Post: #26

(12-27-2017 05:05 PM)911 Wrote:  Debeguiled, I disagree about women being susceptible to porn in the same manner men are. If that were the case, you wouldn't have women being outnumbered 50 to 1 on cheating sites like Ashley Madison, and men and women would be sleeping together at the same rates as gay males, in parks and bars all over the place. The most sexual women I've dated would go to sites like nerve.com or read erotica, but they didn't have male-like porn habits.

There is a bit less of an imbalance today with a segment of younger women in western/blue state metropoles, but these women have been completely conditioned.

I didn't mean to imply they have the same habits as men when it comes to porn. I just meant they think about sex a lot. Even if they did have the same urges when it comes to porn, they still have societal pressures to say they don't like it.

I was using the documentary I posted as example of women getting all hot about sex and sex work, but they can't come out and be honest, they have to do it in the context of a film that criticizes it.

Just fruity girl thinking.

Post: #27

Note also that porn, scandalously, has one main target: children. Considering that almost all children of the world are now exposed to relentless porn (through internet).
Porn therefore is used by the "pizzagate Uncle-Biden-Podesta" Establishment, to sexualize and corrupt kids, and ultimately bring them (willingly, in a way) to their spirit-cooking (or similar evil stuff) parties.

Don't doubt for one instant that pedos and gays use porn to corrupt the minds of the next generation and get new young asses to sodomize.

Post: #28

(12-27-2017 05:12 PM)911 Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 01:25 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  Because pornography is cultural subversion perpetrated by their financial backers, the Jews.

The sexual liberation movement is tied up with women's rights, abortion, porn, etc. All forms of political mind control to drive people away from healthy relationships, family, and Christendom.

Agree completely.

E. Michael Jones, who is referred to in Tomtud's video above, has done the most definitive and penetrating analysis on the subject of pornography as powerful tool for psychological warfare and political control in his book "Libido Dominandi", perhaps the finest work ever on the subject of sexual revolution.





http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/1...do_ad.html

Exactly; E. Michael Jones is the foremost mind speaking this today and is the rightful leader to the anti-Judaism movement, if there is such a thing.

You start by listening to Jordan Peterson and his defense of Logos, vis a vie the attacks on it by the Cultural Marxists (Jacque Derrida, Michel Foucault) or Jon Rappaport and his talks of the Individual vs. the False Collective, but neither one is willing to name the elephant in the room.

That's when you step up to the plate and listen to what Jones has to say. That is, that the battle of Logos (Christ) vs. Anti-Logos (Judaism) has been the most important struggle in the West over the past 2,000 years, ever since Jesus confronted the Pharisees.

Post: #29

I didn't know that feminists weren't going after porn. They have managed to get a lot of porn outlawed in Canada, as well as other countries. Many of these feminist freaks call pornography "violence against women" and other nonsense. We are already seeing the impact in laws against revenge porn, which should be a CIVIL matter, not a criminal one. We don't even need laws against revenge porn anyway. A woman can already sue the man because he has posted her photograph without her permission. That is how revenge porn should be handled.

Post: #30

Say what you like, but Australian porn is worse.

Post: #31

How about a NSFW tag?

Post: #32

(12-28-2017 09:25 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  How about a NSFW tag?

It's a thread with porn in the title, it goes without saying.

Post: #33

(12-28-2017 10:11 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 09:25 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  How about a NSFW tag?

It's a thread with porn in the title, it goes without saying.

Wait till I get home and start posting photos of naked feminists in here.

Post: #34

(12-29-2017 12:55 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 10:11 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 09:25 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  How about a NSFW tag?

It's a thread with porn in the title, it goes without saying.

Wait till I get home and start posting photos of naked feminists in here.

You wouldn't dare.

Post: #35

(12-27-2017 02:07 PM)Wutang Wrote:  The second wave feminists from the 80s and 90s were vehemently against porn and sex work, seeing it as exploitative and dehumanizing towards women.

Yes. Some feminists have targeted porn, just not this generation of feminists.

The most prominent anti-porn feminist was Andrea Dworkin. (Not posting her photo; ugly beyond imagination. Among her claims: the idea that all penetrative sex is rape. Her 'husband' celebrated the limp penis.) Dworkin and her colleagues had some legal successes in restricting pornography.

In the 1980s, there was a debate within feminism called the 'sex wars', pitting pro-sex feminists (embracing porn, sex work, bdsm, even pedophilia) against the anti-sex crusaders.

Post: #36

Some classical feminists have also been pro-porn, such as Pagalia. Most classical feminists, however, claim porn objectifies women in the worst way. They are against modeling and anything else that celebrates the female form.

Feminism is still evil though, since it replaces worship of sexuality with worship of money. Everything about first and second wave feminism is about how women can make more money to compete with men.

Post: #37

(12-30-2017 12:25 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Some classical feminists have also been pro-porn, such as Pagalia. Most classical feminists, however, claim porn objectifies women in the worst way. They are against modeling and anything else that celebrates the female form.

Feminism is still evil though, since it replaces worship of sexuality with worship of money. Everything about first and second wave feminism is about how women can make more money to compete with men.

Most feminists--especially Gloria Steinem--have called Camille Paglia "anti-feminist."

Post: #38

(12-28-2017 01:17 AM)puckerman Wrote:  They have managed to get a lot of porn outlawed in Canada, as well as other countries.

But in Canada the supreme court said it's ok to have (most types of) sex with an animal.

Post: #39

Wendy McElroy is a libertarian (and usually a fairly thought-provoking thinker and writer), and also seems to identify as "feminist".

I've never much looked into what she meant by that, because I enjoy her writing on politics and economics and culture.

Here is her essay on why she supports porn: http://www.wendymcelroy.com/freeinqu.htm

(can't give a summary cos I haven't read it past the first paragraph, but maybe those interested in this thread will find something worth discussion)

Post: #40

(12-30-2017 09:40 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 01:17 AM)puckerman Wrote:  They have managed to get a lot of porn outlawed in Canada, as well as other countries.

But in Canada the supreme court said it's ok to have (most types of) sex with an animal.

I think bestiality is now an acceptable lifestyle choice for women courtesy of SJWs, even if you kindap a monster and stick him in your bathtub to use as a sex-slave.





I fuck monsters because reasons.

Post: #41

(12-27-2017 03:05 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The Jewish Connection™ exists but it doesn't go on to explain why the harpy-on-the-street doesn't go apeshit about porn the way she does about things as trivial as manspreading.

I stated some time ago that these bitches inherently sense when a thing is too large for them to take a swipe at.

Porn falls into that field, as does islam. The guy on the 99b that refuses to close his legs like he's wearing a skirt? Not so much.

Take on islam or porn and you're going to get steamrolled. They're not easy targets, and women are nothing if not reliably gutless.

Of course feminists are against porn or many are, but attacking porn goes counter the wishes of their masters, so all campaigns get zero backing from above and thus go nowhere.





The thing is that porn does the following for the elite:

+ it sucks the male energies dry - more porn equals less protesting and dealing with the real issues at hand
+ it lowers male testosterone - always a good thing for the elite
+ it decreases the actual desire and frequency of having sex even when they have a partner which decreases population growth
+ it gives men an outlet for their drives and lets them be together with shrieking fat feminist bitches longer than they otherwise would be - in fact the contrary to feminist thinking is true - it does not raise their standards, it actually lowers them since they can get their beauty kicks from porn while having mediocre sex with their fatties
+ it changes the very balance of the brain and works later as a kind of placating SOMA/drug for all positive male endeavors - that is why those who practice nofap report an increase in all positive activities, increase in real sex and a far more active lifestyle

Thus porn is a very valuable tool. Back when the internet started in the 1990s those that observed things also saw all the newscasters on TV talk of how much porn there is on the internet. They talked in a disgusted concerned manner, but all of this was planted so that as many men as possible would get online. It was deliberate.

So remember gents - the feminists will only be able to go through the agenda points that are in tune with their masters and creators. If the globalists wanted feminism gone, then it would not last 1 year before most women would be disavowing it and were going back to the 1950s (for example in the case of an Alien invasion and the need for billions of strong masculine women and cannon fodder - feminism could not be afforded then).

Post: #42

The internet made porn a fact of life... has nothing to do with feminists

Lots of feminist prudes would love to outlaw pron but it's too easily distributed

Passionate non-contractual sex is much harder to find on the internet so they've gone after that instead

Post: #43

All of the dudes in this thread cheering sexbots because sexbots will finally upend the power women have...


Read this thread. You're falling right into the damn trap they've set for you and cheering it the whole way.

Post: #44

The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

Btw, with respect to porn, sexbots, etc., sooner or later men will tire of it because nothig beats the real thing.

Post: #45

(01-06-2018 12:44 AM)PharaohRa Wrote:  The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.

Post: #46

(01-06-2018 07:20 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(01-06-2018 12:44 AM)PharaohRa Wrote:  The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.

To add to this: Porn also has a HUGE gay following and presence. Feminists attacking porn would mean insulting their gay "besties." A lot of gay men lead porn-driven lives.

This isn't just because of online porn. I discovered this in college. Before the Internet, gay guys used the bathrooms in the Fine Arts Building as jerk-off stations and used to leave their disgusting gay hardcore mags with titles like Honcho on top of the sinks.

My friends and I made it a point to trek over to the University Center when nature was calling.

Post: #47

(01-06-2018 07:20 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(01-06-2018 12:44 AM)PharaohRa Wrote:  The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.

Feminists have painted themselves into a corner with the theory of "intersectionality". This is why they manufacture rape claims against "frat boys".

Post: #48

(01-06-2018 07:34 PM)Brother Abdul Majeed Wrote:  

(01-06-2018 07:20 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(01-06-2018 12:44 AM)PharaohRa Wrote:  The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.

Feminists have painted themselves into a corner with the theory of "intersectionality". This is why they manufacture rape claims against "frat boys".

Yes - attacking rap would be seen as attacking an "oppressed" minority.

Though I think that rap is also supported by the elite and there are quite a few strong connections to the entire gangsta-culture created with some shady government agencies being involved similar to the Flower Power drug hippie culture in the 1960s.

There are even some black rappers who have expressed those concerns in the past:





Thus attacking rap would not be condoned from above.

----

The same is happening with the rape culture bullshit. Feminists have trouble accusing the lowly ghetto black despite the fact that many rapes are done exactly by that group.
Thus the white frat boy is the face of true evil.

But there is a caveat to that - as soon as the black guy reaches fame, wealth or success, then he is equated with a white man and can equally easy be vilified or slandered - or falsely accused of rape. His wealth negate his former oppressed status and elevate him to a stage so that woman can now freely spout their bullshit about him.

Post: #49

MSM & Feminists will never attack porn for only one good reason:
"Women masochistic biological needs for any form of "violence" applied to them to be satisfied" if they're not you'll find them self destruct [NSFW] in the name of any kind of bullshit possible

Porn is the only medium that offer staged violence against women without the cons of "real" violence and Porn sites stats are good proofs about that: (click on pic for more insights)

If you find yourself asking a significant panel of women why they love Rough Porn so much none of them will be able to answer you but the facts are here:
Their guts will tie in knots, their pussies will open like flowers in need of water watching any hardcore porn scenes, Feminists Belle Knox or Annabel Chong and many others are proof that porn is at least equally useful for women as it is for men if not more.

Each time it's better to have the words of women to corroborate those allegations but I don't have any right now.

Post: #50

Second thought...

The other reason that most feminists don't go after porn is that they're reactive idiots who simply emote in reponse to whatever they're told to be angry about.

They aren't told to be angry about porn by the hive mind, so they don't go after porn.