Post: #76

Let me test the waters with this idea.

Part A: Would you be proud for people to see you with her while you're in a tux and she's in some cute little evening gown?

Part B: In said situation, would they assume you're escorting her or that she's your "escort"?

Those plastic models with the fake asses above would pass part A for most dudes but they'd fail part B because they look like dirty hoes.

Post: #77

Here's how I would personally put it.

Wife=Petite, small, very feminine.
FWB=Thicc perferably short and throwable.
The mother of my children=5'9+ with nice calves and a nice ass.

In my experience the thicker girls are just funner to fuck. I do however agree that there is a classy beauty about petite feminine women. My main girl would always be the type of girl that could play a bond girl. You know smaller and would look amazing in a cocktail dress.

Post: #78

(04-18-2019 06:45 PM)Donfitz007 Wrote:  dang Hank got banned??? HOW? he was legendary

I'm not going to talk bad about hank because he isn't around to stick up for himself, but just a guess, if he posted something that violated the forum rules, maybe game denialism, and that took his warning to 25% or 50%, and it would go away after 3 months if he did nothing, but he instead protested it and it went over 100%, that would do it. Hank had good passive game.

On topic,

Post: #79

(04-18-2019 08:52 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Let me test the waters with this idea.

Part A: Would you be proud for people to see you with her while you're in a tux and she's in some cute little evening gown?

Part B: In said situation, would they assume you're escorting her or that she's your "escort"?

Those plastic models with the fake asses above would pass part A for most dudes but they'd fail part B because they look like dirty hoes.

This is an excellent explanation of the dichotomy. Chicks with Chun Li thighs are too much associated with video vixens and twerking(which I personally fucking hate has become a thing) to be taken as anything other than a semi-pro or pro.

Post: #80

For those who cite chunky women in paintings as evidence that beauty standards have changed:




All those paintings of women are actually that of men with breasts added on and genitals switched.

The rest of the body fits the male body that is used to model those paintings.

Post: #81

Comte De St. Germain: Christ Almighty, I'm on board with ya ...

Post: #82

(04-18-2019 09:08 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  For those who cite chunky women in paintings as evidence that beauty standards have changed:




All those paintings of women are actually that of men with breasts added on and genitals switched.

The rest of the body fits the male body that is used to model those paintings.

That's just for Baroque and Renaissance art.

The different depictions of Venus shown at 4:55 didn't change very much in 2500 years. None of those depictions would win a wet t-shirt contest in the 1990s either.

Post: #83

One in the eye for all the H8ers who don't appreciate a Hot Woman (2019 version)





No Plastic Surgery!! Thats the latest excuse of the body positive.

Check out the white chick page left of screen - 03:20.

Almost the physical embodiment of slovenliness and thottery.


That runway model was hot down to her waist.. merely cute on account of her flabby ass. Would attack if drunk, would not aspire to dating her and being known for it.

She is not runway quality because she is flabby and too wide for post Neanderthal/ Pre Obesity standards.

I thought I had rose tinted glasses about the 90s of my youth until someone recently scanned some pics from 95 onto facebook.

Holy-Motherfucking-Shit ..

those girls were so hot back then.

They are now all wall victims with lots of kids but the screen-time, tech-neck, bags-under-eyes chicks of today could not hold a candle to how fresh and svelte those girls-next-door from just one provincial town in the Uk were once.

100% agree with OP of this thread's opening comment : /thread-67356...busted+SEA

The physical decline in quality of western women in just 20 years is frightening but it is being brushed under the carpet and memory holed.

For those who feel their tastes are under attack -

This thread /thread-70738.html came with a trigger warning in the title so was bound to spark debate but..

Bear in mind that there is a thread asking "Which Nationality of Asian (Oriental) women got the nicest asses?"

(We know we know.. we get it.. Our love of the tight, peachy -and seemingly chiseled out of marble- asses on Asian girls is WrongThink ..

They are all pancake flat and we are stupid)

and lo and behold.. pictures of Latinas and Brazilians and Hip-Hop THICC girls abound in a thread that is less than 5 pages long.

Comments like "you Crazy Bruh" proliferate.

The intolerance is not just on one side.

This Forum will not be shut down by the future ((Globalist State)) it will disintegrate owing to the bitter civil war between the THICC/ PHAT brigade and those who cling to the memory of lissome and lithe females that used to stalk our catwalks,

our high streets..

and our lives..

And who still stalk our minds.

Post: #84

(04-24-2019 07:01 AM)Bienvenuto Wrote:  One in the eye for all the H8ers who don't appreciate a Hot Woman (2019 version)





No Plastic Surgery!! Thats the latest excuse of the body positive.

Check out the white chick page left of screen - 03:20.

Almost the physical embodiment of slovenliness and thottery.


That runway model was hot down to her waist.. merely cute on account of her flabby ass. Would attack if drunk, would not aspire to dating her and being known for it.

She is not runway quality because she is flabby and too wide for post Neanderthal/ Pre Obesity standards.

I thought I had rose tinted glasses about the 90s of my youth until someone recently scanned some pics from 95 onto facebook.

Holy-Motherfucking-Shit ..

those girls were so hot back then.

They are now all wall victims with lots of kids but the screen-time, tech-neck, bags-under-eyes chicks of today could not hold a candle to how fresh and svelte those girls-next-door from just one provincial town in the Uk were once.

100% agree with OP of this thread's opening comment : /thread-67356...busted+SEA

The physical decline in quality of western women in just 20 years is frightening but it is being brushed under the carpet and memory holed.

For those who feel their tastes are under attack -

This thread /thread-70738.html came with a trigger warning in the title so was bound to spark debate but..

Bear in mind that there is a thread asking "Which Nationality of Asian (Oriental) women got the nicest asses?"

(We know we know.. we get it.. Our love of the tight, peachy -and seemingly chiseled out of marble- asses on Asian girls is WrongThink ..

They are all pancake flat and we are stupid)

and lo and behold.. pictures of Latinas and Brazilians and Hip-Hop THICC girls abound in a thread that is less than 5 pages long.

Comments like "you Crazy Bruh" proliferate.

The intolerance is not just on one side.

This Forum will not be shut down by the future ((Globalist State)) it will disintegrate owing to the bitter civil war between the THICC/ PHAT brigade and those who cling to the memory of lissome and lithe females that used to stalk our catwalks,

our high streets..

and our lives..

And who still stalk our minds.

Give it time. I am guessing that the fat bubble will burst in the US. There are real consequences to obesity and the feminist lifestyle to the ability to reproduce.

1. If you are fat (male or female), you are not getting laid as frequently.

2. Hot fit guys are spreading their seed more effectively than fat asses.

3. Feminist lifestyle culture causes women to avoid pregnancy, abort babies, and pollute their bodies past child bearing age (plenty of other issues to name).

I think many other people in the forum are more pessimistic about the state of society in the US. I think the fat-bubble is about to burst in the US.

More and more women (and male feminists) are speaking out against these nasty fat pigs. Roosh said recently that we are at peak homo (I agree).

I claim that we are at peak thot fat ass (in the US).

Post: #85

If you shared photo of physical state of the modern 21 year old MAN, it would be even worse.

Sad.

Post: #86

(04-24-2019 11:09 AM)spydersuit Wrote:  ...

Give it time. I am guessing that the fat bubble will burst in the US. There are real consequences to obesity and the feminist lifestyle to the ability to reproduce.

1. If you are fat (male or female), you are not getting laid as frequently.

2. Hot fit guys are spreading their seed more effectively than fat asses.

3. Feminist lifestyle culture causes women to avoid pregnancy, abort babies, and pollute their bodies past child bearing age (plenty of other issues to name).

I think many other people in the forum are more pessimistic about the state of society in the US. I think the fat-bubble is about to burst in the US.

More and more women (and male feminists) are speaking out against these nasty fat pigs. Roosh said recently that we are at peak homo (I agree).

I claim that we are at peak thot fat ass (in the US).

For every strong, independent womyn that doesn't reproduce, you will have 2 migrants from Mexico, the Philippines or Africa who will come in and fill in for her non-existent progeny. That is the crux of the Kalergi plan. The US and Canada will be blended into Latin America.

The pushing of girls with fat asses is the promotion of the aesthetic ideal that is compatible with that demographic and cultural plan, the debased brown Cardi B hood girl is the new feminine ideal. White women with normal physiques and a feminine demeanor are no longer on top.

Here is the evolution of that ideal:

1920s: the flapper (the term comes from old English, equivalent to whore or slut). The first modern socially-engineered feminist archetype. Liberated upper class urban party woman with short hair, simpler/more functional, more revealing wardrobe (pants and shirts or straight strap dress with no bras) cigarette and boyish features (thin, flat-chested), a modern departure from the more traditional voluptuous corset-clad victorian 1900s predecessor.



1930s-40s: not much going on with the Great Depression and WW2, a more functional, more basic modern housewife who can fasten rivets on a B-17 and help out while her husband is fighting overseas. Rosie the Riveter:



1950s: a slow variation but still in the same mold, not quite fat but definitely more voluptuous, reflecting era of abundance (Marilyn Monroe, redhead secretary in Mad Men). Women were still very thin, taking the tram and walking around in the city, before the massive advent of suburbs, but they aspired to be more voluptuous like Marilyn, and the mores were still quite conservative. Grace Kelly:






1960s-70s: hippie girl, no longer a housewife but a girl that is woke, feminist and "spiritual" (ie, non-christian), no longer interested in the oppressive patriarchal model of early marriage and family. Gloria Steinem Hugh Hefner and Helen Gurley Brown as main influencers. Body lines are sex bombshell curvaceous yet thinner than the 50s (Jane Fonda, Brigitte Bardot, Raquel Welsh).






80s-90s: liberated career girl, wants to have her cake and eat it (figuratively, because she has to stay thin). Thin, toned bodies, with the advent of the modern career girl who goes to the gym. Phoebe Cates, Bo Derek with toned bodies and classic facial beauty.






2010s-2020s: onset of full-on SJW cultural marxism with the 2nd generation of women, raised by boomers who were already socially engineered and bought their programming full-on, falling out from the Church and being too busy working or doing their thing. Can't cook, because they weren't taught to, and don't appreciate marital life, domestic arts and the family sphere. So they eat out, so they're fat.

Social media culture and maximum exposure to popular culture, where the idealized woman is now the polar opposite of Grace Kelly: Kim Kard. or Cardi B. Completely unrestrained/unhinged women who are driven by their impulses and following the "do what thy wilt" Crowleyan ethos, so they're a bit fat and "sex positive" promiscuous, drenched in a culture of degeneracy.

Whites are no longer cool or wanted in the Kalergist scheme, so the music is by design mostly black, raw and dark, performed by handpicked 2nd generation hoes who come from homes broken in the 1970s-80s, now debased to levels getting pretty close to the bottom of the moral barrel. The model body reflects that of the modern debased urban woman, and the cartoonish anime sex creature, catering to young men who were weened on porn:

Post: #87

Past events are not necessarily predictive if the future. You go further back in time and some of those broads were fairly hefty.

Post: #88

And how does all that explain Gigi Hadid or Kendal Jenner?

Sure the big booty fat chicks crowd have a megaphone, but who is actually listening and taking the cues? Fat chicks?

What is missing here is a causal relationship.

Some of those chicks in the 50s and 60s had big asses too.

I think Trump has a pretty decent lockdown on the immigration issue, and I hope it improves.

I fail to see what most of that post has to do with reproductive rates of fat women.

Post: #89

(04-24-2019 07:01 AM)Bienvenuto Wrote:  



Check out the white chick page left of screen - 03:20.

Almost the physical embodiment of slovenliness and thottery.

Those fat thighs rubbing against each other remind me that "anti-chafing bands" are apparently a thing now, and they are modeled by landwhales on runways. Yup, you read it correctly. Anti-chafing band models. So it seems obesity is here to stay.

Post: #90

It's not just the near morbid obesity on these girls that's shocking, it's the fact that you see them publicly displaying their flesh in stripper gear, as opposed to just riding along on their cart in a Walmart isle.

Post: #91

You will learn to love your glutinous, lack of self control, hyper consumerist, hambeast superiors inferior male proles!

They will lead your households, follow the programming, govern the spending and you will worship the ground they walk on or be swiftly replaced.

Post: #92

nudity eyebleach

Post: #93

(04-20-2019 05:40 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 09:08 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  For those who cite chunky women in paintings as evidence that beauty standards have changed:




All those paintings of women are actually that of men with breasts added on and genitals switched.

The rest of the body fits the male body that is used to model those paintings.

That's just for Baroque and Renaissance art.

The different depictions of Venus shown at 4:55 didn't change very much in 2500 years. None of those depictions would win a wet t-shirt contest in the 1990s either.

I don't think they are actually depictions of the ideal. Whilst archaeologists may have labelled them as such. There is no good basis for such claims.


For all we know. They may have been modelled after real noble women who were fat.

Post: #94

(04-25-2019 02:15 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 05:40 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 09:08 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  For those who cite chunky women in paintings as evidence that beauty standards have changed:




All those paintings of women are actually that of men with breasts added on and genitals switched.

The rest of the body fits the male body that is used to model those paintings.

That's just for Baroque and Renaissance art.

The different depictions of Venus shown at 4:55 didn't change very much in 2500 years. None of those depictions would win a wet t-shirt contest in the 1990s either.

I don't think they are actually depictions of the ideal. Whilst archaeologists may have labelled them as such. There is no good basis for such claims.


For all we know. They may have been modelled after real noble women who were fat.

Wrong.

1. An artist back then wouldn't spend so much time making an ugly statue/painting.

2. People didn't put up ugly art for 2500 years.

3. If you're creating artwork about the Goddess of love, beauty, desire, sex, fertility, prosperity and victory, then you want to make her look as beautiful as possible.

4. Making nobility look ugly is a fast way to get in trouble.

Post: #95

(04-25-2019 02:43 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-25-2019 02:15 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 05:40 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 09:08 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  For those who cite chunky women in paintings as evidence that beauty standards have changed:




All those paintings of women are actually that of men with breasts added on and genitals switched.

The rest of the body fits the male body that is used to model those paintings.

That's just for Baroque and Renaissance art.

The different depictions of Venus shown at 4:55 didn't change very much in 2500 years. None of those depictions would win a wet t-shirt contest in the 1990s either.

I don't think they are actually depictions of the ideal. Whilst archaeologists may have labelled them as such. There is no good basis for such claims.


For all we know. They may have been modelled after real noble women who were fat.

Wrong.

1. An artist back then wouldn't spend so much time making an ugly statue/painting.

2. People didn't put up ugly art for 2500 years.

3. If you're creating artwork about the Goddess of love, beauty, desire, sex, fertility, prosperity and victory, then you want to make her look as beautiful as possible.

4. Making nobility look ugly is a fast way to get in trouble.

Sure. How about some evidence to support those statements?

Post: #96

SO PTT might be 100% right, as I look around I see more and more guys not smashing but actually starting Long term relationships with fat women. My girl at the moment is Petite with a fatter ass and huge breast, not even as big as the original girl I posted and yet shes self-conscious of thick (almost fat women). Her best friend is a short fat girl who has guys drooling over her.

Maybe its the tinder reason, as fat women get more matches because they match with anybody.

I can understand not wanting to work for a very attractive woman when you could settle for a 4-5 with a decent personality.

Post: #97

Assortative mating. The hottest guys and girls find each other and mate. 5s fuck 5s. 3s fuck 3s, and 10s fuck 10s. Most of the people in the population are monogamists.

Why work on increasing your score and fuck 9s and 10s, when you can regularly get 5s without working too hard?

Black pill my friend.

Post: #98

This by far has been the best hot or not thread I've seen in awhile.

Ass worship has led to girls letting themselves go and get fat, but I sTILl HaVe aN aSS!

Same goes with hoes with fake tits who let themselves go because they bank on their bolt ons only.

I love hitting bitches from behind, but there's a limit on the ass I'll handle.



I can 100% Cosign what LDN says about PT as I've seen the talent PT has had.

In his world he can definitely say WNB and she's fat.