xpatplayer
Wingman
  
Posts: 710
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 15
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
Interesting topic Brian. Its interesting to note that there is a Hellenistic Reconstructionist movement in Greece. However, it is important to note that the original interpretations of all 3 Abrahamic faiths were in favor of traditional and stable societies, interpretations which existed until ~80-100 years ago. While I agree that learning about pagan religions is an excellent source for learning about your ancestors, I wouldn't necessarily agree that they are better for society than Abrahamic ones. Remember that the Celts encouraged promiscuity among women. This undoubtedly corrupted their society.
Rawgod - Abrahamic faiths weren't necessarily responsible for planes, computers and globalization. Remember that the Mesopotamians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Chinese, Indians, Persians and Arabs all made significant scientific discoveries and were already trading much before Abrahamic religions came around. Who knows what they could have achieved if it wasn't for invasions and societal decay?
|
|
| 05-22-2014 10:36 PM |
|
|
Andy_B
Wingman
  
Posts: 603
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 2
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
Eh.
Revert back to sacrificing animals? Revert back to believing in pantheons of anthropomorphic Gods? Revert back to religions that were mostly explanations for poorly understood meteorological phenomena?
I don't think so.
There is some vague appeal to the idea of going back to the roots of your culture, but I don't really think that justifies bringing back belief in mythological horned creatures and stuff like that.
Now, you could say that Christianity is just as superstitious as the old Pagan customs, and I'd be inclined to agree with you. Among the newer religions, Christianity is sort of peculiar in that it retains a sort of Pagan flavor; man-Gods, the trinity, saints, etc. But I mean, if you don't like that stuff, you can just convert to Islam, which is truly monotheistic and has a non-anthropomorphic God. If Islam is still too superstitious for you, then there's always buddhism.
At the same time, I think this discussion is kind of irrelevant, because abrahamic religion is dying out anyway. In the long run, this new secular human rights pseudo-religion will become dominant and "religion" will go the way of Paganism. If you want to get back to your culture's traditional customs, just follow traditional practices and argue for traditional morality. You don't need Zeus or Odin to help you do that.
|
|
| 05-23-2014 05:42 PM |
|
|
kdolo
Banned
Posts: 1,041
Joined: May 2011
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
Maybe we should go back to the religion that was the basis of the Abrahamic religions (and much of the Greek too) - these people kicked a lot of butt...
Perhaps something was lost in the changes
OSIRIS
ISIS (mother with child - becomes Mary with baby jesus)
The Trinity - osiris-Isis-Horus - father-son-holy ghost (Isis becomes a bird that flies - in Christianity - female is removed -becomes a ghost)
(This post was last modified: 05-30-2014 06:30 PM by kdolo.)
|
|
| 05-30-2014 06:26 PM |
|
|
kdolo
Banned
Posts: 1,041
Joined: May 2011
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
(05-30-2014 08:11 PM)Brian Boru Wrote: I don't want to start a major religious debate, I just think it's interesting food for thought
There's nothing to debate really. Its historical fact.
Even the Bible admits it. Moses was raised in Pharaoh's house ! i.e. as an Egyptian with Egyptian religion.
10 commandments are the 42 negative declarations of MAAT - but shortened.
Circumcision - Egyptian (African)
Notion that after death the soul goes to Heaven or Hell depending on what happens when your soul is judged.
Isis giving birth to Horus even though Osiris is dead when she has sex with him = immaculate conception.
ankh becomes the cross
etc..... theres much much more.
|
|
| 05-30-2014 09:27 PM |
|
|
berserk
Banned
Posts: 1,131
Joined: Mar 2014
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
I am curious about this though, did other of European, and particularly Northern European heritage, find Christianity utterly confusing and irrelevant as a child? I could never as a child - or adult - identify in any way with the stories of the Old or New Testament. It held no meaning to me and why should it, it is the stories of people who lived in a strange country far away, in an arid desert of warring tribes.
On the other hand Asatru or Wodanism is the collective stories of my heritage. They describe the same mountains and fjords as I've seen and my ancestors. I was always as a child fascinated by the stories of Thor, Odin, Loke etc and could easily identify.
I believe that Christianity was in many ways the greatest tragedy of the European people. It set Europe back for centuries as it descended into religious tyranny. Destroyed the heritage of the great Roman empire, destroyed a rich pagan culture, destroyed science.
The Enlightenment Period, which elevated Europe to global leadership was a return to pagan and classical ideas in art and science. If not for this return to the great romantic ideas of paganism, Europe might have been another middle east stuck in religious fervor.
I am firmly on the side of Nietzsche in that I see Christianity as the origin of marxism and slave morality and would be very happy to see Christianity destroyed in Europe and a return to pre-christian lore and tradition. The only problem is that marxism is more likely to be the replacement religion.
|
|
| 06-01-2014 06:46 AM |
|
|
Slick Shimmer
Recovering Beta

Posts: 225
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 2
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
I'm currently reading The Secret Teachings of All Ages by Manly P. Hall.
I cannot find a link to the downloadable pdf at the moment, but I digress. The book is quite fascinating. I can't comment hugely on it because I'm about a third of the way through, and frankly, there's a hell of a lot to cover.
It's always been my firm belief that Abraham-centric world history concepts were faulty. A lot of "biblical history" is laid to rest like wastepaper in this book, but because the book is Masonic in origin, it's not without it's biases.
There is a book I read about two months ago called Ego & Archetype, which I found extremely illuminating. The author hits the ball out of the park in 90% of this book. The endings a little flimsy but it really doesn't matter.
Edinger uses the concept of the collective unconscious to shine light on the walls of the soul itself. He analyzes all kinds of alchemical concepts and their relation to the human psyche and spirit. When I read this book, it resonated with me in some of the same ways that the manosphere has. In fact, I believe this book led me to the manosphere. There is stuff in here that is absolute, in my opinion. What really floored me was how redpill it was. This book got me past moping over a dead LTR, and provided way more motivation than empty praise and "support" ever could.
(This post was last modified: 06-01-2014 08:12 AM by Slick Shimmer.)
|
|
| 06-01-2014 07:55 AM |
|
|
Byzantium
Game Denialist
Posts: 46
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 1
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
(05-22-2014 09:04 PM)Brian Boru Wrote: Basically, it advocates that people revert to their ancestral traditions, those practiced prior to the conversion to Christianity (or Islam, as the case may have it). This means Iranians revisit Zoroastrianism, Latin peoples revisit the Roman gods, native peoples of the Americas revisit their traditions, and northern Europeans revisit the gods of Celtic or Norse legend. Seeing as the Abrahamic faiths have led civilization to its current condition, the old ways can be seen as a better alternative. The above video details the Scandinavian variety of pagan revival.
I was curious what the wise men of the forum might think about the subject. I find it interesting and worth looking into. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Christianity is the original religion, and ("Eastern") Orthodoxy is true Christianity, there nothing is older than it, it predates the foundation of the world and space and time.
As far as the neo-pagans, those religions are dead, and those who try to revive them are just mockeries of the past. They're like a bunch of LARPers out in the woods, pretending to be clerics of pagan gods and cast magic spells, but they don't really believe it, not the way Russians believe in Orthodoxy, or the Jihadis in Islam.
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2015 05:45 AM by Byzantium.)
|
|
| 12-20-2015 05:42 AM |
|
|
Saga
Chubby Chaser
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 13
|
RE: Opinions on older (pre-Christian) spirituality
(12-20-2015 05:42 AM)Byzantium Wrote: Christianity is the original religion, and ("Eastern") Orthodoxy is true Christianity, there nothing is older than it, it predates the foundation of the world and space and time.
Such an assertion carries with it the logical conundrum that a religion based on Christ could exist before Christ.
Quote:As far as the neo-pagans, those religions are dead, and those who try to revive them are just mockeries of the past. They're like a bunch of LARPers out in the woods, pretending to be clerics of pagan gods and cast magic spells, but they don't really believe it, not the way Russians believe in Orthodoxy, or the Jihadis in Islam.
These seem to be strange judgments: people are right to practice the religions that they find most compelling. Whether done by 1 person, 10 people or 1 billion people it makes no difference, the purpose of ritual is to evoke and invoke the eternal. And anyway when it comes to historical lineage neopaganism isn't much different from churches founded in the last half-century (in the US there are many): they're new traditions based on old antecedents.
That aside, how can you be so sure that neo-pagans don't believe the things they claim to believe?
|
|
| 12-20-2015 06:54 PM |
|
|