Post: #51

You know what the irony of all those beautiful 60s and 70s pictures you guys have posted is? They're real. But today's bitches use elaborate digital tricks, like Instagram, to try to replicate this look. What they don't seem to understand is that the charm in those pictures isn't special effects, it's the subjects. No matter what newest-version-of-the-iPhone you have, no amount of electronic sleight-of-hand is going to turn you into one of these lamentably extinct cuties.

Post: #52

(12-13-2012 01:36 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(12-13-2012 12:49 PM)thedude3737 Wrote:  But yeah as someone else mentioned, I hate hairy snatches.

I actually like hairy bush, so that's another check mark in the plus column for the 1960s.

Even if you didn't they'd be more than willing to change just to please you.

Post: #53

(12-13-2012 05:44 PM)YoungGunner Wrote:  

This picture is classic.

60's Playboy going for the close. You can see he is pitching her to roll to his crib to spark one.

Is that a pipe in his hand?

Post: #54

Only a matter of time.

   

Post: #55

(12-13-2012 10:03 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(12-13-2012 05:44 PM)YoungGunner Wrote:  

This picture is classic.

60's Playboy going for the close. You can see he is pitching her to roll to his crib to spark one.

Is that a pipe in his hand?

She looks like a total sweetheart. Nearly impossible to find this look among chicks older than 19 or 20 nowadays.

Post: #56

Quote:She looks like a total sweetheart. Nearly impossible to find this look among chicks older than 19 or 20 nowadays.

This does not look like a sweetheart to me

Post: #57

(12-13-2012 11:08 PM)storm Wrote:  

Quote:She looks like a total sweetheart. Nearly impossible to find this look among chicks older than 19 or 20 nowadays.

This does not look like a sweetheart to me

Haha, I meant more of a devilishly girly type. My favorite...

And that guy has awesome hair.

Post: #58

Sorry to wake you guys from this splendid little dream of ours.

This is what 50 years of Women's Lib* looks like:

*Retro term for feminism

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

Post: #59

(12-13-2012 02:07 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Earlier today, Roosh posted the video below in his Twitter feed. These are American girls dancing on one of those music TV shows in 1969. Ever since I saw it, it's had my hamster going at a million. I've watched five times, even though it fills me with a melancholic feeling I can't entirely describe.





I could write paragraphs about it, but I don't need to with this group.

Quick Observations:

1. No tattoos.
2. Thin, even skinny.
3. Longer hair (on average).
4. Natural and sexy (but unskanky) look.
5. Subtly feminine aura that's near-impossible to describe.
6. Better music.

A purple piller might say: "Well, Tuthmosis, those are hand-picked chicks for the TV show." What would we respond? It's not like when you walked out of that studio you had a bunch of Adeles and Anal-Tattoo Broads walking on the street, and these were the only 11 girls like this. This may not have been typical, but it was common.

A skeptic would say, "You're just romanticizing the past. There were other draw-backs--like prudishness." That could be true, but I can't help but think, like Roosh muses, "I would have been more than happy" with this arrangement. Certainly more--or in a more meaningful way--than I am with the current crop.

It's an interesting historical moment for guys with our sensibilities too: right in the midst of the so-called "sexual revolution," and the advent of second-wave feminism. Was this the best time to be a man? Slightly liberated chicks, but not yet ruined. Or, is this, in fact, the beginning of the long ascent that we find ourselves at the bottom of? Or, is it something else entirely?

Let's discuss.

It was a pretty good time. Our women were very different then and in the 70s. Things began to change in the eighties. I think obesity is the major difference. I think women are fundamentally very unhappy being fat, disgusting pigs. The real decline into bitchiness began in the mid-nineties when women started coming of age, already fat.

It was much better being a man before the obesity crisis, more women to chose from, better attitude, fewer messed up hormones from the poisoned food supply. It countries with more traditional food supplies, like Ukraine, women are still very feminine, even when they are pudgy (which is rare).

Post: #60

(12-14-2012 12:51 AM)rastignac Wrote:  

(12-13-2012 02:07 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Earlier today, Roosh posted the video below in his Twitter feed. These are American girls dancing on one of those music TV shows in 1969. Ever since I saw it, it's had my hamster going at a million. I've watched five times, even though it fills me with a melancholic feeling I can't entirely describe.





I could write paragraphs about it, but I don't need to with this group.

Quick Observations:

1. No tattoos.
2. Thin, even skinny.
3. Longer hair (on average).
4. Natural and sexy (but unskanky) look.
5. Subtly feminine aura that's near-impossible to describe.
6. Better music.

A purple piller might say: "Well, Tuthmosis, those are hand-picked chicks for the TV show." What would we respond? It's not like when you walked out of that studio you had a bunch of Adeles and Anal-Tattoo Broads walking on the street, and these were the only 11 girls like this. This may not have been typical, but it was common.

A skeptic would say, "You're just romanticizing the past. There were other draw-backs--like prudishness." That could be true, but I can't help but think, like Roosh muses, "I would have been more than happy" with this arrangement. Certainly more--or in a more meaningful way--than I am with the current crop.

It's an interesting historical moment for guys with our sensibilities too: right in the midst of the so-called "sexual revolution," and the advent of second-wave feminism. Was this the best time to be a man? Slightly liberated chicks, but not yet ruined. Or, is this, in fact, the beginning of the long ascent that we find ourselves at the bottom of? Or, is it something else entirely?

Let's discuss.

It was a pretty good time. Our women were very different then and in the 70s. Things began to change in the eighties. I think obesity is the major difference. I think women are fundamentally very unhappy being fat, disgusting pigs. The real decline into bitchiness began in the mid-nineties when women started coming of age, already fat.

It was much better being a man before the obesity crisis, more women to chose from, better attitude, fewer messed up hormones from the poisoned food supply. It countries with more traditional food supplies, like Ukraine, women are still very feminine, even when they are pudgy (which is rare).

Imagine Brazilian girls in that time also. Sweet Jesus.

Post: #61

(12-13-2012 10:21 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

She looks like a total sweetheart. Nearly impossible to find this look among chicks older than 19 or 20 nowadays.

Probably because she's about 15 or 16! Guy looks like her teacher going for a perv move to me. lol

A couple of these h.s. pictures have me shaking my head about you guys. What, do you want to go back in time and mack on high school girls?

A lot of cute, skinny high school girls today too. But I doubt we'd start posting their pictures on here and idolizing them.

I'm just giving you a little shit, but let's keep a little perspective here.

And I have to agree with Gio and Caligula that while modern-day women definitely got their problems, there are plenty of feminine ones to be found. With the sheer population expansion, even all the fatties don't crowd out all the hotties.

That said, judging by the descriptions of the lifestyle a lot of us lament on here, I think many would be happy in some foreign beach-town banging European tourists to pass the time...Most on here would rather do something a little more upward-mobile, but a simple life with beautiful women on a cool island or beach in paradise would probably bring more happiness.

That and possibly even settling down with a simple, loyal woman once you got a lil' bangin' out of your system.

Beyond All Seas

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe.
To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes
frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Kipling

Post: #62

(12-14-2012 12:51 AM)rastignac Wrote:  

(12-13-2012 02:07 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Earlier today, Roosh posted the video below in his Twitter feed. These are American girls dancing on one of those music TV shows in 1969. Ever since I saw it, it's had my hamster going at a million. I've watched five times, even though it fills me with a melancholic feeling I can't entirely describe.





I could write paragraphs about it, but I don't need to with this group.

Quick Observations:

1. No tattoos.
2. Thin, even skinny.
3. Longer hair (on average).
4. Natural and sexy (but unskanky) look.
5. Subtly feminine aura that's near-impossible to describe.
6. Better music.

A purple piller might say: "Well, Tuthmosis, those are hand-picked chicks for the TV show." What would we respond? It's not like when you walked out of that studio you had a bunch of Adeles and Anal-Tattoo Broads walking on the street, and these were the only 11 girls like this. This may not have been typical, but it was common.

A skeptic would say, "You're just romanticizing the past. There were other draw-backs--like prudishness." That could be true, but I can't help but think, like Roosh muses, "I would have been more than happy" with this arrangement. Certainly more--or in a more meaningful way--than I am with the current crop.

It's an interesting historical moment for guys with our sensibilities too: right in the midst of the so-called "sexual revolution," and the advent of second-wave feminism. Was this the best time to be a man? Slightly liberated chicks, but not yet ruined. Or, is this, in fact, the beginning of the long ascent that we find ourselves at the bottom of? Or, is it something else entirely?

Let's discuss.

It was a pretty good time. Our women were very different then and in the 70s. Things began to change in the eighties. I think obesity is the major difference. I think women are fundamentally very unhappy being fat, disgusting pigs. The real decline into bitchiness began in the mid-nineties when women started coming of age, already fat.

It was much better being a man before the obesity crisis, more women to chose from, better attitude, fewer messed up hormones from the poisoned food supply. It countries with more traditional food supplies, like Ukraine, women are still very feminine, even when they are pudgy (which is rare).

You should speak more on it and tell us some stories Pops

Post: #63

Was cockblocking common in the 60s and 70s? If I went up to a girl at a bar and started talking to her, would her friends pull her away?

Post: #64

(12-14-2012 09:01 AM)Apollo2 Wrote:  Was cockblocking common in the 60s and 70s? If I went up to a girl at a bar and started talking to her, would her friends pull her away?

We have to ask Tenderman.

Post: #65

Perhaps looks are almost the same in schoolgirls today and in the 60's, as it's hard to fuck yourself up that much in so little time, but the attitude is not. Sure, schoolgirls would have been hard before, but they would not have been raging bitches. Nearly every schoolgirl that I know nowadays (and believe me, I know plenty) is at least moderately bitchy and requires asshole game to bang.

Post: #66

(12-13-2012 10:13 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Only a matter of time.

I'd buy it.

Post: #67

(12-13-2012 10:03 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

This picture is classic.

60's Playboy going for the close. You can see he is pitching her to roll to his crib to spark one.

Is that a pipe in his hand?

Its gotta be a pipe or a joint.

He's saying - "this is the super duper groovy inter planetary mind expander, Lets sip some peppermint tea and listen to my favorite album"

Post: #68

(12-13-2012 08:33 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

This is going up on the wall in my home.

Beautiful shot

(12-13-2012 05:44 PM)YoungGunner Wrote:  

I hope nobody sees their mom in these photos

I think this is my aunt in the green shirt.

To my family members reading this, please confirm or deny this?!?

(12-13-2012 09:00 PM)Grit Wrote:  To what extent do people physically resemble their psychology? How closely does physical appearance and psychological state align?

When you read an article with the word "cisgender" you know that the author has been thinking way too hard and is 99% guaranteed to be an ugly mofo.

Whoa, very interesting. I think that obviously, your looks play a big part in your perspective.

Cool post.

Post: #69

They were different times.Greek girls in the sixties.

Post: #70

Man this thread depresses the fuck outta me.

Post: #71

(12-14-2012 11:36 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Man this thread depresses the fuck outta me.

It depresses you? It's already affected my actual approaches. I was talking to these two chicks earlier today and this thread crossed my mind. The chicks were okay, but when I started thinking of what I was settling for, they went way-the-fuck-down. The disgusting blue-haired monster I posted above didn't help matters either. I mean, I knew the reality in the abstract, but the juxtaposition was deadly.

Keep in mind that I already bought the song and have been playing it on loop. I've lost my mind a little more because of that amazing stupid video.

If Roosh really does start working on that time-machine, I'd likely be right there doing calculations and testing too.

[attachment=9112]

Post: #72

Someone should make a terminator inspired movie about a sith lord player from the future who goes back in time and seduces myriad women. The Jedi response is to send back their best player to cockblock and AMOG the bad ass player, thus saving the spacetime continuum and appeasing the god of game.

but, their is a role reversal when the good player actually ends up bedding more women and realizes that he has become the thing he was sent back to stop.

"FUTURE MACK"

Post: #73

(12-14-2012 11:51 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(12-14-2012 11:36 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Man this thread depresses the fuck outta me.

It depresses you? It's already affected my actual approaches. I was talking to these two chicks earlier today and this thread crossed my mind. The chicks were okay, but when I started thinking of what I was settling for, they went way-the-fuck-down. The disgusting blue-haired monster I posted above didn't help matters either. I mean, I knew the reality in the abstract, but the juxtaposition was deadly.

Dude, I'm really lucky because my dancing game gets me girls below 21. I get to bang 18-19-20 year olds. So when I see this video, I'm only depressed because thankfully I can still pull girls who look better than those girls.

But when I realize those were just average girls doing their thing, all around the age of 24, then I have my realization.

It is so difficult to target the younger demographic in the US because of how few there are, how high in demand there are, and when I realize what most men have to settle for, I just feel bad about everything.

And it's not even like I get to score a young cutie every week. It's more like every other week because of how few of them are around, and how many of them are corrupted (fatness, feminism, or blind careerism).

I think of all the huge natural advantages I have in the game, and I realize if I were alive back in the 1960's I would have crushed so much hot pussy it wouldn't have been funny. Then I think of how much effort I put in today to get what I can, and compare it to most other guys my age who get NOTHING except from a bunch of used up, older sluts past 25 - and I'm just completely hopeless.

Roissy was wrong. Even if every man learns game, it's not going to save men. There's going to be winners and losers in this zero-sum game and most men are fucked.

And this is the crux of the situation -

If I couldn't get some tight young snatch, what would be the point of gaming girls? I can't even imagine gaming a woman past the age of 25, makes my head hurt. I have banged women over 25, but that was before I was good at the game.

Now when I meet an older girl, I realize I would be better off with masturbation. It's THAT unappealing to me, and this thread doesn't help.

I think game is on it's deathbed. Without a supply of hot young girls, who the fuck is gonna spend time on this shit?

Post: #74

I can deal working around the fatties like landmines. The thing that gets to me is how so many girls have nasty attitudes and wanna be "one of the guys". That shit needs to stop. Who knows if it ever will...

Post: #75

(12-15-2012 12:40 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(12-14-2012 11:51 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(12-14-2012 11:36 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Man this thread depresses the fuck outta me.

It depresses you? It's already affected my actual approaches. I was talking to these two chicks earlier today and this thread crossed my mind. The chicks were okay, but when I started thinking of what I was settling for, they went way-the-fuck-down. The disgusting blue-haired monster I posted above didn't help matters either. I mean, I knew the reality in the abstract, but the juxtaposition was deadly.

Dude, I'm really lucky because my dancing game gets me girls below 21. I get to bang 18-19-20 year olds. So when I see this video, I'm only depressed because thankfully I can still pull girls who look better than those girls.

But when I realize those were just average girls doing their thing, all around the age of 24, then I have my realization.

It is so difficult to target the younger demographic in the US because of how few there are, how high in demand there are, and when I realize what most men have to settle for, I just feel bad about everything.

And it's not even like I get to score a young cutie every week. It's more like every other week because of how few of them are around, and how many of them are corrupted (fatness, feminism, or blind careerism).

I think of all the huge natural advantages I have in the game, and I realize if I were alive back in the 1960's I would have crushed so much hot pussy it wouldn't have been funny. Then I think of how much effort I put in today to get what I can, and compare it to most other guys my age who get NOTHING except from a bunch of used up, older sluts past 25 - and I'm just completely hopeless.

Roissy was wrong. Even if every man learns game, it's not going to save men. There's going to be winners and losers in this zero-sum game and most men are fucked.

And this is the crux of the situation -

If I couldn't get some tight young snatch, what would be the point of gaming girls? I can't even imagine gaming a woman past the age of 25, makes my head hurt. I have banged women over 25, but that was before I was good at the game.

Now when I meet an older girl, I realize I would be better off with masturbation. It's THAT unappealing to me, and this thread doesn't help.

I think game is on it's deathbed. Without a supply of hot young girls, who the fuck is gonna spend time on this shit?

Samseau, you hit it exactly. Pussy paradises are where a man with game and experience can get 18 to 24 yr old women regularly. Nothing should be more important for a player than that.
I will post a thread about that soon.