Post: #1

So I was flipping thru the July 2011 Cosmopolitan and there was this article named something like "How to Reply to His Text"

Guess this is women's text game... might be useful for all to see what kind of advice is being given out!

The main theme was "don't make it too easy for him" - you want him chasing you, because you are the reward that should only be given out to those who work hard enough for it.

It even went as far as saying that men would not value the girl who replies too eagerly and would appreciate more the girl who is a challenge (i.e. the girl who plays games).

So there you have it ladies - even if you are a fat, ugly, old, annoying bitch you can still raise your market value just by being a challenge. Act as the princess you feel you are, and he will see you as one, too.

Post: #2

(09-16-2011 03:56 AM)K-man Wrote:  So I was flipping thru the July 2011 Cosmopolitan and there was this article named something like "How to Reply to His Text"

Guess this is women's text game... might be useful for all to see what kind of advice is being given out!

The main theme was "don't make it too easy for him" - you want him chasing you, because you are the reward that should only be given out to those who work hard enough for it.

It even went as far as saying that men would not value the girl who replies too eagerly and would appreciate more the girl who is a challenge (i.e. the girl who plays games).

So there you have it ladies - even if you are a fat, ugly, old, annoying bitch you can still raise your market value just by being a challenge. Act as the princess you feel you are, and he will see you as one, too.

Bro, If your reading cosmo, I STRONGLY RECCOMEND buying Rooshes book , and reading the G manifesto . and start approaching, rather than trying to be a spy on thier mags. Wake up dog.

Post: #3

(09-16-2011 04:05 AM)TheHitMan Wrote:  Bro, If your reading cosmo, I STRONGLY RECCOMEND buying Rooshes book , and reading the G manifesto . and start approaching, rather than trying to be a spy on thier mags. Wake up dog.

Ok BRO. My first approach was in 1990 and first bang in 1992 - were you even born then?
Thanks for the tip anyway.

Post: #4

Nothing more annoying than some ditzy broad trying to gain hand by pretending to play hard to get.If the chicks who write for those mags think behaving like that makes us value them more they are even more deluded than I thought.A friendly and accessable girl beats some wanna be princess every time in my book.

Post: #5

The main difference between "chick game" and "guy game" is that men WORK to improve in order to make themselves the prize (physical/mental/accomplishment/skills). Women have the audacity to believe they are already a prize simply because they were born with a vagina.

Post: #6

To K-man's defense, I'm pretty sure he wasn't reading Cosmo for game tips.

Post: #7

Not a bad idea to skim through this shit if lizard has them in her house or bring it with her to yours....that way you never get caught by surprise....read the highlights...laugh and when she tries to pull a trick from cosmo on you...just say yah i know you read it in your magazine and watch the reaction on her face....

...as they say "keep your friends close...and your enemies...."

P.S also useful is to know what Oprah or Ellen are touting currently....i am amazed how many "strong" "independent" lizards listen to these whores....

Post: #8

Reading cosmo wouldn't be a bad social engineering move, would it?

Post: #9

(09-16-2011 10:05 AM)haywire Wrote:  Reading cosmo wouldn't be a bad social engineering move, would it?

Cosmo/Vogue/Elle/Marie Claire et al are largely responsible for the massive mindfuck Anglosphere women are suffering.They're not so much chick lite reading but rather social reengineering primers.In away I feel sorry for the 45 year old single mother brainwashed she's as hot as a 21 year old coed thanks to a cocktail of overt and subliminal messages internalised from writeups such as 'why you should fake an orgasm for Brad,' or how to fake swag with a 50$ J.C Penney charge card-their simple minds were simply overwhelmed!!

Post: #10

I realize that a lot of women read Cosmo as if it were a serious thing, but Cosmo uses a cookie-cutter template more like the crap websites use. "10 ways to please your man" doesn't exactly jump out as a deep and thoughtful study of male psychosexual triggers.

Admittedly, there are women dumb enough to treat this shit as gospel. But, I don't don't know how much oppo research is to be gained from the rather broad stroke insight of "a lot of women are very dumb and will believe any shit". That's pretty 101 around these parts.

Post: #11

(09-16-2011 12:15 PM)mycleverid Wrote:  I realize that a lot of women read Cosmo as if it were a serious thing, but Cosmo uses a cookie-cutter template more like the crap websites use. "10 ways to please your man" doesn't exactly jump out as a deep and thoughtful study of male psychosexual triggers.

Admittedly, there are women dumb enough to treat this shit as gospel. But, I don't don't know how much oppo research is to be gained from the rather broad stroke insight of "a lot of women are very dumb and will believe any shit". That's pretty 101 around these parts.

It's amazing to me how many of these "lists" people take as exactly that, gospel. They'll go out and if some guy doesn't something that doesn't mesh with whatever list she was reading that week then he's automatically written off a loser or whatever. This is only going to get worse my friends.

Post: #12

Initially, I thought it was retarded advice - it would work for a few minutes on me, then I'd think, wait, why am I getting caught up over a chick who's disrespecting me?

Most guys want to be manipulated. They want to be misled into thinking she's better than she is. I've had *many* guys tell me that if they liked a girl, they wouldn't want to fuck her on the first date. If she consented, the thinking goes, then she's a slut, and that would ruin her. Better she should wait, regardless of her past, so that the man can continue to like her. In reality, whether or not she's a slut was determined long before her decision to fuck you on the first date or not; her waiting for the third date now won't negate the fact that she say, got gangbanged last semester. Even on these forums, there are guys confused by this distinction.

The more women try and manipulate men, the more players will prosper. Women are introducing all these tests and trials that ensure it. Think of an obstacle course race. Who wins in such a race? Natural athleticism aside, it's the guy who's most familiar with the course. He can anticipate hurdles and negotiate the course the most effectively.

The player is the victor - he is the one with the most experience in navigating the challenges of dating and seduction. The more obstacles a woman introduces, the more likely she is to end up in the hands of a player. Waiting before sex is the only effective tactic for repelling players, but American girls can't wait.

Girls today are welcoming players with open arms - that is having non-committal sex with high value men, knowing full well they aren't his only one. I'm banging this girl now, and there's a running joke between us that I have several girls at house every night. Her face alights with this beaming, mischievous smile as she says it to me. Of course, it's not true, but she openly digs the idea of it, as if she's getting a piece of the hottest meat on the block, proving that she's hot too. For her, the social proof is as good as the sex. She is beneath me in attractiveness and such, and that is probably a factor as well.

Post: #13

Playing hard to get, waiting for sex, mind games, etc. to raise the woman's value is I believe the basic female "game". I suggest getting somewhat familiar with the female game bible, The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right (google it, I cannot post links yet)

BTW it was originally published in 1995, so way before Mystery or Neal Strauss widely popularized pickup. I'm pretty sure these "rules" actually work fairly well on the average chump, part of being a good player is to see right through it and being immune.
Really, male betas are as much (or even more) susceptible to "game" as your average bimbo, if not more...

Post: #14

Links for The Rules:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rules
http://www.amazon.com/Rules-Time-Tested-...0446602744

Post: #15

(09-16-2011 02:35 PM)SVK Wrote:  Playing hard to get, waiting for sex, mind games, etc. to raise the woman's value is I believe the basic female "game". I suggest getting somewhat familiar with the female game bible, The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right (google it, I cannot post links yet)

BTW it was originally published in 1995, so way before Mystery or Neal Strauss widely popularized pickup. I'm pretty sure these "rules" actually work fairly well on the average chump, part of being a good player is to see right through it and being immune.
Really, male betas are as much (or even more) susceptible to "game" as your average bimbo, if not more...

Results of game for men: Sex with more girls, hotter girls and/or less effort and money expended per girl.

Results of 'Cosmo Game' and The Rules: Sex with men who won't commit or dominating and emasculating men so much they become contemptible. Most likely, the man is forced into a position of weakness via manipulative calling, texting and flaking patterns, thereby rendering him low value in the woman's eyes and ruining him as a potential lover.

Actual, effective game tactics for women: Be pleasant, look hot, and don't have sex until well into a long term mutually exclusive relationship.

Then again, I keep assuming a woman's goal is a stable long term relationship. We know it often isn't. If the goal is to bang experienced non-needy guys, the American woman's style of game is actually effective. Being feminine and pleasant might even be counterproductive, because it could stir feelings of attachment and affection in men. Thus, Cosmo Game is uniquely suited for cum dumpsters.

Post: #16

Rules forget to stipulate one thing; attractive girls (8 and above...any maybe the odd 7 with a killer body and an average face) can do such shit as play hard to get, delay sex and play mind games...not all men have sufficient game and options to shut a girl like that out (which is why all men should learn game).

But this type of Cosmothink is the exact thing that makes 4's think they're 8's; fact is, no matter how nasty the girl is, somewhere out there some guy is willing to jump through hoops to get at her pussy.

Post: #17

Yeah, this is probably the main distinction between men's game and women's game.
Men's game is about self-improvement. It is about identifying your weaknesses and building on your strengths, mainly thru trial and error.
Women's game is about just assuming a pattern of behavior that might be fit for a hot young 8, and then wondering why it didn't work (could it be because you are a 34-yo sagging bitchy 5?)

Post: #18

(09-16-2011 01:16 PM)basilransom Wrote:  Waiting before sex is the only effective tactic for repelling players, but American girls can't wait.

This right here is gospel.

We Americans live in a country where if a guy doesn't make a move by the third date, the girl will start suspecting he's gay.

Then again, I saw Prague, and there if you don't rape her brutally by the second song she suspects you might be gay.

The problem with American women is they have negotiated themselves a hell of a deal, especially compared to other women internationally. On balance, they tend to get rich guys who are better-looking than them to lick their goddamned feet. But, somehow, the media has put it in their heads that this is not enough.

The joke is that all women want a dominant man to fuck them. Instead, most American women just pussy train wimps. And then they sit there feeling bad about the whole thing and blaming men for it.

Post: #19

I really think these stupid rules are just going to make it easier for guys who game. I've noticed a huge change in myself over the years, in that I have become extremely less patient with any bullshit from women. Even when I have been starting from zero after a break up or whatever with no prospects, after about a month of hard work new pussy always has come in.

The fact is, if you have a game model where you are constantly interacting with women(Cold approaches, social clubs, social circle, online etc.) your tolerance for her playing hard to get goes to zero. Let them play hard to get all they want, eventually the hard to get girls will realize the guy dropped them for some girl who put out on the first date.

Post: #20

Thanks for the information you've shared. I believe that I’ve learned a lot from the points...

Post: #21

(09-16-2011 03:17 PM)basilransom Wrote:  Then again, I keep assuming a woman's goal is a stable long term relationship. We know it often isn't. If the goal is to bang experienced non-needy guys, the American woman's style of game is actually effective. Being feminine and pleasant might even be counterproductive, because it could stir feelings of attachment and affection in men. Thus, Cosmo Game is uniquely suited for cum dumpsters.

Don't you think it is a little sad that a lot of American women are fine with being one step above masturbation?