Post: #1

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43396008

His brief history was quite a time.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #2

Post: #3

Hopefully he, james watson, maurice wilkins, and dyson will not be the last of the genius anglos.

But their collective fading is depressing.

Post: #4

A brilliant mind, no doubt about it. It's a meissing that in the last years of his life, he became a kind of free, unnecesary and ridiculous Atheist, progressive media show.
The man had any right to be an Atheist and defend his mind; but his gratitious, anti-religious statetements he said every time he wanted to popularize science were not necesary. He could've kept them to himself and still made and share a prodigious explanation of how the Universe works.
More sad became his transformation into a kind of celebrity and how the media inflated every one of his opinions on every issue to make them a kind of Universal truth.

Post: #5

A wise man.

Post: #6

The problem with atheists is their atheism is their religion and they will jump (or twitch) at any chance to proselytize. Smart guy no doubt, but I thought it really odd when he did those jaguar ads a year ago.

Post: #7

End result:

2 marriages, both of which ended in divorce.

How on earth did he father 3 children ?

Post: #8

(03-13-2018 11:37 PM)porscheguy Wrote:  The problem with atheists is their atheism is their religion and they will jump (or twitch) at any chance to proselytize. Smart guy no doubt, but I thought it really odd when he did those jaguar ads a year ago.

Right now he’s rolling up to the pearly gates in his wheel chair, it’s surrounded by clouds, he’s like “ho. Lee. Fuck. I. Was. Wrong”. The clouds part, and there’s a big ass flight of stairs leading to the pearly gates. “Fuck!”

Too soon?

Post: #9

According to the film with Benedict Cummerbund or whatever his fucking name was, his dick was still working fine; different system.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #10

Daily Mail newspaper in the UK published this story just 2 months ago

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...uppet.html

Quote:Has Stephen Hawking been replaced with a lookalike?
Conspiracy theorists claim the REAL professor is DEAD and a 'puppet' has taken his place - and reveal the SIX clues that support the idea

-Professor Stephen Hawking, 76, is one of the world's most well-known scientists
-Conspiracy theorists claim the real Hawking is dead and has been replaced
-Suggest a lookalike is used instead - and point to six 'clues' to support the idea

By Jacqui Deevoy For Mailonline
Published: 14:28 GMT, 12 January 2018


Professor Stephen Hawking is one of the world's most well-known scientists and has had his life story told in books, documentaries, and Oscar-winning dramas. But conspiracy theorists claim we hardly know anything about the award-winning physicist, who celebrated his 76th birthday on Monday. For there are certain corners of the internet where people are convinced that the real Professor Hawking died decades ago and that in the intervening years the political and scientific elite have installed a lookalike to act in his place. Some of those who believe he has been supplanted think Professor Hawking, Director of Research at the Centre for Theoretical Cosmology within the University of Cambridge, died in 1985 - three years before the publication of his best-selling book A Brief History of Time. The idea might seem outlandish, but conspiracy theorists have outlined six signs that they claim clearly support their idea, ranging from the way he looks to the complexity of his theories. Here FEMAIL shares the 'clues' - and looks into the reasons why theorists think he has been replaced...

His appearance

People change as they age – there's no doubt about that – but, as the conspiracy lovers point out, not many people look younger in 2017 than they did in 1982, especially if they're suffering from a disease as disfiguring as ALS. Nor do people's ears decrease in size and as they get older; and, although gums can recede and teeth can wear down and fall out, it's rare for teeth to change in structure completely without major dental work. Hair that gets blonder and less grey with age can be explained, but why would someone vain enough to dye their hair neglect their teeth so badly? In fact, when the sceptics examine photographs of the man they consider to be an imposter, they often comment that his teeth look as if they've been made worse, with the bottom teeth longer than they were previously (and disrespectfully referred to by some members of the conspiracy community as "the twin towers") and the top teeth filed away to stubs.

His condition

It's not just how he looks that's the problem – there's the issue with his condition. The average life expectancy for a person suffering from ALS is said to be four years from diagnosis. Stephen was diagnosed in 1963 with a prognosis of two years. Yet it would appear that he is still alive - miraculously, some would say – some 55 years later.

The wedding photographs

The pictures taken on the day of his marriage to first wife Jane Wilde (whose book Travelling To Infinity: My Life With Stephen was made into the 2014 film The Theory Of Everything) look pretty normal. There's Hawking, long-faced, square-jawed with his floppy dark hair and crooked teeth holding hands with his new baby-faced wife. But it's the photos of his second wedding, when he married Elaine Mason, a woman who'd worked as his nurse, that have come under scrutiny. Photos available of that wedding show Mason wearing a different wedding outfit in each and looking decidedly older with shorter redder hair in the second photo. In the first, she appears with Stephen Hawking and in the second, she is standing alongside someone who certainly looks like Hawking but who, doubters have concluded, is more than likely a lookalike. Independent investigators think old pictures of Hawking are gradually being erased and replaced with Photoshopped or even re-shot versions.

The voice-synthesizing computer

His voice-synthesizing computer is another matter for conjecture. It's said to work by Hawking twitching a cheek muscle to scan and choose words on the screen and these written words are then turned into spoken words via the voice synthesizer. Those who believe that Professor Hawking is a puppet for the elite don't believe that anyone could do all this simply by twitching a cheek muscle and have observed that he's not constantly moving his face when he's 'talking'. What they think is actually happening is that the professor isn't doing anything at all and the voice we hear is the result of NASA astrophysicists typing information into a computer – information that they want the masses to hear and trust - and it being transmitted to the computer attached to Hawking's wheelchair. The robot voice that emanates from that computer has nothing to do with Hawking – it's just information that NASA want to push onto a gullible and unsuspecting public, fans of Hawking, who hang on to - what they believe to be his - every word.

The complexity of his theories

A lot of the theories presented by Hawking are difficult to prove. An example of this can be seen in a TV programme, hosted by Magnus Magnusson, where Hawking appeared alongside science fiction writers Arthur C. Clarke and Carl Sagan. The voice from the machine spoke. It said: 'There are two kinds of time. There is what's called real time. This is the kind of time that's measured by a clock, the time that we feel passing, the time in which we grow older… Then there is imaginary time… a well-defined mathematical concept… Imaginary time has no beginning or end. Imaginary time is closed in on itself, like the surface of the earth. The surface of the earth doesn't have any beginning or end…'

So why the need for a 'puppet professor'?

If what the conspiracy theorists say is true and if the real Hawking has been switched, the question would obviously be: why?

The most common theory is that it was – and still is - important for those in control to push science and 'lose' God. The powers that be want people to feel that they are tiny unimportant dots in an infinite universe, on one of a trillion planets, in a sea of countless suns, the reason being that people who feel insignificant and small also feel powerless and unimportant, thus making them easier to control. They also want to get the public used to accepting theories as fact. The substitute Hawking, they claim, is used as a puppet to instill fear in the general population, promoting the idea that the human race has only 100 years left, that aliens exist and that contact with them – which may be imminent - could be catastrophic. All this scaremongering puts the public in a fearful state, again making them easier to manipulate. Sceptics have observed that the 'puppet professor' is also a great proponent of Artificial Intelligence and science, claiming that 'philosophy is dead', that there is no God and that science has the answers to everything – all of which goes against his earlier philosophical stance and theories. The Hawking of the last ten years has also pushed global warming, is anti-Trump, anti-Scottish Independence and anti-Brexit. He is suddenly very political, seemingly allowing his name to be tacked onto anything and everything in an attempt to make certain ideas or political agendas more credible; and, because the general public believe Professor Hawking is one of the most intelligent scientists of all time, this works. In recent years, he's waxed lyrical about climate change, is a supporter of The Paris Agreement and, in an article in The Guardian last year, was quoted as being in support of carbon tax. He also recorded a tribute for the Democratic candidate Al Gore and was part of an academic boycott of a conference in Israel. There are many more examples of how Hawking's name has been attached to various political agenda, which truth-seekers find highly suspicious.

Some of those who believe Stephen Hawking has been supplanted think he died back in 1985 when he contracted pneumonia and was on life support. His life was purportedly saved by a tracheotomy. Prior to this, he'd been unable to communicate, but when he returned – looking noticeably different – he was miraculously able to 'talk' using an unbelievably advanced computer system. Not only was he able to communicate better than ever, he was also able to convey ideas that contradicted previous ideas and supported new, money-making agendas, allowing his name to be used to sell whatever scam, idea or product governments or big companies want to sell. The motive is there. The pictures speak louder than words. So could it be that the conspiracy theorists are right this time?

Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...uppet.html

Post: #11

I just learned now at his death that he has children. How did he achieve that being bound to wheelchair? Money? Fame? Or super game?

Gives me creeps imagining a weird woman jerking him off and putting his semen in herself.

About him as a scientist - as I understand he was smart but by no means truly exceptional among today's astrophysics. His disability and unique look made him a celebrity and made him to fit in a stereotypical cartoonish role of "all brains no body" genius type that is indoctrinated in children from cartoons and James Bond movie villains and was successful with laymen of science and that made him a popular proselytizer of some (perhaps selectively atheism biased) scientific concepts to masses.

Post: #12

(03-14-2018 01:42 AM)Mage Wrote:  I just learned now at his death that he has children. How did he achieve that being bound to wheelchair? Money? Fame? Or super game?

Gives me creeps imagining a weird woman jerking him off and putting his semen in herself.

About him as a scientist - as I understand he was smart but by no means truly exceptional among today's astrophysics. His disability and unique look made him a celebrity and made him to fit in a stereotypical cartoonish role of "all brains no body" genius type that is indoctrinated in children from cartoons and James Bond movie villains and was successful with laymen of science and that made him a popular proselytizer of some (perhaps selectively atheism biased) scientific concepts to masses.

Doctors retrieve sperm from newly-dead and comatose men, so taking it from a disabled man should be no problem.

This actually brings up a subject that used to be discussed in the manosphere circa 2005, before Heartiste and the like: What rights do dead and comatose men have to their own sperm? Very little, it seems.

https://qz.com/678484/widows-and-parents...-deceased/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/...-coma.html

https://nypost.com/2017/07/29/these-wome...nds-sperm/

Post: #13

Post: #14

Sad thing about our society is that his death will only be talked about for a day or two. Yet when a Paul Walker or some Kardashian-type dies, the whole world obsesses over it for weeks.

Post: #15

He actually died a week ago but his body relaxed against the control stick of his chair and he'd been doing laps of the neighbourhood for days before someone realised what was going on.

As for jerking off a genius cripple, well it's a no-brainer. You pump out a few kids, teach them basic maths and literacy and then place them in front of a computer each with a hundred bucks in bitcoin and tell them that only the top performing daytrader will get to eat at sundown.

Once you're a billionaire you can afford to pay for ethics lessons.

Post: #16

"The most common theory is that it was – and still is - important for those in control to push science and 'lose' God. The powers that be want people to feel that they are tiny unimportant dots in an infinite universe, on one of a trillion planets, in a sea of countless suns, the reason being that people who feel insignificant and small also feel powerless and unimportant, thus making them easier to control. They also want to get the public used to accepting theories as fact. The substitute Hawking, they claim, is used as a puppet to instill fear in the general population, promoting the idea that the human race has only 100 years left, that aliens exist and that contact with them – which may be imminent - could be catastrophic. All this scaremongering puts the public in a fearful state, again making them easier to manipulate. Sceptics have observed that the 'puppet professor' is also a great proponent of Artificial Intelligence and science, claiming that 'philosophy is dead', that there is no God and that science has the answers to everything – all of which goes against his earlier philosophical stance and theories. The Hawking of the last ten years has also pushed global warming, is anti-Trump, anti-Scottish Independence and anti-Brexit. He is suddenly very political, seemingly allowing his name to be tacked onto anything and everything in an attempt to make certain ideas or political agendas more credible; and, because the general public believe Professor Hawking is one of the most intelligent scientists of all time, this works. In recent years, he's waxed lyrical about climate change, is a supporter of The Paris Agreement and, in an article in The Guardian last year, was quoted as being in support of carbon tax. He also recorded a tribute for the Democratic candidate Al Gore and was part of an academic boycott of a conference in Israel. There are many more examples of how Hawking's name has been attached to various political agenda, which truth-seekers find highly suspicious. "

I doubt Hawking was really replaced. Perhaps he did a deal with the Devil for another 30 years of life.

BTW I read brief history of time shortly after it came out and was not impressed. I remember thinking that there was nothing new in Hawkings book that I had not read previously about black holes and relativity. Nothing new here - no new science.

I came to the conclusion Hawking only became famous simply for being a disabled scientist.

ALS must have badly affected his judgment if Hawking not only believed in but enthusiastically pushed the global warming agenda. Or again that bought a life extension for him.

Still, in the UK a pop band keyboardist with a pHd in astronomy has already been groomed as Hawkings useful (intelligent) idiot replacement.

Post: #17

(03-14-2018 03:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  As for jerking off a genius cripple, well it's a no-brainer. You pump out a few kids, teach them basic maths and literacy and then place them in front of a computer each with a hundred bucks in bitcoin and tell them that only the top performing daytrader will get to eat at sundown.

If there are multiple "maths" then shouldn't you write "literacies" as well?

Post: #18

(03-14-2018 03:22 AM)Guitarman Wrote:  Still, in the UK a pop band keyboardist with a pHd in astronomy has already been groomed as Hawkings useful (intelligent) idiot replacement.

Hey, D:Ream was the bomb, yo.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #19

(03-14-2018 03:28 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(03-14-2018 03:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  As for jerking off a genius cripple, well it's a no-brainer. You pump out a few kids, teach them basic maths and literacy and then place them in front of a computer each with a hundred bucks in bitcoin and tell them that only the top performing daytrader will get to eat at sundown.

If there are multiple "maths" then shouldn't you write "literacies" as well?

Post: #20

..

Post: #21

(03-14-2018 01:42 AM)Mage Wrote:  I just learned now at his death that he has children. How did he achieve that being bound to wheelchair? Money? Fame? Or super game?

He had the 3 children with his first wife in the early stages of his disease and they met before he became massively famous.

Later on in the wheelchair he'd be a regular at the strip clubs getting lapdances and not giving a shit about what other people thought of it.

Legend.

Post: #22

I think he should be admired as what sheer perseverence can do in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds. Given 2 years to live at age 21, and living to nearly 80 is one thing (my Dad's Dad had an illness in the same family and died within 10)...but having only the use of his cheek for 40+ years and writing books by selecting single letters as they scroll by is remarkable. Can you imagine how long that must take? For a forum that admires Jordan Peterson's ethics about hard work, it's amazing, really.

Moreover, he was a practising scientist, and tenured professor at Cambridge right until then end, comparing him to someone like Brian Cox, who has contributed nothing really, in the scheme of science is stretching. The fact that the media portrayed him up as some kind of cyborg takes away from his work if anything, since it implies he was somehow ‘helped’. When in reality, its incredibly impressive that he managed to be at the forefront of black hole theoretical physics despite such a disastrous disability. I don’t care if he disapproves of Brexit or Trump, many intelligent people do. This “anyone who disagrees with me politically is an idiot” is what leftists do when it comes to discussions on immigration, let’s not do that.

Anyway, more relevant to the forum is the fact he was such a G in his field he had affairs more than once and used to game his nurses despite looking like he did. Check this out:

Quote:Hawking became a regular at Stringfellows strip club in London, and the proprietor recalls a hilarious run-in with the professor one night.

“I went and introduced myself and said, ‘Mr. Hawking, it’s an honor to meet you. If you could spare a minute or two, I’d love to chat with you about the universe,’” Stringfellow recalled.

“Then I paused for a bit and joked, ‘Or would you rather look at the girls?’

“There was silence for a moment, and then he answered, ‘The Girls.’”

Hawking has also reportedly been spotted numerous times getting lap dances at the California strip club Devore, and was even said to have frequented Freedom Acres, a swinger’s club in California.

“I have seen Stephen Hawking at the club more than a handful of times,” a member said, according to the Huffington Post. “He arrives with an entourage of nurses and assistants. Last time I saw him, he was in the back ‘play area’ lying on a bed fully clothed with two naked women gyrating all over him.”

Tim Holt, University of Cambridge press officer, later confirmed that Hawking had frequented the swinger’s club, but claimed that he wasn’t a regular. “This report is greatly exaggerated. He visited once a few years ago with friends while on a visit to California,” Holt told the Cambridge News.

They don't call him the "Master of the Universe" for nothing.

RIP Big Steve

Post: #23

(03-14-2018 03:28 AM)Suits Wrote:  If there are multiple "maths" then shouldn't you write "literacies" as well?

You can call it whatever you want because maths is a social construct.

Post: #24

(03-14-2018 03:28 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(03-14-2018 03:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  As for jerking off a genius cripple, well it's a no-brainer. You pump out a few kids, teach them basic maths and literacy and then place them in front of a computer each with a hundred bucks in bitcoin and tell them that only the top performing daytrader will get to eat at sundown.

If there are multiple "maths" then shouldn't you write "literacies" as well?

Ever heard of “mathmatics”?

Post: #25

They just hating Steve's game.