Post: #151

what are your thoughts on the newest obsession of Anita S ?:

@femfreq

"One of the most radical things you can do is to actually believe women when they tell you about their experiences."

and huge panels at some new conference where she went to beg for more donations,

and on the panels it is written "Listen to women and BELIEVE !" [blindly and without checking of course]

http://twitter.com/laura_hudson/status/5...48/photo/1

We really must stop somehow this men-hating feminazi

Post: #152

(09-16-2014 03:40 AM)corners Wrote:  what are your thoughts on the newest obsession of Anita S ?:

@femfreq

"One of the most radical things you can do is to actually believe women when they tell you about their experiences."

and huge panels at some new conference where she went to beg for more donations,

and on the panels it is written "Listen to women and BELIEVE !" [blindly and without checking of course]

http://twitter.com/laura_hudson/status/5...48/photo/1

We really must stop somehow this men-hating feminazi

Yep, no burden of proof necessary. Right, guys.... guys?

In an age of "guilty until proven innocent" one of the most radical things we can do is still believe in "innocent until proven guilty" and place the burden of proof upon the accuser.

Post: #153

(09-16-2014 03:42 AM)HawkWrites Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:40 AM)corners Wrote:  what are your thoughts on the newest obsession of Anita S ?:

@femfreq

"One of the most radical things you can do is to actually believe women when they tell you about their experiences."

and huge panels at some new conference where she went to beg for more donations,

and on the panels it is written "Listen to women and BELIEVE !" [blindly and without checking of course]

http://twitter.com/laura_hudson/status/5...48/photo/1

We really must stop somehow this men-hating feminazi

Yep, no burden of proof necessary. Right, guys.... guys?

In an age of "guilty until proven innocent" one of the most radical things we can do is still believe in "innocent until proven guilty" and place the burden of proof upon the accuser.

Just check out the comments on my blog saying that I ought to apologize for reporting the accurate truth. Kids these days are just dumb enough to believe all of that nonsense - and yet they still hate cops who bogart their joints. Stupid. Utterly stupid.

Post: #154

(09-16-2014 04:09 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:42 AM)HawkWrites Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:40 AM)corners Wrote:  what are your thoughts on the newest obsession of Anita S ?:

@femfreq

"One of the most radical things you can do is to actually believe women when they tell you about their experiences."

and huge panels at some new conference where she went to beg for more donations,

and on the panels it is written "Listen to women and BELIEVE !" [blindly and without checking of course]

http://twitter.com/laura_hudson/status/5...48/photo/1

We really must stop somehow this men-hating feminazi

Yep, no burden of proof necessary. Right, guys.... guys?

In an age of "guilty until proven innocent" one of the most radical things we can do is still believe in "innocent until proven guilty" and place the burden of proof upon the accuser.

Just check out the comments on my blog saying that I ought to apologize for reporting the accurate truth. Kids these days are just dumb enough to believe all of that nonsense - and yet they still hate cops who bogart their joints. Stupid. Utterly stupid.

Sounds standard-issue to me. You'll always get someone telling you to apologize for bringing facts to light when the issue is *GASP* completely due to feels. Logic and reason don't real with these people.

Post: #155

Trial by Combat would be an upgrade from the sort of jurisprudence these degenerates advocate.

Post: #156

(09-16-2014 04:18 AM)Aurini Wrote:  Trial by Combat would be an upgrade from the sort of jurisprudence these degenerates advocate.

Ah, the trial of Gladiators in the Coliseum... the only problem is that the primary revenue-generators wouldn't survive!

Post: #157

Everytime that I read any of the tweets from http://twitter.com/femfreq it just makes my blood boil so hard...

everything that this woman Anita S stands for is a neverending, limitless hate against everything that is masculine or manly,
while in the same time constantly victimizing herself,
and saying that any ask for proofs on her feminazi claims
is actually just another "victim blaming" and a "conspiracy theory"

Post: #158

(09-16-2014 04:34 AM)corners Wrote:  Everytime that I read any of the tweets from http://twitter.com/femfreq it just makes my blood boil so hard...

everything that this woman Anita S stands for is a neverending, limitless hate against everything that is masculine or manly,
while in the same time constantly victimizing herself,
and saying that any ask for proofs on her feminazi claims
is actually just another "victim blaming" and a "conspiracy theory"

I'm caught between trying to figure out whether it's true or whether it's satire and she's just pulling some huge prank on everyone. Then I just drink and all my concerns wash away.

Her account, though, is the typical SJW trope: claim a victim stance, ask for support, argue with any evidence being brought up to the contrary, repeat.

Post: #159

I hate quoting myself, but I feel that this piece of ammunition was somehow missed:

(09-16-2014 02:43 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

The fact that someone notified the department yesterday and it got forwarded to the FBI just proves that the department hasn't been notified before (as in two weeks before, when Anita first claimed to have received those threats). Look at what that mail is saying: "This in fact was the case as of yesterday".

In other words, the first time anyone filed a complaint related to this matter was today. She filed a complaint only after being called out for not filing.

She first fabricated a threat against herself, then fabricated a claim that she had contacted the "local police", and now she's trying to make the complaint that was lodged today seem like it had been in existence all this time, whereas clearly it wasn't (otherwise the police department would never say "This in fact was the case as of yesterday"; instead they would say "This in fact was the case as of two weeks ago").

She herself is providing us with additional proof of her having been lying all this time.

If I am misreading this or making some wrong assumptions, please tell me.

Post: #160

(09-16-2014 04:49 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I hate quoting myself, but I feel that this piece of ammunition was somehow missed:

(09-16-2014 02:43 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

The fact that someone notified the department yesterday and it got forwarded to the FBI just proves that the department hasn't been notified before (as in two weeks before, when Anita first claimed to have received those threats). Look at what that mail is saying: "This in fact was the case as of yesterday".

In other words, the first time anyone filed a complaint related to this matter was today. She filed a complaint only after being called out for not filing.

She first fabricated a threat against herself, then fabricated a claim that she had contacted the "local police", and now she's trying to make the complaint that was lodged today seem like it had been in existence all this time, whereas clearly it wasn't (otherwise the police department would never say "This in fact was the case as of yesterday"; instead they would say "This in fact was the case as of two weeks ago").

She herself is providing us with additional proof of her having been lying all this time.

If I am misreading this or making some wrong assumptions, please tell me.

:/ Really hard to say what he means by "That was the case yesterday" - it could also mean "Yesterday we didn't know what was going on, but today I learned that we handed it to the FBI weeks ago." It's funny - the slimeball who posted that email initially stopped digging immediately, and then accused GamerGate of not being intellectually curious enough to do a thorough investigation.

I've sent the Officer a follow-up email, to try and figure out what's going on. I'll be posting a summary of the situation on Wednesday, even if I haven't heard back from him.

Post: #161

(09-16-2014 04:15 AM)HawkWrites Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:09 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:42 AM)HawkWrites Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:40 AM)corners Wrote:  what are your thoughts on the newest obsession of Anita S ?:

@femfreq

"One of the most radical things you can do is to actually believe women when they tell you about their experiences."

and huge panels at some new conference where she went to beg for more donations,

and on the panels it is written "Listen to women and BELIEVE !" [blindly and without checking of course]

http://twitter.com/laura_hudson/status/5...48/photo/1

We really must stop somehow this men-hating feminazi

Yep, no burden of proof necessary. Right, guys.... guys?

In an age of "guilty until proven innocent" one of the most radical things we can do is still believe in "innocent until proven guilty" and place the burden of proof upon the accuser.

Just check out the comments on my blog saying that I ought to apologize for reporting the accurate truth. Kids these days are just dumb enough to believe all of that nonsense - and yet they still hate cops who bogart their joints. Stupid. Utterly stupid.

Sounds standard-issue to me. You'll always get someone telling you to apologize for bringing facts to light when the issue is *GASP* completely due to feels. Logic and reason don't real with these people.

I think those people are so emotionally fragile that telling the accurate truth brings them to tears and feels like a personal attack.

Post: #162

(09-16-2014 04:18 AM)Aurini Wrote:  Trial by Combat would be an upgrade from the sort of jurisprudence these degenerates advocate.

Methinks the complete ban on violence allows those snakes to flourish. Since Fighting and violence is prohibited rather than regulated, the passive-aggressive verbal approach works better. They are the types that thrive in the bureaucractic environment and prove skilled at conspiracy.

Perhaps this is my ignorance speaking.

Post: #163

Anita has taken the art of threatening herself to new highs.

Latest news is that she, which is such a star, got a " b o m b " threat at her latest
speech...

Anita and her supporters will do absolutely ANYTHING to stay in the spotlights...

Post: #164

Anita now has a quote on the back of a book (The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy 3rd Ed.).

Colleges are using this book for classes. Here are some of the reviews on Amazon:

"I ordered this book for a class, but really it's a very interesting read. It really makes you stop and think."

"This book explains male privilege clearly. So much enlightenment. Great book. Highly recommend. This is the REAL deal. Must read."

"I highly recommend this book to individual readers, men's organizations, and professors of sociology and woman's studies. This book is ripe with text to discuss in the classroom."

"This is a great book. It is the kind of book you want as madatory reading in social studies in school. At some point, if you are woman, you will get angry as a number of your suspicions get confirmed. YOu will become angry as you see your father and husband colluding to keep you in your place. BUt you will also be able to see past that behaviour wnd not truly BLAME them for it.If you are a man, I suppose this isn't a comfortable read either. BUt while Mr. Johnson is telling you to change he manages to never blame you for teh history."

This is what they're forced to read in college.

Post: #165

not one single word in the last weeks from the feminazi Anita
on how the investigation is going to catch her good friend false flag "threatener"...

I am not surprised at all...

Post: #166

Drop any class immediately if they try to use some bullshit femi-tome as their textbook.

Post: #167

Which one is worse: Anita Sarkesian or Laci Green ?

Post: #168

That's like asking if a metastasized cancer is worse than a beginning one. Of course Anita is worse. She is the same, but much more influential and powerful.

Post: #169

(10-03-2014 04:23 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  That's like asking if a metastasized cancer is worse than a beginning one. Of course Anita is worse. She is the same, but much more influential and powerful.

Laci Green has 1 million 80 thousands subscribers.

Laci Green has a big power on YouTube, indeed both of them are terrible,
the biggest problem is that both of them have a large influence on our society

http://www.youtube.com/user/lacigreen

Post: #170

I didn't know that.... I retract my statement in that case.

Just for comparison, how many subscribers does the most popular channel on YouTube have?

Post: #171

(09-16-2014 04:18 AM)Aurini Wrote:  Trial by Combat would be an upgrade from the sort of jurisprudence these degenerates advocate.

Post: #172

Learned that Anita won an "Ambassador of the year" award a couple of months ago at this year's GDC (game developer conference)





It was award by the creative director and writer of "The Last of Us".

Fuckin disgraceful.

Post: #173

(10-03-2014 03:28 PM)Seboist Wrote:  It was award by the creative director and writer of "The Last of Us".

From earlier in the thread:

AnonymousBosch Wrote:I wrote up my analysis of how the SJW / Cultural Marxism mindset permeates every aspect of a mainstream hit like 'The Last Of Us', but it's come out at 10+ pages, and I'm not about to dump a wall of text that size on this forum.

There you go. My observation that 'The Last Of Us' was entirely-polluted by SJW thinking was accurate.

Maybe I should drastically-edit it down and throw it up on Pastebin.

Post: #174

I was actually thinking of that post you did when I was posting that bosch.

Curious to see what you wrote.

Post: #175

Is Last of Us still worth playing? Naughty Dog has a very impressive artists, and usually well made games. Or is the SJW so annoying its worth just avoiding? I really enjoyed Uncharted 1 and 2. Haven't played 3 yet.