Post: #26

Stacy Abrams is the worst of a bad lot. She was heavily supported (no pun intended) by out of state money in the Georgia governors race. Rumor is that Creepy Joe Biden will soon name her as his running mate even though such announcements usually occur after the primaries. I think hands-y Joe needs a woman to distract from his groping

Post: #27

Dream combo for 2020:



She should be able to vote at least, very based by dem standards. Also, cult member, anti-homo, half Asian.

Post: #28

(03-19-2019 06:28 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Women or not, the QUALITY of presidential candidates has drastically declined over the last 15-20 years. This was the country of Washington, Jefferson, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower etc. Well-spoken, thoughtful men who cared deeply about the nation and culture and not just the GDP. To compare those guys with whatever we have now, on both sides of the aisle, is just sad.

Good point but, every single president you mention, even Washington and Eisenhower, were attacked just as harshly in their time. You're viewing them through rose-colored glasses.

Jefferson? Oh my god. He was considered a monster by his opponents, ripped to shreds. Still is by some historians.

Then there are many dozens of forgotten and kind of useless presidents that you don't mention. Tyler, Hayes, Coolige, Taft, Cleveland, Arthur, Garfield, etc etc. Their quality was terrible.

Post: #29

(03-19-2019 02:04 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  Good point but, every single president you mention, even Washington and Eisenhower, were attacked just as harshly in their time. You're viewing them through rose-colored glasses.

Jefferson? Oh my god. He was considered a monster by his opponents, ripped to shreds. Still is by some historians.

Then there are many dozens of forgotten and kind of useless presidents that you don't mention. Tyler, Hayes, Coolige, Taft, Cleveland, Arthur, Garfield, etc etc. Their quality was terrible.

You're missing the point. Regardless of their policies, they were well-read and highly eloquent, and not in the bullshit way that Obama was. Check out the Lincoln-Douglas debates. It puts Trump-Hillary to shame. I know I sound like Clint Eastwood from Gran Torino but goddamit I'm pissed

Post: #30

(03-19-2019 03:21 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(03-19-2019 02:04 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  Good point but, every single president you mention, even Washington and Eisenhower, were attacked just as harshly in their time. You're viewing them through rose-colored glasses.

Jefferson? Oh my god. He was considered a monster by his opponents, ripped to shreds. Still is by some historians.

Then there are many dozens of forgotten and kind of useless presidents that you don't mention. Tyler, Hayes, Coolige, Taft, Cleveland, Arthur, Garfield, etc etc. Their quality was terrible.

You're missing the point. Regardless of their policies, they were well-read and highly eloquent, and not in the bullshit way that Obama was. Check out the Lincoln-Douglas debates. It puts Trump-Hillary to shame. I know I sound like Clint Eastwood from Gran Torino but goddamit I'm pissed

Well when you put it that way, I agree completely!

Post: #31

Absurdly unqualified you say?!?

   

Post: #32

That’s funny, I always figured Cory Booker as a closet homosexual.

There was something too “try hard” about him announcing that he was dating Rosario Dawson.