Post: #1

Wonder if he'll blame Trump or that climate change has had a physical effect on him causing irritability.

He is also an UMN professior of Environmental Studies, a fellow at the Royal Canadian Geographic Society and a go to expert for NPC media outlets.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...anc-e.html

Quote:A University of Minnesota professor and climate change expert has been arrested after he choked his fiancée during an argument, cops say.

Aaron H. Doering, 47, violently strangled his fiancée and left her fearing for her life on Wednesday, according to criminal charges filed on Thursday.

He was arrested and charged with two felony counts of domestic assault by strangulation and is in Hennepin County jail on $40,000 bail.

When cops arrived to the Minneapolis home of the tenured professor and his fiancée, they found the two arguing and the victim with red marks on her forehead and bruises in the shape of fingers on one side of her neck, according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune.

The perp:


One of his flings before his current fiance:


Wait this dude has a kid? Hypocrite since having kids is bad for the earth.

https://nypost.com/2018/12/28/climate-ch...is-fiance/

Quote:Doering’s website bills him as an explorer with a “passion for education and change” and details some of his lectures to more than 15 million students, as well as his dog-sledding trips and more than 5,000 miles exploring the Arctic since 2004. His latest project, “The Changing Earth,” is an Emmy-nominated documentary about a 137-mile trek through the Arctic wilderness into Iceland.

“Aaron has received millions of dollars in grants; has published more than 80 journal articles, books, book chapters, and conference proceedings; and is the coauthor of two books, The New Landscape of Mobile Learning: Redesigning Education in an App-based World and Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching,” the website reads.

Doering’s Twitter account, which has nearly 4,000 followers, identifies him as an adventurer and is peppered with photos of extreme Canadian Arctic locales, as well as his young son.

Post: #2

"As reality sunk in, I cried my eyeballs out and asked the women he'd been two-timing me with to stay out of what I had with him so that I could 'save him' because of the promises me made me between alchohol-fueled explosions."



Yeah, she deserved what happened to her.

Post: #3

(12-30-2018 02:35 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  "As reality sunk in, I cried my eyeballs out and asked the women he'd been two-timing me with to stay out of what I had with him so that I could 'save him' because of the promises me made me between alchohol-fueled explosions."



Yeah, she deserved what happened to her.

Which was probably nothing. Minneapolis is the bluest city in America...it would make even San Francisco blush. The man is going to lose every time and he sounds like too much of a soyboy to assault anyone. Good thing in this situation hes a dipshit anyway.

Post: #4

Who knew fake science people were that psychotic?

Post: #5

Looks like a case of man made climate change in that house.

Post: #6

You think she’s faking the injuries and he never attacked her? He probably is legit crazy if he subscribes to climate change so whole heartedly.

Post: #7

“Aaron has received millions of dollars in grants; has published more than 80 journal articles, books, book chapters, and conference proceedings; and is the coauthor of two books, The New Landscape of Mobile Learning: Redesigning Education in an App-based World and Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching,” the website reads.

An unintentionally revealing paragraph.

If there's no climate change, he doesn't get his millions in grant money.
If there's no "rape culture" the feminists don't get grant money.
If there's no human trafficking crisis, the cops and NGOs don't get their grants.
If there's no vaping crisis...

Need I go on? See how this works? The media is usually complicit in promoting the crisis of the moment. This time they let the cat out of the bag.

Post: #8

(12-30-2018 04:38 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  If there's no human trafficking crisis, the cops and NGOs don't get their grants.

I remember pulling through the drive in at In-N-Out Burger one day. There was some sign on the window that said "22 cents of every hamburger goes to fighting sexual trafficking" (I am paraphrasing, but that was the gist of it).

I could't help thinking about the non-profit office somewhere that came up with that nonsense and will now get paid for their "work". Really, they don't ever have to prove they accomplished anything - only that they helped "awareness".

If 99% of non-profit companies died tomorrow, the world would be a better place.

Post: #9

What is the vaping crisis?

Post: #10

Presumed innocent.
Odd how guys here will jump on the MeToo train and #BelieveWomen if they don't like the accused's politics.

Post: #11

(12-30-2018 05:32 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  Presumed innocent.
Odd how guys here will jump on the MeToo train and #BelieveWomen if they don't like the accused's politics.

That's not what's happening here. If you'll notice, there is already some skepticism as to the claims.

However, the guy's a left wing asshole being hoist by his own petard. I have no idea if he's innocent or not (though what evidence there is suggests guilt) - and quite frankly, I don't care. But it is kind of funny.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I guarantee that both of them exuded warning signs from day one. Crazy dated crazy and the predictable results came in.

Post: #12

I think there is always a decent chance she is faking the injuries. Without access to all of the evidence how could we possibly know about his guilt?

Post: #13

Guilt or innocence is of no import if there are visible marks. No way in hell he can beat a jury trial in his thoroughly cucked state, will have to plead out. People watch too much CSI and think any forensic evidence the answer key. Even if the girl rrecants it won't matter.

Post: #14

Climate change science has nothing to do with feminism, free college, socialist health care, or transgender bathroom policy.
A discerning man should be able to separate issues on the facts rather than how political tribes take sides.
I am not a physicist, meteorologist, or atmospheric chemist, so I am not qualified to debate the merits. I do note that the majority of such people believe there's an issue with burning carbon. My gut tells me that switching to cleaner power means cleaner air. I've choked in the haze of Shanghai, Manila, and Guangzhou.
This guy may be guilty, maybe not. I defended scores of cases like that, it was never a surprise when the police report turned out to be bullshit.

And I'm in before someone says it's a plot of the Jews.

Post: #15

Guess he suffered a meltdown

Post: #16

(12-30-2018 05:59 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  Climate change science has nothing to do with feminism, free college, socialist health care, or transgender bathroom policy.

None of those things have anything to do with one another. And yet, if you tell me where you stand on one of them, I can predict with 95% certainty where you stand on the rest.

Funny how that works.

Post: #17

Fucking climate change weirdos. Just because she was a climate change denier doesn't mean he had to strangle her to win the argument.

Post: #18

(12-30-2018 05:59 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  Climate change science has nothing to do with feminism, free college, socialist health care, or transgender bathroom policy.
A discerning man should be able to separate issues on the facts rather than how political tribes take sides.
I am not a physicist, meteorologist, or atmospheric chemist, so I am not qualified to debate the merits. I do note that the majority of such people believe there's an issue with burning carbon. My gut tells me that switching to cleaner power means cleaner air. I've choked in the haze of Shanghai, Manila, and Guangzhou.
This guy may be guilty, maybe not. I defended scores of cases like that, it was never a surprise when the police report turned out to be bullshit.

And I'm in before someone says it's a plot of the Jews.

"Climate change" science has everything to do with feminism and trans dystopia, it's part of the same quasi-religious cult, being totally infiltrated and dominated by misanthropic zealots who lie to further their agenda and keep the funding going.

Quote:My gut tells me that switching to cleaner power means cleaner air.

Your gut feeling is wrong Sp5, conflating CO2 with pollution is a naive take. The haze in china is not CO2, it's other compounds. CO2 is not a toxic gas, it's in your breath at high concentration, and it's also a crucial element to photosynthesis and a very powerful airborne fertilizer. The fact that there is more of it in the atmosphere today means plants grow faster. Some researchers have credited the CO2 fertilizer effect with agricultural productivity gains providing food for about a billion people. CO2 is life!

CO2 is a godsend, not a poison, and its effects on temperature are very minor, because it's a not a powerful greenhouse gas and its concentration are minute relative to other greenhouse gas like water vapor, whose spectrometry is far wider than that of CO2. The notion that CO2 is some kind of control knob on weather is bunk.

This guy is guilty as fuck, this is another great case of physiognomy confirmed. This guy reminds me of the retard antifa prof who smashed the head of a peaceful demonstrator with a bike lock, these guys are virtually interchangeable hardcore psycho hippies:

Post: #19

(12-30-2018 04:38 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  “Aaron has received millions of dollars in grants; has published more than 80 journal articles, books, book chapters, and conference proceedings; and is the coauthor of two books, The New Landscape of Mobile Learning: Redesigning Education in an App-based World and Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching,” the website reads.

An unintentionally revealing paragraph.

If there's no climate change, he doesn't get his millions in grant money.
If there's no "rape culture" the feminists don't get grant money.
If there's no human trafficking crisis, the cops and NGOs don't get their grants.
If there's no vaping crisis...

Need I go on? See how this works? The media is usually complicit in promoting the crisis of the moment. This time they let the cat out of the bag.

On point thread musical inter-mission:

Post: #20

(12-30-2018 05:59 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  Climate change science has nothing to do with feminism, free college, socialist health care, or transgender bathroom policy.
A discerning man should be able to separate issues on the facts rather than how political tribes take sides.
I am not a physicist, meteorologist, or atmospheric chemist, so I am not qualified to debate the merits. I do note that the majority of such people believe there's an issue with burning carbon. My gut tells me that switching to cleaner power means cleaner air. I've choked in the haze of Shanghai, Manila, and Guangzhou.

1) Climate change and haze/pollution are different topics
2) What happens to climate change scientists who disagree with the narrative?

(12-30-2018 06:49 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(12-30-2018 05:59 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  Climate change science has nothing to do with feminism, free college, socialist health care, or transgender bathroom policy.

None of those things have anything to do with one another. And yet, if you tell me where you stand on one of them, I can predict with 95% certainty where you stand on the rest.

Funny how that works.

Eh Climate change science is a weird one. Without being aware of the depths of how fake the fake news media is, it's quite easy for someone to believe the narrative. While to believe the others you have to be progressive. Presumably if you are a conservative/libertarian who isn't aware about the fake news media or climate change in general(plenty common in somewhere like NZ) then you'll believe in climate change without the rest of that. Because of this your certainty with regards to climate change probably should be a bit lower. I'd say 85% or so.

Post: #21

(12-30-2018 08:16 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  Eh Climate change science is a weird one. Without being aware of the depths of how fake the fake news media is, it's quite easy for someone to believe the narrative. While to believe the others you have to be progressive. Presumably if you are a conservative/libertarian who isn't aware about the fake news media or climate change in general(plenty common in somewhere like NZ) then you'll believe in climate change without the rest of that. Because of this your certainty with regards to climate change probably should be a bit lower. I'd say 85% or so.

Please don't take offence to this, but that's a bit pedantic.

I agree that Climate Change is the odd man out there. Let's give it a 70% correlation instead of the 95% I stated for the others. The reason being, that sane environmentalism is a universal cause. Nobody wants heavy metals in their drinking water, plastic in the Pacific, or deforestation of our lands. This creates a large group on the right who support environmentalism because they don't realize that the leadership has been co-opted, and are now dedicated to the anti-human agenda.

That said - we're not discussing the average environmentalist, we're talking about a guy who profits substantially off of government funding. While I might give your average environmentalist a 70% score, I'd give this guy a 99% score. This is why I consider going into nuance pedantic.

Again, please don't take offence - I'm just saying that we should call this spade a spade.

Post: #22

(12-30-2018 08:29 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(12-30-2018 08:16 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  Eh Climate change science is a weird one. Without being aware of the depths of how fake the fake news media is, it's quite easy for someone to believe the narrative. While to believe the others you have to be progressive. Presumably if you are a conservative/libertarian who isn't aware about the fake news media or climate change in general(plenty common in somewhere like NZ) then you'll believe in climate change without the rest of that. Because of this your certainty with regards to climate change probably should be a bit lower. I'd say 85% or so.

Please don't take offence to this, but that's a bit pedantic.

I agree that Climate Change is the odd man out there. Let's give it a 70% correlation instead of the 95% I stated for the others. The reason being, that sane environmentalism is a universal cause. Nobody wants heavy metals in their drinking water, plastic in the Pacific, or deforestation of our lands. This creates a large group on the right who support environmentalism because they don't realize that the leadership has been co-opted, and are now dedicated to the anti-human agenda.

That said - we're not discussing the average environmentalist, we're talking about a guy who profits substantially off of government funding. While I might give your average environmentalist a 70% score, I'd give this guy a 99% score. This is why I consider going into nuance pedantic.

Again, please don't take offence - I'm just saying that we should call this spade a spade.

None taken, it's really too tempting for me to be pedantic. I'm not really sure why.

If I suddenly become like MMX(please don't take it personally- love ya) or Jordan Peterson I politely request someone step in and stop me before I become out of control.

Post: #23

(12-30-2018 05:32 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  Presumed innocent.
Odd how guys here will jump on the MeToo train and #BelieveWomen if they don't like the accused's politics.

Absolutely bud. You destroy the enemy by any means necessary, in fact using the enemy's own weapons against him makes it that much more delicious. You don't have to "jump on the MeToo train" in order to enjoy watching shitstains like this guy being buried by a shitavalanche of their own creation. Jumping on the bandwagon implies you actually believe the women making the accusations.

Me, I HOPE this phaggot never so much as raised his voice against that woman and his life will be ruined by what are utter lies. That is exactly the fate the Left wants for people like me and I'm happy to return the favor and then some.

Post: #24

(12-30-2018 06:55 PM)JackinMelbourne Wrote:  Fucking climate change weirdos. Just because she was a climate change denier doesn't mean he had to strangle her to win the argument.

Must have been a heated debate!

Post: #25

Update:

Two more women have come forward and the university is reviewing the matter. Meanwhile, the man's lawyer just issued a statement that is bound to trigger every SJW that reads it.

Quote:Doering, 47, calls the domestic assault charge "false." His newly hired attorney, Christa Groshek also called the allegations made by the other women "not true."

"Just because he's macho and handsome doesn't mean he couldn't have been a victim in these relationships," Groshek said. "The last thing he ever says he would do is assault a woman."

https://kstp.com/news/two-more-women-say...964/?cat=5