Post: #1

Hackers Got a Woman Fired by a Startup After She Called Out Sexual Harassment

"The termination apparently came as the result of an unknown group of people — presumably men — who descended on the SendGrid website following an incident in which Richards, a (former) developer relations "evangelist," called out a man who made what she deemed sexist remarks during a presentation at PyCon, a conference for Python coders. She sent out the following tweet in addition to a post she wrote on her personal site."

http://news.yahoo.com/hackers-got-woman-...38875.html

   

Post: #2

Overheard at the python conference: Hey girl you wanna see MY python...

Post: #3

Almost all these Adria stories in the media were written by women..

Business Insider
http://www.businessinsider.com/rachel-sk...rid-2013-3
By Rachel Sklar

Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/22...32686.html
Alexis Kleinman

ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/tweet-d...U8hKBwtTHU
Joanna Stern

The Atlantic
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technolog...red/63400/
REBECCA GREENFIELD

BBC News
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21896442
Zoe Kleinman

Salon
http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/women_ar...tersphere/
MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS

Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/deannazandt/...-question/
Deanna Zandt

That patriarchy is really keeping women down.

Post: #4

These bithches are tiresome with their biased reporting.

Post: #5

(03-24-2013 10:56 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Almost all these Adria stories in the media were written by women..

Business Insider
http://www.businessinsider.com/rachel-sk...rid-2013-3
By Rachel Sklar

Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/22...32686.html
Alexis Kleinman

ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/tweet-d...U8hKBwtTHU
Joanna Stern

The Atlantic
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technolog...red/63400/
REBECCA GREENFIELD

BBC News
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21896442
Zoe Kleinman

Salon
http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/women_ar...tersphere/
MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS

Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/deannazandt/...-question/
Deanna Zandt

That patriarchy is really keeping women down.

   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Post: #6

The first one is bangable.

Post: #7

It's worth pointing out that comment sections of these articles have been outstanding---for instance, the first comment on the Atlantic article by "Dream Chaser":

Quote:Your piece is incredibly biased. What actually happened is that she overheard a joke in a private conversation that was not even sexist (she mistakenly ascribed sexist meaning to it), she then made a picture of the guys without their consent and posted it on Twitter (this is ACTUALLY against the conference rules FYI) to publicly humiliate them. Even that was not enough for her, she then called organisers to throw them out. Organisers of course believed her that the joke was sexist at the time (female privilege?) so they asked them to leave. One of them lost his job later because of it (a father of three). The last straw was her incredibly arrogant blog and tweets, comparing herself to brave Joan from Arc for this whole immature tantrum over a silly joke. Add her racist tweets to the mix and you can understand why people became upset.

This comment has 635 upvotes and a handful of downvotes. No way these are all manosphere dudes.

People are not toeing the feminist line anymore and the feminists are beginning to losing control of the debate. Long way to go, but guys are in fightback---and it's damn good to see it.

Post: #8

Goodwin's law confirmed already in the thread topic.

Post: #9

(03-24-2013 11:26 AM)Vicious Wrote:  Goodwin's law confirmed already in the thread topic.

Post: #10

As hard as the feminist media spinsters try to spin the topic to their advantage still a large chunk of people are finally standing up to such stupidity and asinine bias reporting.

Post: #11

It's been talked about on the forum before about how as soon as women are introduced into a male-dominated group, the focus of that group gradually shifts from accomplishing its established goals to ensuring that the women within the group are comfortable.

This entire situation, and the feminist reactions to it essentially prove the truth of that assertion beyond a shadow of a doubt.

What can we take away from this? The fact that women have absolutely no place in any environment where the primary focus is actually getting shit done. They are a poison on group cohesion and efficiency. The mission of the group must take a back seat to the feelings of the women present, every time.

If you're forced to work alongside women in your workplace, you should not only seek to avoid them as much as possible, but actively work to exclude them from any meaningful projects you have involvement with. It's simply become too risky for men to have any professional interaction with women. Their mere presence makes the group less effective (because it must now waste time and resources catering to her feelings) and if she feels aggrieved for whatever reason she can torpedo your career with a single accusation of harassment, which as we've seen here doesn't even have to be directed at her or contain harassing language at all.

This should be motivation for all white collar, wage slave players to get the hell out of corporate America to start their own hustles. Until then, however, tread very carefully. Every woman in your office is a potential land mine that can blow up your career with nothing more than a quick lie to HR, or in this case, a tweet.

Post: #12

(03-24-2013 11:57 AM)scorpion Wrote:  It's been talked about on the forum before about how as soon as women are introduced into a male-dominated group, the focus of that group gradually shifts from accomplishing its established goals to ensuring that the women within the group are comfortable.

This entire situation, and the feminist reactions to it essentially prove the truth of that assertion beyond a shadow of a doubt.

What can we take away from this? The fact that women have absolutely no place in any environment where the primary focus is actually getting shit done. They are a poison on group cohesion and efficiency. The mission of the group must take a back seat to the feelings of the women present, every time.

If you're forced to work alongside women in your workplace, you should not only seek to avoid them as much as possible, but actively work to exclude them from any meaningful projects you have involvement with. It's simply become too risky for men to have any professional interaction with women. Their mere presence makes the group less effective (because it must now waste time and resources catering to her feelings) and if she feels aggrieved for whatever reason she can torpedo your career with a single accusation of harassment, which as we've seen here doesn't even have to be directed at her or contain harassing language at all.

This should be motivation for all white collar, wage slave players to get the hell out of corporate America to start their own hustles. Until then, however, tread very carefully. Every woman in your office is a potential land mine that can blow up your career with nothing more than a quick lie to HR, or in this case, a tweet.

Women truly despise betas. A family man with 3 kids is scum compared to a famous court jester who gives her the tingles.
   

Post: #13

(03-24-2013 12:17 PM)Kingsley Davis Wrote:  Women truly despise betas. A family man with 3 kids is scum compared to a famous court jester who gives her the tingles.

I wonder how she can listen to a Top 40 song without getting all offended and huffing and puffing on twitter.

Post: #14

It's nice to see that men are finally starting to see the ridiculous hyprocisy that surrounds us on a daily basis. This guy was a father of 3 and a familyman and she decides to get his ass fired for a few words.

That's the best part about the misandry bubble. We don't have to protest or do shit. When more men start checking out of society and live only for themselves, the country will crumble. We don't need much to get by and we've been providing for ourselves since we've moved out of the house (and some of us, even earlier than that). The only reason why working class men acquire wealth is to support their families. Take away the families and most of them realize that they can get by with a lot less and have much more fun doing so. The entire feminist illusion is supported, and will be destroyed, by the fact that there are millions of working class men out there putting in their time to make sure that shit actually gets done because their families require a certain standard of living. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a bachelor's tax in the near future.

Post: #15

Women like her are just half the problem. The other half are the people who empower her and support her side of the argument. The people in his company who made the decision to fire him are just as guilty.

No one really knows what happened inside his boss's office and how the discussion went when they pulled him in for 'the talk' but they should have had his back. If the guy had a stellar record working at his company, they should have just laughed at this woman's face. Now, if he had a spotty record of similar type of incidents, then this may have been the straw that broke the camel's back, so to speak.

Take Scott Sassa - he looks like he accomplished a lot not only for his company but also in the industry in general. He should have been 'untouchable'. But as we now know, that wasnt the case.