Post: #1

A good article from Emma Woolf, a skinny woman who is sick and tired of the fat feminists cunts with stupid double-standards judging her size:

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/...appearance

While I disagree with her stance on fat-shaming (she thinks it's bad, while I think it's good), she does raise some good points and it's good to see that finally more and more people are starting to see how fucking ridiculous this "fat acceptance" shit is and how utterly hypocritical these feminist land whales are.

Post: #2

(12-13-2013 06:49 PM)Mr. Calicoat Wrote:  A good article from Emma Woolf, a skinny woman who is sick and tired of the fat feminists cunts with stupid double-standards judging her size:

More like a double-double standard!

Post: #3

Both obesity and malnutrition are health hazards.

That is all.

Post: #4

(12-13-2013 06:49 PM)Mr. Calicoat Wrote:  A good article from Emma Woolf, a skinny woman who is sick and tired of the fat feminists cunts with stupid double-standards judging her size:

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/...appearance

While I disagree with her stance on fat-shaming (she thinks it's bad, while I think it's good), she does raise some good points and it's good to see that finally more and more people are starting to see how fucking ridiculous this "fat acceptance" shit is and how utterly hypocritical these feminist land whales are.

Good article - thanks for sharing.

Post: #5

Obesity is a major epidemic in the first world.

Being too skinny is a problem and unhealthy but it isnt draining and killing huge sections of our population. It isn a big (heh) problem.

Just like there isnt fat shaming in undernourished societies. Malnutrition is the problem there so even if you swing too far in the other direction (skinniness for us, obesity for them) its still preferable to the respective macro issue.

The day anorexia becomes as much of a problem as obesity is when you'll see skinny-shaming in the first world.

Post: #6

It is a serious problem
/thread-16491.html

Post: #7

(12-14-2013 10:07 AM)Checkmat Wrote:  Obesity is a major epidemic in the first world.

Being too skinny is a problem and unhealthy but it isnt draining and killing huge sections of our population. It isn a big (heh) problem.

Just like there isnt fat shaming in undernourished societies. Malnutrition is the problem there so even if you swing too far in the other direction (skinniness for us, obesity for them) its still preferable to the respective macro issue.

The day anorexia becomes as much of a problem as obesity is when you'll see skinny-shaming in the first world.

To add to that:

Anorexia is often a result of serious psychological problems. Men or women with anorexia have serious mental issues and need to be helped professionally. So shaming them is just harsh, cruel and uncalled for.

Fat people on the other hand, are almost always fat simply because they're lazy or have little-to-no self control. How often do you see fat women being fat because of psychological traumas or serious mental issues? Not often.

That's the huge difference between anorexia and obesity and that is why in my opinion skinny-shaming is just terribly wrong while fat-shaming is perfectly okay.

Post: #8

Fatties see the mere existence of slender women as a constant, silent rebuke of their obesity

Therefore slender women must be eliminated

Post: #9

Women demanding "fat acceptance" by men is like men demanding "poor acceptance" by women. It ain't gonna happen.

At least being poor, one has multiple avenues of getting into a better situation, unlike being fat. Oh wait...

Post: #10

My problem with women is simple: most are lazy as hell and will never set foot in a weight room beyond doing cardio exercises on an elliptical with the resistance at 0 or 2.

They then proceed to starve themselves with dieting. Eating absolutely nothing.

I cook with and user massive amounts of butter. Real organic butter. I'm far from overweight and fat.

I try and tell girls that if they seriously started lifting, the weight would melt off and they can start eating more food without dieting!

Arguing with fools.....

Post: #11

Feminists etc. have no problem enforcing their own double standard.

They will shame based on being thin. They will victim-blame men who are victims. They will hold double standards while complaining about double standards.

Their principles are not principles as normally understood, they're just convenient shrieks they've learned to use in certain situations.

I remember once I was talking with a chubby feminist who of course would be against fat-shaming. And she said "People whose thighs don't touch freak me out."

Post: #12

(12-14-2013 02:48 PM)Sonsowey Wrote:  Feminists etc. have no problem enforcing their own double standard.

They will shame based on being thin. They will victim-blame men who are victims. They will hold double standards while complaining about double standards.

Their principles are not principles as normally understood, they're just convenient shrieks they've learned to use in certain situations.

I remember once I was talking with a chubby feminist who of course would be against fat-shaming. And she said "People whose thighs don't touch freak me out."

hahahahahaha

Post: #13

(12-14-2013 01:36 PM)frenchie Wrote:  My problem with women is simple: most are lazy as hell and will never set foot in a weight room beyond doing cardio exercises on an elliptical with the resistance at 0 or 2.

They then proceed to starve themselves with dieting. Eating absolutely nothing.

I cook with and user massive amounts of butter. Real organic butter. I'm far from overweight and fat.

I try and tell girls that if they seriously started lifting, the weight would melt off and they can start eating more food without dieting!

Arguing with fools.....

Do you really want a muscular woman? Let them for cardio and stay away from heavy lifting. The most they should be lifting is whatever weight the baby weighs when they get pregnant.

Post: #14

It's all too appropriate that we use the term "bullying" when talking about fat people.

Post: #15

(12-14-2013 12:05 PM)MrXY Wrote:  Fatties see the mere existence of slender women as a constant, silent rebuke of their obesity

Most low-value people passive-aggressively despise high-value people, whilst trying to adopt their trappings to falsify their value in the laziest way possible. It's why aspirational media works.

The people who don't even try are worthless wastes of a life.

Post: #16

(12-14-2013 02:51 PM)soup Wrote:  Do you really want a muscular woman? Let them for cardio and stay away from heavy lifting. The most they should be lifting is whatever weight the baby weighs when they get pregnant.

WYB?

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=131139653

Post: #17

Gross

Post: #18

(12-14-2013 02:51 PM)soup Wrote:  

(12-14-2013 01:36 PM)frenchie Wrote:  My problem with women is simple: most are lazy as hell and will never set foot in a weight room beyond doing cardio exercises on an elliptical with the resistance at 0 or 2.

They then proceed to starve themselves with dieting. Eating absolutely nothing.

I cook with and user massive amounts of butter. Real organic butter. I'm far from overweight and fat.

I try and tell girls that if they seriously started lifting, the weight would melt off and they can start eating more food without dieting!

Arguing with fools.....

Do you really want a muscular woman? Let them for cardio and stay away from heavy lifting. The most they should be lifting is whatever weight the baby weighs when they get pregnant.

Soup, you offer a lot of valuable info on here but is this really an area you're well-versed in?

Martin Berkhan Wrote:Women, you need to put down those pink dumbbells, throw that Shape Magazine in the trash can and stop with this nonsense. You seem to believe that the modest amount of strain will cause you to wake up looking like a bodybuilder in the morning. Horseshit.

...What you need to do is slap yourself and start training for real.

http://www.leangains.com/2012/10/train-l...ddess.html
The strongman athlete the author is dating:

Quote:Concern yourself with 250-300 lbs deadlifts and 200-250 lbs squats, avoid starvation diets, and enjoy the ride. You'll be much happier with the outcome of that, than say crackers and yoghurt, 2 hr daily cardio sessions and those mickey mouse curls you read about in Cosmo.

Eat like a man, train like a man, and look like a goddess. Would be a fairly accurate and true quote, if it wasn't for the fact that most men train like retards.

Post: #19

I've noticed a trend of women who are into fitness going to the other extreme of heavy lifting etc.

Guaranteed it's due to higher levels of test in these girls + women becoming exceedingly more masculine.

I like girls to workout, but there's a big difference between being toned and in shape and spending an hour on the squat rack to lift 300lbs.

Post: #20

(12-15-2013 04:55 PM)deuce Wrote:  

(12-14-2013 02:51 PM)soup Wrote:  Do you really want a muscular woman? Let them for cardio and stay away from heavy lifting. The most they should be lifting is whatever weight the baby weighs when they get pregnant.

WYB?

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=131139653

Some of them. But the majority? Nope.

Post: #21

Most men who lift weights do not carry an impressive amount of muscle mass. Go to any gym and you will see that this is the case.

Women, given that they tend to dedicate themselves to lifting heavy weights less, and don't push themselves as hard, would probably never develop much hypertrophy even if you sent them to the gym and made them do squats. If they do nothing but lower body training with barbells and a few token pushups it should not be a problem. I can't see why firmer and larger asses are undesirable.

Post: #22

Post: #23

(12-16-2013 02:54 AM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  I've noticed a trend of women who are into fitness going to the other extreme of heavy lifting etc.

Guaranteed it's due to higher levels of test in these girls + women becoming exceedingly more masculine.

I like girls to workout, but there's a big difference between being toned and in shape and spending an hour on the squat rack to lift 300lbs.

Sounds pretty scientific to me.

Post: #24

I realize that feminism is fighting for control over women, not their freedom. As long as there are hot girls, guys can pretty much ignore feminists in the sex market. I think that they subconsciously believe that if they can get all the women to be tatted up or fat, then it makes their manjawed ugliness seem less unattractive.

What they fail to realize is that men who have had good pussy are spreading the light that good pussy is not only better then unattractive pussy, it is also attainable. This is the legacy of man and I believe that underneath any social conditioning a man will have instincts that can differentiate between quality in women.

Damn feminism. I now see it as one of the most spiteful, jealous, hateful, self-centered ideologies that exist. It may have been necessary in the past but it has metastasized into an abomination.

Post: #25

Checkmat you starting to sound like a there is fewer things more attractive to me than muscles on a girl.

Understand that muscles are a simulacrum for a penis. Big tense veiny muscles look like an erection. Same with big noses.

I don't want to be looking at dick on a woman. Why are you promoting this masculinization of girls?