Post: #1

“On Conan O'Brien, Kunis reveals that she makes a recurring monthly donation to Planned Parenthood in the name of Vice-President Mike Pence. Pence is adamantly pro-life, so you get the laugh out loud juxtaposition by thanking him for helping women pay for their abortions.”

"As a reminder that there are women out there in the world who may or may not agree with his platform, I put him on a list of recurring donations that are made in his name to Planned Parenthood. Every month, his office—he gets a little letter that says 'an anonymous donation has been made in your name."

http://www.wwtdd.com/2017/11/mila-kunis-...t-up-video

Yet she shits out Ashton Kutcher's brood...

Post: #2

More social validation and "you go girl" ego stroking.

Nothing to see here.

Post: #3

Better her than the US taxpayer

Post: #4

(11-06-2017 06:07 PM)str8_thggn Wrote:  Better her than the US taxpayer

Hell nah. Dollar for dollar, there is no better ROI for the United States of America than funding abortions. If they put me in charge, I'd go a step further and have federal employees going door to door and seeing how much money it would take for R-selected orcs to have their tubes tied.

Abortion is the one issue where both parties go full retard. Republicans are hellbent on ensuring as many future democrats as possible see the light of day, while the democrats vociferously fight to abort their own gibsmedat electorate.

In a sane logical world, conservatives would be pulling out all the stops to make sure every lowlife who wants an abortion can afford one, while the democrats would be yelling bloody murder about racist republicans funding the genocide of black baby bodies.

The funny thing is that it may well end up that way pretty soon as identity politics inevitably ratchets up. Abortion was one of the issues in the old cuckservative-corporate democrat "two party" scam that served as a distraction to make sure nobody talked about the things that mattered like immigration and trade. Now that Trump has blown the lid off Pandora's box by bringing the important shit front and center, abortion's utility as the great red-herring to distract the electorate with has lost its effectiveness so we may well see the two parties realign on the issue according to what should be their logical positions.

Post: #5

(11-06-2017 06:39 PM)Higgs Bosun Wrote:  R-selected orcs to have their tubes tied.

I think they should do that before you can get any government benefits (welfare, etc.) takes care of two problems at once.

Post: #6

(11-06-2017 08:28 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  

(11-06-2017 06:39 PM)Higgs Bosun Wrote:  R-selected orcs to have their tubes tied.

I think they should do that before you can get any government benefits (welfare, etc.) takes care of two problems at once.

I remember seeing a story a couple months ago about a group that was paying addicts and criminals money to be sterilized. Of course the left thought it was the second coming of Mengele. They would prefer infants be ripped apart by forceps and vacuums than support rational birth control methods.

Post: #7

You could offer "at risk" young women $100k to get permanently sterilized and it would still be wildly cost effective. Once a kid is made, I'm still not going to be in favor of murdering it.

Post: #8

So she's racist against black babies?

Maybe she's just a well-intentioned eugenicist.

Maybe she just wants less poor people.

Or maybe she just gets off on the thought of unborn babies' skulls being pierced so their brains can be sucked out.

I think I've said before, wherever you fall on the abortion policy debate, it seems we should all be able to agree it's not good. Not ideal. Not something we should promote publicly. Or fund publicly.

Post: #9

(((Mila Kunis))) comes from a Jewish family and has cited antisemitism in the former Soviet Union as one of several reasons for her family's move to the United States.

Post: #10

One problem I have with the abortion debate is the cucked out stance of trying find a "middle ground." A lot of people have been beaten into the trench of "abortion is wrong but I just don't want to pay for it, you can still do it though." You're either against it or for it, I don't care where a killer gets his weapon, I care that he is murdering someone. The rabid left has tricked people into debating the morality of payment over the morality of the act.

Post: #11

I was somewhat anti-abortion until a long exposure to ghetto / welfare culture (including whites in this via my experiences with generational welfare cases in VT).

I would say we are 70%-75% product of our genetics (nature) with the rest nutrition an culture (nurture). We spent billions in welfare, Head Start, Section 8, etc.. and it has not lead to any improvement. Poverty and violence is still with us. You can't fix low IQ, lack of future time orientation, lack of emotional self-control, and a violent orientation if it is hard coded into one's genes.

My outlook turned darker over time, concluding that there are a lot of people that I do not want reproducing.

Post: #12

I like the comments on that page:

"Well, looks like my next check to the NRA will be on Mila Kunis's behalf"

"If she really wanted to make a statement she would have aborted her 2 kids in his name. NOT FUNNY IS IT? Neither is she."

Post: #13

(11-07-2017 12:54 PM)Hell_Is_Like_Newark Wrote:  I was somewhat anti-abortion until a long exposure to ghetto / welfare culture (including whites in this via my experiences with generational welfare cases in VT).

I would say we are 70%-75% product of our genetics (nature) with the rest nutrition an culture (nurture). We spent billions in welfare, Head Start, Section 8, etc.. and it has not lead to any improvement. Poverty and violence is still with us. You can't fix low IQ, lack of future time orientation, lack of emotional self-control, and a violent orientation if it is hard coded into one's genes.

My outlook turned darker over time, concluding that there are a lot of people that I do not want reproducing.

Average IQ is relative, to a possible future genetically engineered society with average IQ of 150 or higher, your IQ might also be considered low and you would be selected for abortion. Think about it.

You can increase public future time orientation and emotional self control of general population in a rather homogeneous society with clear values. Just look how different are Americans and Canadians where huge amount of people are on welfare, 25% of population takes psychiatric medicine and SJW issues run rampart with Eastern Europe or China or Japan, where such issues are very small, despite similar IQ levels.

Poverty is also relative. In a medium 150 IQ society, people with 110 IQ will be the unemployed hobo's. There is a bottom 1-5% of poor people that cannot be eliminated no matter what. Violence will also exist always, it's stupid to hide from that. Low IQ violence is two drunkards brawling and hitting their wives. High IQ violence is socially awkward silent people who are too smart to dumb themselves down to play reproductive games committing a carefully planned mass shooting. No matter how high the IQ is reproductive game will require some level of irrationality and either it will be regulated by culture and traditions or people will turn to animals, dumb animals or smart and viscous animals, doesn't matter.

One thing I have noticed is that high IQ doesn't really increase abilities of introspection. Many high IQ people can be vain and proud and stubborn to the point of being infantile, violent, treacherous, backstabbing and crazy. Without culture that bestows values and self control and understanding of sin and virtue, no amount of high IQ will really help. Lot's of destructive high IQ communists and SJW out there. You think Bernie Sanders is low IQ? You think his supporters like the Amazing Atheist and liberal college students and liberal professors are low IQ? You think Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao were low IQ? No, there is a matter of wisdom that is above IQ and that even very high IQ people may lack.

Post: #14

(11-07-2017 12:32 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  You could offer "at risk" young women $100k to get permanently sterilized and it would still be wildly cost effective. Once a kid is made, I'm still not going to be in favor of murdering it.

I'm still mulling it over, but there are days when I am convinced that this kind of eugenics is exactly where we need to go in this country.

If it were up to me, I would pay the legal guardian of every unmarried low-IQ or poor young woman (between the ages of 13-40) 1000 USD every month she does not give birth to a future loser/death-row-inmate. If she does give birth during that time, the payments immediately cease and she is given no additional gov't help. IUDs and oral contraception would, of course, be freely available. And for good measure, low-IQ or poor young men would be payed 1000 USD every month they are gainfully employed, in the military, or in the Peace Corps or some shit.

With this policy in place, most of the social problems we face would be eradicated with a generation, if not sooner. The abortion problem is basically solved at the price of making contraceptives free and widely available--if traditional conservatives can't swallow that compromise then there never was really any hope for America.

Post: #15

(11-07-2017 01:35 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

(11-07-2017 12:32 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  You could offer "at risk" young women $100k to get permanently sterilized and it would still be wildly cost effective. Once a kid is made, I'm still not going to be in favor of murdering it.

If it were up to me, I would pay the legal guardian of every unmarried low-IQ or poor young woman (between the ages of 13-40) 1000 USD every month she does not give birth to a future loser/death-row-inmate. If she does give birth during that time, the payments immediately cease and she is given no additional gov't help. IUDs and oral contraception would, of course, be freely available. And for good measure, low-IQ or poor young men would be payed 1000 USD every month they are gainfully employed, in the military, or in the Peace Corps or some shit.

The problem is that no one is willing to deal with the optics of taking away her welfare when the conditions aren't met. So she gets money no matter what - once welfare starts, it doesn't stop.

The solution is to make the condition permanent from the beginning. Hell, you could offer her $250,000-$500,000 and it would still be worth it.

Post: #16

If there was a referendum on banning abortion, I would vote to ban it. However, that's not happening any time soon. People like Kunis are providing money to kill people who are much more likely to align with the left. Once they've expunged the genes that are given to leftism by their dwindling birth rates and abortions, only then will you be able to ban abortion.

Ironically I often hear the left argue for abortion by saying that these people are much more likely to cause social problems (true). Yet for those that survive the abortion threat and start causing social problems then they tend to swaddle them, protect them from harsh sentences and the death penalty and blame it all on social injustice. There is no logic to their philosophy.

Post: #17

(11-07-2017 01:39 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(11-07-2017 01:35 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

(11-07-2017 12:32 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  You could offer "at risk" young women $100k to get permanently sterilized and it would still be wildly cost effective. Once a kid is made, I'm still not going to be in favor of murdering it.

If it were up to me, I would pay the legal guardian of every unmarried low-IQ or poor young woman (between the ages of 13-40) 1000 USD every month she does not give birth to a future loser/death-row-inmate. If she does give birth during that time, the payments immediately cease and she is given no additional gov't help. IUDs and oral contraception would, of course, be freely available. And for good measure, low-IQ or poor young men would be payed 1000 USD every month they are gainfully employed, in the military, or in the Peace Corps or some shit.

The problem is that no one is willing to deal with the optics of taking away her welfare when the conditions aren't met. So she gets money no matter what - once welfare starts, it doesn't stop.

The solution is to make the condition permanent from the beginning. Hell, you could offer her $250,000-$500,000 and it would still be worth it.

Fair enough...but no one is willing to entertain the optics of deploying these kinds of eugenics-based solutions to begin with. An electorate that is capable of even entertaining these kinds of solutions is an electorate that has undergone such a fundamental shift to the point where all of these ideas are on the table.

Post: #18

(11-07-2017 01:39 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(11-07-2017 01:35 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

(11-07-2017 12:32 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  You could offer "at risk" young women $100k to get permanently sterilized and it would still be wildly cost effective. Once a kid is made, I'm still not going to be in favor of murdering it.

If it were up to me, I would pay the legal guardian of every unmarried low-IQ or poor young woman (between the ages of 13-40) 1000 USD every month she does not give birth to a future loser/death-row-inmate. If she does give birth during that time, the payments immediately cease and she is given no additional gov't help. IUDs and oral contraception would, of course, be freely available. And for good measure, low-IQ or poor young men would be payed 1000 USD every month they are gainfully employed, in the military, or in the Peace Corps or some shit.

The problem is that no one is willing to deal with the optics of taking away her welfare when the conditions aren't met. So she gets money no matter what - once welfare starts, it doesn't stop.

The solution is to make the condition permanent from the beginning. Hell, you could offer her $250,000-$500,000 and it would still be worth it.

That isn't how thots work:

They would take the 500000$, assuming we are dumb enough to give it, then then turn around and have the surgery undone as soon as she has her tubes tied, then start making more babies. She would spend the 500000 on stupid shit, cigarettes or booze, and then have her 10 kids and get on welfare.

Post: #19

Saw a headline link earlier this morning (didn't click) that her Pence trolling had triggered a Jim Beam boycott.

Post: #20

The thing is it's not so much about her standing her ground on an issue or making a statement as opposed to her just trolling the Pence. Leftist are so caught up in believing they have the correct ideology that they can't fathom another point of view as correct, so they feel conservatives are a lost cause, and you don't try to win over lost causes, that's too difficult so you might as well fuck with them. I've seen this way of thinking before. I knew a writer who ghost wrote for those romance novels you see at pharmacy or whatever. She understood that the majority of her audience was conservative christian women, so she would work as hard as possible to insert her agenda into these novels not in a malicious way to piss off the reader; but in a way that forces the reader to sympathize or cheer for the gay character or whatever. With these types it's all about forcing their message, they can't just live and let live. You have to see the world their way.

Post: #21

(11-07-2017 12:45 PM)durangotang Wrote:  (((Mila Kunis))) comes from a Jewish family and has cited antisemitism in the former Soviet Union as one of several reasons for her family's move to the United States.

Quote:GQ magazine named Kunis the Knockout of the Year for 2011,[142] with Men's Health naming her one of the "100 Hottest Women of All-Time".[143] FHM magazine ranked her number 9 on its 2012 Hot 100 list,[144] but she reached number 1 on their 2013 "100 Sexiest Women in the World" list,

Kunis is a 7-7.5 tops. This is almost as bad as ((the media)) barrage telling us how beautiful a woman trannie Bruce Jenner is.

Post: #22

(11-07-2017 12:54 PM)Hell_Is_Like_Newark Wrote:  I was somewhat anti-abortion until a long exposure to ghetto / welfare culture (including whites in this via my experiences with generational welfare cases in VT).

I would say we are 70%-75% product of our genetics (nature) with the rest nutrition an culture (nurture). We spent billions in welfare, Head Start, Section 8, etc.. and it has not lead to any improvement. Poverty and violence is still with us. You can't fix low IQ, lack of future time orientation, lack of emotional self-control, and a violent orientation if it is hard coded into one's genes.

My outlook turned darker over time, concluding that there are a lot of people that I do not want reproducing.

family background is a stronger predictor for IQ, and a much stronger predictor for good or bad behavior:

Quote:The general effects of divorce are;
• Loss of concentration and attention
• Declining grades and behavior problems at school
• Withdrawal from friends
• Emotional outbursts and health problems
• Serious anger with one or both parents
• Delinquency and substance use
(samhsa.gov, 2011)
.

http://ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_...013/26.pdf

Things like breastfeeding and being part of a functional, loving family have very strong correlation with IQ. Welfare culture only became a feature of Black American population in the 1960s-70s after that segment was effectively targeted for social engineering. In the 1950s, only 4% of Blacks were born out of wedlock. Your perspective above completely ignores this relatively recent social phenomenon.