Post: #101

(01-22-2014 09:23 AM)soup Wrote:  Actually this begs the question: has anyone he had success or heard Of a successful way of automating their online game?

I wouldn't say successful, but I played around with yes-clicking macros. I'm not a professional coder so can't write a good macro for OKc that gives high ratings to all girls.

The easiest way to semi-automate without any macros is something I'm pretty sure many RVF-ers already know: to keep clicking "yes" on okc site, okc app, tinder app, etc while watching tv/youtube/whatever, then cull the "candidates" who respond/like you back later.

Post: #102

I would bang that girl after drinking a bottle of vodka. Converted to the standard 1-10 scale, she is a 4-4.5 in my book.

Post: #103

He could've just gone to Chinatown for lunch.

Post: #104

Reposting this from the asian 10s thread. Chris, if you're reading this you've got to adjust your standards higher. Much higher:

Post: #105

^^^^Guy's response to that:

   

Post: #106

(01-22-2014 08:01 PM)aphelion Wrote:  Top is a hard 9 sir.

My first thought.

Stunning. And I'm not into asians. But I'm for sure into bodies like that....

Post: #107

I was at work a few years back and I brought my spanky new powerbook to work(before apple products blew up in popularity). This Korean girl walked past my desk and said "Ooooooo nice laptop". So she chilled out with me for a half hour and I let her play with it.

You don't need math to pick up Asian girls. You just need to peacock the right way with expensive electronics. I call it Asian Peacocking

Post: #108

(01-22-2014 08:01 PM)aphelion Wrote:  Top is a hard 9 sir.

And I refuse to believe that the second one is the same girl. Besides the fact that her face doesn't really look the same, I can't imagine a world where a girl would voluntarily go from #1 to #2.

Definitely not the same girl, I was only going to post one but then found another and forgot to add the plural. I actually prefer to bottom girl over the top. To each their own. And that's why I ranked em as 7s. Everyone agrees they're good looking but not exactly how good looking. A true 9 is undisputed.

Post: #109

Asian women tend to respect men a lot more than white ones do. They are generally more eager to please.

Post: #110

(01-22-2014 04:59 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Dude, this guy goes to UCLA--where Asian girls outnumber library books

They call it

University of Caucasians Lost amongst Asians

for a reason.

Post: #111

UCLA sounds like PP. I should have gone there back in the day.

Post: #112

(01-23-2014 02:08 PM)Menace Wrote:  UCLA sounds like PP. I should have gone there back in the day.

If you like blondes, UCSB is better:

University of Countless Sexy Blondes

Post: #113

That much effort and that's the best he can pull?

She has a Moe Howard haircut. Jesus dude.

Post: #114

(01-21-2014 08:18 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  On the negative: She spends 0 time on her clothes, hair, make-up and general appearance. I agree she's a 4. With minimal effort she could be a 6 or 7.

Absolutely! She can look much better with a bit of make-up. Look at what make-up did for this girl:

Post: #115

(01-22-2014 09:02 PM)Brodiaga Wrote:  

(01-22-2014 09:23 AM)soup Wrote:  Actually this begs the question: has anyone he had success or heard Of a successful way of automating their online game?

The easiest way to semi-automate without any macros is something I'm pretty sure many RVF-ers already know: to keep clicking "yes" on okc site, okc app, tinder app, etc while watching tv/youtube/whatever, then cull the "candidates" who respond/like you back later.

Tinder and the OKC swipe interface are easiest, you just yes everyone. On OKC, the basic idea is to go look at her questions and click "She Cares About". Those are the ones you have to get. Basically get the 1st page of those with the matching answers and set to "Mandatory" and you've got a 90+% match.

The downside is that you have to wait 24 hours to change your answers, and if she doesn't check your email often, you've gotta wait to change your answers or the match numbers won't be as good when she gets around to reading your email. I've found that some chicks pay attention to the number, but I don't know. I think that especially with younger chicks they'll be more into just the pictures and a decent profile.

You will find that you get "clusters" like he talks about. I was screwing around and got one pretty cute chick up to 95% match, and there was a half dozen other acceptable ones over 90%. So I think you'd have to rotate through, find one you like and try to match up, work those leads, then start changing your profile to match your next target. It's going to be a slow process.

Post: #116

You could probably pay your little sister to sit on the computer all day, message girls and setup dates for you. Just incentivize her. Tell her she gets a bonus if a date leads to a bang. Extra bonus for a SNL. She'd probably get a kick out of it.

Post: #117

(01-24-2014 07:18 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  You could probably pay your little sister to sit on the computer all day, message girls and setup dates for you. Just incentivize her. Tell her she gets a bonus if a date leads to a bang. Extra bonus for a SNL. She'd probably get a kick out of it.

There you go. Didn't someone on this forum hire an Indian personal assistant to set up his dating?

Post: #118

Turns out there's a good chance this guy may have violated federal laws:

http://pando.com/2014/01/22/did-the-math...uter-laws/


All he had to do was learn Game---now he could be going to the slammer. It's hard out there for a beta...

Post: #119

Obviously this guy did not make good use of his work (88 dates without a bang...god damn), but if this method is reproducible it seems like an incredible opportunity. Imagine if you combined 20 OKC messages a day with the first date bang recipe...

I'd be extremely interested if any of the technologically inclined people here can figure out how to reverse engineer his method. It seems like his main discovery was that answering more of the match questions that other people answer increases your visibility to them, and therefore increases the number of messages you get. Anybody know how one might go about figuring out which match questions girls are answering?

Post: #120

This story is popping up all over Facebook lately.
Here's a better pic of the happy couple.

Post: #121

(01-25-2014 09:22 PM)gringochileno Wrote:  Anybody know how one might go about figuring out which match questions girls are answering?

On each girls profile it says which questions they answered.

It would be pretty simple to make scripts that:

1) Add to a database all the girls that match your criteria.
2) Go through the database one by one and extract all her answers as well as biography and other stuff from her profile page and put it the databases.
3) With the database of questions you can easily sort by the one with the most results and which answer is the most popular. Could also add additional information like race and body weight to get even more accurate results. (ex: latinas who are slim, athletic, or average answer question #234 yes 90% of the time.)

If I have some time next week after I get some shit I need to do done I will post some sample code. Actually I already have 20% of the code written in PHP (with MySQL) from previous data extraction research projects.

Post: #122

(01-25-2014 11:21 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  This story is popping up all over Facebook lately.
Here's a better pic of the happy couple.

Damn, now it's almost guaranteed she won't marry him. It would be awwwwwwkwwwwaaaaaarrrrddd....

Post: #123

In "just" 90 days? Heck last time I used OKC I found a future spunk catcher and set up a date in 30 min while I was at the elliptical at Equinox.

This guy should have just paid me, hotwheels, Gmac, Soup, delicious_tacos or a bunch of other people on here $50 to fix his profile and write some opening messages and he would have gotten laid in under a weeks time.

The easy snatch would have gotten him some perspective too. Might have made him realize his search for the "girl of his dreams" is more like "the girl that will accept me".

Post: #124

Where does it say that he went 88 dates without a bang?

Post: #125

[quote='Professor Fox' pid='634216' dateline='1390352383']


The thing I want to comment on this is that how does this girl think she deserves a 6ft white guy with blue eyes, just showun how much of a sellers market it is in the anglosphere especially with online dating.

Also does anyone ever pay attention to them questions I just assumed the girls messaged back due to your pictures and they "like" whatever shit you write in your profile.