Post: #26

(01-05-2014 10:02 PM)jariel Wrote:  

Sheeyit, I'd take any two of them girls. Nigel can have the rest.

Post: #27

Guess my standards are low. I'd say yes to all of them

Post: #28

(01-05-2014 09:56 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  ooh i wanna play this game

You get the one on the left for sure. But on of the fat ones comes with

They all seem smashable to me. You'd have a point if they were doing muffin tops in bikinis, but they aren't.

However this on the other hand:



is bad.

Post: #29

Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

Post: #30

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Your choice of the slim friends plus the hippo.

Dude thanks for the laugh. I had a good chuckle. When I first saw the pic, I was like duh any of the 4. Then I saw this^^

Post: #31

Can I take a combination of barbiturates while smashing that? Alcohol alone wont erase the memory of seeing that whale naked... let alone touching her. Ugggh.

Post: #32

(01-05-2014 09:56 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  ooh i wanna play this game

You get the one on the left for sure. But on of the fat ones comes with

(01-05-2014 09:58 PM)pheonix500000 Wrote:  [quote='Sourcecode' pid='621584' dateline='1388977015']
ooh i wanna play this game

A bit OT, but I could swear that is the same girl twice.

I'd have to pass on a threesome with her and either of the other potentials (bad face). I would, however, do it with the stripy one from the first photo and her cubbyish blonde friend on the far right.

Post: #33

(01-06-2014 04:21 PM)blkgatsby Wrote:  Can I take a combination of barbiturates while smashing that? Alcohol alone wont erase the memory of seeing that whale naked... let alone touching her. Ugggh.

Negative. No drugs, no alcohol.

Must bang stone cold sober. So yeah, this will be seared into your memory. Is the mental trauma worth tapping one of her cute friends?

Post: #34

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

What is the time commitment on "eating that pussy?"
I think I could give her a solid 10 seconds.

Post: #35

(01-06-2014 04:40 PM)Gopher Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

What is the time commitment on "eating that pussy?"
I think I could give her a solid 10 seconds.

As long as she wants. Considering that probably no man has ventured down there with his mouth, I think it would be fair to say that this wildebeest would demand a good 30 MINUTES of tongue love.

You game? Her friends are all waiting to bang you right afterward . . .

Post: #36

Regarding the whale, I'd definitely bang her for a couple of minutes (assuming I could get hard) if I got to bang all of her friends, too. To be honest, you'd be hard pressed to find a 3 or 4 that I wouldn't bang if I could get to include a friend of hers that is a 6+ to join in on the action.

Back in my clueless college days, I had a girlfriend that was about the size of the middle girl in the purple top and black bottom, from up thread so I'd take all three of those chicks on at the same time. I don't chase chicks that big these days but if I was hammered and it was a layup- hell yea.

Post: #37

(01-06-2014 04:47 PM)assman Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 04:40 PM)Gopher Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

What is the time commitment on "eating that pussy?"
I think I could give her a solid 10 seconds.

As long as she wants. Considering that probably no man has ventured down there with his mouth, I think it would be fair to say that this wildebeest would demand a good 30 MINUTES of tongue love.

You game? Her friends are all waiting to bang you right afterward . . .

Oh god that's horrible... She would have to shower probably a good 45 minutes before hand and lube up with some of that strawberry flavoured KY jelly before a mouth was ever going anywhere near that vortex. I assume it'd be like this:

http://www.xvideos.com/video456161/world...t_his_head

As long as I was allowed to shower and rinse my mouth out with acid afterwards before diving into the friends I'd be game. You'd probably have to throw in a couple hours of therapy as well

Post: #38

(01-06-2014 04:47 PM)assman Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 04:40 PM)Gopher Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

What is the time commitment on "eating that pussy?"
I think I could give her a solid 10 seconds.

As long as she wants. Considering that probably no man has ventured down there with his mouth, I think it would be fair to say that this wildebeest would demand a good 30 MINUTES of tongue love.

You game? Her friends are all waiting to bang you right afterward . . .

Wouldn't it be a shame if you plowed through that 30 minutes of hell, but when you got to the dessert, you found that the experience had robbed you of the ability to ever get your dick hard again.

I'd like to have a go at her friends, but I just don't think I'd be able to pay the price of admission.

Post: #39

(01-06-2014 04:47 PM)assman Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 04:40 PM)Gopher Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

What is the time commitment on "eating that pussy?"
I think I could give her a solid 10 seconds.

As long as she wants. Considering that probably no man has ventured down there with his mouth, I think it would be fair to say that this wildebeest would demand a good 30 MINUTES of tongue love.

You game? Her friends are all waiting to bang you right afterward . . .

Fuck no.

Post: #40

I just don't know what to say. I agree with McQueen on the dropping standards for two or more chicks. But fuck. These are all awful trade offs! Threesomes are amazing.. but not THAT amazing.

I guess the fact i'd MMF it up with Flavio long before any of the other options makes me wonder if i've been watching too much porn.. but i just can't cope with an ugly chick. Grim.

Post: #41

All of these women way the Aussie average of 154 pounds.

Post: #42

(01-06-2014 11:11 AM)germanico Wrote:  

(01-05-2014 10:02 PM)jariel Wrote:  

I would bang every woman in that picture twice.

Lol is that white girl making chink eyes?
I'd do them all individually or as threesomes.

Post: #43

Post: #44

(01-06-2014 07:33 PM)jariel Wrote:  

I would slam that

Post: #45

(01-06-2014 07:40 PM)pheonix500000 Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 07:33 PM)jariel Wrote:  

I would slam that

Without question.

Post: #46

The hippo would crush my head in between her thighs. I don't like being dead, so I would not tap that.

Post: #47

(01-05-2014 10:02 PM)jariel Wrote:  

Maybe my standards are low, but I'd hit all of them.

Edit, except for that one monster on the end.

Post: #48

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

Put me in coach.

Also cannot believe fellow RVFer's wouldn't.

No war was won without sacrifice.

Post: #49

Fu$k it!

Post: #50

(01-06-2014 09:47 PM)CoonAssTino Wrote:  Fu$k it!

I think that the whole point of this thread is to pair one desirable candidate with a particularly undesirable participant and see how many guys would be willing to simultaneously jump on a live grenade while they bang the hottie.

The photograph that you posted features two people are simply undesirable in every possible way.