Post: #151

Every day would be like Christmas. I'd smile too.

Post: #152

(11-29-2017 03:21 AM)BelyyTigr Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 05:14 PM)Cuchulainn2016 Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 02:04 PM)BelyyTigr Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:59 PM)Baphomet Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:38 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Please dont tell me that people here are dumb enough to believe that any royal "love story" is anything more than tabloid bullshit and PR. These marriages are by and large arranged for basically genetic engineering.

I don't know why anyone would care about "Royals" at all. "Royals" are "Royal" because of the vagina they pop out of, not because of anything they've accomplished.

Well said. He's a benefit scrounger on a MONUMENTAL scale.
This garbage was the FULL 30 mins in the evening news.
I'm truly sickened and embarrassed to be a British citizen tonight.
Most of all, I'm embarrassed most of all by the amount of gimps kissing the arses of this feudalist parasite and his muppet of a girlfriend.

PS I notice she's trying the "discrimination" card already, because she's half black.

Well, he flew CAS for me in that sandy middle eastern place where westerners go to die, and played a significant role in me being able to extricate myself and my subordinates from a deadly scrape. And despite rumours to the contrary he was at significant risk himself.

So, I wouldn't describe him as a benefit scrounger, as unlike the prolie scum who are benefit scroungers, he didn't choose it for himself.

Well firstly, do you KNOW for a fact that Harry Hewitt was taking risks? After all, his family have a huge history of pr stunts and propaganda. Secondly, even if he did take a risk, its only what vast numbers of soldiers do. Soldiers who are often turfed out and find themselves without a job, or home or anything Except these soldiers aren't given billions of pounds each from non-consenting taxpayers.

Hewitt was never forced to take the taxpayers billions. He's free to renounce his so called "title". Free to refuse the billions or hand them back to people who actually go out and EARN what they get. But he won't because he's onto a nice easy ticket.

As for benefit scrounging, the only real benefit scroungers I've ever seen have been 3rd world immigrants. Sometimes a crook who uses benefit claiming as a "front". Sometimes mentally ill people are classed as "avoiding work". VERY occasionally there's the British slapper with 6 kids - but big deal. If it wasn't for them, Britain would probably be majority Muslim already. Benefits payments are tiny, whereas Hewitt is conning the public out of BILLIONS of their money.
Attacking working class white Brits and the benefits system is like saying capitalism should be banned because some businessmen dodge taxes. The fact is, its a bullshit claim invented by Harry Hewitt's kind. Just like Hitler used to say, "when you tell lies tell big ones, because no one will believe you had the audacicity to make them up".

If Brits want a "monarchy", then fine, we can vote for one. But we won't have a referendum, because everyone knows they'll be booted out on the ears. A German Greek family masquerading as a "British tradition". You couldn't make it up! Greece and Germany booted their own leeches out long ago. And that sums it up.

Im not going to debate the merits of a royal family or a constitutional monarchy against an elected premier. Simple short version is, I prefer a constitutional monarchy for many reasons.

However, I find the argument that the children of a monarch are somehow lesser, or evil, than poor people, because they happened to be born into a royal family as as idiotic an argument as saying white people are bad, because a tiny percentage of their ancestors may have had something to do with slavery.

As for renouncing the billions paid from taxpayers to the crown, why the fuck would he? Irrespective of my own wealth, when my parents die, I'm not going to refuse their money/assets because they earned their money from taxpayers in their early working days. I'm also pretty sure it isn't billions from taxes.

As for him being in danger, I know for a fact he actively sought out combat, despite the Crown, the government, and the higher echelons of the army doing their best to stop him. He isn't alone in his family for doing that, and I haven't heard of any politicians offspring doing the same recently.

And with regards to soldiers being left broken, unemployed, homeless and overlooked by society, he seems to doing his best for his comrades in arms since his army career.

I may be somewhat biased, as I took the same career pathway as him, at the same time and know him from that, and truth be told, he is a genuinely likeable and down to earth guy. Perhaps not a soldiers soldier, but definitely a combat soldiers officer. And, surprisingly he was one of the least stuck up, silver spooned twats I encountered in the officer corps during my adventures whilst taking his grandmothers shilling.

I think she is attractive and WB, but she is significantly below his SMV, but if it makes him happy its no big deal, some weird matchups do seem to work long term. I will judge them a few years down the line.

Post: #153

^^ I'm not out to badmouth the British military at all. However, didn't the higher ups make sure Harry was always surrounded by Ghurkas whenever he was anywhere dangerous, as opposed to actual British guys?

Wasn't it also concluded that the interview where he runs away because danger was afoot was completely staged?

Aloha!

Post: #154

(11-29-2017 03:10 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 06:57 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 03:29 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  Id attribute it more to a lack of a strong male father figure in his life. I mean how much manliness could a kid learn from this guy?

Plenty of the officers in the British army in WW2 would have looked and dressed like that when not at war.

So thirty years later they gave Charles their clothes?

Aloha!

... yes, and their fishing rods too; but unfortunately, not their guts.

Post: #155

(11-29-2017 05:12 PM)Kona Wrote:  ^^ I'm not out to badmouth the British military at all. However, didn't the higher ups make sure Harry was always surrounded by Ghurkas whenever he was anywhere dangerous, as opposed to actual British guys?

Wasn't it also concluded that the interview where he runs away because danger was afoot was completely staged?

Aloha!

He is a VIP whether people like it or not. He was also an Apache pilot and was in the danger zone I'm sure.

Imagine if the Taliban caught Harry. He'd be a prize to make a spectacle out of.

Post: #156

(11-29-2017 06:57 AM)Teedub Wrote:  ...

Plenty of the officers in the British army in WW2 would have looked and dressed like that when not at war.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't those the fags picked 100% on an academic and "breeding" basis?

I'm no expert but I thought British officers of that era were renowned for being pantywaist Milquetoasts hand picked because their CO's didn't want to suffer the indignity of sitting down to elevensies only for their subordinate to butter his crumpet with the wrong spoon.

This is probably one of the main reasons that the US military enjoyed such stellar success by comparison for a time, given it's officers were until recently chosen for demonstrated capacity to do war while most other armies were still handing out command positions to Uncle Reginald's son in law "because he's the right sort".

Post: #157

(11-29-2017 06:35 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Imagine if the Taliban caught Harry. He'd be a prize to make a spectacle out of.

I've heard this argument before. Actually, imagine the shit storm the US military would have rained down onto the Taliban had he been captured.

No one loves symbolism more than me. Unfortunately, in this day and age, the facts are easily debatable.

The only real danger Harry faced was the Apache crashing. Luckily the thing is way over engineered to never crash.

It's great for morale and support (and funding) for the war back home to have a xool figurehead type involved. Let's be honest though and admit that's what he was.

Once more, I mean this with all due respect to the British military. The bulk of the dealings I ever had with them were quite enjoyable.

Aloha!

Post: #158

The yellow fever is strong in this thread. Markle is very bangable and is better looking at 36 than most 25 year olds. Still it's a mistake with her age and career. I doubt he had barely any choice in who he got to marry. Especially as the bastard prince.

Hopefully his kids turn out alright but it's not uncommon for a royal family controlling the crown for a whole to have some undesirable kids from too much familial mixing and having kids too old.

Post: #159

How many people in the world inherently have more access to pussy than Prince Harry?

Ronaldo (t1 soccer stars)
Dicaprio (t1 Hollywood guys)
Prince Harry

Especially in England. All he has to do is hang out on any college campus and see which girls want to play princess on an exclusive tour of Buckingham Palace.

This man has serious psychological issues, that's the only explanation.

Post: #160

(11-29-2017 06:39 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I'm no expert but I thought British officers of that era were renowned for being pantywaist Milquetoasts hand picked because their CO's didn't want to suffer the indignity of sitting down to elevensies only for their subordinate to butter his crumpet with the wrong spoon.

FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

COMMONWEALTH CIVIL WAR

IT'S ON! IT'S GOING DOWN

Post: #161

(11-29-2017 08:03 PM)realologist Wrote:  Markle is very bangable and is better looking at 36 than most 25 year olds.

.

Post: #162

...




Him (thinking): WTF ?! This bitch is crushing my hand !
Her (thinking): What a sucker...that was a lot easier than I thought.






Him (thinking): Fuck...what am I doing ? Maybe I can still get out of this somehow...
Her (thinking): What if he changes his mind before the wedding ? I need to lock this down with something more valuable than this crummy ring.






Her: "Oh Harry sweetie...I have a surprise for you !"
Him: "Oh really....whats that ?"





Her: "This ring. It's not enough...I need something more special from you."
Him: "Uh....like what ?!"






Her: "Your balls....put them right here !"

Post: #163

(11-29-2017 08:10 PM)Enoch Wrote:  How many people in the world inherently have more access to pussy than Prince Harry?

Ronaldo (t1 soccer stars)
Dicaprio (t1 Hollywood guys)
Prince Harry

Especially in England. All he has to do is hang out on any college campus and see which girls want to play princess on an exclusive tour of Buckingham Palace.

This man has serious psychological issues, that's the only explanation.

I think Harry acts like a SJW 17 year old, rebelling against his strict old-school family; along the lines of, "Oh, in this family, you're all bigoted snobs, White, Conservatives, keeping to yourselves, plus you hated my mother because she was about to re-marry an "Arab" prince". I'll get my revenge by marrying a divorcee SJW "Afro" woman who whores at Hollywood".

It's pretty obvious that Harry is getting revenge from the alleged bad treatment (and possible assassination?) of his mother, by opening the door to royalty to someone even "worse" (from a Conservative point of view) than Dodi al Fayed.

His reasoning might very well be, "You killed Diana because you wanted no Al Fayed blood in your lineage? Wait until I add afro-american blood into your precious lineage then!"

By the way, here is an excellent line taken from another forum member (CC), about the old divorcee: "She cashed in her hoe-miles and hit the jackpot!"

Post: #164

(11-29-2017 08:17 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 08:03 PM)realologist Wrote:  Markle is very bangable and is better looking at 36 than most 25 year olds.

.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #165

Is any of her family black? She kinda looks like Brazilian to me.

Post: #166

(11-29-2017 06:39 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 06:57 AM)Teedub Wrote:  ...

Plenty of the officers in the British army in WW2 would have looked and dressed like that when not at war.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't those the fags picked 100% on an academic and "breeding" basis?

I'm no expert but I thought British officers of that era were renowned for being pantywaist Milquetoasts hand picked because their CO's didn't want to suffer the indignity of sitting down to elevensies only for their subordinate to butter his crumpet with the wrong spoon.

This is probably one of the main reasons that the US military enjoyed such stellar success by comparison for a time, given it's officers were until recently chosen for demonstrated capacity to do war while most other armies were still handing out command positions to Uncle Reginald's son in law "because he's the right sort".

Reginald's son in law or not, they were still there storming the beaches with that famous stiff upper lip. British men of all classes (the working class used to be aspirational, and not enthralled to imported street culture) used to wear a full suit on a day out to the sea side, don't make 'em like that anymore. But yes, in response to Kona, perhaps Charles could have updated his attire just a tad.

Post: #167

(11-30-2017 02:39 AM)Rossi Wrote:  Is any of her family black? She kinda looks like Brazilian to me.

Well at least from that question we can tell you don't read celebrity gossip. But alas, yes - her mum is African American (though what percentage of African genes I don't know, as Meghan is very light skinned and has no black features). Her dad is white.

Post: #168

(11-28-2017 09:07 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 02:43 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  His relationship with Markle


After meeting in 2004, Markle and Engelson were engaged in 2010, but didn't marry until September in 2011 in Jamaica. The wedding celebrations reportedly lasted four days, but the ceremony itself only lasted 12 minutes. Unfortunately (but fortunately for Harry) the pair divorced in 2013 after two years together because of "irreconcilable differences."

Look at this game nugget right here.

It is worth repeating this over and over. Guys, in a LTR, after the first two years, if you do not marry the woman, they grow increasingly more and more bitter with each passing year. You will drag them to the altar, but the damage is already done.

I know this first hand because I made that mistake as well and like the research says, most marriages do not go past the first two years. This dude dated a woman for 6 fucking years, engaged one, and married two. Once married he still did not or (was not able to) fully validate her existence with children. She was too cold to care. She had long spoiled out.

I don't care if she and you started dating in high school and want college degrees first. If you do not marry her early, she is not validated, and her emotional fitness (for being a wife) will scatter like chaff in the wind. Then you likely have only a few years to get her children to stabilize her emotionally and mentally. If she is older than you, you are already gambling on house money.

Again to recap, once you get to the two year mark on an LTR, let em go unless you want to marry them.

Anecdotally, I've seen this on a smaller scale. Never been engaged. But I have seen when I first meet a woman who's seriously interested in me, there's a window to ask her out. She's interested, engaged, etc. If I hesitate and take too long to ask her out, the window closes, and she's bitter and cold towards me.

If it can happen on a smaller scale (asking a chick out) I could absolutely see it happening on a larger scale (after years of dating) as it seems to be the same phenomenon.

Post: #169

A prime example of one of our namby pamby officer types for you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Fras...Lord_Lovat

Post: #170

(11-30-2017 06:53 AM)Sumanguru Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 09:07 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 02:43 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  His relationship with Markle


After meeting in 2004, Markle and Engelson were engaged in 2010, but didn't marry until September in 2011 in Jamaica. The wedding celebrations reportedly lasted four days, but the ceremony itself only lasted 12 minutes. Unfortunately (but fortunately for Harry) the pair divorced in 2013 after two years together because of "irreconcilable differences."

Look at this game nugget right here.

It is worth repeating this over and over. Guys, in a LTR, after the first two years, if you do not marry the woman, they grow increasingly more and more bitter with each passing year. You will drag them to the altar, but the damage is already done.

I know this first hand because I made that mistake as well and like the research says, most marriages do not go past the first two years. This dude dated a woman for 6 fucking years, engaged one, and married two. Once married he still did not or (was not able to) fully validate her existence with children. She was too cold to care. She had long spoiled out.

I don't care if she and you started dating in high school and want college degrees first. If you do not marry her early, she is not validated, and her emotional fitness (for being a wife) will scatter like chaff in the wind. Then you likely have only a few years to get her children to stabilize her emotionally and mentally. If she is older than you, you are already gambling on house money.

Again to recap, once you get to the two year mark on an LTR, let em go unless you want to marry them.

Anecdotally, I've seen this on a smaller scale. Never been engaged. But I have seen when I first meet a woman who's seriously interested in me, there's a window to ask her out. She's interested, engaged, etc. If I hesitate and take too long to ask her out, the window closes, and she's bitter and cold towards me.

If it can happen on a smaller scale (asking a chick out) I could absolutely see it happening on a larger scale (after years of dating) as it seems to be the same phenomenon.

Spot on. That is very correct. That is why being able to pick up on visual (body language), verbal, and social cues when talking to women is very important when learning game.

Women, especially Western ones, love dropping hints. In the glory of all of their arrogance, if you fail to pick up the hint, they become angered by your inability to read their mind. How many hints they allow depends on the woman. Some give one, some give three, and some are like some Mainland Chinese women and can give almost 100 hints before giving up on you. Black American women sometimes give one in a 3 second window and still might take it away if you bite, just because they wanted to see if you would bite at all. What they want is for you to chase from there. Women with high SMV and lots of education, tend to have smaller and tighter windows unless they are just full on slutty.

To these women if you cannot get the hint, you are not "The One", because The One can read them like an open book. That is one reason why guys with less SMV than others are able to pull way above their weight. By using the clues she offers and making good reads on the eye contact that can exploit that and at least get a date or bang off that, and she might look past his lack of features (looks, height, etc.).

Without honing this skill, you would have to rely only on blind approaching and making something out of nothing. A pure numbers game, whereas if you could read them well and take what they give you, you can be more targeted or surgical in approaching the more receptive ones, saving you lots of time and energy.

Post: #171

(11-28-2017 04:22 PM)Matt3B Wrote:  Anyone deciphered his weird hand symbolism that he keeps making an effort to get into all of his public photos? "Body language experts" are saying he's subconsciously covering his vital organs because he's nervous.

Surely it's some sort of cult symobolism.

(11-28-2017 12:52 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Harry has become very popular with the mainstream media. I wonder what kind of plans the elite have with him.

Zel? 911?

In the last century or two, a high-ranking, close relative to the crown ruler (usually a brother or first cousin) is often groomed to become the head freemason. In France, Louis XVI's cousin, the duke of Orleans, was the grandmaster of the Grand Orient lodge, he conspired to overthrow the monarchy, voted for the execution of his cousin, only to be guillotined himself later on. The basic definition of a useful idiot.



Queen Elizabeth's cousin, prince Edward the duke of Kent, has been the head of British masonry for many decades.




Albert, Prince of Wales (left), Duke of Clarence and The Duke of Connaugh, 1886

Harry is being groomed for that role.

Post: #172

(11-29-2017 06:53 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Is this jew? Uhh. I mean. Is this true?

There are some strong allegations that Diana is the bastard daughter of James Goldsmith,
who was known to have an affair with her mother and who bears a resemblance to Diana.
She also looks a lot like her half-sibling Goldsmiths.





Goldsmith is a very close associate of the Rothschilds. Charles was not fond of Diana,
she was pretty much imposed on him.

Post: #173

small correction: Prince Albert is the fat dude in the middle in the above picture, not on the left. Here he is with Vicky:

Post: #174

(11-30-2017 07:15 AM)Nordwand Wrote:  A prime example of one of our namby pamby officer types for you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Fras...Lord_Lovat

Notice how tall the Baron is in this picture compared with his troops in the background:
   

I read that during WWII American military officers averaged three to six inches taller and 30 pounds heavier in weight than their enlisted troops in general because the officers were usually from middle or upper class backgrounds and had had access to better nutrition growing up. I imagine that it was a similar situation with the British nobility and peers who served as officers in the King's military.

If they had been born just 50 years earlier Harry and William would be taller than most of the men around them on the streets of the Commonwealth, adding to their stature and status. Now they don't have the advantage of a better diet.

Post: #175

(11-29-2017 05:12 PM)Kona Wrote:  ^^ I'm not out to badmouth the British military at all. However, didn't the higher ups make sure Harry was always surrounded by Ghurkas whenever he was anywhere dangerous, as opposed to actual British guys?

Wasn't it also concluded that the interview where he runs away because danger was afoot was completely staged?

Aloha!

I believe there was some heightened security for his first tour, and that was when the powers that be were shit scared of something happening to him. He was effectively kept from any action, and when a newspaper broke the story of him having been there he was shipped home immediately.

When the story broke, some lucky bastard made a bit of money by selling ginger wigs and t-shirts with "I'm Harry" printed on them to the troops. Made for some comical looking patrols.

Anecdotally, when the government shipped him home, he took up a space on a flight that would have gone to someone injured and he shared the flight with seriously injured personnel, hence his shitloads of work with veterans charities.

The fact he was pulled out early, was the reason for him to retrain for the apache, after all its a lot harder to replace apache crew, than it is to replace a platoon commander.

With regards to the ghurkas, outside of their own regiment, units, and sometimes individual troops will be used to plug manpower holes in other units, for example a regiment may be a platoon short, so the ghurkas will supply a platoon. It means the ghurka regiment itself has troops who are trained in all areas of combat, and the non-ghurka unit significantly benefits from the ghurkas, who are all happy, can-do, experienced men, who can storm 5 machine guns nests with a spork.

The video of him running, was actually him being called out for troops in contact, which to the uninitiated means allied personnel where in the shit and need support.

I remember a story in the press about an attack on the base where elite jihadis blew a whole in the perimeter and stormed the base to kidnap Harry, but where fought off by plucky clerks and cooks who armed themselves and rushed to their royals defense. That was about an accurate a story as most newspaper stories.

Now I think about it, a lot of the lefty press at the time ran stories about how awful it was a royal was there, after all wouldn't that make the locals attack british troops trying to kill or capture him. Not only did that show how little they understood what was happening there, but it showed that they could not fathom that combat troops quite often want to get to grips with the enemy, and where looking forward to them trying, hence the ginger wigs I mentioned above.

But this isn't about war stories, its about something more important, WB or WNB. I would, but wouldn't make her a duchess.