Post: #51

(01-10-2014 08:11 AM)Mage Wrote:  Mansophere should introduce a new terminology and spread it so that English language would have ways to differentiate between different kinds of single moms.

...

and evil single moms:

6)Sperm thieves

Too many shades for a single term.

I further move to have all "sperm theives" dubbed "sperm-jackers" by the manosphere in the future.

I really like the punchiness of that term.

Post: #52

Best comment on OP:


This advice is hilarious because it is so bad.

Post: #53

I suspect she is shooting for a gig as a variation of the sassy right-wing chick, like Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin.

The one thing that would surely give her an orgasm is a regular talking head rotation on Fox News. It's all about drawing attention to herself.

And when two of America's most famous celebrities got that way through leaked sex tapes, who's to say she's not playing it right?

I don't think she'll get there unless she loses weight.

Post: #54

(01-10-2014 12:59 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  And when two of America's most famous celebrities got that way through leaked sex tapes, who's to say she's not playing it right?

Good god I hope she doesn't do a sex tape

Post: #55

(01-09-2014 05:29 PM)Truth Teller Wrote:  Whatever, screw her. She's only one of many unattractive American women who thinks herself far better looking than she is.

Quick story from the past (beta Truth Teller): I dated this blonde girl on again, off again for about 2 years of high school. Now, my friends all told me she was a psycho bitch (which she turned out being), but I ignored them. So we break up, get back together, and the cycle repeats itself for about 2 years.

We break up for the last time, and she gains a massive amount of weight (this girl was 5'3", 100 or so lbs when we started going, now she's probably about 130 or 145). So I get a bit into game and living my life and I suddenly realize that this girl isn't that attractive. I hook up with this Vietnamese girl, but my beta vestiges are disgusted at me. So I lost the opportunity for a fuck buddy because I was being a pussy.

Anyway, the blonde one comes back and starts bitching at me. By this time, I've taken the red pill and really don't want anymore of her shit. I tell her "lose some weight and stop thinking you're superior to everybody." She shuts up and I haven't spoken to her since.

By the way, did I mention that she sent her mother and sister after me once because I was being "an asshole" by not wanting her at the moment.

I look back at this and am disgusted with how beta I was. Just fucking terrible.

Just congratulate yourself on being smart enough NOT to marry her or get her knocked up. You might have stepped on a land mine. You didn't. Be happy!

Post: #56

You know what pisses me off? It's just another example of how ass-backwards everything seems to be right now.

I see a lot of this in the UK - things the opposite of how they ought to be in a rational, functioning society.

She seems to think that being a divorcee with kids at over thirty makes her some sort of asset in the relationship world. Anyone with half a brain can see how much of a fucking liability she would be to any sane single guy's life.

It's like Orwell's double-speak in '1984'. The opposite of truth. The sad thing is so many people can't see it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublespeak

Post: #57

The saga of the execrable, frivorced mommy blogger Jenny Erikson continues.

Now, she's disappointed that the husband she dumped without cause does not want to be her emotional tampon and beta orbiter BFF.

This is what entitlement looks like:

Quote:I can wish it was all I want, but it doesn’t seem to be in the cards for me. It’s been almost a year since we ended things [who's we? -- notice how she can't even admit that she ended things], and I can count on one hand the number of conversations we’ve had that didn’t involve the logistics of the divorce or the children.

***

“Just because we’re not married doesn’t mean I don’t want to be friends,” I said. You think I’d know by now not to say such nonsense, but I couldn’t help myself. I wanted a friendship not just for the kids, but also because there are parts of him that I genuinely enjoy -- I did marry him for a reason. No such luck.

He just stared at me and said, “I can’t be friends.”

“What do you mean?” I cautiously asked.

“It’s all or nothing. I can’t be just friends if I can’t have you for my wife.”

And that’s basically it right there. The fundamental personality differences that made it impossible for us to have a mutually satisfying long-term marriage are now making it incredibly difficult for us to have any semblance of friendship, no matter how superficial.

What "personality differences" would those be -- that he expected you to be his wife? Jenny Erikson looks worse by the day. Here's hoping that she gets the fate she deserves: loneliness.

Post: #58

Sigh.

She got into her marriage due to social conditioning.

She got out due to social conditioning.

Now she is staying single due to social conditioning.

Do you see a common pattern?

I feel sorry for her. The Christian purity culture messes women up, but combined with feminism it's quite the cocktail of delusion. If she'd be smart, she'd buy her husband a copy of Married Man Sex Life, or be realistic about her dating options.

Post: #59

(02-27-2014 12:21 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  Sigh.

She got into her marriage due to social conditioning.

She got out due to social conditioning.

Now she is staying single due to social conditioning.

Do you see a common pattern?

I feel sorry for her. The Christian purity culture messes women up, but combined with feminism it's quite the cocktail of delusion. If she'd be smart, she'd buy her husband a copy of Married Man Sex Life, or be realistic about her dating options.

What's wrong with women being taught to stay virgins for marriage?

1. I seriously doubt she was a virgin when she married. She talked about dating numerous guys who broke her heart before she married.

2. Her problem is that she married someone she wasn't attracted to. There's nothing biblical about this.

Post: #60

(01-09-2014 04:41 PM)DetlefMourning Wrote:  Yup, she had the nice beta husband and she divorced him. So what the fuck is it that she wants? I mean, I don't care what she wants, because I would not want anything to do with her, but she doesn't even know herself what that is.

Apologies to whomever wrote this on the blog the other day, but I thought it was best analysis of the female condition, and matched my years of experience with women:

Quote:"What do women want? More."

That's really all you need to know.

The other thing to take away from this:

I didn't bother to read the article. The dating concerns of an ugly, past-it woman are of no interest to me, even to mock.

Nothing of interest will ever be written by a woman blogger, particularly as their desperate need for social approval makes the majority of what they're writing fiction. It's all status-whoring and manufactured drama.

Anything women write ties back into the concept of More: her life is more interesting; she has more suitors; her children are more intelligent and talented; her career is more demanding; her lifestyle is more opulent; her friends are more amazing; she is more morally-concerned than others. No matter all the more she has, she is always chasing more, for doesn't she deserves more?

Fiction. It's all pure fiction. Blogs and op ed pieces are purely written by women to make other women want to be their best friend, whilst also wishing their life was like theirs. Yes, even Lindy West: she just has identified a target audience whose existence is so pathetic that hers looks aspirational by comparison.

As for any 'Power Career Woman', why the hell would I bother fucking a 31-year-old, double-chinned, anti-family woman in a legal career that's guaranteed to make her both money-hungry and miserable, when I could fuck the 19 year old au pair who would is actually raising the child for her?

Post: #61

(02-27-2014 12:21 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  I feel sorry for her. The Christian purity culture messes women up, but combined with feminism it's quite the cocktail of delusion.

I'd argue the problem is simply any woman's lack of strong commitment to any opinion, spiritual belief, vow, child or man. If it possibly stops them getting something they want, it will be discarded with no further thought, and no guilt will be felt for doing so.

Women full stop are masters at spinning their hamsters to absolve themselves of their sins, so it's not like it's unique to Christian Girls. It's just that their hypocrisy is even more pronounced, and their rationalisations show greater desperation.

Post: #62

The reason she is extra picky now as a "single mother" is that she mistakenly believes she could have done better when she first married. Now she is trying to correct a perceived mistake by being extra picky. She is hilariously wrong, since she is now both older and fatter, but doesn't see it.

Women in general will almost inevitably think that they could have done better. Ether immediately after a marriage, or more likely after the initial feelings have worn off after a few years. The reason is because any individual woman can always fuck a "better" man than the best man who will marry her. This is essentially a law of nature and stems from biological differences between men and women and has all sorts of consequences for both men and women. To me this fact is so central to an individual woman's life it is essentially the "Female Condition".

So this woman is half right. She could have done "better", but not as a wife, only as a fuck buddy. The inability to realise that just because she could have slept with better men at the time she married her husband doesn't mean any of them would have married her is where she goes wrong. After all the emotional turmoil a woman standing at the alter can be assured that the man she is marrying is the best she can do. It is essentially that a mirror is being held up to her for the first time. The value of the man she marries is her value at that point in time.

If she could do better she would do better.

Post: #63

At least her ex is strong enough not to give into her nonsense.

I read this post by mikecf at dangerandplay. http://dangerandplay.com/2011/12/16/arth...-on-women/

He posted the writings of Arthur Schopenhauer, a German Philosopher. It had some deep insights on women.

Quote:Hence, it will be found that the fundamental fault of the female character is that it has no sense of justice.

I would read justice as also being fair, honorable, respectful. She doesn't treat her ex at all in with any of those qualities.

Post: #64

(01-09-2014 03:47 PM)Glock Wrote:  

Quote:Regardless, the whole experience got me thinking about what kinds of things might knock my socks off on a first date enough to get me to agree to a second.

[...]

I’d rather curl up with boxed white wine and a novel than go on a second date I’m not excited about.

[...]

Don’t expect sex on the first date: I’m a mom. I know where babies come from. The end.

Don't expect sex on the first date + second date only with a guy who knocks her socks off = she bangs on the second date.

Post: #65

(01-10-2014 08:11 AM)Mage Wrote:  

(01-10-2014 07:54 AM)wiscanada Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 10:54 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Just to be clear, she is NOT a "single mom."

A single mother is a woman who was left by a man to raise a kid alone. She is a DIVORCED WOMAN WITH A CHILD. There is a difference.

This woman is usurping the title "single mom" so she can claim "heroic victim" status. This demeans the women who actually rise above circumstances they were FORCED INTO but this woman chose.

The media lumps all women with kids and no husbands together as "single moms" for political reasons -- to make them seem "empowered." Let's not do that here.

This is a pet peeve of mine. It pisses me off to no end the way the media and feminists manipulate the language to make them all seem like hapless victims when they're the VICTIMIZERS, like in this case.

This is a good point. A widow is a 'single mom' and so is the woman who got pregnant by a jamaican apple picker that left on the next plane out of Toronto.

I have no problem pulling the rug out from under women who claim this, they'll say "something, something...its hard being a single mom" and I would say "getting paid to be single with a free babysitter every other weekend is called being a divorcee, a widow with a dead husband and no life insurance is a single mom"

I feel this is something important. Mansophere should introduce a new terminology and spread it so that English language would have ways to differentiate between different kinds of single moms. Perhaps someone should make a RoK article on this.

There are the innocent single moms:

1)Widows
2)Legitimately raped women who choose not to abort. (Some will debate the innocence of this)
3)Abandoned women

and evil single moms:

4)Frivorcees, divorcees,
5)Single sperm donor users
6)Sperm thieves
7)Professional "baby mommas" who collect "baby daddies" and their kids.
8)Divorced lesbians or single women who adopt children (celebrity style) (some will debate the evil of this)
9)Women who were technically abandoned, but that is because they were just plain insufferable. (debatable)

Too many shades for a single term.

Hate to say it, but for dating, the "abandoned" moms are some of the worst. Most guys wont desert the mother of their children...it just doesn't happen the way it does in the feminazi narrative very often, they have to actively DRIVE away a guy with daily horrific psychotic behavior to the point where he has to pick where he'll be best for the kids - jail, mental institution, or far from her.

If she's addicted to those bottom of the barrel losers that actually will desert their child (in a society that has never had such a surplus of White Knights and beta providers willing to take care of her and be a good father), then you're going to have a damn hard time connecting with her as a productive human being with some kind values or Code of Conduct.

Post: #66

(02-27-2014 03:42 PM)Bad Hussar Wrote:  The reason she is extra picky now as a "single mother" is that she mistakenly believes she could have done better when she first married. Now she is trying to correct a perceived mistake by being extra picky.

That may be true, but don't think that is the actual reason for her no-first-date-bang "pickiness".

IMO it is a game-theoretic strategy to punch above her SMV weight by selecting for men who are unaware of their true SMV.

Let me explain: A divorced overweight woman over 30 with 2 kids who barely rates a 6 on her best cutesy pic has a real SMV that is pretty close to zero.

Any man who has SMV and is even somewhat aware of SMV dynamics will know that a woman like her doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell unless she bangs on the first date.

So, a man that she would be willing to date again and who is willing to go on a second date with her must a) have SMV and b) be unaware of her true SMV and c) be unaware of his true SMV. Because if a) were not true, she wouldn't want to see him again, and if b) and c) were not true, he wouldn't want to see her again unless she had banged on the first date and done good.

Hence, Jenny is screening for beta chumps. She wants a guy who will overestimate her SMV and underestimate his own SMV, because a dude like that is going to be more malleable LTR material than a dude who gets it.

Which is fair enough.

Post: #67

(02-27-2014 12:57 PM)megatron Wrote:  

(02-27-2014 12:21 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  Sigh.

She got into her marriage due to social conditioning.

She got out due to social conditioning.

Now she is staying single due to social conditioning.

Do you see a common pattern?

I feel sorry for her. The Christian purity culture messes women up, but combined with feminism it's quite the cocktail of delusion. If she'd be smart, she'd buy her husband a copy of Married Man Sex Life, or be realistic about her dating options.

What's wrong with women being taught to stay virgins for marriage?

1. I seriously doubt she was a virgin when she married. She talked about dating numerous guys who broke her heart before she married.

2. Her problem is that she married someone she wasn't attracted to. There's nothing biblical about this.

When society emasculates everyone willing to stand up and be a husband/father, it's hard to blame so many guys for simply deciding to be a Player. The amount of Alpha needed to run a household nowadays (in the face of Divorce Rape and such) is plenty to maintain a large rotating harem.

"But I want kids!"

And if there is one thing we've learned here is how infrequently guys get to keep their kids. What a crock.

Post: #68

(01-10-2014 12:31 PM)redpillrage33 Wrote:  

(01-10-2014 08:11 AM)Mage Wrote:  Mansophere should introduce a new terminology and spread it so that English language would have ways to differentiate between different kinds of single moms.

...

and evil single moms:

6)Sperm thieves

Too many shades for a single term.

I further move to have all "sperm theives" dubbed "sperm-jackers" by the manosphere in the future.

I really like the punchiness of that term.

I've always preferred "Baby-Raped".

"What happened to Jimmy?"

"He got baby-raped by some crazy chick, he's doing double shifts at the factory every night now."

Post: #69

Jesus. She looks like Jack Nicholson.

Post: #70

What does "frivorced" mean?

Post: #71

^Frivolous divorce.

Basically, the concept is that the woman is leaving simply because she is "unhappy." Wrecking her husband's life, her kid's life and causing unnecessary financial and psychological damage to her family.

Post: #72

(02-28-2014 03:38 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  ^Frivolous divorce.

Basically, the concept is that the woman is leaving simply because she is "unhappy." Wrecking her husband's life, her kids and causing unnecessary financial and psychological damage to her family.

Well, here's the problem..

I believe that being unhappy is a good reason to get divorced.

The issue is her lack of foresight.

It's like all those women who get cats. A cat is a 17 year investment of time. You can't just give them away when you get bored or whatever.. unless you have no empathy.

I don't see any other answer to this aside from avoiding marriage.

Post: #73

(02-28-2014 03:43 AM)soup Wrote:  It's like all those women who get cats. A cat is a 17 year investment of time. You can't just give them away when you get bored or whatever.. unless you have no empathy.

Soup, I'm on local Facebook group for trading goods in my town, and I'm amazed at the number of women who post, trying to give away their pets for frivolous reasons. Easily a post of this nature every two days: "Don't have the time"; "Landlord doesn't like it"; "Need a quieter pet"; "Moving house and the yard is smaller"; "Want to get another puppy - a full-sized dog is too much work." No sentimentality or empathy whatsoever.

It's odd, given the female 'nurturing / caring / overemotional' stereotype, (which I always thought was a myth anyway). Women are starting to treat their pets like men.

Post: #74

I notice boxed wine is very popular with divorced or unhappily married women. When not drinking alone, they find it easy to act shocked that all of it is gone -- because the container is not transparent.

Post: #75

(02-27-2014 05:30 PM)WD-40 Wrote:  That may be true, but don't think that is the actual reason for her no-first-date-bang "pickiness".

IMO it is a game-theoretic strategy to punch above her SMV weight by selecting for men who are unaware of their true SMV.

Let me explain: A divorced overweight woman over 30 with 2 kids who barely rates a 6 on her best cutesy pic has a real SMV that is pretty close to zero.

Any man who has SMV and is even somewhat aware of SMV dynamics will know that a woman like her doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell unless she bangs on the first date.

So basically knowing the basics of the sexual market is its own attraction factor. Excellent thought.