Post: #51

(01-06-2019 07:34 PM)SaintLaurentJake Wrote:  What do you guys think ? A 7 I'd say maybe even 7.5.






Shes pretty hot wouldnt need any alcohol to bang proudly but nothing really too special, like an above average jane.. Nice tits though

Face is pretty meeeeh, good tits. Tough one

Post: #52

6's are average but cute girls: like that one cute barista at the local coffee shop, she has green eyes and black hair, who you would definitely bang (she has huge tits) but not date because she is about 10 lbs overweight.

7's are like that one cardio bunny at the gym, likely has 1000-5000 instagram followers, but still has to earn a living somehow at some boring ass job.

8's are hanging out with dudes like Bilzerian, basketball players, rappers, getting into the hottest clubs in big cities, and dont really have to "work" a day in their life (some work the pole). You likely don't interact with them unless you're into those circles.

9's are supermodels on DiCaprio's yacht or married to the elite. 10's are personal preference but most won't ever achieve them.

This is pretty much a Western point of view, I'm sure in South America you will find an 8 walking down the main boulevard. And I'm sure your status can attract her but its all circumstantial... Regardless, I retire the 1-10 scale to the ever popular BANG/WNB category.

Post: #53

(01-06-2019 02:07 PM)Saweeep Wrote:  No no, I'm referring to your comments on the girl in the picture.

Ok, I said she's not a 10 for me. That's it.

It's subjective after all.

I like, for example, the girls that PapayaTapper posts.

Post: #54

(01-07-2019 01:45 PM)mundele Wrote:  

(01-06-2019 07:34 PM)SaintLaurentJake Wrote:  What do you guys think ? A 7 I'd say maybe even 7.5.






Shes pretty hot wouldnt need any alcohol to bang proudly but nothing really too special, like an above average jane.. Nice tits though

Face is pretty meeeeh, good tits. Tough one

^^ I'm with you. 5 or 6, definitely not a 7, due to face being meh. I'd have to see more pics to give a final answer.

Post: #55

(01-07-2019 02:10 PM)Matrixdude Wrote:  This is pretty much a Western point of view, I'm sure in South America you will find an 8 walking down the main boulevard. And I'm sure your status can attract her but its all circumstantial...

Honestly, I've lived and traveled across all of South America but I still haven't found that mythical place I see referenced in the forums where you can bump into a tree and a bunch of 8s will fall off.

Post: #56

(01-07-2019 02:32 PM)Super Average Man Wrote:  

(01-07-2019 02:10 PM)Matrixdude Wrote:  This is pretty much a Western point of view, I'm sure in South America you will find an 8 walking down the main boulevard. And I'm sure your status can attract her but its all circumstantial...

Honestly, I've lived and traveled across all of South America but I still haven't found that mythical place I see referenced in the forums where you can bump into a tree and a bunch of 8s will fall off.

It's all matter of tastes. I don't find to much attractive my 'paisanas' nor any stunner from here, although I delight in middle east or nordic beauty.

Post: #57

(01-07-2019 02:32 PM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

(01-07-2019 01:45 PM)mundele Wrote:  

(01-06-2019 07:34 PM)SaintLaurentJake Wrote:  What do you guys think ? A 7 I'd say maybe even 7.5.






Shes pretty hot wouldnt need any alcohol to bang proudly but nothing really too special, like an above average jane.. Nice tits though

Face is pretty meeeeh, good tits. Tough one

^^ I'm with you. 5 or 6, definitely not a 7, due to face being meh. I'd have to see more pics to give a final answer.

What a joke this thread is becoming. That chick is a 5 or 6? As in average looking? She is thin with DDs, easily a 7.

And the guy calling that lingerie model a 7 with an 8 body...

Be at least semi objective when you rate. When you rate a chick, you should have some sort of bell curve distribution. Let's call a 10 the top 1% of fertile women. A 9 is the top 2-4%, 8 is 6-10%, etc.

You can't rate a chick based on what she is compared to her peers on TV or instagram models...

In my opinion Bilzerian hits nothing less than an objective 10. All his chicks are easily in the top 1% of women their age.

Post: #58

That girl is a 6-7 range depending on your preference. For me its a solid 6.5
People should start using the decimals too, cuz it helps a lot.

Post: #59

solid 6's, girl on the right in the bottom pic is a 7. girl on the right in the top pic might just be a 5.

       

Post: #60

If you guys ever want to know how ugly you are, without going on Tinder, post your scores below.

Post: #61

Man. I'd like to see the women some of you are fucking and or LTR'ng if Ms. DD there is a 6; granted I wouldn't rate her more or less than a point, point and half away from it.

But with the amount of lard asses permeating the western landscape, skewing the reality that we live in NOW, not what we all know it SHOULD (will??) be when the latest iteration of feminism gets gone...She's better than an average rating. It's hard to judge where some of you gents live, much less be banging or dating because I want to go where you are apparently.

Objectively I know this forum is made up of *woke dudes and such; along with those that are black pilled, game aware, yadayada, all of which absolutely increase ones selection bias but...lol wow.

*I do get that we're basing it on looks only; a huge percentage of a woman worth but...as I'm past 40 dating a 23yr old...damn you all for awaking me to the facts of the "happiness gene" in women. Makes it even tougher to find a quality chick from my pre-game dystopia I lived in.

Post: #62

(01-07-2019 04:24 PM)Aenema Wrote:  solid 6's, girl on the right in the bottom pic is a 7. girl on the right in the top pic might just be a 5.

Rating is a bit harsh.

I'm clarifying my views here just for the future, when I refer to a bang/plate of mine by the number scale.

Girl on top right is my the definition of a 6. Slightly above average face, relatively thin. Not hot enough to chase. Rest seem to be at least 7 for me with bottom right being a hard 8. Two girls on the bottom right have what it takes to be an 9 for me if their bodies were totally off the hook. I'd probably put the three bottom girls closer to an 8. Young, hot, thin, two on the right have ample boobs, nice eyes. Definitely hotter than at least 80% of the female population, even in NYC.

Post: #63

@Graft Agreed 100%.

Some of the ratings ITT are a bit nonsensical. Yeah, beauty is subjective to an extent. But there are traits which are objectively associated with beauty - otherwise plastic surgeons would not exist. The girls in @Aenema's picture are all 7+ except for the butterface on the top right.

Post: #64

(01-06-2019 01:58 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  6





7

Concur, they're accurate sixes. Average/ok looks = 6
Average/ok but fat = 5 and below
Perfect facial symmetry, slenderness, well proportioned titts and arse, no cankles = 8 and above

Pretty simple.

But this is LTR stuff really. When it comes to bangs/short term relationships I prefer to use WB/WNB. A binary system, either yes (would bang) or no (wouldn't bang).

This system takes into account situational factors and non "beauty" elements like chemistry/pheromones or interesting features and personality.

Post: #65

(01-07-2019 05:10 PM)Graft Wrote:  

(01-07-2019 04:24 PM)Aenema Wrote:  solid 6's, girl on the right in the bottom pic is a 7. girl on the right in the top pic might just be a 5.

Rating is a bit harsh.

I'm clarifying my views here just for the future, when I refer to a bang/plate of mine by the number scale.

Girl on top right is my the definition of a 6. Slightly above average face, relatively thin. Not hot enough to chase. Rest seem to be at least 7 for me with bottom right being a hard 8. Two girls on the bottom right have what it takes to be an 9 for me if their bodies were totally off the hook. I'd probably put the three bottom girls closer to an 8. Young, hot, thin, two on the right have ample boobs, nice eyes. Definitely hotter than at least 80% of the female population, even in NYC.

Top right has to be a below average face. She almost looks deformed, I feel bad saying it. I don't see how bottom middle could ever be an 8 or 9. I find all of them to be plain. Not even a humble brag, for a girl to be an 8+ and really fit my definition of hot she needs full lips. Thin-lipped white girls will never be over a 7 to me.


With that said, WB all

Post: #66

Three 6's and a 9.5

   

Post: #67

(01-07-2019 03:30 PM)Graft Wrote:  

(01-07-2019 02:32 PM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

(01-07-2019 01:45 PM)mundele Wrote:  

(01-06-2019 07:34 PM)SaintLaurentJake Wrote:  What do you guys think ? A 7 I'd say maybe even 7.5.






Shes pretty hot wouldnt need any alcohol to bang proudly but nothing really too special, like an above average jane.. Nice tits though

Face is pretty meeeeh, good tits. Tough one

^^ I'm with you. 5 or 6, definitely not a 7, due to face being meh. I'd have to see more pics to give a final answer.

What a joke this thread is becoming. That chick is a 5 or 6? As in average looking? She is thin with DDs, easily a 7.

No, you can't base the rating on the average. The average woman in America is fat, so then you'd be giving overweight women a 5 in your scale. That doesn't work, a 5 is a thin girl, a 6 is a thin girl that's not quite a 7, and a 7 is a pretty girl. This girl doesn't make it to 7 because her face isn't aesthetic.

It's not based on averages, it can't be, especially not in America anyhow.

This girl is not average looking, she's above average, but an above average girl in America is just a girl that isn't fat, hence, a 5 or 6. To be a 7 a girl has to be thin and attractive, this girl's face doesn't make the cut for a 7.

And this is why the thirst exists. If you're basing your system on the average, then your system rewards fatties. The problem with your system is if the population gets fatter, all the girls' ratings stay the same, because you're basing the rating on averages.

That's absurd, the thirst is real.

Post: #68

(01-07-2019 04:24 PM)Aenema Wrote:  solid 6's, girl on the right in the bottom pic is a 7. girl on the right in the top pic might just be a 5.

The first pic, girl on the right, I'd give her a 5 or 6, yeah.

But the second pic, the girl on the right, she's not a 7, she's dating frat guys, she's like an 8, or more if you're into her look. Same with the other girls in that pic.

Post: #69

(01-07-2019 05:10 PM)Graft Wrote:  

(01-07-2019 04:24 PM)Aenema Wrote:  solid 6's, girl on the right in the bottom pic is a 7. girl on the right in the top pic might just be a 5.

Rating is a bit harsh.

I'm clarifying my views here just for the future, when I refer to a bang/plate of mine by the number scale.

Girl on top right is my the definition of a 6. Slightly above average face, relatively thin. Not hot enough to chase. Rest seem to be at least 7 for me with bottom right being a hard 8. Two girls on the bottom right have what it takes to be an 9 for me if their bodies were totally off the hook. I'd probably put the three bottom girls closer to an 8. Young, hot, thin, two on the right have ample boobs, nice eyes. Definitely hotter than at least 80% of the female population, even in NYC.

^^ Agreed.

Post: #70

(01-07-2019 05:21 PM)Super Average Man Wrote:  @Graft Agreed 100%.

Some of the ratings ITT are a bit nonsensical. Yeah, beauty is subjective to an extent. But there are traits which are objectively associated with beauty - otherwise plastic surgeons would not exist. The girls in @Aenema's picture are all 7+ except for the butterface on the top right.

^^ Agreed.

Post: #71

(01-07-2019 09:05 PM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

(01-07-2019 04:24 PM)Aenema Wrote:  solid 6's, girl on the right in the bottom pic is a 7. girl on the right in the top pic might just be a 5.

The first pic, girl on the right, I'd give her a 5 or 6, yeah.

But the second pic, the girl on the right, she's not a 7, she's dating frat guys, she's like an 8, or more if you're into her look. Same with the other girls in that pic.

Yeah girl on the right is an 8. But there's nothing attractive about the middle and left to me. Plain

Post: #72

(01-07-2019 02:10 PM)Matrixdude Wrote:  6's are average but cute girls: like that one cute barista at the local coffee shop, she has green eyes and black hair, who you would definitely bang (she has huge tits) but not date because she is about 10 lbs overweight.

7's are like that one cardio bunny at the gym, likely has 1000-5000 instagram followers, but still has to earn a living somehow at some boring ass job.

8's are hanging out with dudes like Bilzerian, basketball players, rappers, getting into the hottest clubs in big cities, and dont really have to "work" a day in their life (some work the pole). You likely don't interact with them unless you're into those circles.

9's are supermodels on DiCaprio's yacht or married to the elite. 10's are personal preference but most won't ever achieve them.

This is pretty much a Western point of view, I'm sure in South America you will find an 8 walking down the main boulevard. And I'm sure your status can attract her but its all circumstantial... Regardless, I retire the 1-10 scale to the ever popular BANG/WNB category.

This is exactly why traveling outside of the US its easier to bang 8s and 9s. Social hierarchy and elitism is so much more prevalent in attitudes for American girls.

Post: #73

(01-06-2019 08:33 PM)Donfitz007 Wrote:  With that said thylane blondeau is a 9.5 to me

Show this picture to your son. If he notices the dove on her shoulder, you are certainly not getting any grandchildren from him.

Also, she's 16 in this picture, so no Warner Bros ratings for the sake of the forum.

Post: #74

^^
The first thing I notice about that girl is the anus lips

Post: #75

(01-08-2019 05:02 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  Show this picture to your son. If he notices the dove on her shoulder, you are certainly not getting any grandchildren from him.

Also, she's 16 in this picture, so no Warner Bros ratings for the sake of the forum.

She's 18 and its hard to tell the difference between her at 18 and her at 16. I literally typed in her name then added 18. So forgive me, I tried.