily limit in a few minutes.

I don't think these apps are a waste of time, sure the response rate is pretty low and on blendr and tindr you dont even find out who liked you unless you also liked them but I figure I always got a few minutes to kill waiting in line somewhere or a few minutes before I leave the office, I'll open up the app flip through a few and then go about my business.
jamaicabound 路 2015-03-30 13:51:00 路 #3779
(03-30-2015 10:57 AM)Mister X Wrote:  
(03-30-2015 09:49 AM)zatara Wrote:  Saving their swipes for people they actually like is a good thing though, in my opinion. It means you're less likely to waste your time chatting with someone who just casually swiped right for you with no real interest.

At 50 swipes a day you should probably be getting 5+ new matches a day back anyway. 5 new girls a day is enough of a time sink, I think. An attractive girl is probably still getting 25+ matches a day, if she gets 50 right swipes.

I think the forecasts of Tinders doom are somewhat premature. It's still been hopping in every city I've used it in in the last few months. I've yet to talk to a good looking girl who's complained about the like limit - possibly because they're already pretty selective.

Yeah, that's why I swipe selectively. I only want to match with girls I'm truly into. And for a time, that was happening. And then it wasn't. The height of my Tinder run was late summer/early fall. I had gotten about 200 matches in two months. And then I hit the wall. I would struggle to get one match a day, despite swiping through hundreds of profiles. I would delete my profile every few days and start over, but it was the same shit. Get one or two matches that first day of making a new profile, and nothing after that. Then tinder plus came and it's even worse now. It seems most men here agree that it's worse.

I don't think it's premature to say they're finished. I think most would say that they are. There are other apps that do pretty much what Tinder does but for free.

The only reason it's still somewhat kicking is because no new app has come out to take away the market share. Hinge, Bumble, and Happn all have a variety of things wrong with them. Whether it's lack of user base, buggy performance, or stupid gimmicks like Bumble's thing where women have to initiate the conversation or the match expires after 24 hours.

If/when a new app comes and does exactly what Tinder does - swipe left for no, right for yes - but it's free, and there's no performance issues - Tinder will be officially done.

I expect something new by the summer as we live in a pretty fast and competitive world, but who knows. I think it's safe to say though that summer on Tinder this year won't be quite as enjoyable as it was last year and the years before that. They're certainly not on an upswing.

I read an interesting article the other day talking about how straight people need a Grindr. If you were to ask people whats the straight version of grindr they'd probably say blendr or tindr but basically the article said neither are really the smae thing, both kind of bill themselves as meet friends even though most peoples intention is sex, straight people need a straight lets fuck type app like grindr is for gays.

I've never been on grindr but appaently you have to upload like a leg pic, stomach pic, ab pic, bicep pic. I actually think that would be pretty cool as we all know how girls do the 45 degree angle pic or above the shoulders. I've hooked up with chicks before where they may have a nice face but got some tree trunks of legs or some other body part that just doesn't do it for me. If someone came up with a straight hookup app for straight people that was like legs, butt tits, face I think it could be a hit. That said probably only straight whores would be on there as most girls even if that is their inteniton dont want to put themselves out there like that. I used to use craigslist dating section and it was basically all fucking but girls didn't want to admit to themselves or others they wanted a hookup so would post in the w4m dating section and knew they were getting the same thing without hvaing to feel sleezy or look sleezy.
Lizard King 路 2015-03-30 20:19:00 路 #3780
(03-30-2015 10:48 AM)michelin Wrote:  I'm new to online game. Swiped about 60-70 girls to get 1 match (a 6.5 who hasn't responded yet to my message).

It seems to be hard to collect matches, so I plan to uninstall and hit the street again to get some real numbers.
Don't uninstall.

Leave it ticking in the background. Put something provocative or interesting in the About section. Leave it a few days, don't even respond to matches. go back and deal with it; everything you do will add to your learning, eventually you'll get better. Be positive.
blacknwhitespade 路 2015-03-31 11:56:00 路 #3781
I just downloaded tinder, it's asking for all my info from facebook. Is this how this app works? Is there any way around this? I don't want to have to cough up all my facebook info if I don't have to.
Clark 路 2015-03-31 14:10:00 路 #3782
(03-31-2015 11:56 AM)blacknwhitespade Wrote:  I just downloaded tinder, it's asking for all my info from facebook. Is this how this app works? Is there any way around this? I don't want to have to cough up all my facebook info if I don't have to.

Create separate 'fake' FB account for this.
OGNorCal707 路 2015-03-31 18:08:00 路 #3783
Tinder has been a complete and utter waste of my time so far, not a single date, shit I haven't even got a chick to give me her phone number yet, it's really annoying. I keep telling myself to delete it then suddenly I get a couple hot chicks match on there, so I cling onto some hope that it will yield results. At first I wasn't even getting girls that were replying to my initlal text, now I'm getting girls who are replying, but either taking forever with their replies, even when I see that they are "active" on there, or suddenly go radio silence on me when I start to ask them for their phone # or suggest to hang out.

Maybe my online game is kind of weak, but I'm really starting to think that these chicks are just out to attention whore or are just so bombarded with guys messaging them that they are ADHD and being ridiculously picky. Whatever the case it's fucking lame, I guess I'm not investing a great deal of time or energy, but when 100% of the girls are flaking, it's getting kind of old, and is kind of discouraging.
Lizard King 路 2015-03-31 19:49:00 路 #3784
@b/w fake facebook. Worked for me.
Brodiaga 路 2015-03-31 19:54:00 路 #3785
(03-31-2015 11:56 AM)blacknwhitespade Wrote:  I just downloaded tinder, it's asking for all my info from facebook. Is this how this app works? Is there any way around this? I don't want to have to cough up all my facebook info if I don't have to.

Tinder will not post anything on FB.

It will use your name and age, so if you want to change that, you need another FB account or change it in your main account before you link it to Tinder.

You can only use photos from FB for your Tinder profile. If you don't like your FB friends to see your Tinder profile photos, just post them as private and nobody else will see them, but you can still use them on Tinder.
jamaicabound 路 2015-03-31 22:12:00 路 #3786
(03-31-2015 06:08 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  Tinder has been a complete and utter waste of my time so far, not a single date, shit I haven't even got a chick to give me her phone number yet, it's really annoying. I keep telling myself to delete it then suddenly I get a couple hot chicks match on there, so I cling onto some hope that it will yield results. At first I wasn't even getting girls that were replying to my initlal text, now I'm getting girls who are replying, but either taking forever with their replies, even when I see that they are "active" on there, or suddenly go radio silence on me when I start to ask them for their phone # or suggest to hang out.

Maybe my online game is kind of weak, but I'm really starting to think that these chicks are just out to attention whore or are just so bombarded with guys messaging them that they are ADHD and being ridiculously picky. Whatever the case it's fucking lame, I guess I'm not investing a great deal of time or energy, but when 100% of the girls are flaking, it's getting kind of old, and is kind of discouraging.

I'm really striking out with tinder as well and it's quite surprising. Not to sound full of myself but back when I was on okcupid and other sites I remember actually getting a message from okcupid or pof saying I was above average attractiveness and had a lot of women itnerested in me so they were going to show my photo more and match me with hotter women but now I find myself striking out on tinder. I literally go through whatever the max amount of swipes you can and am pretty liberal with my swipe yes's and I still have yet to get a match
jamaicabound 路 2015-03-31 22:14:00 路 #3787
(03-31-2015 07:49 PM)Lizard King Wrote:  @b/w fake facebook. Worked for me.

For anyone trying to make a fake facebook they now seem to require a phone number. I think they purposely try to not allow text forwarding or texting apps as verification and try to limit it to real phone numbers. I had tried text plus and a number of other apps to get my verification text and none would go through. Finally out of the blue FB gave me an option to receive a call instead of a text so I put in my text plus NY number and wala got the call with verification code.
N掳6 路 2015-03-31 23:54:00 路 #3788
(03-31-2015 11:56 AM)blacknwhitespade Wrote:  I just downloaded tinder, it's asking for all my info from facebook. Is this how this app works? Is there any way around this? I don't want to have to cough up all my facebook info if I don't have to.

Change/ keep your age to/ at <29.
Lizard King 路 2015-04-01 04:42:00 路 #3789
(03-31-2015 10:14 PM)jamaicabound Wrote:  
(03-31-2015 07:49 PM)Lizard King Wrote:  @b/w fake facebook. Worked for me.

For anyone trying to make a fake facebook they now seem to require a phone number. I think they purposely try to not allow text forwarding or texting apps as verification and try to limit it to real phone numbers. I had tried text plus and a number of other apps to get my verification text and none would go through. Finally out of the blue FB gave me an option to receive a call instead of a text so I put in my text plus NY number and wala got the call with verification code.

Perhaps because you're using a phone to set it up?

I set it up on a laptop, and didn't have to use phone verification.
jamaicabound 路 2015-04-01 08:41:00 路 #3790
(04-01-2015 04:42 AM)Lizard King Wrote:  
(03-31-2015 10:14 PM)jamaicabound Wrote:  
(03-31-2015 07:49 PM)Lizard King Wrote:  @b/w fake facebook. Worked for me.

For anyone trying to make a fake facebook they now seem to require a phone number. I think they purposely try to not allow text forwarding or texting apps as verification and try to limit it to real phone numbers. I had tried text plus and a number of other apps to get my verification text and none would go through. Finally out of the blue FB gave me an option to receive a call instead of a text so I put in my text plus NY number and wala got the call with verification code.

Perhaps because you're using a phone to set it up?

I set it up on a laptop, and didn't have to use phone verification.

They must track IP's. I setup a lot of fake social media account for marketing and I notice after a period where I've setup a lot on twitter all the sudden they will want a phone number and FB asks me for one as well. Just incase anyone is prompted for a phone verification and not just email just use a texting or free call app and get a phone call instead of text.
Foolsgo1d 路 2015-04-01 22:08:00 路 #3791
(03-30-2015 01:51 PM)jamaicabound Wrote:  
(03-30-2015 10:57 AM)Mister X Wrote:  
(03-30-2015 09:49 AM)zatara Wrote:  Saving their swipes for people they actually like is a good thing though, in my opinion. It means you're less likely to waste your time chatting with someone who just casually swiped right for you with no real interest.

At 50 swipes a day you should probably be getting 5+ new matches a day back anyway. 5 new girls a day is enough of a time sink, I think. An attractive girl is probably still getting 25+ matches a day, if she gets 50 right swipes.

I think the forecasts of Tinders doom are somewhat premature. It's still been hopping in every city I've used it in in the last few months. I've yet to talk to a good looking girl who's complained about the like limit - possibly because they're already pretty selective.

Yeah, that's why I swipe selectively. I only want to match with girls I'm truly into. And for a time, that was happening. And then it wasn't. The height of my Tinder run was late summer/early fall. I had gotten about 200 matches in two months. And then I hit the wall. I would struggle to get one match a day, despite swiping through hundreds of profiles. I would delete my profile every few days and start over, but it was the same shit. Get one or two matches that first day of making a new profile, and nothing after that. Then tinder plus came and it's even worse now. It seems most men here agree that it's worse.

I don't think it's premature to say they're finished. I think most would say that they are. There are other apps that do pretty much what Tinder does but for free.

The only reason it's still somewhat kicking is because no new app has come out to take away the market share. Hinge, Bumble, and Happn all have a variety of things wrong with them. Whether it's lack of user base, buggy performance, or stupid gimmicks like Bumble's thing where women have to initiate the conversation or the match expires after 24 hours.

If/when a new app comes and does exactly what Tinder does - swipe left for no, right for yes - but it's free, and there's no performance issues - Tinder will be officially done.

I expect something new by the summer as we live in a pretty fast and competitive world, but who knows. I think it's safe to say though that summer on Tinder this year won't be quite as enjoyable as it was last year and the years before that. They're certainly not on an upswing.

I read an interesting article the other day talking about how straight people need a Grindr. If you were to ask people whats the straight version of grindr they'd probably say blendr or tindr but basically the article said neither are really the smae thing, both kind of bill themselves as meet friends even though most peoples intention is sex, straight people need a straight lets fuck type app like grindr is for gays.

I've never been on grindr but appaently you have to upload like a leg pic, stomach pic, ab pic, bicep pic. I actually think that would be pretty cool as we all know how girls do the 45 degree angle pic or above the shoulders. I've hooked up with chicks before where they may have a nice face but got some tree trunks of legs or some other body part that just doesn't do it for me. If someone came up with a straight hookup app for straight people that was like legs, butt tits, face I think it could be a hit. That said probably only straight whores would be on there as most girls even if that is their inteniton dont want to put themselves out there like that. I used to use craigslist dating section and it was basically all fucking but girls didn't want to admit to themselves or others they wanted a hookup so would post in the w4m dating section and knew they were getting the same thing without hvaing to feel sleezy or look sleezy.

Grndr works well because gays are just thirsty for dick and ass at a rate a man likes it. An app designed for straight people will always rely on the woman and her needs which is not the same as a gay guys needs.
bigbait 路 2015-04-02 14:11:00 路 #3792
(03-30-2015 01:51 PM)jamaicabound Wrote:  I read an interesting article the other day talking about how straight people need a Grindr. If you were to ask people whats the straight version of grindr they'd probably say blendr or tindr but basically the article said neither are really the smae thing, both kind of bill themselves as meet friends even though most peoples intention is sex, straight people need a straight lets fuck type app like grindr is for gays.

What article did you read?
This one?
http://magazine.good.is/articles/how-to-...r-to-women

(04-01-2015 10:08 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Grndr works well because gays are just thirsty for dick and ass at a rate a man likes it. An app designed for straight people will always rely on the woman and her needs which is not the same as a gay guys needs.

There are definitely girls who will use a real hookup up.
For example the girls who used Tinder in the early days (nowadays most girl's Tinder profiles i see say "not looking for a hookup") or all the girls on okcupid who list "casual sex" in their profile.

Of course there are still insane amounts of girls on both tinder or okcupid who are down for casual sex, they usually just need to be cooked tuth's first date bang recipe first.

In my experience most girls on okcupid who put "casual sex" in their profile are overweight or cam girls.

I think some questions that may shed some light on this are:
1) Why did tinder succeed as a hookup app in the early days?
2) Why is tinder no longer primarily a hookup app?

These are the main theories:
1) The percentage of women who want NSA sex is low. Tinder's early adopters were into NSA sex. As tinder saturates the population the percentage of women on tinder who want NSA sex necessarily drops.
1.A) Tinder's early adopters were younger. Youth is somewhat correlated with a desire for NSA sex.
1.B) Tinder's early adopters were partiers (Tinder market intentionally focus on this demographic). Partiers is somewhat correlated with a desire for NSA sex.
1.C) Tinder's early adopters were by definition greater risk takers because they were willing to use a new dating app.
2) As tinder saturates the male population it is easier for women to find the best looking guys. This theory implies that Tinder is still a hookup app for guys with chiseled abs and model faces.
jamaicabound 路 2015-04-02 14:46:00 路 #3793
(04-02-2015 02:11 PM)bigbait Wrote:  
(03-30-2015 01:51 PM)jamaicabound Wrote:  I read an interesting article the other day talking about how straight people need a Grindr. If you were to ask people whats the straight version of grindr they'd probably say blendr or tindr but basically the article said neither are really the smae thing, both kind of bill themselves as meet friends even though most peoples intention is sex, straight people need a straight lets fuck type app like grindr is for gays.

What article did you read?
This one?
http://magazine.good.is/articles/how-to-...r-to-women

(04-01-2015 10:08 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Grndr works well because gays are just thirsty for dick and ass at a rate a man likes it. An app designed for straight people will always rely on the woman and her needs which is not the same as a gay guys needs.

There are definitely girls who will use a real hookup up.
For example the girls who used Tinder in the early days (nowadays most girl's Tinder profiles i see say "not looking for a hookup") or all the girls on okcupid who list "casual sex" in their profile.

Of course there are still insane amounts of girls on both tinder or okcupid who are down for casual sex, they usually just need to be cooked tuth's first date bang recipe first.

In my experience most girls on okcupid who put "casual sex" in their profile are overweight or cam girls.

I think some questions that may shed some light on this are:
1) Why did tinder succeed as a hookup app in the early days?
2) Why is tinder no longer primarily a hookup app?

These are the main theories:
1) The percentage of women who want NSA sex is low. Tinder's early adopters were into NSA sex. As tinder saturates the population the percentage of women on tinder who want NSA sex necessarily drops.
1.A) Tinder's early adopters were younger. Youth is somewhat correlated with a desire for NSA sex.
1.B) Tinder's early adopters were partiers (Tinder market intentionally focus on this demographic). Partiers is somewhat correlated with a desire for NSA sex.
1.C) Tinder's early adopters were by definition greater risk takers because they were willing to use a new dating app.
2) As tinder saturates the male population it is easier for women to find the best looking guys. This theory implies that Tinder is still a hookup app for guys with chiseled abs and model faces.

I found myself laughing at your post regarding the girls who say I'm not here for hookups. I'm new to Tinder and have been noticing that and its like get the fuck off here and go to eharmony if your looking for a life partner or go to okcupid to "date" but don't come to a hookup app to not hookup.

As someone who is using tinder to attempt to hookup a threesome its very frustrating lol
Ingocnito 路 2015-04-02 15:39:00 路 #3794
Seems to be getting increasingly uglier lately in my area.
And whats up with all these "outdoorsie" bitches saying:"I love outdoor anything, guns, hunting, fishing, boating.." Actually pretty cute girls too... who apparently were taught by their fathers or boyfriends to do this shit so they have some identity.

The level of "man activities" in profiles is silly.

Oh, and every girl does "yoga" now, drinks IPAs, does mud-runs, sky dives, and has pictures of lame ass monuments overseas in background. God the herd is herdy.
Lizard King 路 2015-04-02 15:52:00 路 #3795
(04-02-2015 03:39 PM)Ingocnito Wrote:  Seems to be getting increasingly uglier lately in my area.
And whats up with all these "outdoorsie" bitches saying:"I love outdoor anything, guns, hunting, fishing, boating.." Actually pretty cute girls too... who apparently were taught by their fathers or boyfriends to do this shit so they have some identity.

The level of "man activities" in profiles is silly.

Oh, and every girl does "yoga" now, drinks IPAs, does mud-runs, sky dives, and has pictures of lame ass monuments overseas in background. God the herd is herdy.

Exactly the same for me in a 3rd tier UK city.

Photos of lizards with their spawn.
Drinking.
At a festival or concert.
Striking an 'outrageous' pose.
Numerous photos but all of groups of lizards.
Etc..

It's nauseating.

We want to see how feminine a woman is. We don't want to see how irresponsible she is.
CH-Toronto 路 2015-04-02 15:59:00 路 #3796
(04-02-2015 03:52 PM)Lizard King Wrote:  
(04-02-2015 03:39 PM)Ingocnito Wrote:  Seems to be getting increasingly uglier lately in my area.
And whats up with all these "outdoorsie" bitches saying:"I love outdoor anything, guns, hunting, fishing, boating.." Actually pretty cute girls too... who apparently were taught by their fathers or boyfriends to do this shit so they have some identity.

The level of "man activities" in profiles is silly.

Oh, and every girl does "yoga" now, drinks IPAs, does mud-runs, sky dives, and has pictures of lame ass monuments overseas in background. God the herd is herdy.

Exactly the same for me in a 3rd tier UK city.

Photos of lizards with their spawn.
Drinking.
At a festival or concert.
Striking an 'outrageous' pose.
Numerous photos but all of groups of lizards.
Etc..

It's nauseating.

We want to see how feminine a woman is. We don't want to see how irresponsible she is.

I'm just lucky there's no limit on the swipe left.
bigbait 路 2015-04-02 17:40:00 路 #3797
Let's try to answer the question of what would happen if we created the perfect straight hookup app.

For the purpose of the thought experiment assume that:
1) When a person signs up for the hookup they agree to meet for a one hour no strings attached sex session.
2) No guy or girl ever misses a scheduled sex appointment.
3) There is an objective scale of attractiveness for both men and women (0-5). (I used 0-5 because that is what okcupid used).
3) There is a normal distribution of attractiveness - i.e. a bell curve. That is what okcupid found to be true for female attractiveness but not for male attractiveness. (http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-l...ne-dating/)
4) The app guarantees that each person hooks up with most attractive person of the opposite sex who is available for the appointment.

I wrote a script that calculates how hot the guys have to be to get sex on this hypothetical app.
These are the variables I used.

Percent-of-guys-that-want-sex = 90%
Percent-of-girls-that-want-sex = 30%
Number-of-times-per-week-that-guys-want-sex = 5
Number-of-times-per-week-that-girls-want-sex = 2

With these values no guy who is below a 5 gets to fuck a girl who is 3 or above. No guy who is below a 4 is getting laid at all.

As long there are more guys that want to hookup than girls and as long as guys want sex more often than girls do, any straight hookup that is very efficient at matching people will be a wasteland for guys that are not photogenic.

I think the conclusion is that guys who have little luck with tinder would have much worse luck on a straight hookup app.

You can run this here: http://codepen.io/pen/
Code:
var numGuys = 90;
var numGirls = 30;
var guyAppointmentsPerWeek = 5;
var girlAppointmentsPerWeek = 2;

function getNormalAttractivenessDistribution() {
    return [ 0.07, 0.19, 0.23, 0.23, 0.19, 0.07 ];
}

function scale(input, factor) {
    for(var i = 0; i < input.length; ++i) {
        input[i] *= factor;
    }

    return input;
}
    
function expand(input, size) {
    var result = [];
    var i = 0;
    while(true) {
        if(input[i] < .5) {
            ++i;
            if(i >= input.length || result.length == size) {
                return result;
            }
        } else {
           input[i] -= 1;
           result.push(5 - i);
        }
    }
}

function getAttractivenessOfIndividuals(numIndividuals) {
    return expand(scale(getNormalAttractivenessDistribution(), numIndividuals), numIndividuals);
}

function getAppointments(numPeople, numAppointmentsPerWeek) {
    var appointments = [];

    var attractivenessOfIndividuals = getAttractivenessOfIndividuals(numPeople);
    for(var i = 0; i < attractivenessOfIndividuals.length; ++i) {
        var attractiveness = attractivenessOfIndividuals[i];
        for(var j = 0; j < numAppointmentsPerWeek; ++j) {
            appointments.push([i, attractiveness]);
        }
    }
    
    return appointments;
}

var girlAppointments = getAppointments(numGirls, girlAppointmentsPerWeek);
var guyAppointments = getAppointments(numGuys, guyAppointmentsPerWeek);


var html = "<table border=1px><tr><th>Appointment</th><th>Girl ID</th><th>Girl Rating</th><th>Guy ID</th><th>Guy Rating</th></tr>";
var i = 0;
while(i < girlAppointments.length && i < guyAppointments.length) {
    var girlAppt = girlAppointments[i];
    var guyAppt = guyAppointments[i];
    html += "<tr><td>" + i + "</td><td>" + girlAppt[0] + "</td><td>" + girlAppt[1] + "</td><td>" + guyAppt[0] + "</td><td>" + guyAppt[1] + "</td></tr>";
    ++i;
}

html += "</table>";

document.body.innerHTML += html;
zatara 路 2015-04-03 07:08:00 路 #3798
(04-02-2015 05:40 PM)bigbait Wrote:  Let's try to answer the question of what would happen if we created the perfect straight hookup app.

For the purpose of the thought experiment assume that:
1) When a person signs up for the hookup they agree to meet for a one hour no strings attached sex session.
2) No guy or girl ever misses a scheduled sex appointment.
3) There is an objective scale of attractiveness for both men and women (0-5). (I used 0-5 because that is what okcupid used).
3) There is a normal distribution of attractiveness - i.e. a bell curve. That is what okcupid found to be true for female attractiveness but not for male attractiveness. (http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-l...ne-dating/)
4) The app guarantees that each person hooks up with most attractive person of the opposite sex who is available for the appointment.

I wrote a script that calculates how hot the guys have to be to get sex on this hypothetical app.
These are the variables I used.

Percent-of-guys-that-want-sex = 90%
Percent-of-girls-that-want-sex = 30%
Number-of-times-per-week-that-guys-want-sex = 5
Number-of-times-per-week-that-girls-want-sex = 2

With these values no guy who is below a 5 gets to fuck a girl who is 3 or above. No guy who is below a 4 is getting laid at all.

As long there are more guys that want to hookup than girls and as long as guys want sex more often than girls do, any straight hookup that is very efficient at matching people will be a wasteland for guys that are not photogenic.

I think the conclusion is that guys who have little luck with tinder would have much worse luck on a straight hookup app.

You can run this here: http://codepen.io/pen/
Code:
var numGuys = 90;
var numGirls = 30;
var guyAppointmentsPerWeek = 5;
var girlAppointmentsPerWeek = 2;

function getNormalAttractivenessDistribution() {
    return [ 0.07, 0.19, 0.23, 0.23, 0.19, 0.07 ];
}

function scale(input, factor) {
    for(var i = 0; i < input.length; ++i) {
        input[i] *= factor;
    }

    return input;
}
    
function expand(input, size) {
    var result = [];
    var i = 0;
    while(true) {
        if(input[i] < .5) {
            ++i;
            if(i >= input.length || result.length == size) {
                return result;
            }
        } else {
           input[i] -= 1;
           result.push(5 - i);
        }
    }
}

function getAttractivenessOfIndividuals(numIndividuals) {
    return expand(scale(getNormalAttractivenessDistribution(), numIndividuals), numIndividuals);
}

function getAppointments(numPeople, numAppointmentsPerWeek) {
    var appointments = [];

    var attractivenessOfIndividuals = getAttractivenessOfIndividuals(numPeople);
    for(var i = 0; i < attractivenessOfIndividuals.length; ++i) {
        var attractiveness = attractivenessOfIndividuals[i];
        for(var j = 0; j < numAppointmentsPerWeek; ++j) {
            appointments.push([i, attractiveness]);
        }
    }
    
    return appointments;
}

var girlAppointments = getAppointments(numGirls, girlAppointmentsPerWeek);
var guyAppointments = getAppointments(numGuys, guyAppointmentsPerWeek);


var html = "<table border=1px><tr><th>Appointment</th><th>Girl ID</th><th>Girl Rating</th><th>Guy ID</th><th>Guy Rating</th></tr>";
var i = 0;
while(i < girlAppointments.length && i < guyAppointments.length) {
    var girlAppt = girlAppointments[i];
    var guyAppt = guyAppointments[i];
    html += "<tr><td>" + i + "</td><td>" + girlAppt[0] + "</td><td>" + girlAppt[1] + "</td><td>" + guyAppt[0] + "</td><td>" + guyAppt[1] + "</td></tr>";
    ++i;
}

html += "</table>";

document.body.innerHTML += html;

Just want to say thats a great post - really interesting work.

I think the stigma associated with such an app would keep away all but the most slutty girls unfortunately - similar to having 'Looking for: casual sex' on okcupid or elsewhere.
Thesoloist 路 2015-04-03 09:13:00 路 #3799
(03-31-2015 06:08 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  Tinder has been a complete and utter waste of my time so far, not a single date, shit I haven't even got a chick to give me her phone number yet, it's really annoying. I keep telling myself to delete it then suddenly I get a couple hot chicks match on there, so I cling onto some hope that it will yield results. At first I wasn't even getting girls that were replying to my initlal text, now I'm getting girls who are replying, but either taking forever with their replies, even when I see that they are "active" on there, or suddenly go radio silence on me when I start to ask them for their phone # or suggest to hang out.

Maybe my online game is kind of weak, but I'm really starting to think that these chicks are just out to attention whore or are just so bombarded with guys messaging them that they are ADHD and being ridiculously picky. Whatever the case it's fucking lame, I guess I'm not investing a great deal of time or energy, but when 100% of the girls are flaking, it's getting kind of old, and is kind of discouraging.

Sadly Tinder's "Glory" days have passed, the app is a graveyard now, best thing to do is hit the field. I got a buddy whose a good looking guy and he's banging 5's at best a year ago he was getting 6-9's

Things have changed
swuglyfe 路 2015-04-03 10:04:00 路 #3800
(04-03-2015 09:13 AM)Thesoloist Wrote:  Sadly Tinder's "Glory" days have passed, the app is a graveyard now, best thing to do is hit the field. I got a buddy whose a good looking guy and he's banging 5's at best a year ago he was getting 6-9's

Things have changed

Yep. A flash in the pan, as it were. The lessons learned are still relevant, re: the utter thirstiness of dudes breaking the whole system, blurredsevens on pictures, short, snarky bio, etc.

I have elected to turn down the internship offer I received from them, and will be working at a consulting firm instead over the summer.
A courtesy visit to their office sealed the deal for me: SWPL central.
Pages: 1 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 268