Post: #276

Oh believe me I'm waaay more articulate in person; just not great at quill and parchment but I'll try. Any clarification on the Way not to be a Sucker...? Serious inquiry; til I think your clowning...Sir. That response isn't very...expansive, if not down right adversarial. Broad strokes aside I was looking for...well anything you find helpful to buoy the spirit when your energy is waning. Podcasts, inspiration sources, cold showers, self flagellation...?

I do agree tho; I do the good fight bc of the men that are by my side. And truly they are some of the most powerful men of our day and age. But I (we) could always use more allies, no?

I don't do depression any more...PTSD after 6 deployments for the better part of a decade and finding my path after that, cured(ish) me. (Black dog and all...)

Alcoholism? Flol naw my pop was a WWII, Korea and 'Nam vet so as his son that was on the receiving end of his admonishments; Hard... I'm not going down that path. I work at a very risque damn near porno type bar so alcohol is everywhere but i keep it under control. For instance; my personal ethos is I never drink when alone at home. Only when I have company in whatever form that may take.

Regarding SM~ isn't the message more important than the messenger Bazz?

Yea I don't like some of the monotonous way he relates everything back to some of his core arguments. I would love to hear what he does with say with his daughters schooling...does he home school? How is the dynamic with his wife... does he just expound on being loving and dominate online but fail in real life?? IDK but there are some theory to application I wish he'd expound on more. But all in all Stef still has very relevant messages on a consistent enough basis.

Post: #277

When I said to fight the good fight, that to me comes with undertones of being a white knight, or overly idealistic. If the world is going to hell, and I set out to try to make a difference instead of enjoying the decline, I can easily see the risk of putting in effort to try to help people who would just take advantage of my help. I would feel like a sucker in that case.

One of the appeals of enjoying the decline is that you're not a sucker. I think trying to "do the right thing" carries a significant risk of being a sucker.

However, I find the idea of enjoying the decline to be discouraging. For me personally, this carries the risk of alcoholism and depression. I don't want this, so I feel the need to find a more upbeat approach to life.

I believe it is possible even in this declining phase of civilzation to make a good life with deep, satisfying relationships. I believe it's possible to have joy and hope. I don't see this coming from an enjoy the decline approach. I think enjoy the decline has an inherently negative connotation.

So, for me the chance at feeling that joy, freedom, happiness, and light heartedness is the thing that inspires me to engage with the world. I think that means trying to make the world a better place, but doing so for people that are worth it and who treat me right.

Post: #278

The first call on 4095 is quite good. Former liberal chick questioning her phd / put off the kids plan.

https://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/4095/pimpi...-16th-2018

Post: #279

Abortion and Child Support Hypocrisy

Post: #280

Stefan has a brilliant mind and I cannot believe that he has fallen for this blatant attempt to misdirect people. This is nothing more than the newly approved version of the libtard blame Russia meme. Approved opposition at it's finest.

The subject of Communist infiltration is an important one and I dare say she does nothing other than say that the boogieman was present everywhere.

She actually blames the Soviets for Pearl Harbor which is a blatant lie. Misdirect your attention over here please...

Neocon con job.

Post: #281

Cool but where does he stand on the JQ?

Post: #282

(06-05-2018 12:09 PM)churros Wrote:  Cool but where does he stand on the JQ?

Useless shitpost which you seem to have one cut and paste.

Post: #283

(06-05-2018 12:07 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  Stefan has a brilliant mind and I cannot believe that he has fallen for this blatant attempt to misdirect people. This is nothing more than the newly approved version of the libtard blame Russia meme. Approved opposition at it's finest.

The subject of Communist infiltration is an important one and I dare say she does nothing other than say that the boogieman was present everywhere.

She actually blames the Soviets for Pearl Harbor which is a blatant lie. Misdirect your attention over here please...

Neocon con job.

Stefan never disagrees with the "experts" he brings on and if he does he does it in a jokey way or he'll have them so checked out he'll never massively disagree with them, rather than a have full fledged debate instead, its "the conversation"

He'll smash the hammer down on the ordinary people that call in with a problem (Often justifiably so), because they won't call him on his shit or nobody his intellectual equal calls in, I seen it once or twice where just such a person did, he was had/boxed in and cornered by an astute caller, and he flew into a typical narcissists rage and ended "the conversation", that was some disappointing shit.

I want to him apply the same attitude to his experts, so I can get the popcorn.

Post: #284

(06-05-2018 02:22 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 12:09 PM)churros Wrote:  Cool but where does he stand on the JQ?

Useless shitpost which you seem to have one cut and paste.

churros:

Where are my posts making constant Jew comments?? You are the one who always makes these sarcastic jq comments, not me. I recall making a legit argument contra all the JBP obsession which called him approved media, but this was neither explicit nor implicitly a Jew comment. I have also never posted a content related reply in the JQ thread.

Your rep comment: "Ruins every vaguely political thread by constantly harping about the Jews."

Now show me the links where I ruined / harped / mentioned Jews? And I did it to EVERY thread?

Do you have any links???

You should be banned for your outright false statement. I could not care less what you think, I welcome your negative rep, and you make make any argument you wish but outright false statements?

I am calling you out as a bad attitude troll and slimy, manipulative liar for that rep comment.

Post: #285

(06-17-2018 11:43 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 02:22 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 12:09 PM)churros Wrote:  Cool but where does he stand on the JQ?

Useless shitpost which you seem to have one cut and paste.

churros:

Where are my posts making constant Jew comments?? You are the one who always makes these sarcastic jq comments, not me. I recall making a legit argument contra all the JBP obsession which called him approved media, but this was neither explicit nor implicitly a Jew comment. I have also never posted a content related reply in the JQ thread.

Your rep comment: "Ruins every vaguely political thread by constantly harping about the Jews."

Now show me the links where I ruined / harped / mentioned Jews? And I did it to EVERY thread?

Do you have any links???

You should be banned for your outright false statement. I could not care less what you think, I welcome your negative rep, and you make make any argument you wish but outright false statements?

I am calling you out as a bad attitude troll and slimy, manipulative liar for that rep comment.

If you want to have a discussion, I suggest you pm me respectfully i.e. without addressing my as an "idiot," and refrain from stoking drama in a public forum like a woman.

You also left your negative rep for me first, which is plainly childish behaviour.

Post: #286

(06-18-2018 12:00 AM)churros Wrote:  

(06-17-2018 11:43 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 02:22 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 12:09 PM)churros Wrote:  Cool but where does he stand on the JQ?

Useless shitpost which you seem to have one cut and paste.

churros:

Where are my posts making constant Jew comments?? You are the one who always makes these sarcastic jq comments, not me. I recall making a legit argument contra all the JBP obsession which called him approved media, but this was neither explicit nor implicitly a Jew comment. I have also never posted a content related reply in the JQ thread.

Your rep comment: "Ruins every vaguely political thread by constantly harping about the Jews."

Now show me the links where I ruined / harped / mentioned Jews? And I did it to EVERY thread?

Do you have any links???

You should be banned for your outright false statement. I could not care less what you think, I welcome your negative rep, and you make make any argument you wish but outright false statements?

I am calling you out as a bad attitude troll and slimy, manipulative liar for that rep comment.

If you want to have a discussion, I suggest you pm me respectfully i.e. without addressing my as an "idiot," and refrain from stoking drama in a public forum like a woman.

You also left your negative rep for me first, which is plainly childish behaviour.

So you said I ruin every political thread with Jew comments but don't have a single link.

Post: #287

(06-18-2018 12:04 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  So you said I ruin every political thread with Jew comments but don't have a single link.

Well bro how about your safe space thread, which you created to mock those who complained about the jewposting in the Jordan Peterson thread?

/thread-68607...pid1791672

Are you seriously asking daddy moderator to ban someone you disagree with? Not very libertarian of you. I know you already reported my posts.

Post: #288

(06-18-2018 12:45 AM)churros Wrote:  

(06-18-2018 12:04 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  So you said I ruin every political thread with Jew comments but don't have a single link.

Well bro how about your safe space thread, which you created to mock those who complained about the jewposting in the Jordan Peterson thread?

/thread-68607...pid1791672

Are you seriously asking daddy moderator to ban someone you disagree with? Not very libertarian of you. I know you already reported my posts.

That's it? I ask you to show me evidence of:

"Ruins every vaguely political thread by constantly harping about the Jews."

And you link a thread I started which does not mention JEWS and isn't about Jews.

YES I think you should be banned - and not for "disagreement" but for being a vile liar. Why don't you leave my neutral rep but make it based either on your opinion that I suck which you are entitled to without reasons, or some actual fact which you can back up with links, but not based on a total made up bullshit shitpost in the form of a rep.

I have 2000 plus posts and have never HARPED about JEWS, nor have I ever RUINED a thread. In fact, I got the biggest Jew hating scum bag ever here banned in a big way, check your history "bro." I'm also a Molyneux fan - must be confusing to you since you aren't sure if that makes me a right wing whacko or a jewish shill? Molyneux, and other thinkers who didn't stick to traditional academia and had to cut it on their own in writing and on podcasts turn academics into twisted little balls of frustration that they dared think off the reservation.

To me you are an SJW pretending not to be one in this forum, climate change alarmist, and a little Marxist, and that's why your panties are in a wad. You have nothing to say that wouldn't expose you as such, and so you stick to the JQ snive remarks as your only hope of criticizing those who are a threat to expose you. (Even when you have no evidence.) It's funny, I picked up on your sneaky cynicism but hadn't read your old posts. A quick scan reveals tons of pro-Marx, anti "anglo-saxon", climate change alarmism, malthusian socialist statements about population, etc. Busted.

Are you the forum's own internal private ADL? Take your obsessive little Nazi hunt somewhere else "bro."

I think your room is really dirty.

(05-01-2016 12:36 PM)churros Wrote:  ... The world is already over-populated.

(11-20-2016 10:56 AM)churros Wrote:  Let me know if you’re working in academia.

Post: #289

Post: #290

(06-23-2018 07:16 AM)Horus Wrote:  

I'm dying over here. Thanks so much for this!

Post: #291

I am starting to lose respect for Stefan Molyneux. Joe Rogan calls him out for lying about Robin Williams's money and why Robin killed himself:





Rollo Tomassi mentions that he had an interview with him in February, and Stefan has never posted it.

Post: #292

(06-23-2018 03:36 PM)puckerman Wrote:  I am starting to lose respect for Stefan Molyneux. Joe Rogan calls him out for lying about Robin Williams's money and why Robin killed himself:





Rollo Tomassi mentions that he had an interview with him in February, and Stefan has never posted it.

What part of the video does he talk about Stefan?

Post: #293

(06-23-2018 03:36 PM)puckerman Wrote:  I am starting to lose respect for Stefan Molyneux. Joe Rogan calls him out for lying about Robin Williams's money and why Robin killed himself:

Rogan really threw Stefan over the bus re: Ana Kasparian. Joe looked like a bit of a white knight cuck on this one. Not surprisingly Stef was never on JRE again after this:

Post: #294

(06-23-2018 03:41 PM)Horus Wrote:  

(06-23-2018 03:36 PM)puckerman Wrote:  I am starting to lose respect for Stefan Molyneux. Joe Rogan calls him out for lying about Robin Williams's money and why Robin killed himself:





Rollo Tomassi mentions that he had an interview with him in February, and Stefan has never posted it.

What part of the video does he talk about Stefan?

I listened to the video twice and don't really want to take the time to listen again.

Here is a tweet from Rollo saying that he was interviewed though:

https://twitter.com/rationalmale/status/...84?lang=en

Post: #295

(Quoting puckerman here)

Let me put it like this... I'd be absolutely shocked if he ever retweeted or interviewed me, despite our many overlapping beliefs and similarities.

Post: #296

Molyneux has more than a few flaws. But Joe Rogan is a piece of work. He's just in it for the clicks. No idea why anyone would like his pro-establishment, aw-shucks persona.

Post: #297

Joe Rogan is of middling intelligence and has many dumb (and blue pill) opinions but I tune in when he has a good guest because he runs a great interview.

Name one show with anywhere near the audience that will let various "evil white males" talk for 3 hours without attacking the whole time.

I think if Rogan didn't do his little blue pill pushbacks he would have to endure more attacks and career damage than most would be willing to deal with.

Post: #298

I get that about Rogan but he'll have a guest on and listen to their possibly non-establishment views, then on another show he'll stab them in the back with the most insipid msm talking points about the issue. He's a people pleaser and a blue pill cuck.

Post: #299

I really can't hate on Stefan.

He has risked getting banned for having controversial people like Jared Taylor on and discussing population level IQ differences.

Like Cerno he is 99% good from my vantage point.

Post: #300

(06-24-2018 12:19 AM)godfather dust Wrote:  Joe Rogan is of middling intelligence and has many dumb (and blue pill) opinions but I tune in when he has a good guest because he runs a great interview.

Name one show with anywhere near the audience that will let various "evil white males" talk for 3 hours without attacking the whole time.

I think if Rogan didn't do his little blue pill pushbacks he would have to endure more attacks and career damage than most would be willing to deal with.

Yeah, he can say some really insightful things, and then will get hung up on some weird nitpick and then annoy a guest with it over and over.

Agree that overall, if he has a good guest, he is worth listening to.