Post: #1

Interesting video, I can relate.

Post: #2

I stopped watching at :02, when he said he was from RSD

Post: #3

(05-14-2014 04:22 PM)AntiTrace Wrote:  I stopped watching at :02, when he said he was from RSD

Try watching until around 5:00 and judge the content.

Post: #4

Women wanna get fucked hard and an Alpha is the right man for the job. What's so hard to understand about that?

Post: #5

(05-14-2014 04:30 PM)rangman2000 Wrote:  

(05-14-2014 04:22 PM)AntiTrace Wrote:  I stopped watching at :02, when he said he was from RSD

Try watching until around 5:00 and judge the content.

done.

The point of the video up to that point is an attempt to say that providers (i.e. good job) will get shit tested and shunned by woman based upon their seduction attempts.

It's not about that. It's about good game vs. bad game.

A dude with a great job with mad game is going to kill it.
A dude with shitty game and a great game is going to flounder.
A dude with no job and mad game is going to kill it.
A dude with no job and no game is going to flounder.

What is the deciding factor?

Game. That is all.

Post: #6

This is actually worth forwarding to "nice guy" betas. At least the first 4:30 seconds.

Post: #7

Have to say, I really enjoyed that, especially the first few minutes where he's in the bar, being the loud, arrogant, confident, slightly assholish guy.
Very entertaining, although you wonder sometimes is some of it staged.
And of course, some of his value and response from women comes from the fact that someone with a tv/video camera is following him and so he clearly has 'status'. The slightly effeminate voice also helps him in the initial stages as he doesn't come across as a threat, as chicks are wondering if he might be gay.
Sure it's slick and a bit bling, but there's some good info here, and it's pretty funny stuff, I'll definitely check out some more RSD clips having seen this.

Post: #8

How does a red-blooded, pussy chasing man develop such a gay sounding voice? I feel like nine times out of ten, guys who talk this way are something other than heterosexual. I just don't trust them.

Post: #9

I don't know why RSD gets all the hate it does.

That is a great video. He demonstrates on camera the difference between a nice guy approach and his, and then he walks up to the girls and tells them exactly what that difference is and calls them out on it.

How many people here could basically deliver a heartsie blog post as a monologue to a girl and make it their game? How many of you have your girl pull a threesome for you on camera, like he does at the end of this video? Right.

It seems like RSD gets hate for the same reason most things that become successful and popular do - jealousy.

Post: #10

Observations from watching him in action, whether it's talking to girls or guys:
1) He completely owns his persona, he's confident and unapologetic, but in an unthreatening way, cos of the slightly feminine vibe of his high pitched fast speaking voice, and bright clothes.
2) He's one funny motherfucker, there's always a few parts that get me laughing in his clips, all those voices he puts on imitating girls or beta males. That shit gets girls on your side straight off the bat, if you can show that you're a funny/witty, relaxed and socially aware dude.
3) In all his interactions, you can see he's having a good time, so he's entertaining himself first and foremost, and if it entertains the girls/guys he's with as well, so much the better, ie. it feels natural and congruent, not forced, another vital component of creating that 'comfort' vibe with women.
I can see aspects of my personality in him for sure, it's already giving me some ideas on how I can improve my own game.

Post: #11

The last time I was getting two girls into a cab to go back to my place, If I would've stopped and looked like I was talking to a camera and said out loud "get a girl wingman, it is the only way to do it" while pointing in a certain direction...they would've said "who the fuck are you talking to?".

My guess is that this would've killed the deal. (well, unless they were told they were on camera...and then, well...)

And, he needs a better tailor.

Post: #12

(05-15-2014 08:07 AM)runsonmagic Wrote:  I don't know why RSD gets all the hate it does.

I don't deny that there owen has something of value to share as far as self improvement, giving women what they want and not being a chump.

he also tailors his speeches to men who are chumps and says the "LOOKS DON'T MATTER!! Game is everything!"

It's no secret that women like handsome men, which is not to say that guys that are ugly physically cannot pull. But to preach "looks don't matter' to guys that put no effort into becoming better men is basically like telling fat kids that they need to eat more ice cream on hot summer days to be happy.

I am no game denialist, but who is going to pull more women, a good looking guy with game or an ugly guy with game?

Post: #13

I find his approach annoying and effeminate. The effect of his voice on my poor ears is second only to Neil Strauss.

He yaks non-stop and competes with the girl for who can talk more, talk louder and talk higher. He sounds like a chick with his incessant uptalk.

He's also a poor listener. He keeps superimposing his game theories on everything that happens in the interaction and then badgers the girl to agree with him.

At this point she's decided that she likes him (god know why) so what does she give a fuck? She's thinking: "Yes, I don't know, sure, whatever. Umm..can you please stop saying weird things and take me to your hotel and smash the living daylights out of me already?"

The whole video comes off as validation seeking in the guise of educational footage. "Look how much I know about game. Right? Am I right!? What's happening is X, Y and Z." I'm all for analyzing but not at the expense of your student and never at the expense of the MOMENT. Something just makes me want to choke this putz.

I'm also dubious that he's helping his student very much. As far as I can see, he's taking his money, showing off and tooling him.

He keeps intellectualizing every bit of the interaction, which has the effect of bringing his student into his head instead of into his body and into the present moment. I don't see that he's teaching him a damn thing. In fact, he's probably doing harm. He's just regurgitating game theories and calling it coaching.

Post: #14

(05-15-2014 07:43 AM)djwaters420 Wrote:  How does a red-blooded, pussy chasing man develop such a gay sounding voice? I feel like nine times out of ten, guys who talk this way are something other than heterosexual. I just don't trust them.

I also don't like that higher-pitched, male semi vocal-fry voice either; it's very off putting to me as well, but I guess it's working for him? Seems to be more of the SoCal speech inflection that I've notice develop over the past couple decades (which they have on many of the TV shows coming out of Hollywood, I guess). Not very manly, but can't argue with his aggressive game I guess.

Neil Strauss sounds even more effeminate than this guy. Which supports Roosh's view I read somewhere that the early PUAs essentially became like women in order to infiltrate their cliques and get laid.

BTW I'd have no interest in the women he's speaking with, they just seem vapid and superficial (like so many entitled American women these days, especially 7+ women who at times can seem like rare unicorns)

Post: #15

(05-15-2014 11:35 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I am no game denialist, but who is going to pull more women, a good looking guy with game or an ugly guy with game?

honestly, i think the ugly dude with no game will pull more. I am decent looking, tall, fit, and I pulled NOTHING until I started to learn some game.

Post: #16

(05-15-2014 11:35 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I am no game denialist, but who is going to pull more women, a good looking guy with game or an ugly guy with game?

Probably the good looking guy, but the point is that the ugly guy would still pull more with game than with no game. Even if its 1 woman a year vs 0, he's still made an improvement by bettering his game

(05-15-2014 11:42 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  I find his approach annoying and effeminate. The effect of his voice on my poor ears is second only to Neil Strauss.

He yaks non-stop and competes with the girl for who can talk more, talk louder and talk higher. He sounds like a chick with his incessant uptalk.

He's also a poor listener. He keeps superimposing his game theories on everything that happens in the interaction and then badgers the girl to agree with him.

At this point she's decided that she likes him (god know why) so what does she give a fuck? She's thinking: "Yes, I don't know, sure, whatever. Umm..can you please stop saying weird things and take me to your hotel and smash the living daylights out of me already?"

The whole video comes off as validation seeking in the guise of educational footage. "Look how much I know about game. Right? Am I right!? What's happening is X, Y and Z." I'm all for analyzing but not at the expense of your student and never at the expense of the MOMENT. Something just makes me want to choke this putz.

I'm also dubious that he's helping his student very much. As far as I can see, he's taking his money, showing off and tooling him.

He keeps intellectualizing every bit of the interaction, which has the effect of bringing his student into his head instead of into his body and into the present moment. I don't see that he's teaching him a damn thing. In fact, he's probably doing harm. He's just regurgitating game theories and calling it coaching.

The whole point of the video was to analyze, and to get women to explicitly confirm some truths we all know so that noobs get the picture. You have to remember the target audience here. I don't he wasn't actually going for any of the girls in the vid, bc he was there with the girl at the end, who is seemingly a 'regular' who knows his job and the filming. It also wasn't a student, he says at the beginning that he's there with a friend of his who happens to tick the beta boxes.

Post: #17

(05-15-2014 11:51 AM)Akula Wrote:  

(05-15-2014 07:43 AM)djwaters420 Wrote:  How does a red-blooded, pussy chasing man develop such a gay sounding voice? I feel like nine times out of ten, guys who talk this way are something other than heterosexual. I just don't trust them.

I also don't like that higher-pitched, male semi vocal-fry voice either; it's very off putting to me as well, but I guess it's working for him? Seems to be more of the SoCal speech inflection that I've notice develop over the past couple decades (which they have on many of the TV shows coming out of Hollywood, I guess). Not very manly, but can't argue with his aggressive game I guess.

Neil Strauss sounds even more effeminate than this guy. Which supports Roosh's view I read somewhere that the early PUAs essentially became like women in order to infiltrate their cliques and get laid.

BTW I'd have no interest in the women he's speaking with, they just seem vapid and superficial (like so many entitled American women these days, especially 7+ women who at times can seem like rare unicorns)

He's a Canadian originally from Hamilton, which is about 2 hours from Toronto. A lot of Ontario men sound even worse than that. I do admit it's a bit hard to stomach, but by knowing where he grew up, he had to do a lot of work to unscrew himself from the Toronto Indoctrination system, so I give him a pass on the effeminate voice.

I don't know anything about Tyler and RSD except from what was written in the Game since I learned game by fallowing Juggler and David D after reading the book. Love him or hate him, when it comes to pure knowledge about the game and society, he's right on par with Roosh I believe.

Post: #18

(05-15-2014 11:35 AM)eradicator Wrote:  

(05-15-2014 08:07 AM)runsonmagic Wrote:  I don't know why RSD gets all the hate it does.

I don't deny that there owen has something of value to share as far as self improvement, giving women what they want and not being a chump.

he also tailors his speeches to men who are chumps and says the "LOOKS DON'T MATTER!! Game is everything!"

It's no secret that women like handsome men, which is not to say that guys that are ugly physically cannot pull. But to preach "looks don't matter' to guys that put no effort into becoming better men is basically like telling fat kids that they need to eat more ice cream on hot summer days to be happy.

I am no game denialist, but who is going to pull more women, a good looking guy with game or an ugly guy with game?

I used to watch a lot of his videos and actually learned a lot. While he does say that looks are not that important for a guy , he also teaches to improve yourself to the max, go to gym, eat better, change style. Basically control what you can and let the rest fall as it will, which is a sound advice.

Post: #19

(05-15-2014 11:51 AM)MtnMan Wrote:  

(05-15-2014 11:35 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I am no game denialist, but who is going to pull more women, a good looking guy with game or an ugly guy with game?

honestly, i think the ugly dude with no game will pull more. I am decent looking, tall, fit, and I pulled NOTHING until I started to learn some game.

Depends on what you're looking for:

Bar scanks with air for brains, quality bisches with family money, etc

Bar skanks i can't bed for the life of me. I have a friend who has only slept with 7 women. All seven of them were incredibly attractive women.

Post: #20

Am I the only one who has noticed that RSD's content has suddenly shifted into the red pill arena?

I expect them to present longstanding red pill theory as something new or revelatory.

Post: #21

That guys suit jacket is too big for him. The sleeves are hangin over his hands. Makes him look little.

Post: #22

Girl who looks like a feminist: "We want guys to punch us in the vagina."

Post: #23

These women are throwing stones in glass houses.