Post: #26

(11-17-2014 07:41 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  These types of discussions are mental masturbation of the manosphere.

Agreed. And, maybe this will ruffle some feathers, I think the people that typically get involved and have "theories" for this stuff are guys that don't actually approach women and get laid.

Just sayin'

Post: #27

(11-20-2014 09:02 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

(11-17-2014 07:41 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  These types of discussions are mental masturbation of the manosphere.

Agreed. And, maybe this will ruffle some feathers, I think the people that typically get involved and have "theories" for this stuff are guys that don't actually approach women and get laid.

Just sayin'

Most guys will never come close to the 9-10 range or even approach one. The subtle differences between a 9, 9.5, 10 is inconsequential.

I have noticed that guys with similar experience to me with women also have similar ratings.

Post: #28

(11-20-2014 09:02 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

(11-17-2014 07:41 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  These types of discussions are mental masturbation of the manosphere.

Agreed. And, maybe this will ruffle some feathers, I think the people that typically get involved and have "theories" for this stuff are guys that don't actually approach women and get laid.

Just sayin'

Personally I don't mind these conversations. I've always wondered: Do men struggle to distinguish the true level of a females physical characteristics once said female is above/greater than his physical level of attractiveness?

I.E: [And without meaning to be derogatory] Most [Atypically Ugly] girls have partners. I wonder whether their partners honestly assess their looks in that regard?

Re: The Thread. Assuming they're thin - Small tits, big tits, nice ass etc: Doesn't really bother me.

My ideal characteristics are:

1.) The cheekbone/jaw contour I.E. Keira Knightly in the below pic.
2.) A nose that curves inwards at the bridge.

Post: #29

(01-03-2015 07:16 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

(11-20-2014 09:02 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

(11-17-2014 07:41 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  These types of discussions are mental masturbation of the manosphere.

Agreed. And, maybe this will ruffle some feathers, I think the people that typically get involved and have "theories" for this stuff are guys that don't actually approach women and get laid.

Just sayin'

Personally I don't mind these conversations. I've always wondered: Do men struggle to distinguish the true level of a females physical characteristics once said female is above/greater than his physical level of attractiveness?

I.E: [And without meaning to be derogatory] Most [Atypically Ugly] girls have partners. I wonder whether their partners honestly assess their looks in that regard?

Re: The Thread. Assuming they're thin - Small tits, big tits, nice ass etc: Doesn't really bother me.

My ideal characteristics are:

1.) The cheekbone/jaw contour I.E. Keira Knightly in the below pic.
2.) A nose that curves inwards at the bridge.

I find that kind of cheek jaw masculine and downright creepy sometimes
Agree about the nose though

Post: #30

(01-03-2015 08:34 PM)Aenema Wrote:  I find that kind of cheek jaw masculine and downright creepy sometimes
Agree about the nose though

It's interesting. A few of my best friends think the exact same way.

I.E:



over



Where as I'm the opposite.

Post: #31

(01-03-2015 11:23 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

(01-03-2015 08:34 PM)Aenema Wrote:  I find that kind of cheek jaw masculine and downright creepy sometimes
Agree about the nose though

It's interesting. A few of my best friends think the exact same way.

I.E:



over



Where as I'm the opposite.

Interesting. Rosie is pretty close to a 10 for me although I prefer her with a more youthful face..
   

Miranda doesn't do it for me at all though. I'm not a fan of tiny, compact faces like that. Especially not on a girl of Miranda's height.

Post: #32

I think I'll get a girl to take off her shoes next time instead of escalation.

Just want to make sure she's a 10 first.

Post: #33

Allow me to try from the OPPOSITE direction... factors that ruin attraction for me. As I'm getting old and desperate, I'm looking more at what I WON'T accept than what I DEMAND and DESERVE lozlolzl.

However, one thing that's changed for me is I can't miss how a girl FEELS about me...
to me it's inseparable from physical appearance-- for instance pupil dilation or lack of is real, not imagined-- as well as research indicating that facial expressions of delight and disgust are also.

1) Pimply, scarred face. (conversely, smooth, dewy translucent, young ( under 25) looking skin is great.)
2) lack of small waist.
3) Suspicious personality, irritability (Frequent marker, early on as you are getting to know someone: "Why are you asking?" when asked some innocent question 'Like what town do you live in')
4) cankles
5) Dull neurologically, flat expression, slow/less eye movement, it probably correlates somewhat with low IQ, even lovely genetics girls are limited in attractiveness when they can hardly figure out how to
open a door.
6) ugly feet with clawlike or misproportioned toes. I think a lot of provincial girls here in the Phils grow up rarely wearing shoes and their toes get spread out and may actually be healthier but I like them less.
7) Puffy upper arms, I like THIN upper arms, I wonder if this area responds to dieting?

I have a particular type of silhouette that is maddeningly attractive, it seems like a template my body already has, 5'2-5'7" very slim ( 90-110) long legs, thigh gap, thin neck, pouty lips, big eyes... like a miniaturized model of girls you see in NY Times.