Post: #76

(12-04-2018 06:47 PM)Sherman Wrote:  It is useful to review some of the history to get a perspective of what is happening.

People today don't realize what a huge shock Darwin's Theory of Evolution was to people in the 19th century. It was the second biggest shift in consciousness in the West, the first being Copernicus. Darwin destroyed the myth of Genesis. His proof was so massive and convincing that the real top thinkers in the West could never again be Christian. Herbert Spencer, the English aristocrat, applied Darwin's theory to society and began the revolution of thought. Not long after, Karl Marx came on the scene.

Marx is considered one of the leading founders of sociology, and his theories dominate Western academies. Marx created "conflict theory" where he framed all social reality in terms of groups competing for resources. Sociologists also created the term "Social Constructionism" based on the theory that all social interaction is invented by someone.

So, you can see these two concepts from sociology working today. The main tactic of the left is to create conflict, so that it forces a process of dialectictic change. You could see how the trap is set. The left starts talking about "white privilege" and talking smack about "whites". The provocation is set. Some men in Charlottesville take the bait, and walk with torches saying "we will not be replaced". They created a prefect image that fit into the narrative which could be easily constructed because they control the media. This event was hugely beneficial to the Democratic Party politicians who brought it up over and over again. Change through dialectics.

The other is "social constructionism". At first, the sociology departments focused on "race" as being a social fact and not a real fact. They deconstructed race. Then they turned to sex, saying there is a difference between sex and gender, and that "gender" is socially constructed. For example: why blue for boys and pink for girls? This is a socially constructed reality and the answer can't be found in the physical world.

With these two concepts, the left can change society in any direction they want. You can convince people that the sky is green, and the grass is blue, if you can convince them that they are social constructs.

The weakness of their approach is rarely challanged. Namely, Sociology claims to be a social science. But, they are not doing science, but choosing what they think is right and dressing it up as scientific truth, and what they don't think is right is "deconstruted" for the purpose of destroying it. Their whole system is based on fraud. Social engineering is a conscious choice of values and is not objective scientific investigation. It is a mistake to assume that they don't have values. They do have rigid and strong values and intend on forcing them on the rest of the world through manipulation, fraud, and ultimately violence. You will be eliminated for being the "inversion" of their reality.

This was probably one of the best analyses of modern sociology I have come across anywhere. SOLID STUFF! Earning you a rep point.

Post: #77

^Excuse my ignorance, but is it the theory of evolution or the law of evolution? Does Darwin's crap stand in the same constellation of IRREFUTABLE AND DEMONSTRABLE PROOF As the laws of Physics and the other Sciences?

Post: #78

(12-04-2018 10:18 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(12-04-2018 10:02 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I believe there is a connected group of less than 1000 men (probably closer to 100) that own most of the world's Fortune 500 companies, and are using those companies not to make more money, but to control humanity. This is the most plausible explanation for why corporations across vastly different sectors can have identical agendas that appear at identical times.

Especially with the media.
Always tiresome how Australian media will make a fuss over some PC type nonsense that has nothing to do with Australia.
All the while, the Aus. media will parrot the exact same diatribe as American or Canadian outlets.

Same thing on other side of the world, Croatia. Our mainstream media uses the exact same phrases as any globalist controlled media. It is so obvious that I am not sure how doesn't more people pick it up.

Post: #79

(12-11-2018 03:05 PM)El Padrone Wrote:  ^Excuse my ignorance, but is it the theory of evolution or the law of evolution? Does Darwin's crap stand in the same constellation of IRREFUTABLE AND DEMONSTRABLE PROOF As the laws of Physics and the other Sciences?

Of course not, and it didn't destroy Genesis at all, either. It might have dented silly literalist interpretations of Genesis, which were never of the [true] Christian Church to begin with.

If by evolution you suggest a theory of development and change, there is no problem with it for any religious person with any open mind or sound beliefs. If you suggest that it has anything to do with origins, you are very ignorant of what even Darwin himself realized he was ignorant of ...

Post: #80

(12-04-2018 12:36 AM)ChicagoFire Wrote:  

(11-28-2018 01:13 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 12:57 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  But the enemy now is sort of amorphous. It's behind the banks in which we deposit our money. It's in the tech companies whose products we use. It's buying the favors of our politicians.

It's also behind the media people consume and get their "facts" and concepts about life from. Example: Conservative Web sites complain about Cosmo, but they don't think to step back and look at the bigger picture. Who is behind Cosmo?

Cosmo is owned by Hearst Communications, which owns scads of newspapers, magazines, radio stations, Web sites, and syndicates.

So, that article that encourages teenage girls to have anal sex isn't coming from a writer per se. The writer is the tool being used by a MASSIVE organization that has a board of directors of international billionaires.

At risk of outing my actual background, here's an exercise I suggest everyone interested in the topic undertake.


I want you to 1) Write down five to ten brands you associate with SJW-ism It doesn't particularly matter what the brands are or what product they offer. They just need to be global brands that have pushed leftism in aggressive ways. 2) Identify each brand's parent company. If they aren't publicly traded scratch them off your list. 3) Go to Yahoo Finance's Symbol Lookup. For each parent company, punch in their name and ticker. Once you do that navigate over to the "Shareholder information" tab for each company. 4) Write down the top 3 shareholders for each company on your sheet

Notice I'm NOT giving you any specific criteria for what companies to pick. It literally doesn't matter because out of the universe of large-cap, global corporations almost any 5-10 will be fully promoting the globo-homo agenda. I'm also extremely confident that the results of this exercise will be largely the same for any sample of 5-10. Technically you need 25 samples for a statistically valid, 90% 1-tailed confidence interval but the variation between results is so low that as few as five or so samples is virtually guaranteed to give you the same result I get.

If you're intrigued by what you see, the next step is to start looking up the ownership structure of those entities. The entire structure has evolved into an extremely complicated maze relative to feudalism but if you keep following the money, equity ownership ultimately ties into the same group of people.

It's late at night here and I had a long day. I took your challenge expecting nothing.....

OH MY GOD!!!!!!

I looked up Amazon, Facebook, Google, Apple, and AT and T. I won't say who the "Big 4" are but these groups own about 5% of the company and they more or less are in the top 4 owners in each company. 1 of them is #1 every single time. Obviously not spoiling for the rest of you please do this underrated exercise.

What's so amazing is I also looked up some companies (Adidas for example), that don't really push SJWism and these companies were nowhere to be found. Perhaps that's because they're not American, but maybe not. I wish Easy would stop trying not to spoil the fun and just tell us exactly who the owners of Vanguard etc are. Is it (((them)))?

Edit: ahem, I meant "is it aliens".

Post: #81

Quote:So, you can see these two concepts from sociology working today. The main tactic of the left is to create conflict, so that it forces a process of dialectictic change. You could see how the trap is set. The left starts talking about "white privilege" and talking smack about "whites". The provocation is set. Some men in Charlottesville take the bait, and walk with torches saying "we will not be replaced". They created a prefect image that fit into the narrative which could be easily constructed because they control the media. This event was hugely beneficial to the Democratic Party politicians who brought it up over and over again. Change through dialectics.

Thank you. That's literally, exactly why I've been saying that making movements all about "whiteness" ( as was passionately argued for along with mocking jeers of "muh civic nationalism") is a trap. It plays directly into the dialectic for which an outcome is predetermined. There is a REASON that most of these White Power groups have massive numbers of deep state operatives in key leaderhsip positions.

Post: #82

(12-01-2018 09:22 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  ..problem with modern Christians.

Christendom exists because Christians had the will and the moral framework to keep or in some instances retake their lands by force. Obviously there exists a framework in the orthodoxy for earthly resistance to invasion and subjugation by the forces of evil.

Modern Christians and their organizations are the main driving force behind turning stable American Communities into Somalia and Tegucigalpa.

I posted this a while back:

(12-21-2017 04:43 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  ...There are two reasons alone why Somalians are in Minnesota:

Lutheran Social Services
and
Catholic Charities

These are liberal Christian charity organizations. LSS is based in Minnesota and CC has a large presence there. These and similar "charity" groups are responsible for the recruitment and resettling of "refugees". If such a group is bringing in Congolese for example, and the organization is based in Kansas City, then you get Congolese in Kansas City.

LSS and CC have brought in all of the Somalians that have come in via these programs and they are responsible for placing them where they are. LSS even has a nice little study book that they distribute to Lutheran churches so you can learn all the great things about your new soul mates called "My Neighbor is Muslim". It's full of all the expected hard-hitting critiques:

Quote:What does Islam teach about violence?

Jesus’s own radical words are the first place a Christian might turn to
ponder the presence and power of violence in our lives....

They are now actively placing new arrivals in smaller cities and towns despite the fact it's no good for either group.

...Christians and their "charity" organizations are some of the most destructive forces in any nation they operate in. You simply need to look at how much they've "helped" Africa over the years, and now you can see what they're doing to good American communities all over the U.S. They are pure cancer.

The last part needs reiterating: There are few things more destructive than wealthy men and women hellbent on doing "charity" in the name of some "greater power".

Post: #83

You're omitting the fact that modern Christian structures have been subverted by their enemies, a process which has been ongoing for centuries. Your judgment on Christianity will be highly flawed without a basic understanding of this historical fact.

Post: #84

Aren't all NGO's and charities part of the same group and (((groups)))? They share the same $$$, backers, influencers and useful idiots.

Post: #85

I'll cross post this here, about how I see the Catholic Church in Australia is about to be inverted:

/thread-71618...pid1903169

Post: #86

(12-12-2018 06:46 PM)911 Wrote:  Your judgment on Christianity will be highly flawed without a basic understanding of this historical fact.

I'm not passing judgement on Christianity in general though, I'm passing judgement on large Christian "charities", hinging off of Leonard's point about pitfalls of modern Christians- In other words I'm making the same point you just did.

Even though our points are in agreement, I'll give a disagreement anyway just to keep it interesting-

(12-12-2018 06:46 PM)911 Wrote:  Christian structures have been subverted by their enemies, a process which has been ongoing for centuries.

This sounds a lot like the old "well that's not true Socialism though, it has only failed in all societies because the idea has been perverted from it's pure form for centuries."

In other words, it's just as long as people have been involved that it hasn't worked as intended.

---

Another note- someone mention Cosmo Magazine as a source or influence on young girls having anal sex, that is a pretty remarkable conclusion in a thread mentioning Catholicism!

Catholics have history with anal sex perhaps longer and richer than anyone- you could argue they are founding members of this practice. From centuries back, to the great Italian lovers and their films, to modern Argentinian women who have an unusually high acceptance of anal- a great Catholic string of beads links them together. This Catholic anal tradition is so deep and almost instinctual that even 15 year old American boys in an isolated and cold Northern community learn very quickly that the local girls who attend the Catholic High School - while not being so big on offering bj's and the vag - have to been known to offer the asshole with a lot less fuss.

The more you know.

Post: #87

(12-13-2018 02:31 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  This sounds a lot like the old "well that's not true Socialism though, it has only failed in all societies because the idea has been perverted from it's pure form for centuries."

In other words, it's just as long as people have been involved that it hasn't worked as intended.

Except in this case it's actually true. The example is more akin to if a sub-sect of Randian capitalists infiltrated communist organizations to subvert the ideology, largely failed at doing that, and then backed a splinter movement that eventually tore the institution in half.

That's basically what happened to the Catholic church.

Luther was heavily influenced by Kabbalists (From a JEWISH source): https://www.thejc.com/judaism/features/m...s-1.446899


The Puritans, who have caused Christianity to get blame for quite a few things, weren't actually Christians in the dictionary definition of the word :http://www.christianity-revealed.com/cr/files/puritansweremorejewishthanprotestants.html


Many other Catholic "heresies" has significant jewish influence: https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Influence-...1590451600


Modern state of affairs (quote within article): Evangelicals are massively more likely to blindly support Israel than are Catholics. There's a reason that they're heavily propagandized to blindly support Zionism.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/why-do...13068.html

Quote:I'm not passing judgement on Christianity in general though, I'm passing judgement on large Christian "charities", hinging off of Leonard's point about pitfalls of modern Christians- In other words I'm making the same point you just did.

Even though our points are in agreement, I'll give a disagreement anyway just to keep it interesting-

On that note I've been warned not to donate to some of those charity organizations by family members. For example I was told to avoid Catholic Charities because they push openly heretical ideas

At Catholic Charities, "The keynote speaker for their annual national meeting is a heretical Jesuit who rejects all manner of Church Dogma on the usual sexual issues

https://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/20...charities/



Sidenote: You can always tell who the Christian subversives are because they're the people attacking church teaching on gay sex, premarital sex, contraception, and women priests



Overall the Catholic church is in a bad spot because they stopped being aggressive towards Heresy. The policy in previous eras was generally be anyone is free to repent and see the light, but actively preaching against church theology is considered heresy and results in being stripped of any and all positions in the church.

Post: #88

Double post but separate tangent:


For anyone more interested in it there's more at this link: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14763a.htm

TLDR Old school Catholic dogma requires tolerance during civil discussion, but absolute intolerance for theoretical dogma

If, therefore, the Catholic Church also claims the right of dogmatic intolerance with regard to her teaching, it is unjust to reproach her for exercising this right. With the imperturbable conviction that she was founded by the God-Man Jesus Christ as the "pillar and ground of the truth" (1 Timothy 3:15) and endowed with full power to teach, to rule, and to sanctify, she regards dogmatic intolerance not alone as her incontestable right, but also as a sacred duty. If Christian truth like every other truth is incapable of double dealing, it must be as intolerant as the multiplication table or geometry. The Church, therefore, demands, in virtue of her Divine commission to teach, the unconditional acceptance of all the truths of salvation which she preaches and proposes for belief, proclaiming to the world with her Divine Founder the stern warning: "He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned" (Mark 16:16). If, by conceding a convenient right of option or a falsely understood freedom of faith, she were to leave everyone at liberty to accept or reject her dogmas, her constitution, and her sacraments, as the existing differences of religions compel the modern State to do, she would not only fail in her Divine mission, but would end her own life in voluntary suicide. As the true God can tolerate no strange gods, the true Church of Christ can tolerate no strange Churches beside herself, or, what amounts to the same, she can recognize none as theoretically justified. And it is just in this exclusiveness that lies her unique strength, the stirring power of her propaganda, the unfailing vigour of her progress. A strictly logical consequence of this incontestable fundamental idea is the ecclesiastical dogma that outside the Church there is no salvation (extra Ecclesiam nulla salus). Scarcely any other article of faith gives such offence to non-Catholics and occasions so many misunderstandings as this, owing to its supposed hardness and uncharitableness. And yet this proposition is necessarily and indissolubly connected with the above-mentioned principle of the exclusive legitimacy of truth and with the ethical commandment of love for the truth. Since Christ Himself did not leave men free to choose whether they would belong to the Church or not, it is clear that the idea of the Christian Church includes as an essential element its necessity for salvation. In her doctrine the Church must maintain that intolerance which her Divine Founder Himself proclaimed: [b]"And if he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and publican" (Matthew 18:17). This explains the intense aversion which the Church has displayed to heresy, the diametrical opposite to revealed truth (cf. 1 Timothy 1:19; 2 Timothy 2:25; Titus 3:10 sq.; 2 Thessalonians 2:11). The celebrated church historian Döllinger writes very pertinently: "The Apostles knew no tolerance, no leniency towards heresies Paul inflicted formal excommunication on Hymenæus and Alexander. And such an expulsion from the Church was always to be inflicted. The Apostles considered false doctrine destructive as a wicked example. With weighty emphasis Paul declares (Galatians 1:8): 'But though we or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema'. Even the gentle John forbids the community to offer hospitality to heretics coming to it, or even to salute them" ("Christentum und Kirche", Ratisbon, 1860, pp. 236 sq.).[/b]

Post: #89

(12-13-2018 02:31 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(12-12-2018 06:46 PM)911 Wrote:  Your judgment on Christianity will be highly flawed without a basic understanding of this historical fact.

I'm not passing judgement on Christianity in general though, I'm passing judgement on large Christian "charities", hinging off of Leonard's point about pitfalls of modern Christians- In other words I'm making the same point you just did.

Even though our points are in agreement, I'll give a disagreement anyway just to keep it interesting-
...

A more reasonable response might be "there's virtually no such things as real Christians anymore" but theoretically anyone who's "saved" is technically a Christian so you're back to square one.

By my reasoning you have Christ's teachings and everything after that (including edits and rewrites of the Bible) is not Christianity but functionally fanfiction and 3rd edition DM handbooks that's become canon by a various assortment of "authorities" who may or may not have been on the pipe the entire time.

I'm more interested in what works, since I have a wife and kids and going away to live in a monastery to eschew worldly matters while leaving my family to their own devices is not an option I think God would look kindly upon. This is why I tend not to trust the vast majority of Christian preachers, professional or otherwise. Without a link to the future and often having no respect for their ancestors they've reduced Christianity to a rolling doomsday cult with some very feelgood PR. The ones who end up most gleefully sniffing their own farts are typically childless spiritualists who desperately seek to find meaning in their lives, having deferred or disavowed doing the most basic task God gave Adam and Eve.

It should not escape notice that demanding chastity and childlessness from priests heralded the end of Christianity as a bulwark against the invasion of the West, little different from how childless globalists like Merkel care nothing for what becomes of the native children of their nations, as long as their own personal ideology is served. Take a look at red America with their "guns and God" and you will see people that are still breeding and intend for their bloodlines to survive. Not many of them will suffer tedious lectures from metropolitan Christians who tell them violence is a worldly sin without any justification. Meanwhile for those childless metropolitan Christians digging through the minutia of The Book and more importantly all it's accompanying fan-fiction (because you're not a real fan unless you've read...) is a self congratulatory form of masturbation where they applaud themselves for surrendering the West because ultimately nothing of this world is really important.

Post: #90

Church has been infiltrated since God knows who.
People think Jesus was a hippie who let all the flowers bloom, but instead he whipping tables, mocking people of their lack of faith and foolishness, and constantly stating that not everyone gets salvation. Modern Church thinks that he's an all loving God
who let's everyone into heaven as long as they believe in them, whether they are conservative white man shining the light of Christ unto others, or a pedophile tranny.
Hell, at this point I'm not even sure if the Canon is really the REAL canon since it's all decided by men in Ecumenical councils.
I only know God exists and seek more truth and to get closer to God.

Post: #91

(12-13-2018 08:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(12-13-2018 02:31 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(12-12-2018 06:46 PM)911 Wrote:  Your judgment on Christianity will be highly flawed without a basic understanding of this historical fact.

I'm not passing judgement on Christianity in general though, I'm passing judgement on large Christian "charities", hinging off of Leonard's point about pitfalls of modern Christians- In other words I'm making the same point you just did.

Even though our points are in agreement, I'll give a disagreement anyway just to keep it interesting-
...

A more reasonable response might be "there's virtually no such things as real Christians anymore" but theoretically anyone who's "saved" is technically a Christian so you're back to square one.

Technically the definition is more narrow than that: someone who follows the teachings of Jesus as outlined in the New Testament. Rejection of either as valid means you're not Christian no matter how much you call yourself otherwise.

Post: #92

(12-13-2018 08:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  By my reasoning you have Christ's teachings and everything after that (including edits and rewrites of the Bible) is not Christianity but functionally fanfiction and 3rd edition DM handbooks that's become canon by a various assortment of "authorities" who may or may not have been on the pipe the entire time.

For those paying attention to what I mentioned elsewhere, this is another one of my suspected polarities.

Superficiality <--> Gravity

Those paying attention might have noticed the evaporation of detectable snark in my writing over the last nine months. That's because I'm wading through books like 500 pages of Ludwig Ott's 'Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma' or 441 pages of Jordan Aumann's 'Spiritual Theology' on a regular basis. I suspected the further 'upstream' you travel, the less, well, lightweight, your thinking becomes.

So, I'll have a conversation with, say, Mother Superior, where we swap maybe five-ten brief statements, and it feels like worlds of deeper truth are shared, and nothing more needs to be said, because a simple statement like, say, 'He's in the silence' unites both of our separate life experiences that arrived at the same point that our individual details don't need to be shared.

There's a Priest I know who has such depth of off-the-cuff thought that it's humbling to hear his words in a stolen moment, because he's so detached from the world, that I suspect he's unaware of just how rich with knowledge his words are.

Now, think about those who have been swept downstream. Notice the similarity of lightweight concerns, glibness, and desire to handwave away more serious interpretation of events: Trump is Voldermort! Republicans are the Empire! Christians are Ned Flanders!

I suspect this attitude terminates in the fetid swamp of the Pervert and Pathetic Stages of a Dysfunctional Interior Life: the Camp Culture of the Homosexual, where nothing is to be taken seriously other than one's sense of Victimhood, to be worn as an Inverted 'Righteous Morality'.

Now, remember, I recently wrote in the video game thread that a man living a Dysfunctional Interior Life will lack control over his Appetites, becoming more feminine - feeding comfort - rather than refining his masculinity - by always doing the hard thing. This predicts a lack of control of the Concupiscible and Irascible Appetites.

Couple this with what I just saw flicking through Aumann, a book which can be used to ascertain Demonic Intention in people, and states, unsurprisingly, that anything 'useless, futile, frivolous or impertinent' is not of God, and what is is always 'serious and beneficial'.

Now re-read:

(12-13-2018 08:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  By my reasoning you have Christ's teachings and everything after that (including edits and rewrites of the Bible) is not Christianity but functionally fanfiction and 3rd edition DM handbooks that's become canon by a various assortment of "authorities" who may or may not have been on the pipe the entire time.

Ask yourself: does this sound masculine, or feminine? Upstream, or down? A man interested in having a serious conversation about Theology or, as I think I termed the style, 'Irritated, Impotent Faggotry'.

Another polarity would be:

Allegiance to Fantasy <--> Acceptance of Reality

Ages back, I wrote about the tendency for a type of musician to attempt to create 'Gnostic Realities', which I noted always led to a dissatisfaction with their work. Under Catholic Theology, it makes more sense now: what they're actually truly seeking is God, who is the only thing that can satisfy them.

I see no functional difference in the Commie Dreaming of Utopia and a Right Wing Keyboard Warrior dreaming of a White Revolution. Both are delusional as to the human and spiritual reality of the world and will create a world of dysfunction during the process of attempting to force their fantasy into being. Since they're both downstream, they're both reek of Femininity.

Myself? I've read enough to know that 'He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword' is a far more complex idea than when Worldings try to warp it and throw it around to justify their intentions. An offhanded comment by the Priest in question made me dig deeper into it.

Simon Peter draws his sword in the Garden of Gethsemane and cuts off the ear of Malchus and Jesus reprimands him with the quote.

What is important is the sword in question. Peter was carrying a Roman Gladius, a tool of the current oppressors of the Jewish people.

The warning behind this is taken also to mean: He who puts his faith in the protective all-encompassing power of the state - rather than God - will suffer at the state's hand.

As such, the Bible predicts whenever a Godless State is created in the name of 'saving the people', it will instead oppress them, which is why I see this 'Spontaneous' Simultaneous Worldwide Nationalism, always with Zionist Actors in the background, as an approaching cloud of doom.

Note this is the difference between Catholics and Communists: Catholics understand you should share your resources, sure, but know it has to be a choice of each person of their own Free Will, rather than under Force of the State, which negates opportunity for personal sanctification, and is open for abuse.

Quote:I'm more interested in what works, since I have a wife and kids and going away to live in a monastery to eschew worldly matters while leaving my family to their own devices is not an option I think God would look kindly upon.

Then stop sinking endless hours into the latest (((video game))), stop wasting hours a day whining online across multiple locations about revolutionary fantasies that you don't want to disturb your comfort by engaging in yourself, and be an active, engaged husband and father to your family, assuming they even exist.

I say that because it's interesting that you chose to invert the point of this thread and turning it into a tedious bitchfest on Christianity. Why, it's almost like you deliberately-tried to derail the topic, so no-one could get to close to the (((uncomfortable truth))) being discussed.

Anyway, I think the original topic is too black pill a topic for the forum, because the books by Orthodox Jewish authors that I dug into yesterday suggest that Labour Zionists, Freemasons / Illuminati and Reform Jews are all the same S-F Heretics, pretending to be multiple sides of any argument to guarantee the already decided outcome.

It matches my long standing suspicion that Trump isn't really fighting anything, and things that don't fit the Anti-Globalist Propaganda Narrative - obviously trying to shape the desired outcome - such as, Sheldon Adelson controlling the leftist cops and courts in Australia for years, or the Rothschild's Interests in Genie Energy, members of which are all through Trump's White House. If anyone was paying attention - and no-one was - you'll notice that recently, America, for the first time, refused to sign the UN's yearly condemnation on the illegal occupation of Syria's Golan Heights by Israel - the oil rich area that Genie has its hungry eyes on because it will make Israel - a state created by the Rothschilds - energy-independent. This is, apparently, MAGA.

If I was emotionally-invested instead of intellectually-curious, I'd be depressed, but I detached a long time ago, and didn't expect anything by misdirection and impotence from the culture war. Instead I just remember Jesus' words about the Lilies of the Field and the Birds of the Air, and have realised the more you detach from (((culture))), and the more you embrace suffering, the less vile life is.

This means I can face a very harsh approaching reality without trying to deny it or numb it, using illegal drugs, medication, sex, music, money, social media, creature comforts, movies, books, television, pursuit of social status, popularity or tedious fantasies of political power to hide the reality of political impotence. All of which only lead to dysfunction and lead you open to the (((wrong ideas))) being planted in your head.

Thinking about it, The Cross perfects masculinity.

This place is probably the last attachment I need to give up.

Post: #93

(11-28-2018 01:16 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Interesting comment from a family member when I showed them the thread:

"Very intersting. It was a medieval tenant that Satan was the inverter. It was even expressed musically"

In all he did, in all he taught, he kept this aim in sight:
To get the deeds of darkness done, disguised as works of light.
He spread his poison, slow and sure, through many a specious sect,
And made the evil seem the good, bamboozling God's elect.

From - "Light Bearers of Darkness"

Post: #94

(12-13-2018 08:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(12-13-2018 02:31 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(12-12-2018 06:46 PM)911 Wrote:  Your judgment on Christianity will be highly flawed without a basic understanding of this historical fact.

I'm not passing judgement on Christianity in general though, I'm passing judgement on large Christian "charities", hinging off of Leonard's point about pitfalls of modern Christians- In other words I'm making the same point you just did.

Even though our points are in agreement, I'll give a disagreement anyway just to keep it interesting-
...

A more reasonable response might be "there's virtually no such things as real Christians anymore" but theoretically anyone who's "saved" is technically a Christian so you're back to square one.

By my reasoning you have Christ's teachings and everything after that (including edits and rewrites of the Bible) is not Christianity but functionally fanfiction and 3rd edition DM handbooks that's become canon by a various assortment of "authorities" who may or may not have been on the pipe the entire time.

I'm more interested in what works, since I have a wife and kids and going away to live in a monastery to eschew worldly matters while leaving my family to their own devices is not an option I think God would look kindly upon. This is why I tend not to trust the vast majority of Christian preachers, professional or otherwise. Without a link to the future and often having no respect for their ancestors they've reduced Christianity to a rolling doomsday cult with some very feelgood PR. The ones who end up most gleefully sniffing their own farts are typically childless spiritualists who desperately seek to find meaning in their lives, having deferred or disavowed doing the most basic task God gave Adam and Eve.

It should not escape notice that demanding chastity and childlessness from priests heralded the end of Christianity as a bulwark against the invasion of the West, little different from how childless globalists like Merkel care nothing for what becomes of the native children of their nations, as long as their own personal ideology is served. Take a look at red America with their "guns and God" and you will see people that are still breeding and intend for their bloodlines to survive. Not many of them will suffer tedious lectures from metropolitan Christians who tell them violence is a worldly sin without any justification. Meanwhile for those childless metropolitan Christians digging through the minutia of The Book and more importantly all it's accompanying fan-fiction (because you're not a real fan unless you've read...) is a self congratulatory form of masturbation where they applaud themselves for surrendering the West because ultimately nothing of this world is really important.

delete

Post: #95

@Easy_C so if Martin Luther was influenced by Kabbalah why was he an antisemite? He railed against jews, didn't he? I'm confused.

Post: #96

(11-27-2018 12:18 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 12:07 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Since women are especially-prone to spiritual weakness, it makes sense this 'geek girl' programming has seemingly come out of nowhere: they need their soldiers to satanically-reverse the culture.

"Geek girls" (and girls who play video games and are into other masculine activities and also have male style sex drives) are very often victim of asperger syndrome, which falls under the autism spectrum disorders.

These girls have been bred & programmed through various methods (such as baby vaccines) to be better slaves to the evil cause than any of the previous female generations.

Asperger syndrome in girls is tough to spot unless you know what symptoms and behaviours to look for.
I believe it's a LOT more widespread in females today aged 0 to 30 than we are really aware of.

No. Asperger's and Autism are not the same and neither is an umbrella term for the other. The (((DSM-V))) is a subversion tool. Aspergergic people have about as much in common with autists as you do with a second grader when you mess up adding two numbers.

Asperger's is easily diagnosed and so is autism. What you're referring to are varied levels of conscentiousness and neuroticism inferred by both upbringing and social status.

Asperger's is NOT increasing, autism is. They label so many kids aspergic to sell drugs.

And "geek girls" don't exist, only women deluded by their own social status do.

I have the burgers and I'd like to sperg out more but I'm going to end this here, not like its going anywhere anyway.

Geek girls are the male equivalent of beta guys. Pit a gaymer and a physicist, lets see who's better, and who cries more.

Post: #97

The Christian preachers in this presentation really know what is going down. If my local churches had people like this I'd be there in a heartbeat. It may be two hours long but this film by Ben The Baptist did not drag. Very informative and interesting.

Quote:A documentary on the one world government, one world banking system and one world religion of the end times. This film will expose the Antichrist agenda, the New World Order plan for global enslavement, how the Devil will draw the world into perdition and more. The Bible warns of a coming tribulation period in which the Devil manifests himself as a global dictator who persecutes Christians on a planetary scale. The question is, what can we do to prepare? This film will explain what the Bible says about the New World Order, and what saved Christians can do to fight back.

Post: #98

@Rotekz

IFB churches are the last bastion of true hardcore biblical Christianity that could turn a nation around. Problem is people don't want to hear it. Which in my own opinion is because of in your face preaching about hell. But aside from that it can be puzzling how IF Baptist preaching like in the documentary you posted is marginalized even by other christians because it's as about as red pill as one can get from a religious perspective. If you're in the UK Google militarygetsaved.tripod or something like that to find an IFB church near you. There's still a fair share of snakes out there even with the new Baptists so always tread carefully.

Post: #99

Thanks Spectrum. I too get a bit turned off by the talk of burning in hell. The IFB push to go out evangelising is not attractive either as the public have been so deeply conditioned over the decades to be repulsed by 'bible bashing'. I would avoid them myself if I did not already know they were red pilled.

My desire has been to find an Orthodox church locally but there are none. Likewise there are no Independent Baptist churches near me if the militarygetsaved.tripod website listings are accurate. They are restricted to large towns and cities and even there numbers are very few.

All my local churches appear to be infected with globo-homo nonsense. Most of their congregational data online displays consistent decline with aging members dying off and not being replaced. The church in England is going to die off. Perhaps only deep crisis like the coming breakdown of society and civil war will bring it back in a form that actually respects scripture.

Post: #100

(12-16-2018 05:28 AM)rotekz Wrote:  All my local churches appear to be infected with globo-homo nonsense. Most of their congregational data online displays consistent decline with aging members dying off and not being replaced. The church in England is going to die off. Perhaps only deep crisis like the coming breakdown of society and civil war will bring it back in a form that actually respects scripture.

Apparently, it is predicted that there will be NO men in any British church by 2030.