Post: #176

Seems like a godsend to internet/app daters as well. Just run all her Tinder pics through the app, while screening for SIF red flags. The number of matches you'll actually pursue will plummet. I stopped dating online, but it would have been useful in the past.

Now we have evidence to support the widely held theory that you must 'automatically subtract two points' from any photo of a chick you see online.

In my experience it's been a grand total of ONE time that a woman looked better than her pics.

As usual RVF is ahead of the curve.

Post: #177

(11-18-2017 03:29 AM)Tex Cruise Wrote:  

Post: #178

(11-18-2017 11:10 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 03:29 AM)Tex Cruise Wrote:  

Fat girl don't get thick eyebrows only work if you have a thin pretty face.

Post: #179

http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/femini...455055355/

Post: #180

   

Post: #181

^
As someone else on Twitter commented.
MakeApp turns Natalie Portman into Bruce Jenner...

Post: #182

(11-18-2017 10:07 AM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  Female logic : The app is inaccurate because if I don't have makeup on it will still edit the photo and I'll look horrible!

Let's all use female logic.

Sound engineer : This reverb effect is bad because if we record those drums in a hall it will add even more echo and it will sound terrible!

Try guys : This testosterone supplement is ineffective because if...well...erm...fuck it, bad example.

I like this game.

"If I cook already cooked food, it will get dry and gross. Ergo cooking does not work."

Post: #183

I spent all weekend looking at women and thinking what they'd look like without makeup

Good lord women have a small window of beauty

This app is dangerous

Post: #184

(11-19-2017 08:48 AM)LeightonBlackstock Wrote:  I spent all weekend looking at women and thinking what they'd look like without makeup

Good lord women have a small window of beauty

This app is dangerous

I was just looking at Relampago Furioso's eye candy of the week ( https://relampagofurioso.com/2017/11/19/...r-19-2017/ ), and thinking yeah not bad, but what about without that makeup.

It's only been a few days and I can't look at a female face without wondering.

This is why I always say, to judge a woman's beauty, you have to :

Disregard posture
Disregard clothing
Disregard everything below the chin (at first)
Disregard all jewelery and makeup (now much easier, of course)
Ignore hair. Anyone can have any hair

In other words, ignore all distractions, bells and whistles. There's a difference between beauty and titillation.

Then look at :

The shape of the face
The structure (chin size, forehead size, distance between eyes, etc)
The quality of the skin
The beauty of the features one by one
And then how she carries / animates herself
Overall beauty, and does it match / complement her personality (aka is she as nice on the inside as the outside)

Anything else is delusion.

Post: #185

(11-18-2017 11:14 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  ^
As someone else on Twitter commented.
MakeApp turns Natalie Portman into Bruce Jenner...

Caitlyn Jenner! Watch your privilege shitlord!

Post: #186

(11-17-2017 07:08 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Heh.
Heh.
Heh.

Stare into the abyss...




Knew it.
Ban make-up & the reee-steria that would ensue...

So what's the male equivalent of MakeApp? Is it the one where you take a YouTuber who hides behind the face of a legendary Bronze Age king, and expose him for the welfare collecting, chubby, finger-in-the-breeze moderate that he truly is?

Post: #187

(11-19-2017 11:05 AM)homersheineken Wrote:  Caitlyn Jenner! Watch your privilege shitlord!

What difference at this point, does it make?

Post: #188

(11-19-2017 08:48 AM)LeightonBlackstock Wrote:  I spent all weekend looking at women and thinking what they'd look like without makeup

Given that I live in China, I envy you for the fact that you are forced to imagine how the women around you would look without make-up.

Post: #189

(11-19-2017 02:32 PM)Suits Wrote:  Given that I live in China, I envy you for the fact that you are forced to imagine how the women around you would look without make-up.

How bad is the situation in China?

Post: #190

(11-19-2017 11:52 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 07:08 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Heh.
Heh.
Heh.

Stare into the abyss...




Knew it.
Ban make-up & the reee-steria that would ensue...

So what's the male equivalent of MakeApp? Is it the one where you take a YouTuber who hides behind the face of a legendary Bronze Age king, and expose him for the welfare collecting, chubby, finger-in-the-breeze moderate that he truly is?

Alchohol infused shitlord confidence is the male equivalent of makeup.

Post: #191

(11-17-2017 07:52 PM)Cyr Wrote:  This app has come at the right time.
Is there anything wrong with girls wearing a little makeup? No, it makes women look a lot sexier and (like long hair) makes them look more feminine.
However, over the last couple of years, girls have started caking on makeup to ridiculous, drag-like extremes. It looks disgusting and I hope this app can curb that.

Nothing beats taking care of ones own body, eating right and being well hydrated to remaining attractive without need of makeup to cover up the flaws.

Stuff like pimples and blackheads do not pop out of nowhere but as a result of certain things going on that is wrong within the body. If the skin looks terrible the body is likely terrible too.

Whatsapp is bane to those who did not adequately take care of their body, partied hard and ultimately basing their life on lies.

Post: #192

This has been the most High Energy thread in quite a while! I think we all need to recognise this.

Thank you for your service Vlad.

Post: #193

(11-19-2017 10:46 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  This has been the most High Energy thread in quite a while! I think we all need to recognise this.

Thank you for your service Vlad.

Rather interesting to see how something so simple. A smart phone app that merely applies a particular filter.

Can expose so much in the way of human behaviour.
When on a technical level, it's not actually exposing anything. Just applying a double-plus ungood filter.

Post: #194

I love threads like this. The community really comes together . Its like heterosexual Mardi Gras.

Post: #195

(11-19-2017 06:29 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 11:52 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 07:08 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Heh.
Heh.
Heh.

Stare into the abyss...




Knew it.
Ban make-up & the reee-steria that would ensue...

So what's the male equivalent of MakeApp? Is it the one where you take a YouTuber who hides behind the face of a legendary Bronze Age king, and expose him for the welfare collecting, chubby, finger-in-the-breeze moderate that he truly is?

Alchohol infused shitlord confidence is the male equivalent of makeup.

So might that explain prohibition? Women who couldn't get alphas decided to ban alcohol.

Post: #196

Must have been a slow news day when this was released for it to generate so much online bullshit. Do these sites not have better things to write about?

I guess girls just hate the fact that the mask they hide behind can be pulled off so easily. Rather than only the next morning when you wake up and look over and realise she looks nothing like she did last night.

Post: #197

(11-19-2017 10:46 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  This has been the most High Energy thread in quite a while! I think we all need to recognise this.

Thank you for your service Vlad.

Post: #198

This Makeapp is pretty accurate.

Check out this article from 2013. It shows how much make-up is deception:

25 Unbelievable Photos of Adult Film Stars Before and After Applying Make-Up:
http://www.complex.com/style/2013/03/25-...g-make-up/

Post: #199

Esther Vilar Wrote:Women have preserved this "baby look" for as long as possible so as to make the world continue to believe in the darling, sweet little girl she once was, and she relies on the protective instinct in man to make him take care of her.

As with everything a woman undertakes on her own initiative, this whole maneuvre is as incredible as it is stupid. It is amazing, in fact, that it succeeds. It would appear very shortsighted to encourage such an ideal of beauty. For how can any woman hope to maintain it beyond the age of twenty-five? Despite every trick of the cosmetics industry, despite magazine advice against thinking or laughing (both tend to create wrinkles), her actual age will inevitably show — through in the end. And what on earth is a man to do with a grown-up face when he has been manipulated into considering only helpless, appealing little girls to be creatures of beauty?

What is a man to do with a woman when the smooth curves have become flabby tires of flesh, the skin slack and pallid, when the childish tones have grown shrill and the laughter sounds like neighing? What is to become of this shrew when her face no longer atones for her ceaseless inanities and when the cries of "Ooh' and Ah" begin to drive him out of his mind? This mummified "child" will never fire a man's erotic fantasy again. One might think her power broken at last.

But no, she still manages to get her own way — and for two reasons. The first is obvious: she now has children, who enable her to continue feigning helplessness. As for the second — there are simply not enough young women to go around.

It is a safe bet that, given the choice, man would trade in his grown-up child-wife for a younger model, but, as the ratio between the sexes is roughly equal, not every man can have a younger woman. And as he has to have a wife of some sort. he prefers to keep the one he already possesses. This is easy to prove. Given the choice, a man will always choose a younger woman.

― Esther Vilar, The Manipulated Man

Post: #200

(11-19-2017 04:36 PM)MOVSM Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 02:32 PM)Suits Wrote:  Given that I live in China, I envy you for the fact that you are forced to imagine how the women around you would look without make-up.

How bad is the situation in China?