Post: #51

"Emotional abuse" has to be the vaguest and most easily bullshittable form of "abuse" there is. Even when it's real and legitimate, it's still incredibly easy to get away from. Unless you are a child who is not able to walk away from such a scenario - being a victim of continued "emotional abuse" is entirely your own fault.

Post: #52

Make no mistake: this guy is a fuckstain, especially for repeating the favorite lie of leftists that Roosh "supports rape". Jack SmitHIV certainly made a deal with the devil and largely brought this on himself.

BUT... a number of guys here are probably overestimating his actions and forgetting the climate we all live in. "Emotional abuse" descriptions in feminist rags like Jezebel are ripe for hyperbole and histrionic chronicles of female pseudo-victimhood, not just about the women's feelings and responses, but also regarding what the guy did.

Whilst it's very easy to totally conflate his soy politics with the behavior Jezebel describes (therefore believing Jezebel's typist and the accusers), we need something of a timeout to consider things.

(09-25-2018 08:19 PM)Bill Brasky Wrote:  If he was really ZFG, they would never have gone public with this stuff. They felt shitty after the fact that they let a Gamma humiliate them.

I'm not convinced he humiliated them at all.

I get what you're saying, but I think we can all agree that the pro-SJW/feminist political climate is wood-chipping guys who behave in accordance with healthy notions of masculinity.

It's hard for us to allege that feminism is attacking real acts of masculinity while we simultaneously insist that a ZFG or similar attitude will prevent girls from making false accusations in the first place.

The idea that being a ZFG guy is a kind of prophylactic against this #MeToo movement is patently absurd because:

1) No man is ZFG all the time;
2) A ZFG guy is not always going to come across as ZFG to others, even when he is actually not giving any fucks (lost in translation mode), or that ZFG display won't win them over and may actually offend. The type of girl, her fluctuating moods, and other factors all affect how it's received; and
3) The incentives for flimsy rape and now emotional abuse claims - attention, fame, new careers, validation, socially sanctioned excuses for personal addictions/failures, and money - are bigger than ever before and it's hard to see how a ZFG mentality is going to be the panacea it's made out to be (I'm sure Harvey Weinstein was ZFG with at least some of the women he fucked, women who later accused him of rape).

Post: #53

(09-26-2018 10:02 AM)General Stalin Wrote:  "Emotional abuse" has to be the vaguest and most easily bullshittable form of "abuse" there is. Even when it's real and legitimate, it's still incredibly easy to get away from. Unless you are a child who is not able to walk away from such a scenario - being a victim of continued "emotional abuse" is entirely your own fault.

Yep. I've been in relationships with women where I was emotionally abused, and I chose to stay. 100% my responsibility. Still, I think part of the problem is that people (men especially) don't even know what emotional abuse is, and so we're less likely to recognize when it's happening to us and thus take action. Maybe another example of MeToo being a double-edged blade will be men waking up in this particular way, walking away from a shit deal when we see one.

Post: #54

I think I just realized something.

Jack Smith I:



Jack Smith II:



Jack Smith III:



Jack Smith IV:



Jack Smith V will be a gigantic justice war machine made entirely of the other Jack Smiths.



EDIT: Shit, turns out I am not the first person to come up with this bit.

Post: #55

Has a straight (non-Italian) dude ever worn such an outfit? I'd wager a few bucks on closet homo.

Post: #56

(09-26-2018 01:28 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Has a straight (non-Italian) dude ever worn such an outfit? I'd wager a few bucks on closet homo.

It's like he has no personality of his own and just signed up for every men's style box subscription he could find.

That week's look was called "You're Like a Brother To Her".

Post: #57

(09-26-2018 01:23 PM)Jetset Wrote:  I think I just realized something.

Jack Smith I:



Jack Smith II:



Jack Smith III:



Jack Smith IV:

Jack Smith seems to have so little self identity that he appears to be picking identities from fiction:

Jack 1: Shit Patrick Bateman

Jack 2: Shit Mafia Don.

Jack 3: Shit Doctor Who

Jack 4: Shit XXX.

OP Jack: He certainly looks like a macho, macho man.

Post: #58

Ironically he has rapist eyes. The kind that try to say "I'm a bad boy alpha male" but actually say "I sneak into the bedrooms of girls I don't know to sniff their used underwear".

Post: #59

Post: #60

Capslock doing God's work as usual. it will truly be a sad day when Twatter comes for him.

Post: #61

Every fucking time .....

Meanwhile hundreds of public PUAs run around banging tens of thousands - plus tens of thousands of amateur players fucking millions - and almost nothing. The public Players like Roosh and Krauser - nothing - not a peep despite feminists actively searching for "victims" worldwide!

What the feminazis and male feminists are missing is that good Game and Red Pill is congruent with basic human biology, it lets men read subtle female cues about attraction, so that even if they "whip it out", then this is what a girl wanted, but did not dare to ask. While when the male feminists whips it out, then he is little more than a public creeper who is about as apt at reading female attraction like a severe autist.