Post: #101

(06-05-2018 10:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote:And honestly - most Jews prefer to stay in a white dominated Britain, Europe or US - that is why the majority of Jewish men voted both for Trump as well as for Brexit.

Jewish men did not vote for Trump in the aggregate. Around 80% of Jews voted for Hillary according to the Jew York Times. Maybe 40% of Jewish men did, but this could only work out if 100% of Jewish women voted for Hillary. Highly unlikely, I suspect there are roughly 15-25% of Conservative Jewish families in the USA, and that's where all Trump support may have come from.

Good to see Samseau back. This guy knows his Jew.

Aloha!

Post: #102

(06-04-2018 09:23 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  ^ Good to see you Doc.

Good to be back. Work and stress have let up considerably so I am posting more.

Post: #103

(06-03-2018 01:13 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  Whole religion based on Jews.

"The church has been infiltrated!"

Ok.

I was talking about homosexuals, not rabbis, but let's not logic get in the way of a good cheap shot.

To address the issue you believe to be pointing out in your pithiness:

Jesus Christ is the bridge between the Hebrew tradition of history, and the Greek one of philosophy. The Hebrews understood the creation of the Earth, but had no real philosophy. The Greeks understood philosophy, but couldn't figure out how the world came into being.

Jesus Christ, and then the Gospel of St. John bridge the gap. Jesus as the son of God, and God as the rational order of the universe, and creation, establish a metaphysical foundation that no quantum or astrophysicist to this day has been able to best.

Jesus was killed by the Jews because he wasn't the Messiah they wanted. They wanted a King David 2.0 who would lead an army and defeat the Romans. What they got was the opposite, so they had him disposed of. Then, to keep Jews from following Jesus in the centuries to follow, they codified the Talmud.

What we're really dealing with is your futile attempt to push Asatru or whatever neo-pagan nordicism is called these days. Good luck with promoting a religion that understands neither history nor philosophy. I wish it did, but it doesn't.

Post: #104

Not to be a Devorah downer - but it's fair to add that NAJALT. While Jews do number 40% of the Forbes 100 and they do have a disproportionate influence in media, banking, the law, hollywood, certain social sciences (cultural marxism), certain politics (marxism; communism) and so on and so forth, it would be unfair to lay the burden on the entire Jewish people. With 2 million Jews in the United States, maybe 10% of them are actively "in on" the game and can be accountable. The other 90%, as long as they are not actively pursuing rackets, usury, media manipulation and so on, they should not be held accountable.

That said, the whole ANTISEMITIC spiel needs to be dropped. Frankly, it's completely disrespectful and insulting towards all other peoples who have been killed in genocides. Where is the Armenian Poverty Law Center or the Anti-Defamation of 17th Century Bohemians-Leauge? Claiming the genocide of your people was atrocious is perfectly fair. But claiming it was somehow more atrocious than other people who faced similar genocides, implies their suffering is somehow less important. Asserting special treatment as a consequence of your suffering should only be allowed if you're going to give equal accordance to the other 100+ people who were butchered and slaughtered over the centuries.

Post: #105

Actually it's worse than that. They lay the guilt on thick with the very people who rescued them. They have created the Holocaust to the be the original sin of the white man, as if we were all part of a gang that decided to imprison and butcher them until a portion of us grew a conscience and fought to get rid of the ones that remained doggedly evil.

Unless you're from Germany there's only one response to any Jew bitching to the West about the Holocaust.

"Oh yeah. I remember when we saved you from the Nazi's AND gave you a country. I hope you're grateful."

As for "not all Jews should be held accountable" well you've stepped into murky territory with the concept of "held accountable".

What percentage of a group must be acting against the interest of your people for you to disavow that entire group? Obviously if anti-western undermining was an activity which 99.99 percent of Jews actively engaged in then there would be no nonsensical debate about "let's not over generalise because there's at least 5 to 10 genuine race-blind civic nationanalist Jews."

The percent of underminers in any given group at which tolerance wears thin is somewhere north of 1% and south of 100% but where it falls is hard to say.

I asked this question of a former long time member about muslims when I confronted him with a well researched statistic indicating that one in five british muslims wanted Britain to become an islamic caliphate. I further asked him if he would disavow whites as a group if hypothetically speaking a mere 1 in 5 outwardly expressed a desire to expel all non-whites and create a white ethnostate. Keep in mind that 20% would be 50 to 60 million people in America. 60 million Richard Spencers. Enough to easily conquer and keep a dozen major states and destroy the USA as we know it. It was an issue beyond his capacity for reason, as it is for most individualists who demand total adherence to the idea that nobody should be discriminated against because of the actions of other people in their out-group.

What is the percentage of an outgroup that acts in a hostile manner before you are forced to consider the whole group a write-off?

p.s. I'm not posting this as a suggestion that Jews need to be written off entirely. It's just an exercise in consideration that total adherence to individualism is simply not a reasonable expectation.

Post: #106

(06-05-2018 07:27 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 10:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote:And honestly - most Jews prefer to stay in a white dominated Britain, Europe or US - that is why the majority of Jewish men voted both for Trump as well as for Brexit.

Jewish men did not vote for Trump in the aggregate. Around 80% of Jews voted for Hillary according to the Jew York Times. Maybe 40% of Jewish men did, but this could only work out if 100% of Jewish women voted for Hillary. Highly unlikely, I suspect there are roughly 15-25% of Conservative Jewish families in the USA, and that's where all Trump support may have come from.

Good to see Samseau back. This guy knows his Jew.

Aloha!

Yeah - Brexit support among Jewish men was in the majority. Trump had no such luck with massive voting for the Cunt going on (70% overall as I read now.)

Post: #107

(06-05-2018 08:09 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

(06-03-2018 01:13 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  Whole religion based on Jews.

"The church has been infiltrated!"

Ok.

I was talking about homosexuals, not rabbis, but let's not logic get in the way of a good cheap shot.

To address the issue you believe to be pointing out in your pithiness:

Jesus Christ is the bridge between the Hebrew tradition of history, and the Greek one of philosophy. The Hebrews understood the creation of the Earth, but had no real philosophy. The Greeks understood philosophy, but couldn't figure out how the world came into being.

Jesus Christ, and then the Gospel of St. John bridge the gap. Jesus as the son of God, and God as the rational order of the universe, and creation, establish a metaphysical foundation that no quantum or astrophysicist to this day has been able to best.

Jesus was killed by the Jews because he wasn't the Messiah they wanted. They wanted a King David 2.0 who would lead an army and defeat the Romans. What they got was the opposite, so they had him disposed of. Then, to keep Jews from following Jesus in the centuries to follow, they codified the Talmud.

What we're really dealing with is your futile attempt to push Asatru or whatever neo-pagan nordicism is called these days. Good luck with promoting a religion that understands neither history nor philosophy. I wish it did, but it doesn't.

Christianity: the original multicultural diversity.

Post: #108

Jesus never existed.

Post: #109

And Odin did?

YoungBlade: Well, considering St. John wrote his gospel in Greek and its opening chapter immediately makes use of the philosophically loaded concept of Logos (not the poor translation of “the Word”), yeah bucko.

Post: #110

(06-06-2018 08:45 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  And Odin did?

YoungBlade: Well, considering St. John wrote his gospel in Greek and its opening chapter immediately makes use of the philosophically loaded concept of Logos (not the poor translation of “the Word”), yeah bucko.

As long as you admit it.

Merkel has some job openings for you.

Post: #111

Devorah Downer.

Post: #112

The Jewish Question:

Who’s the schmuck who ate the last of the matzah balls??!

Post: #113

(06-06-2018 07:13 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Jesus never existed.

The historical figure of Jesus existed. There are Roman and local sources backing it up - also stating that he had a large following. I wonder how people can claim that bullshit.

Mohammed however did not exist. There are no sources and the entire Islamic sage and Mohammed's life was concocted within 200-300 years by warrior-nomads who had conquered large areas without having much of a strong religion. They made the religion up to consolidate their power and counter Judaism and Christianity in the Middle East.

Post: #114

(06-06-2018 09:35 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 08:45 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  And Odin did?

YoungBlade: Well, considering St. John wrote his gospel in Greek and its opening chapter immediately makes use of the philosophically loaded concept of Logos (not the poor translation of “the Word”), yeah bucko.

As long as you admit it.

Merkel has some job openings for you.

Yeah, I’m sure she’d love an actual hardline Catholic. Might as well start hiring Nazis too.

Why don’t you contribute to a thread for once instead of saying stupid things for attention.

Speaking of multiculturalism, a topic YoungBlade is historically ignorant of (among many other things), I just read this article that outlines how all-encompassing the Jewish influence was to push multiculturalism and the 1965 immigration bill in order de-homogenize America for Jewish benefit:

http://www.culturewars.com/2011/JewishNazis.htm

Another blow to the Petersoniam motion that science alone is crumbling the West’s foundation.

Post: #115

(06-06-2018 05:24 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 09:35 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 08:45 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  And Odin did?

YoungBlade: Well, considering St. John wrote his gospel in Greek and its opening chapter immediately makes use of the philosophically loaded concept of Logos (not the poor translation of “the Word”), yeah bucko.

As long as you admit it.

Merkel has some job openings for you.

Yeah, I’m sure she’d love an actual hardline Catholic. Might as well start hiring Nazis too.

Why don’t you contribute to a thread for once instead of saying stupid things for attention.

Speaking of multiculturalism, a topic YoungBlade is historically ignorant of (among many other things), I just read this article that outlines how all-encompassing the Jewish influence was to push multiculturalism and the 1965 immigration bill in order de-homogenize America for Jewish benefit:

http://www.culturewars.com/2011/JewishNazis.htm

Another blow to the Petersoniam motion that science alone is crumbling the West’s foundation.

Hey, you agreed that Christianity is a diverse, multicultural religion.

Don't get butthurt because your hamster got shot dead.

Post: #116

(06-06-2018 06:34 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  Hey, you agreed that Christianity is a diverse, multicultural religion.

Don't get butthurt because your hamster got shot dead.

Shit dude, you're right. We're a bunch of cucks, worshipping a Jewish dude while railing against the Jews. I mean, yeah, the Jews have a big problem with Catholicism/Christianity and don't give a shit about paganism, but still.

We should follow the religion of our ancestors, no matter how lacking in philosophy, metaphysics, and actual textual foundation that religion is.

Post: #117

Here's my JQ:

Who came up with the idea to cut off part of your penis? Seems like a pretty dramatic way to help you identify your tribe members or w/e.

Post: #118

(06-06-2018 08:28 PM)Enoch Wrote:  Here's my JQ:

Who came up with the idea to cut off part of your penis? Seems like a pretty dramatic way to help you identify your tribe members or w/e.

It was created before recorded history, but the first recorded instance is from ancient Egypt. It's most widely practiced in Africa, the Middle East, and Anglo countries.

I agree it's rather terrible; there's no conclusive evidence that it's more hygienic either, unless one is having lots of unprotected sex with stank hos and then not washing afterward.

Post: #119

I would guess it has something to do with lessening the sexual pleasure and showing God that you value him more, in addition to being able to identify other members.

Post: #120

(06-06-2018 08:13 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 06:34 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  Hey, you agreed that Christianity is a diverse, multicultural religion.

Don't get butthurt because your hamster got shot dead.

Shit dude, you're right. We're a bunch of cucks, worshipping a Jewish dude while railing against the Jews. I mean, yeah, the Jews have a big problem with Catholicism/Christianity and don't give a shit about paganism, but still.

We should follow the religion of our ancestors, no matter how lacking in philosophy, metaphysics, and actual textual foundation that religion is.

Wait, I thought pagans were the ones who provided the philosophy and metaphysics in multicultural Christianity? Or were they just backwards savages while the Hebrews brought civilization to them with their wonderful religion?

Post: #121

Darwinism could be a dope ass religion.

Post: #122

..

Post: #123

(06-06-2018 11:57 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 07:13 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Jesus never existed.

The historical figure of Jesus existed. There are Roman and local sources backing it up - also stating that he had a large following. I wonder how people can claim that bullshit.

Mohammed however did not exist. There are no sources and the entire Islamic sage and Mohammed's life was concocted within 200-300 years by warrior-nomads who had conquered large areas without having much of a strong religion. They made the religion up to consolidate their power and counter Judaism and Christianity in the Middle East.

Definitely a Jesus existed. But the walking on water, virgin birth and all the other miracles probably didnt happen.

http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/surfeit.htm

Quote:Josephus, the first century Jewish historian mentions no fewer than nineteen different Yeshuas/Jesii, about half of them contemporaries of the supposed Christ! In his Antiquities, of the twenty-eight high priests who held office from the reign of Herod the Great to the fall of the Temple, no fewer than four bore the name Jesus: Jesus ben Phiabi, Jesus ben Sec, Jesus ben Damneus and Jesus ben Gamaliel. Even Saint Paul makes reference to a rival magician, preaching ‘another Jesus’ (2 Corinthians 11,4).

Quote:Jesus ben Stada was a Judean agitator who gave the Romans a headache in the early years of the second century. He met his end in the town of Lydda (twenty five miles from Jerusalem) at the hands of a Roman crucifixion crew. And given the scale that Roman retribution could reach – at the height of the siege of Jerusalem the Romans were crucifying upwards of five hundred captives a day before the city walls – dead heroes called Jesus would (quite literally) have been thick on the ground. Not one merits a full-stop in the great universal history.[/code]

Post: #124

(06-07-2018 11:05 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 11:57 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 07:13 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Jesus never existed.

The historical figure of Jesus existed. There are Roman and local sources backing it up - also stating that he had a large following. I wonder how people can claim that bullshit.

Mohammed however did not exist. There are no sources and the entire Islamic sage and Mohammed's life was concocted within 200-300 years by warrior-nomads who had conquered large areas without having much of a strong religion. They made the religion up to consolidate their power and counter Judaism and Christianity in the Middle East.

Definitely a Jesus existed. But the walking on water, virgin birth and all the other miracles probably didnt happen.

http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/surfeit.htm

Quote:Josephus, the first century Jewish historian mentions no fewer than nineteen different Yeshuas/Jesii, about half of them contemporaries of the supposed Christ! In his Antiquities, of the twenty-eight high priests who held office from the reign of Herod the Great to the fall of the Temple, no fewer than four bore the name Jesus: Jesus ben Phiabi, Jesus ben Sec, Jesus ben Damneus and Jesus ben Gamaliel. Even Saint Paul makes reference to a rival magician, preaching ‘another Jesus’ (2 Corinthians 11,4).

Quote:Jesus ben Stada was a Judean agitator who gave the Romans a headache in the early years of the second century. He met his end in the town of Lydda (twenty five miles from Jerusalem) at the hands of a Roman crucifixion crew. And given the scale that Roman retribution could reach – at the height of the siege of Jerusalem the Romans were crucifying upwards of five hundred captives a day before the city walls – dead heroes called Jesus would (quite literally) have been thick on the ground. Not one merits a full-stop in the great universal history.[/code]

All nonsense. Common wikipedia knowledge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

Post: #125

(06-06-2018 05:44 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  Christianity: the original multicultural diversity.

False. It is a singular culture of Christ, but it was indeed the original multiracialism. The Ethiopians (Blacks) were among the first converts post-Christ, St. Paul tells us that Jew, Greek, Male and Female are all one in Christ, and it all comes from the most important parable of the New Testament, the parable of the Good Samaritan. The Neighbor, those God commands us to love as ourselves, of the parable is a foreigner.

Of course, the Jews of the time hated this message, which is why after they were punished by God's wrath for murdering his Son with the genocide of the Jews, destruction of Jerusalem, and its glorious Second Temple, they made sure to preserve racial purity by only accepting children from Jewish women as legitimate Jewish blood.

The end result was a horribly disfigured race full of unique diseases, deformities, and other negative traits, that only 2000 years later are Jews starting to reject, but hey keep telling yourself that racial purity matters.

Ugly on in the inside, ugly on the outside.