Post: #276

Contrary to popular opinion, Jews are not aliens with superhuman strength, regeneration and telepathy. Even with all the financial and political influence they accumulated over the centuries, they're still just a bunch of ordinary (if arrogant) humans that make plenty of human blunders.

If you're a little bitch begging for someone to exploit you, a suitable candidate will come along sooner or later.

Post: #277

When it comes to average tribal IQs the results are the equivalent of having super powers. Ask a guy in the Islamic State with an AK47 who's just about to be hit by a cruise missile.

It's functionally no different from God himself tossing a lightning bolt onto his head.

The greater the degree to which technology progresses the less it matters who has more people, or even more money. At some point a tribe gains the ability to wipe their foes out at the touch of a button, and the only question left is whether it's in their nature to do it or not.

Post: #278

(04-09-2018 05:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  When it comes to average tribal IQs the results are the equivalent of having super powers. Ask a guy in the Islamic State with an AK47 who's just about to be hit by a cruise missile.

It's functionally no different from God himself tossing a lightning bolt onto his head.

The greater the degree to which technology progresses the less it matters who has more people, or even more money. At some point a tribe gains the ability to wipe their foes out at the touch of a button, and the only question left is whether it's in their nature to do it or not.

Unfortunately IQs are superpowers to a degree. The understanding of usury and the lack thereof of the nobility in Europe made the current bunch ascend to such power over the Western world.

But it's also a cumulative enterprise - you need certain high numbers in the tens of millions to even create our current system. You require a certain number of geniuses, but also millions of people who are working tirelessly to keep the machine running. You require even at the bottom people who operate the machines and the McDonald's cash registries. Even for those activities you require an IQ of 93. Most folk below that are of very limited use in the West which explains the opiod epidemic, crime and eternal unemployment.

There are estimates that our system cannot be upheld below an IQ of 96/97.

Imagine what would happen if all the nations with IQs beyond 97 would disappear from one day to the next - and even all Europeans in South America be teleported elsewhere. What would happen? My bet is that Islam would take over quickly since it is the most powerful ideology out there and then the world would revert to the middle ages.

For middle ages technology your IQ requirements may be as low as 80-85.

For straw huts and simple tribes it may be as low as 50. Anyone can do that.

The power of intelligence accumulates over time if the system is sufficiently free, access to education is not restricted and there are no strong negative elements that hinder progress (anti-science mentality, slavery etc.).

The current ISIS crapheads are able to wield the military technology to some degree, but they are not able to replicate it at all. They are like the equivalent of bushmen who are given magic machines that make "poof" when they press a button.

The current usury bunch simply used the weaknesses of the old nobility, their inbreeding, their desire to subjugate smarter men beneath them with their fist-thumping of being "noble-born". Any smart population should know the destructive nature of usury and say: "Wait a moment.... We own the central bank printing, we own the military, why don't we just print the money instead of borrowing it? We just hire smart people to print as much as the economy is productive without becoming worthless. Then maybe we improve it by adding Woergl-like taxes on holding money to increase the velocity of money. It tested extremely well there and not even all money would have to be affected by it. So why are we not doing that?"

The system is so clever that not even economists are asking those questions. But I know that even Milton Friedman before his death agreed with Bill Still. It was just that Friedman understood that he is powerless to affect change, so he might as well get paid avoiding the issue.

Post: #279

"If the system is sufficiently free" is a bit of a sticking point.

Are low IQ super-breeders and rampant low-IQ immigration the sign of a "free" system? Most academics think education should be a universal right, but who pays for it? Are the smart burdened to educate the stupid at their own expense? Particularly if it proves pointless past basic literacy (or even before that in some cases). What if that burden detracts from their ability to have kids of their own?

For a system or a nation built on aggregate IQ for it's success the system would have to retain the dominance of the brainiacs which either means eliminating the universal franchise or eliminating the idiots.

Otherwise you simply end up with a series of momentary spikes in civilisation before a return to dullard rule resumes.

Post: #280

(04-09-2018 05:59 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(04-09-2018 05:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  When it comes to average tribal IQs the results are the equivalent of having super powers. Ask a guy in the Islamic State with an AK47 who's just about to be hit by a cruise missile.

It's functionally no different from God himself tossing a lightning bolt onto his head.

The greater the degree to which technology progresses the less it matters who has more people, or even more money. At some point a tribe gains the ability to wipe their foes out at the touch of a button, and the only question left is whether it's in their nature to do it or not.

Unfortunately IQs are superpowers to a degree. The understanding of usury and the lack thereof of the nobility in Europe made the current bunch ascend to such power over the Western world.

But it's also a cumulative enterprise - you need certain high numbers in the tens of millions to even create our current system. You require a certain number of geniuses, but also millions of people who are working tirelessly to keep the machine running. You require even at the bottom people who operate the machines and the McDonald's cash registries. Even for those activities you require an IQ of 93. Most folk below that are of very limited use in the West which explains the opiod epidemic, crime and eternal unemployment.

There are estimates that our system cannot be upheld below an IQ of 96/97.

Imagine what would happen if all the nations with IQs beyond 97 would disappear from one day to the next - and even all Europeans in South America be teleported elsewhere. What would happen? My bet is that Islam would take over quickly since it is the most powerful ideology out there and then the world would revert to the middle ages.

For middle ages technology your IQ requirements may be as low as 80-85.

For straw huts and simple tribes it may be as low as 50. Anyone can do that.

The power of intelligence accumulates over time if the system is sufficiently free, access to education is not restricted and there are no strong negative elements that hinder progress (anti-science mentality, slavery etc.).

The current ISIS crapheads are able to wield the military technology to some degree, but they are not able to replicate it at all. They are like the equivalent of bushmen who are given magic machines that make "poof" when they press a button.

The current usury bunch simply used the weaknesses of the old nobility, their inbreeding, their desire to subjugate smarter men beneath them with their fist-thumping of being "noble-born". Any smart population should know the destructive nature of usury and say: "Wait a moment.... We own the central bank printing, we own the military, why don't we just print the money instead of borrowing it? We just hire smart people to print as much as the economy is productive without becoming worthless. Then maybe we improve it by adding Woergl-like taxes on holding money to increase the velocity of money. It tested extremely well there and not even all money would have to be affected by it. So why are we not doing that?"

The system is so clever that not even economists are asking those questions. But I know that even Milton Friedman before his death agreed with Bill Still. It was just that Friedman understood that he is powerless to affect change, so he might as well get paid avoiding the issue.

This is all well and good but read up on current AI advancements. The Jews and non-Jew collaborators could replace all of us with robots in 20 years at the absolute max. There is no resistance to this right now.

Post: #281

(04-09-2018 06:13 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  "If the system is sufficiently free" is a bit of a sticking point.

Are low IQ super-breeders and rampant low-IQ immigration the sign of a "free" system? Most academics think education should be a universal right, but who pays for it? Are the smart burdened to educate the stupid at their own expense? Particularly if it proves pointless past basic literacy (or even before that in some cases). What if that burden detracts from their ability to have kids of their own?

For a system or a nation built on aggregate IQ for it's success the system would have to retain the dominance of the brainiacs which either means eliminating the universal franchise or eliminating the idiots.

Otherwise you simply end up with a series of momentary spikes in civilisation before a return to dullard rule resumes.

Yes - our system is still somewhat free, though the screws are tightened and the current elite is out to re-organize our world in their manical way to create a Brave New World system abolishing family and other bonds.

As for the argument of why the rich and the ruling class should educate the poor - they already had those discussions on whether it would be worth it or whether the poor would rise up against them. There was even resistance against broad education by many peasants and the monarchs like the Austrian empress had to use the cops and military to force the peasants to let their children go to school.

The net results were staggering: the future Geothe, Beethoven, Ford, Edison and Tesla were not tilling the fields or laboring without progress in some mines. They quickly ascended beyond the levels of noble-born intellectuals. And the moneyed uptight nobility lived more well-off with a far higher living standard than if they had kept the people uneducated. The people took note as the more democratic France under Napoleon mind-raped the rest of Europe and made those dorks and dukes who inherited their military leadership positions look like idiots. The UK only managed to defeat Napoleon partly because of usury power and partly because they already had their own system of meritocracy running where the 2nd to 5th born son inherited close to nothing and had to be creative to start a military career, start a business or make career in politics. Survival is a good motivation for a lord whose brother is set to inherit millions while your only plus is a good education and some connections.

But of course we are talking here about populations which had all IQs around 100.

Idiots will be born in each generation, but a society should care for an ascension of their tribe - stable marriages, patriarchy was such a system. The smarter ones, the more well-off had more children who survived than the impoverished and pathological ones. That was the case in Europe for centuries. It's been only reversed in the last decades. China still has the same system where the most leftover men are without a woman while the successful ones have multiple women and children.

Look for a country like China and Japan - they have raised themselves to such a degree via positive eugenics/evolution that not even genocidal communism could destroy their system. You drop 5 nukes on China and Japan and they will recreate their societies. But drop 5 metric tons of gold on Somalia and there will be a new re-invigorated civil war over it within 24 hours. Somalia simply needs time to follow the footsteps of Europe or China for generations. Education alone won't save it in this case.

And AIs are overrated. Self-driving cars, self-checkout, robots - that will increase, but that will simply mean that intelligence requirements for the job market will increase. The globalists know this - massive unemployment is predicted partly because of globalization - they want 1-2 big companies to manufacture everything and they hate competition. This has little to do with AIs "taking over".

Post: #282

I might attend this.

Post: #283

Very good interview.

Post: #284

Has anyone from here gone to the Day For Freedom event today? There's a few livestreams of it on YT, no signs of disruption so far...

Post: #285

I'm watching one and its some girl singing cheesy pop ballads? If I was there would have gotten others in the crowd to join me in booing them off the stage. What the fuck kind of music is that for an event like this?

Post: #286

(05-06-2018 05:15 PM)RedPillUK Wrote:  I'm watching one and its some girl singing cheesy pop ballads? If I was there would have gotten others in the crowd to join me in booing them off the stage. What the fuck kind of music is that for an event like this?

The live feed dropped about a 100 people in a minute when this virtue signalling went in to full effect.

Sad.

Jesus it was fucking embarrassing.

There was a very good turn out. Not reported at all in any news outlet.

A lot of people baying for change.

Quite a few people asking wtf a tranny was doing there singing like shit.

Yeah, it was a man, baby!

Post: #287

Sounds like Antifa and other anti-free speech organizations decided not to try to disrupt the event, which is interesting.

Post: #288

(05-07-2018 02:27 PM)C-Note Wrote:  Sounds like Antifa and other anti-free speech organizations decided not to try to disrupt the event, which is interesting.

I think they did try, but they were simply heavily outnumbered. The Football Lads Alliance / Democratic Football Lads Alliance (apparently they are two separate organisations due to an ideological split of some sort, I have no idea what) both came, and they bring enormous numbers. I think the far left might be in for a shock with their anti-trump protests in July. The average (middle class) person might have marched in London against the Iraq war, and while the average (middle class) person probably has an unfavourable view of Trump...they're not going to be booking a day off work to protest his visit in the same way as they did in 2003 for the war.

Post: #289

(05-08-2018 12:17 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 02:27 PM)C-Note Wrote:  Sounds like Antifa and other anti-free speech organizations decided not to try to disrupt the event, which is interesting.

I think they did try, but they were simply heavily outnumbered. The Football Lads Alliance / Democratic Football Lads Alliance (apparently they are two separate organisations due to an ideological split of some sort, I have no idea what) both came, and they bring enormous numbers. I think the far left might be in for a shock with their anti-trump protests in July. The average (middle class) person might have marched in London against the Iraq war, and while the average (middle class) person probably has an unfavourable view of Trump...they're not going to be booking a day off work to protest his visit in the same way as they did in 2003 for the war.

Yup - there were hundreds of Antifa, but they were outnumbered at least 5 to 1 - and those that arrived on the freedom side were not some kind of wimps. Football fans would not have taken a hit with a bike lock and just remained calm and considerate. In addition you had police presence. Any fight would have gone really bad.

Sargon of Akkad reported that Antifa quickly slithered away when they realized how big the other crowd was.

Post: #290

Been listening to his message, fully-uncensored, uncut, and I have gained a lot of respect for him.

Post: #291

Social media reporting that all in one day Robinson was arrested, tried and found guilty of some crime and sentenced to 13 months in prison. Also, that there is a media ban on providing any coverage.

Post: #292

Filming outside the court of a Paki muslim pedo gang trial. Told to turn off his livestream. Refused. Arrested on "suspicion of a breach of the peace".

Directly taken to jail due to being on a suspended sentence already. Wouldn't be surprised if he's murdered in there by some jihadi scum.

If so the saddest part will be the limp-dicked response from all of his "supporters". England doesn't deserve Robinson. If there were a pair of balls between the lot of them then the police trying to arrest him would have been swarmed by pissed off patriots.

Post: #293

Even an ex police officer is not happy about it.






Red pill phil talks about tommy and amy who got arrested for saying "have a gay day" to a homosexual. Yet the police in manchester allowed an arsonist to burn someone's property and smash their fucking windows in - they let him off. A few days later he burned their house down, murdering 4 children - burned alive - and their mum is still seriously ill with burns and may not make it. But if you say "have a gay day" you'll be in serious shit.

It's here!





But yeah, it does look like Tommy has been imprisoned for 13 months, starting today!

We are now in an official state of anarcho-tyranny here in the uk.

Post: #294

(05-25-2018 11:48 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Filming outside the court of a Paki muslim pedo gang trial. Told to turn off his livestream. Refused. Arrested on "suspicion of a breach of the peace".

Directly taken to jail due to being on a suspended sentence already. Wouldn't be surprised if he's murdered in there by some jihadi scum.

If so the saddest part will be the limp-dicked response from all of his "supporters". England doesn't deserve Robinson. If there were a pair of balls between the lot of them then the police trying to arrest him would have been swarmed by pissed off patriots.

I hear you Leonard. But watch that video - there's a few longer versions on youtube should show up for you in 'suggestions'.

You'll notice there was over a dozen big burly coppers there to take him off. Mob-handed. Like amy (who's on crutches) - a dozen of them.

Yet burn someone's house and smash their windows in? No problem. We'll give you an NFA (no further action) - so feel free to come back in a few days and burn everyone alive in the house (young children).

If this isn't anarcho-tyranny, well, I don't know what is.

It's anarchy on the streets here. Thugs and drug-dealers rule. Gangs run things now. People cower in their houses, afraid of the local crews who really run the country, and afraid of the police.

There seems to be a purge against those who are live-streaming. They need to shut that down because the time has come for them to really put the boot in and smash some heads together. They can't do that with live cameras. This is a battle they can't win. They have lost our hearts and minds. But this will make them move vicious. And this will make people ever more resentful.

I don't know what the answer is.

Post: #295

(05-25-2018 12:31 PM)Rigsby Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 11:48 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Filming outside the court of a Paki muslim pedo gang trial. Told to turn off his livestream. Refused. Arrested on "suspicion of a breach of the peace".

Directly taken to jail due to being on a suspended sentence already. Wouldn't be surprised if he's murdered in there by some jihadi scum.

If so the saddest part will be the limp-dicked response from all of his "supporters". England doesn't deserve Robinson. If there were a pair of balls between the lot of them then the police trying to arrest him would have been swarmed by pissed off patriots.

I hear you Leonard. But watch that video - there's a few longer versions on youtube should show up for you in 'suggestions'.

You'll notice there was over a dozen big burly coppers there to take him off. Mob-handed. Like amy (who's on crutches) - a dozen of them.

Yet burn someone's house and smash their windows in? No problem. We'll give you an NFA (no further action) - so feel free to come back in a few days and burn everyone alive in the house (young children).

If this isn't anarcho-tyranny, well, I don't know what is.

It's anarchy on the streets here. Thugs and drug-dealers rule. Gangs run things now. People cower in their houses, afraid of the local crews who really run the country, and afraid of the police.

There seems to be a purge against those who are live-streaming. They need to shut that down because the time has come for them to really put the boot in and smash some heads together. They can't do that with live cameras. This is a battle they can't win. They have lost our hearts and minds. But this will make them move vicious. And this will make people ever more resentful.

I don't know what the answer is.

Thank God the British have the Second Amend... uh, never mind.

Post: #296

Which police department arrested him and which Crown jurisdiction remanded him to prison? The least I can do is go hector them on their Facebook pages, being that I'm in the US.

Post: #297

< This was bound to happen. Count Dankula got a warning shot. Tommy Robinson was already behind bars for a minor offense that they blew out of proportion.

Now he is in for the first case of thought crime. He won't be the last. This is just the beginning.

Post: #298

So many of the comments on twitter support his incarceration.

How do you beat a corrupt government when half the population agrees with their tactics?

Post: #299

(05-25-2018 11:48 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  If so the saddest part will be the limp-dicked response from all of his "supporters". England doesn't deserve Robinson. If there were a pair of balls between the lot of them then the police trying to arrest him would have been swarmed by pissed off patriots.

That was an unnecessary dig at people like me who do this stuff (or have done) in real life. I'm not making any accusations against you personally, but very few people on this forum, including the ones who post constantly about political stuff, have done as much as I have in the real world, if anything at all. That said, I'm not about to add to a criminal record to stick up for Tommy — he's chosen his direction in life, and hopefully one day he gets the recognition he deserves.

But alas, this is terrible news.

Edit: hopefully this makes Dragan rethink his 'controlled/approved opposition' theory.

Post: #300

From his Facebook:

Quote:*PLEASE SHARE*There are reporting restrictions, so we have been told we are unable to speak about what went on today. You may have heard on social media and it is true. If you watched the live stream you will know It is absolutely outrageous what has happened! At the moment all we can say is Tommy will need your support more than ever. Please help show your support by clicking this link http://www.tommyrobinson.online/support