Post: #26

After avoiding to throw up looking at her picture I am just throwing a list of possible problems she is going through..."poor" her:

- Menopause
- No dick in a while (actually I think she is still a virgin, no dick ever)
- Abstinence from ^ is a bitch
- Hate is a powerful feeling, actually makes you feel powerful, more hate justifies everything you do...those bastard men...arghghg
- Joining the mainstream and justifying why she is a complete wacko-cuckoo...easy no?

I agree with CynicalContrarian...I'd love to see her in charge of an island full of "like minded" women who apparently "got this"...it would be an amazing reality show

Post: #27

(06-12-2018 02:37 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  Let's see:

-Ugly
-Jewish
-Her grandparents and parents were socialists/communists
-She's a sociology and women's studies/gender/sex professor
-Hillary fan

Here's another article of hers:

Why This Socialist Feminist Is For Hillary
By Suzanna Danuta Walters

"Born to leftists themselves born to leftists, I am what is known in some circles as a “red-diaper baby.”

My immigrant Jewish grandparents met in New York City, at a meeting of the Young People’s Socialist League on the Lower East Side, and I grew up more familiar with the words to labor anthems than to those of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” My mother was an activist in the civil-rights movement who later engaged with feminism, antiwar activism, and the vast panoply of progressive issues that ebbed and flowed through our national politics over the past half-century.

In other words, I come by my democratic socialism organically and deeply.

Hillary may not be the radical, intersectional feminist that activists—myself included—fantasize about seeing in power. But she’s some kind of a feminist for sure, and her election would no doubt foreground the centrality of gender equity to social justice in ways we have not yet seen at a national level.

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-th...r-hillary/

Anyone want to guess where she lies on Kohlberg's model of moral development?

I've come to the conclusion after years of studying Jews, their ideologies and their history, that they collectively hate life. I'm not talking about a feeling of mere annoyance. I'm talking a deep ingrained, impassioned resentment towards the goodness and beauty of life, of nature, of God. I have theories as to why, which I won't share for the time being, but there is no other conclusion when their actions reveal time and time again that destruction directed towards themselves and the world is their biological imperative.

Post: #28

Quote:I grew up more familiar with the words to labor anthems than to those of “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

Post: #29

(06-11-2018 11:30 PM)Dusty Wrote:   Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this.

The extreme of masculinity is doing whatever you want because you can and the extreme of femininity is saying things to get other people to do what you want. It's a good lens to apply to the left-right also.

This woman is a professional advocate for equality, yet she makes it clear that equality is only possible by men getting out of the way of women and doing things for them. She states they're not equal.

People take a left/feminine or right/masculine approach to the world because it's the more effective method of getting what they want (or not). All this woman has is trying to guilt people into do what she wants. She hasn't got the faculties to do so through domination.

However, whenever the extreme left/feminine takes over a domain they very quickly find that they can now do what they couldn't do before - dominate with force. So they very quickly snap into extreme right/masculine modes.

In the example of a woman who suckers in a zeta provider with her words, she may quickly resort to beating him and screaming down his ear once she's got the safety of the government marriage contract and society's disdain and no care for the welfare of such men.

On a political level, whenever the left takes control, the parameters shift and they are now able to play raw domination rather than submissive manipulation. Death camps, slavery, a population paralyzed by fear.

The places that went most towards radical policies billed as being for lifting people up, were the places that happened the least. All the left-wing rhetoric is fluff to get the thing they really want - dominance. Their regimes center around the further accrual of power while all the issues they say they'll fix get worse. They've hooked you in as a dependent on their reservation.

In my opinion, there is virtually no difference between the left and the right. It's the same motive in different circumstances. Not that there really is a right in the West; and the left is rapidly becoming the right in terms to the escalation of their use of raw dominance and dominant languaage because they now can.

It's seeping into this woman's elementary-level writing. She's not just making guilt inducing statements. She's not just telling you you are inherently bad. She's telling you you need drop out and be a shit heel so she and her entourage can have access to the opportunities you would have taken. It's getting close to the stage of the BPD woman who unleashes her dominance after marriage.

Post: #30

Interestingly, her harshest Twitter criticism is coming from other WOMEN.

I'm starting to suspect that the whole #me-too thing is rapidly alienating a lot of women out there who enjoy being flirted with and pounded by attractive men...and feel threatened that feminism will deny them that fun.

Post: #31

Quote:"Homely carpet muncher writes “I hate men” oped in Washington Post"

Another solid thread title---guys are on fire around here!

Post: #32

(06-12-2018 10:59 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  Interestingly, her harshest Twitter criticism is coming from other WOMEN.

I'm starting to suspect that the whole #me-too thing is rapidly alienating a lot of women out there who enjoy being flirted with and pounded by attractive men...and feel threatened that feminism will deny them that fun.

Yep.

It's because normal women fear male violence against them. They have a million years of evolution teaching them that pissing off the men of the tribe is a deadly mistake and will lead to rogue men running wild and killing them and their children.

Normal women have always ruthlessly suppressed Feminists and hateful women, because those women are utter fucking idiots who stir up wars.

Remember the guy in high school that you hated, because in a tense situation, when there is a fight looming with some big dude that you cannot win against, there was always some asshole who would provoke the big tough guy and thus provoke a fight that you do NOT want to get into. It's the asshole who dragged you into no-win situations. Usually that asshole fight-picker was a total moron who you despised anyway, the only reason you took him with you that night was because you didn't want to argue with him, he kind of disgusted you. Then the asshole does exactly what you most fear...he drags you into a fuckstorm.

That's what this woman is. She's the asshole who will burn every other more moderate woman in the world.

There's a whole organized battalion of these assholes in the world today, relentlessly provoking war between straight men and women.

Adolf Hitler said "I do this because I love Germany" but of course every modern German knows what an evil lie that is. Hitler hated Germans with every fiber of his being. His entire goal in life was to get revenge on normal Germans for rejecting him as a young man. He wanted Germany to burn, burn, burn. Rush Limbaugh coined the term "Femnazis" and that's still accurate.

Modern feminists are the same way. They want heterosexual women to burn, burn, burn. Because modern feminists were the ugly girls in high school who got relentlessly taunted by the pretty girls. That's the genesis of their Lesbianism. That's what Lesbians *are*. The girls who got burned in High School and now "reject men" as a way of dealing with that never ending pain they feel.

They hate men, but much more important, they hate the pretty, witty girls who get married and have a happy family. They seeth with resentment every time they see a mother pushing a baby stroller with her husband. Black hatred, like nothing any man has experienced. Mean girls.

For women, getting married and having kids is the be-all and end-all of their emotional existence. It's like a jockey riding a racehorse or a figure skater skating. It's their entire world. Rip that from them and you create the heart of a mass murderer, only blacker.

Post: #33

(06-12-2018 02:37 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  Let's see:

-Ugly
-Jewish
-Her grandparents and parents were socialists/communists
-She's a sociology and women's studies/gender/sex professor
-Hillary fan

Here's another article of hers:

Why This Socialist Feminist Is For Hillary
By Suzanna Danuta Walters

"Born to leftists themselves born to leftists, I am what is known in some circles as a “red-diaper baby.”

My immigrant Jewish grandparents met in New York City, at a meeting of the Young People’s Socialist League on the Lower East Side, and I grew up more familiar with the words to labor anthems than to those of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” My mother was an activist in the civil-rights movement who later engaged with feminism, antiwar activism, and the vast panoply of progressive issues that ebbed and flowed through our national politics over the past half-century.

In other words, I come by my democratic socialism organically and deeply.

Hillary may not be the radical, intersectional feminist that activists—myself included—fantasize about seeing in power. But she’s some kind of a feminist for sure, and her election would no doubt foreground the centrality of gender equity to social justice in ways we have not yet seen at a national level.

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-th...r-hillary/

Anyone want to guess where she lies on Kohlberg's model of moral development?

The nature and ranting and ravings of a deeply disturbed individual.

Post: #34

(06-12-2018 12:34 PM)Abelard Lindsey Wrote:  

(06-12-2018 02:37 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  Let's see:

-Ugly
-Jewish
-Her grandparents and parents were socialists/communists
-She's a sociology and women's studies/gender/sex professor
-Hillary fan

Here's another article of hers:

Why This Socialist Feminist Is For Hillary
By Suzanna Danuta Walters

"Born to leftists themselves born to leftists, I am what is known in some circles as a “red-diaper baby.”

My immigrant Jewish grandparents met in New York City, at a meeting of the Young People’s Socialist League on the Lower East Side, and I grew up more familiar with the words to labor anthems than to those of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” My mother was an activist in the civil-rights movement who later engaged with feminism, antiwar activism, and the vast panoply of progressive issues that ebbed and flowed through our national politics over the past half-century.

In other words, I come by my democratic socialism organically and deeply.

Hillary may not be the radical, intersectional feminist that activists—myself included—fantasize about seeing in power. But she’s some kind of a feminist for sure, and her election would no doubt foreground the centrality of gender equity to social justice in ways we have not yet seen at a national level.

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-th...r-hillary/

Anyone want to guess where she lies on Kohlberg's model of moral development?

Suzanna is a rather disturbed individual. The photo posted of her makes her look like a guy. I wonder if this is causality in action/

Post: #35

This stupid cunt is a professor at my alma mater. When I went to Northeastern it was a school lauded for its focus on engineering and having the country's #1 internship program. Now we have this useless bitch - director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program - writing articles like this? Fuck this makes my blood boil.

We need a purging.

Post: #36

(06-12-2018 12:34 PM)Abelard Lindsey Wrote:  

(06-12-2018 02:37 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  Let's see:

-Ugly
-Jewish
-Her grandparents and parents were socialists/communists
-She's a sociology and women's studies/gender/sex professor
-Hillary fan

Here's another article of hers:

Why This Socialist Feminist Is For Hillary
By Suzanna Danuta Walters

"Born to leftists themselves born to leftists, I am what is known in some circles as a “red-diaper baby.”

My immigrant Jewish grandparents met in New York City, at a meeting of the Young People’s Socialist League on the Lower East Side, and I grew up more familiar with the words to labor anthems than to those of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” My mother was an activist in the civil-rights movement who later engaged with feminism, antiwar activism, and the vast panoply of progressive issues that ebbed and flowed through our national politics over the past half-century.

In other words, I come by my democratic socialism organically and deeply.

Hillary may not be the radical, intersectional feminist that activists—myself included—fantasize about seeing in power. But she’s some kind of a feminist for sure, and her election would no doubt foreground the centrality of gender equity to social justice in ways we have not yet seen at a national level.

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-th...r-hillary/

Anyone want to guess where she lies on Kohlberg's model of moral development?

The nature and ranting and ravings of a deeply disturbed individual.

Give me a break with this "Red diaper baby" crap. Just because your parents and grandparents believed something doesn't mean you're born to carry that torch.

In fact, it means you're a non-thinking robot who can't see beyond their own family. This is the political equivalent of "My grandmother married a wife-beater, my mother married a wife-beater, I married a wife-beater, and now my daughter's husband is in jail."

When I was growing up, the first thing I did was question why my family believed what they believed. I didn't swallow the Catholic Kool-Aid.

PS: We should change the title of this thread to include this wack-job's name, so people looking for her on Google will be immediately directed here.

Post: #37

(06-12-2018 12:56 PM)redonion Wrote:  This stupid cunt is a professor at my alma mater. When I went to Northeastern it was a school lauded for its focus on engineering and having the country's #1 internship program. Now we have this useless bitch - director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program - writing articles like this? Fuck this makes my blood boil.

We need a purging.

Women like this are ultimately protected by the State, which means the police. They depend on men`s generation of wealth, and if you don`t pay taxes or otherwise try to escape the system you will have to deal with law enforcement eventually. I don`t know how to deal with this in practical terms, but if you analyse the situation logically, I find it hard to come to a different conclusion than law enforcement being the problem.

We have almost 50 percent female police in Norway according to the latest figures. Maybe we will get to a female police ratio where you can start ignoring them, since they won`t pose a real threat? I`m not anti-police in principle, but these people have NO autonomy at all. They are certainly not reflected individuals. They just do what they`re told, no matter what. You saw that in WWII also. Police all over Europe were the first to obey German rule.

Post: #38

Not surprised by her picture or anything, but holy shit WARB...
Would Anybody Really Bang?

Post: #39

(06-12-2018 02:07 PM)Chetthebaker Wrote:  Not surprised by her picture or anything, but holy shit WARB...
Would Anybody Really Bang?

I do think she's still a virgin...no one could get a decent boner...self fucking with a vibrator and thus taking your own virginity doesn't count...so NWBH...No One Will Bang Her

Post: #40

OK, so she's an ugly lesbian and so on, we get it.

But in all seriousness, it's quite astonishing that a tenured academic, who runs an entire department, can get away with such vitriolic misandry in a national newspaper, indeed the newspaper of record.

Aren't there hate speech laws that can be utilised against her somehow? Is there some way to convincingly troll the paper with a lawsuit? Her university?

Post: #41

One of the responses on her twitter....

Quote:This is how you get Trump re-elected.

She is also doing us a favor because she is proving that the feminist brand is about hating men and not about whatever word salad they use to suggest that feminism is about the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.

Post: #42

I`ve never met a radical leftists/Marxist that did not have parents of the same ilk. It`s runs in families like radical religious beliefs...well it is a religion. Faith contrary to evidence.

Post: #43

(06-12-2018 02:13 PM)churros Wrote:  OK, so she's an ugly lesbian and so on, we get it.

But in all seriousness, it's quite astonishing that a tenured academic, who runs an entire department, can get away with such vitriolic misandry in a national newspaper, indeed the newspaper of record.

Aren't there hate speech laws that can be utilised against her somehow? Is there some way to convincingly troll the paper with a lawsuit? Her university?

Very good point! Logically this should be shutdown and the university should distance from her...the real culprit here though is that since today's mainstream is all about metoo and the other movements this goes along the same lines...so it's considered a good article that protects women's right and fights the patriarchy...it basically hits all the right words to be out there today.

Also I'd not be surprised that this is also a bit of a publicity.

Post: #44

(06-12-2018 01:38 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  PS: We should change the title of this thread to include this wack-job's name, so people looking for her on Google will be immediately directed here.

I suspect there will be an article on Return of Kings with a catchy title. Something like.....
Feminist Suzanna Danuta Walters Confirms That "Man Hating" Is The Real Definition Of Feminism

It's important to connect her man-hating with the feminist brand.

Post: #45

(06-12-2018 12:56 PM)redonion Wrote:  director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program -

The absolute irony.

Goes out of her way not to look like a woman.

Or any 'gender' for that matter.

Clearly never has sex...

...and is a Professor and director in those exact things.

At what point does the madness end?

Post: #46

Those attacks are relentless and I would frankly be surprised of the opposite view.

Post: #47

(06-12-2018 12:56 PM)redonion Wrote:  This stupid cunt is a professor at my alma mater. When I went to Northeastern it was a school lauded for its focus on engineering and having the country's #1 internship program. Now we have this useless bitch - director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program - writing articles like this? Fuck this makes my blood boil.

We need a purging.

You could have a bit of power and influence in this situation to slowly enact change. Let them know you won't be making any alumni donations following this kind of hate speech.

When other schools have lost money as a result of radicals, their admin starts to take notice.

Post: #48

After looking at Suzanna Danuta Walters' picture quickly...


Need some quick eye bleach. Pics courtesy of Old Row Chicks.

Post: #49

(06-12-2018 09:42 AM)HornyRamone Wrote:  I've come to the conclusion after years of studying Jews, their ideologies and their history, that they collectively hate life. I'm not talking about a feeling of mere annoyance. I'm talking a deep ingrained, impassioned resentment towards the goodness and beauty of life, of nature, of God. I have theories as to why, which I won't share for the time being, but there is no other conclusion when their actions reveal time and time again that destruction directed towards themselves and the world is their biological imperative.

Apologies for being born Jewish, but thanks for not sharing with us your theories. Please keep it that way.

Post: #50

(06-12-2018 06:13 PM)LeBeau Wrote:  You could have a bit of power and influence in this situation to slowly enact change. Let them know you won't be making any alumni donations following this kind of hate speech.

When other schools have lost money as a result of radicals, their admin starts to take notice.

I actually did just that (via Twitter) before making my post.

Unfortunately my donations aren't even a blip on the radar compared to the mega-donors. If they actually look up my record they'll also see zero donations because donating to a school that you already paid $50k+ for is some unbelievably nonsensical shit if you ask me.

I've already given up on acting like the US university system can be saved. It just sucks to see my own school, which I thought was still a STEM stronghold, succumb to the SJW bullshit.